According to a report by Le Monde, the armed intervention in Libya has led to a secret alliance between Iran and Colonel Moammar Gaddafi. That is the conclusion by sources within the circles of Western intelligence.
The Islamic Republic of Iran, fearing the consequences of the NATO operation in North Africa, has developed a plan to transform Libya into a quagmire for the NATO allies.
Iran seeks to take advantage of the upheavals in the Arab world, seeing it as a factor in the weakening of the West's position in the Middle East, as well as a red herring to divert attention away from its nuclear program, say these sources.
According to this analysis, the Supreme Leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei (in a directive issued early in May), has instructed the Quds forces (special units of the Revolutionary Guards responsible for extraterritorial operations) to provide military assistance to Gaddafi's forces in its war against what they call the "the axis of evil: the United States, France and [the] United Kingdom."
The plan includes the transfer of weapons, including surface-to-surface and surface-to-air missiles, along with other arms to be used against the forces of the Libyan opposition. The operation has been entrusted to members of the Quds forces based in Algeria and Sudan. Hundreds of them have already penetrated Libya in the area of the Cyrenaica close to Egypt, affirm these Western sources.
#2
I don't know if I'd go that far, gromky. After all, it's natural for (healthy i.e., not infected with tranzy mindworm) countries to try to expand their power & influence.
...This causes me to wonder whether the next great cause of the feral Left will be a boycott of souvlaki restaurants throughout Australia. My question stems from the antics of anti-Zionist protesters this past Friday evening outside the Israeli-owned Max Brenner chocolateria in the Melbourne CBD.
A quick google of "Max Brenner boycott" pulls up all sorts of ugliness -- this has been going on for a while -- including a Facebook page with lots of photos of standard issue participants, smugly pleased with themselves.
This unruly mob was so stereotypical that could have been supplied direct from central casting. There were 'kafiyeh' Arab-scarf-wearing Leftwing atheists rallying in defence of the theocratic medievalists of Hamas. There were radical feminists protesting on behalf of an Islamic radical regime that would slap them into a burka so fast it would make their head swim. And let's not forget the Rip Van Winkle hippies, that de rigueur cohort of aging radicals who've never outgrown their anti-Vietnam war protest stage.
And all the while, these protestors were chanting the puerile, poetically-challenged slogans we've come to expect at such events: "hey hey, ho ho [FILL IN THE BLANK] has got to go."
But the most notable ditty of the evening told of liberating Palestine "from the river to the sea". For anyone not immersed in the intricacies of Middle Eastern geography, those boundaries include the entire territory of pre-1967 Israel proper.
In other words, the protesters outside Max Brenner were calling for the annihilation of the Jewish state. As a waggish Israeli once put it in the spirit of his nation's wry sense of humour: "Of course those activists want peace. They want a piece of Tel Aviv, they want a piece of Haifa, and they want a piece of Jerusalem."
Members of that largely Anglo middle-class mob apparently hadn't received enough attention from daddy, and were taking out their existential angst on the world's only Jewish state. From affection-deprived child to embittered anti-Zionist/anti-Semite in three easy steps.
I also suspect the protest organisers deliberately chose Friday evening for their rally because they knew the advent of the Jewish Sabbath would free them from political competition. With all the serious Jews at synagogue, there could be no substantial pro-Israel counter-demonstration. So it was left to less observant Yidden such as I to see how the other one-half-of-one-per-cent lived.
The cops were out in force, showing laudable restraint in the face of some pretty obnoxious provocation. These riffraff formed a human barricade in front of the entrance to Max Brenner, denying people the ability to partake of its delectable wares. The hypocritical irony of protesting an alleged blockade of Gaza by forcibly blockading the entrance to a Jewish-owned business would be delicious if it weren't so obnoxious.
So let's all make haste to the nearest Max Brenner and raise a cup of hot chocolate in a toast to the inalienable right of the Jewish people to national self-determination. In the final equation, that's what this is really all about.
