When I boarded the commuter rail, you were already in the midst of a spirited phone conversation and didn’t seem to care about how loud you were talking. You were talking with someone about the Paris train attack and the growing epidemic of gun violence in America.
You spoke about the “murderous NRA” and “bloodthirsty gun nuts” who were causing our schools to “run red with blood.” You spoke profanely of the Republicans who opposed President Obama’s call for “sensible gun control,” and you lamented the number of “inbred redneck politicians” who have “infiltrated Capitol Hill.”
I found myself amazed at the irony of the situation. While you were spewing your venom, I sat quietly next to you with my National Rifle Association membership card in my wallet and my 9mm pistol in its holster. You were only 12 inches away from my legally owned semiautomatic pistol. I suppose I didn’t look like the “bloodthirsty gun nut” you thought I should be. It apparently didn’t register to you that I could so cleverly disguise myself by wearing a fleece coat, Patriots hat, and khakis.
So, to the angry liberal who sat next to me on the commuter rail: I don’t hate you. I don’t have any ill feelings toward you. I don’t wish to do you harm. And I don’t regret sitting next to you. On the contrary; I feel bad for you. It must hurt carrying that much hate inside of you.
You obviously have strong opinions about this hot topic. So, let me say this as plainly as I can: If a bad guy with a gun had decided to walk onto that train and start shooting people, I would have been prepared and able to use my gun to defend my own life and the lives of everyone else on that train, including yours. Although you may hate me, a gun owner, I would risk my life for you.
Opinions and ideologies make a pretty thin shield against the bullets of a madman. Your liberal self-righteousness and ignorance may have made you feel superior and comfortable, but during that 40-minute train ride to Boston, my gun kept you safe.
#3
Maybe I misunderstood your meaning, but I don't think that the post is stupid. In my experience the uber-leftists run straight to someone like the man on the train when sh*t hits the fan. After Hurricane Ike hit Houston, my NYU trained daughter and her circle of friends showed up at my doorstep as soon as they could because my wife and I had a generator, lots of gasoline, stockpiled food, and the weapons to keep the foregoing.
#4
Brujo I hear ya, my once were friends who wet themselves when I mentioned I wanted a 20g for trap shooting, and who unanimously agreed I was a redneck racist knuckle draggin' so forth because I mentioned that perhaps Sebilius would make a poor choice for a second term as KS Governor (hilarious, since I went to school with most of them but POLICY!), also unanimously agreed they would head my way if TSHTF.
I smiled, and didn't have the heart to tell them they wouldn't even make it out of their city. They'd call the loss of power water and gas life threatening. I'd call it camping.
These guys...these guys...one called me up after the Greensburg Tornado wondering how they could help. I said, "By staying home." Sorry, sixth year college students who can't change a tire are a liability in the real world.
A somewhat condensed opinion piece from Brookings' Kenneth M. Pollack:
The Saudis are scared of the rising tide of popular mobilization and Shiite mobilization; they are scared by their loss of control over the oil market and what that is forcing them to do domestically; they are scared by the spillover from the region’s civil wars and the costs that they are being forced to bear to try to prevent that spillover from affecting them; and they are scared that we are abandoning them for Iran. The Saudis’ world, in other words, is pretty scary. And their modus operandi today is the same as it always has been: to lash out to try to beat back the threats that they see and regain control of their circumstances. Hence their stunning intervention in Yemen, their constant escalation in Syria, and now this latest flare-up with Iran.
It’s also why America’s constant appeals to them to just calm down will have no impact except to infuriate them further. Unless we want to take up some of these burdens for the Saudis (their first choice, as always), then we have nothing that they want. It only adds insult to injury when Washington refuses to recognize the threats that they see, does nothing to help them with those threats, and then tries to keep them from doing what they think they need to do to deal with those threats themselves.
