[Dawn] IT is obvious what fuelled Monday's demand in the National Assembly for the formulation of a law aimed at preventing attacks on minorities. Public reaction over the shameful acts of arson in Lahore's Badami Bagh on Saturday -- that followed the Quetta and Karachi blasts targeting the Shia community -- has been fittingly strong. It has finally become obvious to all that such violence is not only spreading, its intensity too is increasing. While it may be argued that laws regarding transgressions such as arson, looting and harassment -- all of which can be applied to the Badami Bagh tragedy -- are already in place, it is also true that targeted laws criminalising specific practices and protecting specific groups have their value. This is evident, for example, in the body of laws that countries continue to develop to protect vulnerable groups such as women and children.
What is difficult to make out, though, is what the new law demanded by our parliamentarians might be expected to achieve in actual terms given the ground realities. The neglect of minorities' rights has been an issue for decades. The demand for installing a new legislative framework has come at a time when there is less than a week to go before the assemblies are dissolved thus making the proposal appear as a sop to the public, especially with general elections on the horizon. However, more pertinent than this is the cravenness of the political and administrative elite whenever the issue of the misuse of the blasphemy laws or the persecution of minorities has come up.
At every juncture, they have caved in before the hard-line right. Consider merely the way Monday's demand in the Assembly was worded: "[...] carry out necessary legislation, if so desired, to prevent such unfortunate incidents in the future". This hesitant request encapsulates the problem: protecting minorities means standing up to those who persecute them -- but sadly, too few are willing to take that bullet in the chest.
Posted by: Fred ||
03/14/2013 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11125 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
#2
Advanced degrees or studies in comparative logic are probably not required. Anti-Americanism has certainly brought about "change" here in the States. Obviously not a great leap for Burnett, who has little if any use for Israel or the United States.
#4
Ain't it funny how Presnident Passive Aggressive never has to face questions like this? About how guys like him and Holder never have to explain how if Aaron Swartz's death was such a tragedy, why the hell did they drive him to it? (For one example).
#5
That did not use the entire question asked " Erin Burnett to Laura Bush: Should America Accept Anti-Semitism To Effect Change In Middle East similar to how democrats accepted obama's Marxism and lack of accomplishment in order to change America for the worse"
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[Dawn] IT is obvious what fuelled Monday's demand in the National Assembly for the formulation of a law aimed at preventing attacks on minorities. Public reaction over the shameful acts of arson in Lahore's Badami Bagh on Saturday -- that followed the Quetta and Karachi blasts targeting the Shia community -- has been fittingly strong. It has finally become obvious to all that such violence is not only spreading, its intensity too is increasing. While it may be argued that laws regarding transgressions such as arson, looting and harassment -- all of which can be applied to the Badami Bagh tragedy -- are already in place, it is also true that targeted laws criminalising specific practices and protecting specific groups have their value. This is evident, for example, in the body of laws that countries continue to develop to protect vulnerable groups such as women and children.
