Article

2005-03-08 China-Japan-Koreas

China tells Australia to review its defence treaty with the US: report

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Seafarious 2005-03-08 00:00:00 AM|| || Front Page|| [11131 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 ...Gad, those heathen Chinee are idiots...

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2005-03-08 12:33:16 AM|| 2005-03-08 12:33:16 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 China is reported to have demanded that Australia review its 50-year-old military treaty with the United States and New Zealand, warning that it could threaten regional stability ....

One wonders if the term "oxymoron" translates well into Mandarin.

Posted by AzCat 2005-03-08 12:44:54 AM|| 2005-03-08 12:44:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Well, who knows, but I bet that moron definitely does translate well.

Posted by Sobiesky 2005-03-08 12:48:36 AM|| 2005-03-08 12:48:36 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 My guess would be that ox moron probably translates better than oxymoron. ;)

Posted by AzCat 2005-03-08 12:51:25 AM|| 2005-03-08 12:51:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 But not stupid enough to actually do anything about Taiwan, probably. These pathetic Chinese histrionics respond to a widespread and authentic crude nationalism at home, but the beauty is that while the ~~gangsters~~ government gets negligible short-term mileaage at home out of this, it helps generate the real-world response (Japan's slow movement back toward a real security role) that helps us and hems them in. There's a reason China is famous for culture, cuisine, and not foreign policy acumen ....

Posted by Verlaine in Iraq 2005-03-08 12:53:58 AM|| 2005-03-08 12:53:58 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Veraline, they just passed a law about Taiwan today in Beijing, declaring it an indivisible part of China and forbidding it to secede.

If I were Taiwanese, I would probably build a big statue on the shore facing mainland, so it is visible at least by binoculars from over there. Its unveiling would coincide with the declaration of independence. I suppose that I don't have to explain what the statue would represent. ;-)

Posted by Sobiesky 2005-03-08 1:01:55 AM|| 2005-03-08 1:01:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Verlaine, sorry for misspelling you nick.

Posted by Sobiesky 2005-03-08 1:03:55 AM|| 2005-03-08 1:03:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 I can't figure out who or what in China is so flipping stupid. China keeps pushing this Taiwan issue.

aiwan is already a huge investment in China. It doesn't appear that most Chinese folks on Taiwan care about a separate "nation." They do however want to live the way they fell like. If China would just shut the hell up and quit stepping all over it's self a peaceful and gradual reunification will take place. This crap they are doing now just makes that day further off not sooner.

It's totally nutso.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2005-03-08 1:09:34 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com] 2005-03-08 1:09:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 China tells Australia to review its defense treaty with the US:

In a show of Trilateral brinkmanship a senior official in the Australian Ministry of Organic Foods confided; "This demarche from China will not stand. In fact all three ANZUS partners, Australia,New Zealand, and the United States demanded today that China take the MSG out of all Chinese foods (especially take-out)!"

Posted by rice 2005-03-08 1:52:13 AM|| 2005-03-08 1:52:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 "Mainland" china belongs to Taiwan...not the other way around. I think the argument can be made that the government of Taiwan has a hell of a lot more claim on the mainland than the "communist" government on the mainland has on Taiwan.

Posted by Tom Dooley 2005-03-08 2:28:39 AM|| 2005-03-08 2:28:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 A half-century old security arrangement ... threatens stability. Queer bit of reasoning there.

Posted by Rex Rufus 2005-03-08 2:32:18 AM|| 2005-03-08 2:32:18 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 I am watching Japan. As the Chinese rattle sabers, the Japanese quietly rearm. In a competition between PRC and a resurgent Japan, my money is on Japan.

Posted by SR71 2005-03-08 7:19:46 AM|| 2005-03-08 7:19:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Just remember the Argentina scenario, when the economy goes south and unrest goes north, invade and appeal to nationalistic emotions. The Chicom government has yet to experience a real recession and all its wonderful social impacts. Interesting times ahead.

Posted by Thrainter Cliling3962 2005-03-08 9:05:55 AM|| 2005-03-08 9:05:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#14 Is this a return the the 50s and 60s? The Reds used to routinely threaten massive destruction if no one paid attention to them. Rather like the NorKs, in fact.

Posted by Jackal 2005-03-08 9:15:08 AM|| [http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html] 2005-03-08 9:15:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#15 I suppose that I don't have to explain what the statue would represent. ;-)

Or how it's posed.

Posted by Robert Crawford 2005-03-08 9:26:29 AM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-03-08 9:26:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#16 They're making plans, that's for sure. Timing it to coincide with a Hillary presidency, perhaps?

Posted by BH 2005-03-08 10:06:55 AM|| 2005-03-08 10:06:55 AM|| Front Page Top

#17 This should not come as a terrible surprise to anyone. The Chinese, as one would expect, are devotees of Sun Tzu, and Sun Tzu tell us that in order of importance one should attack the enemy's:

1. Strategy
2. Alliances
3. Armies
4. Cities

We've seen plenty of #1. Now expect lots of #2, as they try to scare off our allies in the region.