It’s also why we should expect to see other crises like this one in future. The Saudis are going to keep taking whatever actions they feel necessary to deter or defeat what they see as Iranian efforts to undermine their external power and their internal stability. In the unstable Middle East of the early 21st century, that aggressiveness is going to have very unpredictable effects. But what looks chaotic to Washington will continue to seem entirely logical from the perspective of Saudi Arabia.
Continued on Page 49
#2
Funny how they don't feel threatened by ISIL, isn't it?
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
01/10/2016 12:59 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Virtual imbecile? What is virtual about it?
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
01/10/2016 13:01 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Moreover, Saudi Arabia seems to differ over whether Obama is using the new nuclear deal with Tehran to deliberately try to shift the United States from the Saudi side to the Iranian side in the grand, regional struggle or if he is allowing it to happen unintentionally. The more charitable Saudi position is the former, because that suggests that Obama at least understands what he is doing, even if they think it a mistake and a betrayal. The latter view, for Saudis, sees him as a virtual imbecile who is destroying the Middle East without any understanding or recognition.
no reason it can't be both
Posted by: Frank G ||
01/10/2016 13:50 Comments ||
Top||
#5
...Let them EAT their oil. They've had this coming for a very, very long time, and I have no compassion for them whatsoever.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski ||
01/10/2016 15:22 Comments ||
Top||
#6
This is all another Germany v. USSR or Iraq v, Iran.
All sides suck and we should only get involved enough to keep the fur flying and away from us.
Some days you hug the bear. Some days the bear hugs you.
WASHINGTON — In little-noticed remarks this week, NATO’s supreme allied commander, US Air Force Gen. Philip Breedlove, said that for too long, the United States has “hugged the bear” of Russia. But now, he said, it’s time to get tough.
This toughness should come in the form of more US troops to Europe, he said, and more “high end” training to prepare American forces for a potential battle against the former cold war foe.
The remarks, made while Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was visiting Europe this week, have struck some as a bit alarmist. True, Russia has invaded Crimea and used agents provocateurs, covert operations, and even some of its own Red Army forces in Ukraine.
Defense officials do not believe, however, that Russia is poised to run its tanks through the Fulda Gap – the lowland corridor in Germany where the US military was prepared to intercept a surprise attack from the Warsaw Pact during the 4-1/2 decades of the cold war.
Still, the comments of General Breedlove and others mark a shift in thinking, argues John Herbst, ambassador to Ukraine from 2003 to 2006 and former director of the Center for Complex Operations at National Defense University in Washington.
“I think it’s fair to say that six to eight months ago, if Breedlove had headed off in this direction he would have been walked back by the White House,” and told to tone down his rhetoric. “But not now,” says Mr. Herbst, who briefs US military commanders, “there’s been an evolution in attitudes, among our military but within the administration as well.”
Much of this is due to Russia's recent intervention in Syria, as well as its aggression in Crimea and Ukraine, in which it made use of undercover Russian soldiers in unmarked army fatigues, known as "little green men," to wreak destruction on the ground.
This marks a notable shift since the end of the cold war, when the US quickly began operating on the assumption that European security was solved.
“We thought we could check that box, focus on other things – that Europe would become a provider of security, rather than a consumer of it,” says Jeffrey Mankoff, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
The US view of Russia has changed dramatically – and quickly. “We went from that to ‘Russia is a defeated enemy,’ and not only that, but they’re in total collapse,” says Christopher Harmer, who served on the Pentagon staff developing strategic plans for Europe, NATO, and Russia from 2005 to 2008.
“We thought we could love them into the NATO alliance, and hug them into being responsible state actors,” adds Mr. Harmer, who is now a senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War.
#1
“We thought we could love them into the NATO alliance, and hug them into being responsible state actors,” adds Mr. Harmer, who is now a senior naval analyst at the Institute for the Study of War.
#3
#1 the same idiots that thought building up China and integrating it into the world economy would remove a couple thousand years of its imperialistic expansion behavior.
