Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/20/2006 View Wed 07/19/2006 View Tue 07/18/2006 View Mon 07/17/2006 View Sun 07/16/2006 View Sat 07/15/2006 View Fri 07/14/2006
1
2006-07-20 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Louise Arbour UN High C for Human Rights ranting about War Crimes
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by 3dc 2006-07-20 13:06|| || Front Page|| [11130 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I consider publishing that picture to be a war crime.
Posted by DoDo 2006-07-20 13:23||   2006-07-20 13:23|| Front Page Top

#2 I remember her. She was Fish's wife on "Barney Miller"...
Posted by tu3031 2006-07-20 13:29||   2006-07-20 13:29|| Front Page Top

#3 As exJAG said yesterday: Hezb's the only side committing any war crimes by using civilians as human shields.
Posted by Xbalanke 2006-07-20 13:33||   2006-07-20 13:33|| Front Page Top

#4 "Does this green sash thingy make me look fat?"
Posted by Raj 2006-07-20 13:56||   2006-07-20 13:56|| Front Page Top

#5 Why do anti-semites always hide behind the "atrocities", "war crimes" and "brutal agression" argument? At least the Hezzies say death to Israel in an unvarnished way.
Posted by mcsegeek1 2006-07-20 14:22||   2006-07-20 14:22|| Front Page Top

#6 You know, I don't think Israel, Hezbollah, or Hamas give a rat's ass what that broad says.
Posted by Hupetle Whemble1907 2006-07-20 14:33||   2006-07-20 14:33|| Front Page Top

#7 Au contraire. I wouldn't be surprised if she and her ilk preplanned this PR assault on Israel in close coordination with the Hezzies before the kidnapping.
Posted by mcsegeek1 2006-07-20 15:13||   2006-07-20 15:13|| Front Page Top

#8 Ian McKellen in drag
Posted by Bucky and Gentle 2006-07-20 15:21||   2006-07-20 15:21|| Front Page Top

#9 oops....
Posted by Frank G 2006-07-20 15:22||   2006-07-20 15:22|| Front Page Top

#10 Sod off, Swampy.
Posted by mojo">mojo  2006-07-20 15:25||   2006-07-20 15:25|| Front Page Top

#11 Speaking of 'war crimes' and international law, isn't the NYT, MSM et al due for their Julius Streicher and Hans Fritzsche moment? Or does international law and precedent only apply to Bush & Co. [rhetorical question].
Posted by Gloling Jeque6486 2006-07-20 16:53||   2006-07-20 16:53|| Front Page Top

#12 Everyone is going on about 'proportionality' and most will assume that it means the force used by one side is proportionate to the force used by the other.

As far as I can tell it doesn't mean that at all.

Wikipedia sez: Proportionality: The overall destruction expected from the use of force must be outweighed by the good to be achieved.

So what they are really saying is protecting Israelis (Jews) isn't sufficient reason/justification.

Disgusting hypocrites.
Posted by phil_b">phil_b  2006-07-20 21:49|| http://autonomousoperation.blogspot.com/]">[http://autonomousoperation.blogspot.com/]  2006-07-20 21:49|| Front Page Top

23:58 JosephMendiola
23:45 Anonymoose
23:44 Oldspook
23:36 Oldspook
23:30 Bob Marley
23:26 Oldspook
23:05 BA
23:00 Baba Tutu
22:57 twobyfour
22:55 Baba Tutu
22:39 Capsu 78
22:36 Frank G
22:36 MSM enabler
22:34 BA
22:32 Islamist preacher Omar
22:28 WITT
22:25 mjh
22:24 Omar
22:09 WITT
22:04 BA
22:02 WITT
22:01 BA
22:00 Scott R
21:53 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com