Ted Lapkin has worked as a ministerial advisor to the federal Coalition and as communications director to a senior member of the Republican leadership in the US Congress.
Before we all join the chorus of abuse against the robber agencies, let us not lose sight of what is happening in the eurozone. The EU authorities are attempting to muzzle free opinion, first by threatening Fitch, Moodys, and S&P with vague retribution, and then by drafting restrictive laws to prevent them from publishing unwelcome messages.
It is financial repression, pure and simple. The same will be done to the press in due course. Then to you, dear reader.
We must break the oligopoly of the rating agencies, says German finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble. By we, of course, he means the EU apparatus of coercion.
The European Commission has already created a pan-EU oversight body with binding powers to breathe down the necks of these agencies. It will draft restrictive legislation by the end of the year. The Portuguese downgrade ensures that it will be even nastier. Developments since the sovereign-debt crisis show we need to take a further look at reinforcing our rules, said Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso.
#1
So they can muzzle the rating agencies. Big deal. Then a default by a EU country will be a surprise to the non-informed, and the collapse will still take place. The financial patient will still be terminal. Morons (/channeling Holden Caulfield)
Posted by: Alaska Paul ||
07/07/2011 20:49 Comments ||
Top||
We've recently discussed the genocide of Srebrenica by the Serbs in the Bosnian civil war, and how it was organized by the Serb commander, Ratko Mladic. In case you're wondering whether or not it was really genocide, whether the UN was complicit, and whether the world would really like to forget the whole thing and move on, read this article.
Posted by: Steve White ||
07/07/2011 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11129 views]
Top|| File under:
#2
"The day after the collapse of Srebrenica, July 13, I arrived in Bratunac and stayed there for eight days. I was able to go wherever I wanted to. I was granted all possible assistance; nowhere was I stopped. Everybody is parroting everybody, but nobody shows hard evidence. I notice that in the Netherlands people want to prove at all costs that genocide has been committed. If executions have taken place, the Serbs have been hiding it damn well." - Dutch UN Officer Captain Schouten
Captain Schouten was the only UN military officer in Bratunac at the time the alleged genocidal transport from Srebrenica to Bratunac was supposed to have taken place.
"Naser Oric was the Islamist Commander at Srebrenica, who met with journalists, showed them videos of the bodies of Serbian civilians decapitated by his troops during raids on nearby villages."
"The supposed eyewitness reports of Serbian revenge killings at Srebrenica which have been much trumpeted by the mass media, are thoroughly contradictory. Not only do different witnesses give contradictory accounts but witnesses tell contradictory stories to different reporters."
"Serbian observers have been falsely quoted as admitting the massacre took place. Their objections to these supposed confessions have been refused for publication."
"The Muslims burned 192 villages in Eastern Bosnia, slaughtering many Serb civilians." - Dutch UN officer LTC Karremans
Serb cameraman and journalist Zoran Petrovic-Pirocanac is considering legal measures now that his work is being falsely used as legal evidence concerning mass murder.
The German weekly magazine Stern of 16 November 1995, placed the following caption under a picture taken from his videotape:
"Seconds before the murder: Armed Serbs contain a group of Muslims near Konjevic Polje. A Serb cameraman shot the scene until the first rounds were fired."
But Petrovic says he spent plenty of time at the scene, before as well as after he filmed. And he did not see or hear any gunshots, nor witness any crimes. As such, the Stern caption is pure fabrication, attached to his video stills, yet is now being used as evidence in criminal trials.
He also complains about the words Frank Westerman and Harm van den Berg of the Dutch daily 'NRC Handelsblad' put in his mouth: "In total, our forces have massacred two thousand Muslims." According to Petrovic, he did not say that, nor did he see evidence that Muslims were massacred, though many did die while armed and fighting.