This toughness should come in the form of more US troops to Europe, he said
Ah, no. If they Euros are unwilling to mobilize themselves to defend themselves, there is no need to waste our resources any further. Besides, they're already surrendering to the Islamics. No need to provide more 'targets of opportunity' to their agents.
#5
Gotta have a bogeyman. Of course, there's China and all those whacky guys in the Middle East but that'd be politically incorrect.
Posted by: Abu Uluque ||
01/10/2016 10:25 Comments ||
Top||
#6
"We thought we could love them into the NATO alliance, and hug them into being responsible state actors,"
By Love them into NATO they mean encourage ex Soviet states to join NATO and thus push the Russian paranoia to 11? By hugging them into being responsible state actors we work to destabilize the Russian client in the Middle East? Seems as if we treated Russia like a dog the last 7 years and now we're surprised the dog doesn't like it?
Patriot and Threeper favorite author Matt Braken makes the case that what started in Europe towards the end of 2015 and continues in 2016 is the latest Islamic military offensive against Europe.
And coming soon to a gun free zone near you.
From TFA:
6. Tet, Take Two
Which brings me to the main thrust of this essay. I believe that Europe is being prepared for a Muslim-jihad version of the 1968 Tet Offensive in Vietnam. A vast and concerted act of treason has been taking place across Europe since the creation of the European Union. Under the Schengen Agreement, Brussels promised to guard the outer frontiers of the EU, while abolishing internal border controls. The Eurocrat elites broke the first promise but kept the second, thus opening a wide path for the onrushing Muslim hijra immigration invasion.
Right now, approximately a million new Muslim migrants are engaged in a struggle to find a warm place to sleep in a continent with nothing approaching the capacity to adequately house them. At least 75% of the migrant invaders are Muslim men of fighting age. Native-born ethnic Germans, Swedes and others are being thrown onto the street to provide emergency housing for Muslim “refugees.” Tens of thousands of migrants are currently living in tents, and in temporary shelters like school gymnasiums and underused warehouses.
There will be no means of finding or creating permanent quarters for them before the Central European blizzards come. When the snow is deep in Germany and across Europe, these men are going to enter local houses, demanding to be taken in as boarders — or else. Where it is useful, small migrant children will be held up in front as human shields for their emotional blackmail value, elsewise they will be discarded. One way or the other, Muslim migrants will be attempting to move inside of German homes and apartments seeking heat and food, and the young Muslim men will be seeking undefended infidel or kafir women to slake their lust, (which is their right, under Islamic Sharia law).
#1
Funny views...
We see them as broken family units of immigrants and refugees when historically, this same mass migration occurs as an occupation of new fertile territories after great battles.
#2
See also BREITBART > [Syrian + Iraqi, Muslim] MIGRATION INVASION WILL REACH OVER 10.0 MILYUHN [8-10.0M +], WARNS GERMAN [Development] MINISTER.
EUROPE HAS BARELY SEEN THE [real = true] START OF THE MIGRANT INFLUX.
[DAWN] The bright side first. At least nobody's pretending this didn't originate in Pakistain. It's all about actionable intelligence and resolve and whatnot. But it isn't about denial.
That's a kind of progress. Remember when Mumbai happened? False flag! Kasab was an Indian, and a Hindu to boot. It's impossible for a bunch of gunnies to get in a boat and sail to Mumbai. More Indian lies!
This time it's been different. Sure, there was the usual derisiveness when Pathankot began. The smarty-pants logic was quickly trotted out: how can the Indians already know who did it when they weren't even able to figure it was about to happen?
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Fred ||
01/10/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11125 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
#1
"The possibilities are several, but also rather straightforward. 1) The chaps who hopped across the border did it on their own. Mad men, angry and feeling betrayed. Wanting to let the world know they weren't going to get away with this fake peace business.
Or 2) they had help -- someone, somewhere in the state apparatus either helped them or looked the other way while they went about their business. A rogue, ideological operation -- Modi is a thug and Kashmire will never be forgotten.
