Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 03/08/2005 View Mon 03/07/2005 View Sun 03/06/2005 View Sat 03/05/2005 View Fri 03/04/2005 View Thu 03/03/2005 View Wed 03/02/2005
1
2005-03-08 International-UN-NGOs
Bush to UN: Drop Dead
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by AzCat 2005-03-08 1:11:23 AM|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Contempt is hardly the right word. UN's transnational positivism is dangerous. It would've been dangerous even in the absence of external enemy (Islam). In the presence of external enemy it's intolerable.
Posted by gromgorru  2005-03-08 8:26:02 AM||   2005-03-08 8:26:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Now, if Bush could get Rush Limbaugh to run NPR, we'd really have something. :o)
Posted by badanov  2005-03-08 8:32:33 AM|| [http://www.rkka.org]  2005-03-08 8:32:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I thought this was the most revealing and astounding sentence in the article:

All the remarkable developments that have taken place lately, especially in the Middle East, may—in some cases, certainly will—have to be settled at the U.N. Security Council.

This is the whole difference between Kaplanite one worlders and Boltonite real worlders; when was anything of importance ever settled at the U. N.?
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-03-08 8:58:09 AM||   2005-03-08 8:58:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Bolton at the UN? Ha! That's great. Almost as good as sending Jesse Helms.
Posted by Mitch H.  2005-03-08 9:07:02 AM|| [http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/]  2005-03-08 9:07:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 I have contempt for the UN and I'm proud of it.
Posted by 2b 2005-03-08 10:41:52 AM||   2005-03-08 10:41:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 There could be no clearer sign that the contempt for the international organization, which was such a prominent feature of Bush's first term, will extend into his second term with still greater force and eloquence.

Richly deserved contempt, and the UN is welcome to it.
Posted by BH 2005-03-08 11:14:29 AM||   2005-03-08 11:14:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 I would prefer that Michael Savage run NPR.
Posted by Poison Reverse 2005-03-08 11:43:59 AM||   2005-03-08 11:43:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 I like that idea. Michael Savage and Leann Hanson on Sunday mornings. Wouldn't be hard to wake up, no matter how late you stayed out.
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-03-08 11:50:06 AM||   2005-03-08 11:50:06 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Man I would have liked to see him appoint Mike Savage to the un! The Dips would be scurrying under their desks when he came in. Another good choice would be Ann Coulter. She would give memorable speeches on un day! Also their veto vote would come with long vitriolic speeches on how irrelevant they really are.
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2005-03-08 12:01:45 PM||   2005-03-08 12:01:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Another good choice would be Ann Coulter.

Sarge, you rascal! Leather miniskirts to offend the Islamonuttz, and keep everyone else's attention! She'll offend the others when she makes her speech, and shows common sense.
Posted by BigEd 2005-03-08 12:25:42 PM||   2005-03-08 12:25:42 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 I've been paying pretty close attention to the U.N. for upwards of forty years now, and I'm trying to recall even a single instance-- anything, anywhere, no matter how minor, even-- that's made me think "thank God for the U.N." or "boy, we'd be in really deep shit now if it weren't for the U.N." or something even remotely resembling such sentiments.

I've been REALLY wracking my brain over this-- but I'm drawing a complete, utter blank.
Posted by Dave D. 2005-03-08 12:27:02 PM||   2005-03-08 12:27:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Dave, I've thought of one: if it weren't for the United Nations we'd have to rewrite the lyrics to Summertime Blues":

Sometime I wonder
What I'm gonnna do
There ain't no cure
For the summertime blues

Gonna save two weeks
Gonna have a fine vacation
Gonna take my problem
To the U-nited Nations


Posted by Matt 2005-03-08 12:33:20 PM||   2005-03-08 12:33:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Dave D!
Is today a feast day? :)
Posted by Shipman 2005-03-08 1:05:02 PM||   2005-03-08 1:05:02 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 Sending R. Lee Ermey or Dennis Miller would be clear contempt. Sending Bolton is mere displeasure.
Posted by Dishman  2005-03-08 3:21:56 PM||   2005-03-08 3:21:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 No, sending Paul Reubens would be a sign of contempt. Especially if he was required to be in character.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2005-03-08 3:31:21 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com/]  2005-03-08 3:31:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 Looks like it's "Two for One Day". Piss off the Norkies too...

In July 2003, during the run up to the six-nation talks with North Korea, Bolton described Korean head of state Kim Jong Il as a "tyrannical dictator" of a country where "life is a hellish nightmare." North Korea responded by saying that "such human scum and bloodsucker is not entitled to take part in the talks. ... We have decided not to consider him as an official of the U.S. administration any longer nor to deal with."
Posted by tu3031 2005-03-08 4:03:25 PM||   2005-03-08 4:03:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 If there was ever someone cut out for the UN it was Sam Kinnison. Perfect for the job. In his absence, I'll take Kid Rock.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2005-03-08 4:09:37 PM||   2005-03-08 4:09:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#18 Then again..looks like Bolton is off to great start!
Posted by Rex Mundi 2005-03-08 4:14:13 PM||   2005-03-08 4:14:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 I don't see it, #15 Robert. If he were in character, he'd fit right in there.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2005-03-08 5:14:24 PM||   2005-03-08 5:14:24 PM|| Front Page Top

#20 Mike Savage? You're joking right. The guys so out there I'm convinced he's just a leftie intent on making conservatives look bad.
Posted by 2b 2005-03-08 5:19:17 PM||   2005-03-08 5:19:17 PM|| Front Page Top

#21 I think,2b#20, that he's a politically AC/DC
Posted by SwissTex 2005-03-08 5:51:01 PM||   2005-03-08 5:51:01 PM|| Front Page Top

#22 And Michelle Malkin for head of the INS.
Posted by DMFD 2005-03-08 8:15:12 PM||   2005-03-08 8:15:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#23 No, sending Paul Reubens would be a sign of contempt. Especially if he was required to be in character.

Hey, Kofi, want some freshly buttered popcorn?
Posted by Paul Reubens 2005-03-08 9:44:35 PM||   2005-03-08 9:44:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#24 salted?
Posted by Frank G  2005-03-08 9:46:40 PM||   2005-03-08 9:46:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#25 I understand that if he is acquitted, Michael Jackson will go on an international tour, visiting UN Peacekeeping missions.
Posted by Eric Jablow  2005-03-08 10:13:59 PM||   2005-03-08 10:13:59 PM|| Front Page Top

#26 Plenty o' salt in my butter...
Posted by Paul Reubens 2005-03-08 10:16:28 PM||   2005-03-08 10:16:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#27 DMFD - Michelle as head as the INS - That would be a damn good move.

Either that or as head of that Sky Marshalls (you know the ones who always have to walk past the security checkpoint (in front of all the terrorists) and has to dress in a white shirt, blazer, and tie (with a big 'KILL ME FIRST' sign on the back).
Posted by CrazyFool 2005-03-08 10:33:31 PM||   2005-03-08 10:33:31 PM|| Front Page Top

17:52 Xbalanke
17:52 Xbalanke
17:04 Crerert Ebbeting3481
17:03 Crerert Ebbeting3481
23:54 Brett
23:49 Sobiesky
23:45 Frank G
23:28 SC88
23:02 Raj
22:45 Frank G
22:39 Ted Kennedy
22:38 Paul Moloney
22:33 CrazyFool
22:22 Frank G
22:19 phil_b
22:18 2b
22:18 Aris Katsaris
22:16 Paul Reubens
22:16 trailing wife
22:14 Frank G
22:13 Eric Jablow
22:10 trailing wife
22:06 Atomic Conspiracy
22:06 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com