One witness appearing at the trial about mass murders with two thousand or more victims is Mevludin Oric, from a town not far from Srebrenica. He has turned out to be a relative of Naser Oric.
Mevludin Oric left as a volunteer to Croatia in January 1992, getting military training there. After serving in the notorious Croatian volunteer brigade 'King Tomislav', he went to the city of Posavina, where the first mass murder took place and the war hadnt even started. Its victims were Serbs.
Mevludin Oric was captured by Serbs near Kravica and claims the Serbs took him via Bratunac to a school gymnasium in the town of Glumina, west of Zvornik. From there, the men were supposedly transported in lorries to the site of execution.
But his story has changed three times. The first time he was allegedly taken to "basketball stadium near Bratunac". In an interview a month later, he said it was at "soccer stadium in Nova Kasaba," from where he and others were moved to be killed, "probably in a town called Grbavce."
Two months after that, in yet another interview, he said he was taken to "a school in Krizevci".
Human Rights Watch has not been "able to trace survivors of this crime." But they still assert a crime has been committed.
In 1991, the SDA, the Muslim party of [Islamist leader] Alija Izetbegovic met in Congress held in December. The party decided to implement a radical ethnic policy with the ultimate goal the dzamahirija or Islamist State of Bosnia.
Muslims had to settle in Serb majority lands in Eastern Bosnia in large numbers. Thus, on the orders of the SDA, thousands of Muslims from Sandzak migrated to Bosnia, and descendants of Bosnian Muslims who had settled over a period of time in Turkey received an appeal to return.
In 1992, Serbs were shocked again as invitations were distributed throughout the republic for a mass meeting of Muslims at Bratunac, to be held at the first day of the Bajram, the celebratory end of the Ramadan.
The initiative for this event at the "geographic centre of Muslims from entire Yugoslavia" came from the National Muslim Council which openly advocated arming people and establishing a Muslim state within the Bosnian boundaries. Armed Muslim gangs, some of them factions of the Patriotic League which was formed in the neighboring Vlascenica started to intimidate and drive out Serb inhabitants of smaller towns with Muslim majorities.
That's where they lost me. It's an oxymoron. You're going to tell someone who is fighting for his life that he has to obey some law? War is a crime. There can be no law in war. Not if you're fighting to win.
#4
Despite some fine British and American trial work, the prosecution erred by insisting that all his crimes should be tried in one endless proceeding, and by the end of four years both the presiding judge and the defendant were dead, with no verdict taken.
Four years at the Hague and they couldn't pin a single crime on Milosevic? Fine trial work? Sounds like a monumental failure to me. Sounds like a miscarriage of justice. You keep a guy locked up for four years while you try to get your facts straight? How long are they gonna take with Mladic?
All during the 90's when these wars were being fought all I ever heard from the TV and newspapers was how bad those Serbians were. Only years later did I start to hear little bits and pieces that indicated there might have been two sides to the story. Then I started learning about the historical context going all the way back to the Middle Ages, the Crusades and the Turkish invasions of Europe. Then 9/11 happened. Then I started wondering if perhaps the Serbians know their enemy better than we do.
I guess my biggest problem here is that I don't believe the MSM will ever give us the whole truth about the Balkan Wars. This article is no better. It is obviously slanted toward assumptions of Mladic's guilt when the trial hasn't even started yet. And why the tie in with the Fourth of July? Mladic probably never even heard of it. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Honduras? Why would ATF walk guns to Honduras?
1. The national scope of the Gunwalker Scandal &
2. Because that's where some of the action is.
First, and this is important to understand: the Tampa operation proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that "Project Gunwalker" was a national strategy, not a Phoenix aberration. The "major media" has been slow to understand this. They have ignored the fact that the Houston Field Division had to have played a supervisory role in known straw buying incidents in Dallas and Columbus NM as they are in their area of operations, not Phoenix's. Original reporting on this subject from Texas has been pitiful.