Or 3) it was authorised directly. The damn civilians are up to their tricks again and they need to be put back in their place. Hence an attack on a hard target; hit something soft and there may be all kinds of backlash everywhere.
But those possibilities also don't really matter. It could be any of them and it still wouldn't address the original problem: what do you do about the anti-India lot running around the country?"
I'm with #3
Posted by: Frank G ||
01/10/2016 11:37 Comments ||
Top||
#2
I was kinda hoping the Indian response would have been a missile into an office building in downtown Karachi.
#3
India knows that it can't win a war with Pakistan. Would you want to occupy Pakistan even if you could? Nukes also discourage things. India needs a way to make Pakistan pay a price for these kinds of things. A missile at the ISA office that oked the attack might be one way. Good idea.
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
01/10/2016 19:47 Comments ||
Top||
[DAWN] FOR many years it was an open secret in Lahore, discussed in living rooms and other settings, that the brother of the then army chief was involved in massive land deals around the city, particularly in contracts with Defence Housing Authority, Lahore. Last year, we heard for the first time that the National Accountability Bureau had served notice on the man in question, Kamran Kayani ... four star general, current Chief of Army Staff of the Mighty Pak Army. Kayani is the former Director General of ISI... , for having sold allotment certificates for DHA land in Islamabad to be acquired and developed by him but failing to deliver on his commitments. Notice was reportedly served on him at the time, and when no response was received, the matter was quietly dropped and fell out of the headlines.
Now he is once again in the headlines, this time in Lahore. Once again it is in a NAB case, although notice has not yet been served and word suggests he is no longer in the country to receive one. And once again, it is for failing to live up to his contractual obligation to acquire and develop 15,000 kanals of land for DHA City Lahore, a contract he apparently obtained in 2009. NAB has confirmed that a formal inquiry has been authorised in their Lahore office against two companies, Globaco (pvt) Ltd of one Hammad Arshad, and Elysium Holdings of Kamran Kayani. Common sense tells us that DHA Lahore, which is the complainant in the case, would not move on this matter without authorisation from higher offices in the military. The complaint is serious: that Rs16bn worth of allotment letters were sold to the general public, the money transferred into Mr Arshad's own account, and from there forwarded on to his benefactors and partners in the enterprise.
The episode reminds us all that corruption, whether real or alleged, is not necessarily the exclusive preserve of the politicians. We must ask if it was a coincidence that both inquiries, in Islamabad and Lahore, were launched only after Mr Kayani's brother had relinquished the office of army chief. And although there is no evidence at all to suggest that the former army chief was in the know of such dealings, the very fact that the two were related may lead to scepticism. The sheer rapacity of the snatch-and-grab land acquisition and development scene that has broken out in the country over the past decade is quite a spectacle. The lingering presence of senior military officials, of an institution like the DHA, and now of personalities linked to the highest offices make for troubling thoughts. The present case should not be allowed to quietly disappear from the headlines. The investigating authorities must be pressured to get to the bottom of this affair, and of others where property developers may have reason to believe that they have enough clout to allow them to indulge in unethical dealings.
Posted by: Fred ||
01/10/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
Background on this story from yesterday. The gentleman is a piece of work.
Posted by: Steve White ||
01/10/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
All Israeli leftwingers are pieces of work. IMO, they compare unfavorably with Jews who collaborated with Nazis. After all, the later had an excuse (please don't start a discussion of how much it can justify) of being scared for themselves and families. The former have no excuses except NGOs pay their Israeli collaborators well.
Lots of facts and figures about the various threats Israel currently faces.
[Jpost] We in Israel were not impressed by the leader of ISIS's threat to turn Paleostine into our graveyard.
When Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that territory Israel might withdraw from would be taken over by turban Islam and assured Israeli voters in early 2015 that a Paleostinian state would not be established under his leadership, the B.O. regime responded, as expected, with another barrage of verbal assaults on Israel for undermining the "two-state solution."
