The Paris attacks have driven a significant increase in public support for British military action, especially if our allies are with us
Apparently people are beginning to get the message.
People are fickle. It wasn't long ago that the British people loudly demanded Prime Minister Cameron open the country's doors to the flood of Syrian refugees, along with the publics of Western Europe.
Posted by: Steve White ||
11/21/2015 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under:
Islam derives meaning from physical supremacy, so war becomes an act of faith. To believe in Islam, is to have faith that it will conquer the entire world. And to be a true Muslim, is to feel called to aid in that global conquest, whether by providing money to the Jihadists or to become a Jihadist.
The fulfillment of Islam depends on the subjugation of non-Muslims so that violence against non-Muslims become the essence of religion.
When Hamas states that, "Killing Jews is worship that draws us close to Allah" or the ISIS rapists tell Yazidi girls that rape "draws them closer to Allah", they really do mean it.
They are not perverting a great religion, as our politicians claim, they are living it. Until the West admits it, and starts basing policy on it, the West will keep loosing.
#2
Until the West admits it, and starts basing policy on it, the West will keep loosing.
If our leaders would admit it, then they would have to act on it. In the meantime, Islam is the Religion of Pieces Peace. Pay no attention to the carnage you see on the news.
A very well-done paper on the purpose of, and historical use of, forced displacement. Many thanks to 746 for the find. Some excerpts:
Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement as an Instrument of Coercion Kelly M. Greenhill
Coercion is generally understood to refer to the practice of inducing or preventing changes in political behavior through the use of threats, intimidation, or some other form of pressure—most commonly, military force. This article focuses on a very particular nonmilitary method of applying coercive pressure—the use of migration and refugee crises as instruments of persuasion. Conventional wisdom suggests this kind of coercion is rare at best. Traditional international relations theory avers that it should rarely succeed. In fact, given the asymmetry in capabilities that tends to exist between would be coercers and their generally more powerful targets, it should rarely even be attempted.
Coercive engineered migrations (or coercion-driven migrations) are “those cross-border population movements that are deliberately created or manipulated in order to induce political, military and/or economic concessions from a target state or states.” The instruments employed to affect this kind of coercion are myriad and diverse. They run the gamut from compulsory to permissive, from the employment of hostile threats and the use of military force (as were used during the 1967-1970 Biafran and 1992-1995 Bosnian civil wars) through the offer of positive inducements and provision of financial incentives (as were offered to North Vietnamese by the United States in 1954-1955, following the First Indochina War) to the straightforward opening of normally sealed borders (as was done by President Erich Honecker of East Germany in the early 1980s.
Coercive engineered migration is frequently, but not always, undertaken in the context of population outflows strategically generated for other reasons. In fact, it represents just one subset of a broader class of events that all rely on the creation and exploitation of such crises as means to political and military ends—a phenomenon I call strategic engineered migration. Coercive engineered migration is often embedded within mass migrations strategically engineered for dispossessive, exportive, or militarized reasons. It is likely, at least in part as a consequence of its embedded and often camouflaged nature, that its prevalence has also been generally under-recognized and its significance, underappreciated. Indeed, it is a phenomenon that for many observers has been hiding in plain sight. For instance, it is widely known that in 1972 Idi Amin expelled most Asians from Uganda in what has been commonly interpreted as a naked attempt at economic asset expropriation. Far less well understood, however, is the fact that approximately 50,000 of those expelled were British passport-holders, and that these expulsions happened at the same time that Amin was trying to convince the British to halt their drawdown of military assistance to his country. In short, Amin announced his intention to foist 50,000 refugees on the British, but did so with a convenient ninety-day grace period to give the British an opportunity to rescind their decision regarding aid. And Amin was far from unique.
#1
Not mentioned are the highly successful Coercion driven migrations in Zimbabwe and South Africa. [tongue in cheek]
Whilst we point our fingers at the global others [save the bit about Israeli settlements], not to be neglected is our very own political elites use of Coercion at the local levels, through voting district gerrymandering, low/no interest home loans [the right to own a home], the urbanization of conservative suburbia and resultant 'white flight.'
There is a definite method to the madness. Quite an excellent article by the way. I can't recall seeing the dynamic captured as succinctly.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