Posted by Dreadnought 2005-03-08 10:56:32 AM|| 2005-03-08 10:56:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#18 If I were Taiwanese, I would probably build a big statue on the shore facing mainland, so it is visible at least by binoculars ....

...With the right arm extended, and a clenched fist except for the middle finger pointing skyward?

Posted by BigEd 2005-03-08 11:51:53 AM|| 2005-03-08 11:51:53 AM|| Front Page Top

#19 Mike, AzCat, Sobiesky: does "counter-explains" (according to Babelfish, the translation for "oxymoron") count? :P

BH, Dreadnought -- sadly, this looks like the case. Got any ideas for countermoves that will actually be implemented, or are we going to need some *ahem* "political will" augmentations? (read: vote out liberals -- and start bureaucratic purges)

You, Dreadnought, are completely correct and it bothers me, because the Art of War is predicated on having a dictator-king who can smoothly implement his desires ...

Posted by Ebbavith Flineck2775 2005-03-08 11:54:17 AM|| 2005-03-08 11:54:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#20 Mike, AzCat, Sobiesky: does "counter-explains" (according to Babelfish, the translation for "oxymoron") count? :P

BH, Dreadnought -- sadly, this looks like the case. Got any ideas for countermoves that will actually be implemented, or are we going to need some *ahem* "political will" augmentations? (read: vote out liberals -- and start bureaucratic purges)

You, Dreadnought, are completely correct and it bothers me, because the Art of War is predicated on having a dictator-king who can smoothly implement his desires ...

P.S. Sorry about the double post, I forgot to ID myself.

Posted by Edward Yee 2005-03-08 11:56:34 AM|| 2005-03-08 11:56:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#21 If NK can tell China to F*&K off, so can we

Posted by Frank G 2005-03-08 12:24:04 PM|| 2005-03-08 12:24:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#22 ...China is reported to have demanded that Australia review its 50-year-old military treaty with the United States...

... or risk death in the "Buddha of all Battles" (tm)!

Posted by Hyper 2005-03-08 12:26:08 PM|| 2005-03-08 12:26:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#23 SOMEONE didn't get the memo about not underestimating our nation's enemies ...

Posted by Edward Yee 2005-03-08 1:57:18 PM|| 2005-03-08 1:57:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#24 EY,

I think the most important thing for us is to understand the game that the Chinese are playing. Going back to Sun Tzu again, The Art of War asserts that the greatest skill is shown by generals who win battles without fighting. (Devotees of Clausewitz, feel free to disagree, but that's another discussion.)

I honestly do not believe that the PRC is going to launch a surprise invasion of Taiwan with all the costs and uncertainty associated with such an enterprise. I think their ultimate goal is to bluster and bully, convince Americans, Australians, even Taiwanese that it just isn't worth fighting over and basically hand over the island without a shot being fired.

So I guess it gets back to the old saw: The best way to avoid a fight is to be ready for one.

Posted by Dreadnought 2005-03-08 2:26:18 PM|| 2005-03-08 2:26:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#25 No Big Ed, the statue I'd build would be the "Goddess of Democracy" that the students in Tianemann Square built.

300 feet high with a big light in the torch.

Posted by Steve White 2005-03-08 3:12:14 PM|| 2005-03-08 3:12:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#26 I think that I might have one finger raised.

Posted by DJ 2005-03-08 3:15:15 PM|| 2005-03-08 3:15:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#27 DJ, you've got the right idea. ;-)

Posted by Sobiesky 2005-03-08 3:36:14 PM|| 2005-03-08 3:36:14 PM|| Front Page Top

#28 The civilized world should just ignore China. They are too unstable. Our companies should stop building products there and stop kissing Chinese ass in order to be positioned for when the market finally opens up. Stop investing and let them rot.

POlitical reform would come quickly after that, either that or the Chicoms would attack Taiwan to distract their people, attack Taiwan a decade before they had any chance of winning.

Either way they would cease to be a problem.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-03-08 5:08:42 PM|| [http://rjschwarz.com] 2005-03-08 5:08:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#29 I say review the Treaty! Now is the time to correct any mis-spellings and tidy up the paragraphs.

Posted by Shipman 2005-03-08 6:55:50 PM|| 2005-03-08 6:55:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#30 and verify the damn machine it was typed on

Posted by Dan Rather 2005-03-08 7:25:05 PM|| 2005-03-08 7:25:05 PM|| Front Page Top

17:52 Xbalanke
17:52 Xbalanke
17:04 Crerert Ebbeting3481
17:03 Crerert Ebbeting3481
23:54 Brett
23:49 Sobiesky
23:45 Frank G
23:28 SC88
23:02 Raj
22:45 Frank G
22:39 Ted Kennedy
22:38 Paul Moloney
22:33 CrazyFool
22:22 Frank G
22:19 phil_b
22:18 2b
22:18 Aris Katsaris
22:16 Paul Reubens
22:16 trailing wife
22:14 Frank G
22:13 Eric Jablow
22:10 trailing wife
22:06 Atomic Conspiracy
22:06 Frank G