Those attacks included a threat to "reassess" US "options." That vague statement was actually a reference to the crisis in US-Israel relations three decades ago when president Gerald Ford said there would be a "reassessment" of the US relationship with Israel.
Continued on Page 49
[Observer] Back in October I told you that Hillary Clinton's email troubles were anything but over, and that the scandal over her misuse of communications while she was Secretary of State was sure to get worse. Sure enough, EmailGate continues to be a thorn in the side of Hillary's presidential campaign and may have just entered a new, potentially explosive phase with grave ramifications, both political and legal.
The latest court-ordered dump of her email, just placed online by the State Department, brings more troubles for Team Hillary. This release of over 3,000 pages includes 66 "Unclassified" messages that the State Department subsequently determined actually were classified; however, all but one of those 66 were deemed Confidential, the lowest classification level, while one was found to be Secret, bringing the total of Secret messages discovered so far to seven. In all, 1,340 Hillary emails at State have been reassessed as classified.
There are gems here. It's hard to miss the irony of Hillary expressing surprise about a State Department staffer using personal email for work, which the Secretary of State noted in her own personal email. More consequential was Hillary's ordering a staffer to send classified talking points for a coming meeting via a non-secure fax machine, stripped of their classification markings. This appears to be a clear violation of Federal law and the sort of thing that is a career-ender, or worse, for normals. The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee termed that July 2011 incident "disturbing," and so it is to anyone acquainted with U.S. Government laws and regulations regarding the handling of classified material.
But the biggest problem may be in a just-released email that has gotten little attention here, but plenty on the other side of the world. An email to Hillary from a close Clinton confidant late on June 8, 2011 about Sudan turns out to have explosive material in it. This message includes a detailed intelligence report from Sid Blumenthal, Hillary's close friend, confidant, and factotum, who regularly supplied her with information from his private intelligence service. His usual source was Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA senior official and veteran spy-gadfly, who conveniently died just before EmailGate became a serious problem for Hillary's campaign.
#5
If they don't prosecute her for her obvious crimes here, then the law means nothing. I think the FBI will recommend indictment and if Lynch doesn't, expect Comey to threaten resigning. You can also expect the Intel Community to raise hell
Posted by: Frank G ||
01/10/2016 13:02 Comments ||
Top||
#6
Someday soon their will be a new prez and AG. Charges can still be filed.
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
01/10/2016 13:09 Comments ||
Top||
#7
their --> there. Sorry, cell phone, fat fingers and auto correct.
Posted by: Sven the pelter ||
01/10/2016 13:24 Comments ||
Top||
#8
how could sid b have obtained detailed Secret info ????
Posted by: lord garth ||
01/10/2016 19:28 Comments ||
Top||
#9
Either he intercepted or was given SIGINT. If it was the former, the Klingons should hire him.
Conquerors: How Portugal Forged The First Global Empire
Roger Crowley
Penguin Random House LLC, 2015
This is Roger Crowley's fourth book, and I would suggest it as fourth in the reading order: City of Fortune, 1453, Empires of the Sea, then Conqerors.
Mr. Crowley covers both the Portuguese age of exploration as well as a history of trade in the Indian Ocean, beginning with the initial explorations sent by King Joao. (page 29)
Although Joao had been badly shaken by Columbus's claims, he revived his India plan and prepared a new expedition. But for him it was too late. "The Man is dead," Isabella of Spain was said to have murmured when she heard the news in 1495. She had hoped to marry her daughter to Joao's son, Afonso, but he had already died. The throne passed to the young Dom Manuel, duke of Beja, who had witnessed the final briefing of Paiva and Covilha. Manuel fortuitously inherited a crown, eighty years of accumulated exploration experience, and the launchpad for the final push to India. He had even been gifted the wood to build the ships. If Joao passed into Portuguese history as the Perfect Prince, Manuel was destined to be the Fortunate King.