Honduran officials report that Mexican drug traffickers are expanding their activities in the country and forming links with local bosses in four different provinces, fuelling concerns that organized crime is overwhelming the region.
According to Prensa Latina, Security Minister Oscar Alvarez said that the Sinaloa Cartel and the Zetas have been detected in Ocotepeque, Copan, Colon and Atlantida. The four northern states form much of the Atlantic coastline in Honduras, as well as a large chunk of the border with Guatemala. The Mexicans, Alvarez said, move freely throughout these regions, but rather than seeking to take over areas, the foreign gangs are working through already existing networks of local bosses to increase their presence and expand their operations.
This comes weeks after the discovery of a cocaine-processing lab, which are typically found in the Andean producer nations. This is the first such finding in Central America, and suggests a threat that is mutating. Currently, an estimated 400 tons of cocaine pass through the region on an annual basis, but Central America has not historically been a cocaine-processing region. Alvarez says that the goal for Honduras is to prevent Mexican gangs from laying down enduring roots in the country.
Authorities say that the Honduran cocaine lab was operated by the Sinaloa cartel. Arms stores belonging to the same group have also been captured in Honduras. The shift of cocaine processing from the Colombia, Peru and other Andean nations to Central America could fundamentally shift the economics of the cocaine supply chain. Rather than the South Americans controlling two vital steps in the process--i.e. the collection of the coca base and its processing in laboratories to produce crystallized cocaine--the Colombians would be left just supplying the base. This, in turn, would allow the Mexicans to derive significantly more profit, because instead of buying kilos of cocaine for up to $3,000, they can pay just $1,000 for the base and process it themselves, before selling it in U.S. for up to thirty times that amount.
Furthermore, this would shorten the distance that the cocaine needs to travel, which would both lower the transportation costs and decrease the chance of seizure. As a major center of operations, Central America is all the more appealing because the weaker law-enforcement agencies mean that there is less chance that expensive cocaine will be seized, which further reinforces the profitability of a northward shift.
As Mexican cartels infiltrate Central America, corrupt elements within the region's militaries from places like Honduras are providing them with arms far superior to those of local police. But the question remains: Just how many of the weapons used by Mexican cartels come from military stockpiles in Central America versus civilian gun stores in the United States?
The question is central. The source of the guns fueling a war that has left over 36,000 dead in Mexico since December 2006, has governments and advocate groups on both sides of the border pointing fingers. Mexico is reportedly considering suing U.S. gunmakers, reports CBS News.
The weapons coming from Central America only account for military-grade arms, which include anti-tank weapons as well as M-16 and G36 assault rifles.
The civilian versions of these weapons, such as the AR-15 and the AK-47 variants, account for many more of the seizures made in Mexico, according to several United States Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) sources consulted by InSight. Indeed, ATF agents have repeatedly told InSight that the most commonly carried weapons by cartel foot soldiers are modified, automatic AK-47 variants from Romania and China. These cheaper versions are readily available in many American gun stores and bought, legally, by straw buyers at the behest of middlemen who sell them, illegally, en masse to the cartels in Mexico.
#1
modified, automatic AK-47 variants from Romania and China. These cheaper versions are readily available in many American gun stores and bought, legally, by straw buyers at the behest of middlemen who sell them, illegally, en masse to the cartels in Mexico.
bought Automatics in the US, hmmmm? Why would they pay US gun store prices, then have to convert to fully auto (another Obama-regime lie) when they can get cheap fully auto on the black market? This stinks and there needs to be some prison time for these bastards
Posted by: Frank G ||
07/07/2011 14:38 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Honduras? Why would ATF walk guns to Honduras?
Because Honduras resisted a Chavez clone and upheld the Honduran Constitution.
"According to the head of customs for Mexico's tax administration, Raúl Díaz, in order to stop boats carrying contraband, the southern Mexican state of Chiapas is building a wall along the border river Suchiate, similar to the one the United States is building along its southern border with Mexico."
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.