Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 09/18/2010 View Fri 09/17/2010 View Thu 09/16/2010 View Wed 09/15/2010 View Tue 09/14/2010 View Mon 09/13/2010 View Sun 09/12/2010
1
2010-09-18 Home Front: Culture Wars
Report: Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the U.S. government
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Uncle Phester 2010-09-18 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ]  Top

#1 The report, prepared by teams headed by former Deputy Defense Undersecretary William Boykin and former Defense Intelligence Agency director Edward Soyster

Better late than never.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2010-09-18 03:25||   2010-09-18 03:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Under President Barack Obama, the Brotherhood was believed to have gained even greater influence. The report cited White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan, an enthusiastic supporter of Saudi Arabia who has denied any Islamic threat and called for a U.S. dialogue with the Iranian-sponsored Hizbullah.

"Indeed, it is hard to overstate the danger associated with the president of the United States having as his top advisor in these sensitive portfolios someone so severely compromised with respect to shariah and the threat it poses," the report said.

Can you hear me now???????? Nope, they are all deaf and dumb that side of the river. Ima 'fraid it'll take an American Hiroshima to get their attention.
Posted by Lumpy Elmoluck5091 2010-09-18 09:33||   2010-09-18 09:33|| Front Page Top

#3 hell the muslim brotherhood got elected president
Posted by chris 2010-09-18 10:34||   2010-09-18 10:34|| Front Page Top

#4 How many ways can the US "win" the WOT?

Well, we can beat them into submission. Clearly unpopular with Bambi who took office while the smack down was at its peak.

Option number two is to point the Jihadist at a different target. My vote would be Russia and China but nobody has asked. I wonder who Bambi is trying to point them at? Three guesses and the last two don't count.
Posted by Mike Ramsey 2010-09-18 10:37||   2010-09-18 10:37|| Front Page Top

#5  Later Al Amoudi met George W. Bush during his successful campaign for president in 2000. In 2003, Al Amoudi was arrested and prosecuted on charges that he served as a senior financier for Al Qaida.

"His arrest and conviction should have sent shockwaves through the U.S. intelligence community, particularly its counterintelligence units, since Al Amoudi's blown cover provided a reality check on the extent of shariah's stealth jihad in this country, and how badly we have been penetrated," the report said. "Here was, after all, proof that an Al Qaida and Hamas operative had enjoyed access to the most senior levels of the American government."

Prosecuted?? I'd say.

Wikipedia:

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, Al-Amoudi spoke at the Washington National Cathedral prayer service held to honor the memory of the victims.

In 2004 he pled guilty to three charges of illegal financial transactions with the Libyan government, unlawful procurement of citizenship and impeding administration of the Internal Revenue Service, as well as a role in a Libyan conspiracy to assassinate then-Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah. He agreed to cooperate in ongoing investigations in return for prosecutors dropping 31 other counts and possible reduction in a pending 23-year sentence and $750,000 in fines.[2][3] He was sentenced to 23 years in October 2004.[1]

Al-Amoudi was described as an "expert in the art of deception" in a report by Newsweek journalists Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff, for expressing moderate, pro-American sympathies in his lobbying and public relations work with Americans, but then expressing support for Hamas and Hezbollah at an Islamist rally.[4]

Posted by KBK 2010-09-18 16:17||   2010-09-18 16:17|| Front Page Top

#6 Here is the report (pdf - 177 pages)
Posted by KBK 2010-09-18 16:20||   2010-09-18 16:20|| Front Page Top

#7 "His (Abdul Rahman Al Amoudi) arrest and conviction should have sent shockwaves through the U.S. intelligence community, particularly its counterintelligence units, since Al Amoudi's blown cover provided a reality check on the extent of shariah's stealth jihad in this country, and how badly we have been penetrated," the report said. "Here was, after all, proof that an Al Qaida and Hamas operative had enjoyed access to the most senior levels of the American government."

I am surprised this didn't give the intell community apoplexy. Even more to the point, why they didn't have a freaking clue to begin with. Then there's Obama. Can we impeach him for treason yet?
Posted by miscellaneous 2010-09-18 16:38||   2010-09-18 16:38|| Front Page Top

#8 From the report, "Sharia, the Threat to America":

Today, the United States faces what is, if anything, an even more insidious ideological threat: the totalitarian socio-political doctrine that Islam calls shariah. Translated as “the path,” shariah is a comprehensivelega l and political framework. Though it certainly has spiritual elements, it would be a mistake to think of shariah as a “religious” code in the Western sense because it seeks to regulate all manner of behavior in the secular sphere – economic, social, military, legal and political.

Shariah is the crucial fault line of Islam’s internecine struggle. On one side of the divide are Muslim reformers and authentic moderates – figures like Abdurrahman Wahid, the late president of Indonesia and leader of the world’s largest libertarian Muslim organization, Nahdlatul Ulama – whose members embrace
the Enlightenment’s veneration of reason and, in particular, its separation of the spiritual and secular realms. On this side of the divide, shariah is a reference point for a Muslim’s personal conduct, not a corpus to be imposed on the life of a pluralistic society.

By contrast, the other side of the divide is dominated by Muslim supremacists, often called Islamists. Like erstwhile proponents of Communism and Nazism, these supremacists – some terrorists, others employing stealthier means – seek to impose a totalitarian regime: a global totalitarian system cloaked as an Islamic state and called a caliphate. On that side of the divide, which is the focus of the present study, shariah is an immutable, compulsory system that Muslims are obliged to install and the world required to adopt, the failure to do so being deemed a damnable offence against Allah. For these ideologues, shariah is not a private matter. Adherents see the West as an obstacle to be overcome, not a culture and civilization to be embraced, or at least tolerated. It is impossible, they maintain, for alternative legal systems and forms of governments peacefully to coexist with the end-state they seek.

...

Shariah is Anti-constitutional

If we are to face down shariah, we must understand what we are up against, not simply hope that dialogue and “engagement” will make the challenge go away. Those who today support shariah and the establishment of a global Islamic state (caliphate) are perforce supporting objectives that are incompatible with the U.S. Constitution, the civil rights the Constitution guarantees and the representative, accountable government it authorizes. In fact, shariah’s pursuit in the United States is tantamount to sedition.
Posted by KBK 2010-09-18 16:45||   2010-09-18 16:45|| Front Page Top

23:58 Barbara Skolaut
23:53 rammer
23:52 Private Eye
23:51 Barbara Skolaut
23:48 JAR655
23:27 Secret Master
22:57 Pappy
22:51 Pappy
22:31 Barbara Skolaut
22:29 Barbara Skolaut
22:25 CrazyFool
22:24 Barbara Skolaut
21:34 gorb
21:27 Private Eye
21:02 miscellaneous
20:59 miscellaneous
20:51 miscellaneous
20:51 rammer
20:50 Secret Asian Man
20:37 anonymous2u
20:36 eLarson
20:22 Oldcat
20:18 Procopius2k
20:17 Shomotch Scourge of the Algonquins2445









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com