[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] Probably won't hear much about this, unless it's to criticize her clothes.
Posted by: Fred ||
09/27/2018 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11130 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Why?
Why not ANY North American Indian reservation?
Why not Appalachia or any former coal mining town?
Why not the lowland communities of the Southeast?
Why not the failed city/states in the US?
#6
Definitely goodwill, as Woodrow says. Probably booked as a listening tour. And it’s a nice demonstration of President Trump’s confidence in her ability to manage the touchy heads of minor Third World countries. Can you imagine the disaster Mrs. Obama would have made of such a trip in her arrogant, English-only ignorance?
[Breitbart] INTERVIEWER: First of all, what everyone is curious about, if you were president once more for a day, what would you have done and why?
OBAMA: You know, the truth is if I would president for a day I would do much because the nature of the U.S. presidency, although it is obviously is an extraordinarily powerful position, you stand atop a big ocean line. Steering that ship takes a lot of people and a long time, even if there is a move of a few degrees. So, in one day, I would say hello to all the staff at the White House that I miss. But, obviously, if I had a longer stretch of time, there was a lot of unfinished business when I left. That’s the nature of democracy, you take the baton from the person behind you and you run your race, then you have pass it on and you haven’t done everything you would like to do. The single highest priority that I see globally is the issue of environmental sustainability and climate change.
Obviously, Paris Accords were an important step in the right direction, but it was only a first step and so much more work needs to be done. The good news is technology is accelerating faster than we might have expected, and I’m confident that if we’re able to create an effective ridge over, let’s say over the course of 25-30 years with more efficiency and deployment of existing technology, that we could get to a point were new technologies take us where we need to go. But, that requires a level of political and social commitment on the part of all of us: businesses, the non-profit sector, each of us individuals, that right now is not forthcoming. Unfortunately, we have a U.S administration that deals differently around these issues.
#3
Deep in the Bunker under the Reichskanzlei White House the Führer President Obama was disheartened that the German American people had failed him in the struggle election.
#4
#2 So true. The dream is still there. The lust for power and adulation is craved by this man. In my opinion he will if he hasn't already returned to his drug of choice. No happy ending for this man.
The Senate Judiciary Committee is talking to two men who think they may have been the one who assaulted Christine Blasey Ford, one of the women accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
Ford wrote a letter in July to Senator Dianne Feinstein, the ranking Democrat on the committee, detailing the alleged assault. Kavanaugh and a classmate, Mark Judge, trapped her in a bedroom at an alcohol-saturated party when they were both minors in high school, she said. Kavanaugh then pinned her to a bed and tried to take off her clothes before she managed to escape, she claimed.
However, the unidentified men in question told the committee in separate interviews that they, not Kavanaugh, were the one who had the encounter with Ford in the summer of 1982 that is the basis of her claim, the committee wrote in a timeline of the investigation.
One of the men produced a detailed, written statement about his recollection of the [event]
Well, forgive me, but I think Christine had "encounters" with hundreds of men
I am Spartacus.
I admit I am the one who tried to take advantage of Christine Blasey Ford way back then.
And I am willing to testify under certain conditions.
Of course my recollection of the details is vague considering my state of intoxication.
And the incident was not a big deal to me.
I have moved on to bigger and better things.
...Now, suddenly there’s a third victim out there! Michael Avanetti has grandly announced he has a client who has absolute PROOF that Kavanaugh is a partier and a rapist, and dumps this on Twitter.
...What is missing from her statement? Seems that Kavanaugh nor Judge for that matter even touched Swetnick.
Wait what? That’s exactly right folks. Read her statement thoroughly. Nowhere in that statement is anything that even points to Kavanaugh touching her or any other woman for that matter.
So is this proof? Is this the smoking gun that is going to finally crater Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination? Well... a couple of things to consider.
...Take a look. He is asked if Julie Swetnick is accusing Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her. Does he provide a yes or no answer?
...Remember, the FBI conducted SIX deep background checks on Kavanaugh over the years. How in the world did they miss uncovering details of gang rape parties? Swetnick asserts in her declaration that EVERYONE knew and most of Georgetown Prep participated in these parties. If that is true, then why wasn’t this uncovered during Neil Gorsuch’s hearing?
If those gang rape parties really happened, why didn’t anyone call the police?
Incidentally, can Kavanaugh prove that, in earlier incarnation, he wasn't the Roman centurion leading the detail that crucified a certain Judean religious rabble rouser?
#1
Notice how each accusation is seemingly more egregious than the previous one...
The leftists are "accelerating commitment" on beating Kavanaugh.
I don't really understand why Roe v. Wade is a hill to die on for the leftists, unless it is to defend the concept that Justices can invent legal precedence without Constitutional merit by quoting laws of other nations or public opinion.
#5
There are bigger issues with regard to the Supreme Court than the sub 100 IQ antics at the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings circus going on as we speak.
HERE is, of all things, an Australian blog that discusses the more fundamental issues. Unfortunately, Congress does not have the sense of values or collective level of intelligence to see the big picture.
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
09/27/2018 13:05 Comments ||
Top||
#6
There landed in Auburn an alien
Who spoke not a word of Australian.
Along came Obama
To translate: "No drama!
I'm fluent in sesquipedalian."
#7
Lindsey Graham just blew his top at his Democrat colleagues and called the whole thing a sham. He was quite angry and intense. Dunno what's gotten into him but if that outburst doesn't make it onto the network nightly newscasts, the mask will have clearly dropped to the floor.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
09/27/2018 17:14 Comments ||
Top||
#8
Lindsay apparently had a testosterone steroid injection. It was amazing. His Democrat "friends" had to be shocked, and pushed back
Posted by: Frank G ||
09/27/2018 19:34 Comments ||
Top||
#10
Here is a thought provoking timeline: 1982 - Something may or may not have happened with another 2 (or 4) teenagers at a party, she cannot remember who threw the party, where the
party was held, who she was with or how she got home. She was drinking and said nothing to anyone.
> 1983,
> 1984,
> 1985,
> 1986,
> 1987,
> 1988,
> 1989,
> 1990,
> 1991,
> 1992,
> 1993,
> 1994,
> 1995,
> 1996,
> 1997,
> 1998,
> 1999,
> 2000,
> 2001,
> 2002... She said nothing.
> July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh
> to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit...
> She said nothing.
> 2004,
> 2005... She said nothing.
> May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the
> Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently
> confirmed by the United States Senate... She said nothing.
> June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony
> Kennedy... She said nothing.
> 2007,
> 2008,
> 2009,
> 2010,
> 2011... She said nothing.
> 2012... She remembered 'something' happened in 1982,
> yet doesn't name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to
> authorities.
> 2013,
> 2014,
> 2015,
> 2016,
> 2017 - becomes an anti-trump activist.
> 2018 - now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh's SCOTUS
> confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with
> grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy
> circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then
> reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before
> testifying to her incredible allegations?·
> This is a page right out of the Democrat
> playbook. Can you say Clarence
> Thomas?He called it “a
> technical lynching!”
#11
In most of DC it'd be totally unremarkable for a child born in '83 to have walking, talking grandkids by now... not that the camera hogs disgracing themselves today will lose any sleep about how that comes to pass.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[Breitbart] INTERVIEWER: First of all, what everyone is curious about, if you were president once more for a day, what would you have done and why?