Mr. Crowley describes the continuing pushes into the Indian Ocean, where men battle hardened by fighting off the Barbary raiders, sailing upon large ships with superior cannon, crash their way into an unsuspecting ocean of trade. The hard men such as Vasco de Gama, superior weapons, excellent logistical resupply from Portugal, and sheer daring have the Portuguese smashing nearly any and all opposition to their incursion into what was an amiable trade arena. Indeed, the Portuguese have few setbacks under the leadership of Alfonso de Albuquerque. (page 233)
The first faltering steps in colonial administration were not error free. Timoji was initially put in charge of tax collecting, but this promised to stir dissent from both communities and his remit had to be altered. And although Albuquerque had promised religious freedom, he recoiled in horrer at the practice of suttee â the immolation of Hindu widows on their husband's funeral pyres â and banned it. The underlying sense of Christian mission and his own obduracy also led him to order summary executions that were to cause unrest.
A large portion rightfully deals with the exploits of Alfonso de Albuquerque. (page 313)
Albuquerque had been in the Indian Ocean for nine years. He had worked continually and at a furious pace to build Manuel's empire, during which time he had endured the incessant voyaging, the wars, the intriguing, the rigors of the climate. He had been wounded at Goa; for three months he had been besieged in the Mandovi River in the rain. He had negotiated, intimidated, persuaded, and killed. To outsiders he appeared indestructible. The bullets and the spear wounds had not felled him; the cannonballs had whistled past his head; he had stood up in his boat to taunt the Turkish gunners of Benastarim. But he was nearly sixty years old, and to those who saw him up close, such as his secretary Gasper Correia, "he was old and very wasted in body." Now, in the atomizing heat of Ormuz, between the brilliant blue of the sea and the blinding sunlight on the barren rocks, he was dying.
This was not a tickling contest. The stakes were high for all involved - the Venetians and Genoese stood to lose much money as the backwater prow of Europe cut both the European near monopoly pricing as well as the Mamluk monopoly pricing middlemen from the spice trade, launching Lisbon into European prominence. In fact Mr. Crowley hints at the weakening of the Mamluks as partly the result of this trade bypass, which will usher the Ottoman rise to power as they go on the capture chunks of the failing Mamluk Empire.
Mr. Crowley pulls no punches, nor should he so the reader can have the full appreciation of this page of history concerning the Indian Ocean. In the book's conclusion, a very relevant quote by Alfonso de Albuquerque is noted. (page 322)
Surveying the walls of Ormuz, he declared:
So long as they are upheld by justice and without oppression, they are more than sufficient. But if good faith and humanity cease to be observed in these lands, then pride will overthrow the strongest walls we have. Portugal is very poor and when the poor are covetous they become oppressors. The fumes of India are powerful - I fear the time will come when instead of our present fame as warriors we may only be known as grasping tyrants.
I really enjoyed this book, and Mr. Crowley's whole series of this chapter of the history of the Mediterranean Sea. Again the book reads so easily and vividly at the same time. The battles read like a fine movie script, but it is the atmosphere created where Mr. Crowley shines. At one point I was just reading along when it hit me that after the men and the ship itself, the most important cargo carried was the bilge pump, the ships so worm eaten that any ceasing of the pumping would flounder the ship.
#2
Ima reading Dick and Jane, Sally and Spot a Retrospective in which er nouns are declined, capital Lettres noted and the awesome Run Spot, Run! Chapter is finally recognized for itn awesome effect on English Literature.
#3
I've read _Empires of the Sea_ and it was good. I haven't read any of the others but I have read other works on Venice, notably _A Brief History of Venice_ by Elizabeth Horodwich.
There's all sorts of cheap free or nearly free books on the Kindle Store and at Gutenberg.
#4
I didn't know I knew so little about Venice until reading on the subject. I knew they were shrewd merchants, but didn't know why. Such as their meticulous collection of information. Mr. Crowley mentions in City of Fortune that an archive was found with something like 30 miles of paper noting events and rumors and prices; captains were required by law brief the state about the voyage.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.