We also know how the Brotherhood plans to pull off our destruction. Another MB document, this one undated, is called Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan. It describes a five-installment program for achieving the triumph of Shariah - together with a status report on the realization of several of the phases goals:
Phase 1: Discreet and secret establishment of leadership.
Phase 2: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities. [The MB] greatly succeeded in implementing this stage. It also succeeded in achieving a great deal of its important goals, such as infiltrating various sectors of the Government.
Phase 3: Escalation phase, prior to conflict and confrontation with the rulers, through utilizing mass media. Currently in progress.
Phase 4: Open public confrontation with the Government through exercising the political pressure approach. It is aggressively implementing the above-mentioned approach. Training on the use of weapons domestically and overseas in anticipation of zero-hour. It has noticeable activities in this regard.
Phase 5: Seizing power to establish their Islamic Nation under which all parties and Islamic groups are united.
Decades of autocratic government and a lack of free elections are, of course, the main drivers of the political upheaval in Egypt. But did the sinking dollar and skyrocketing food prices trigger the massive unrest now occurring in Egypt -- or the greater Arab world for that matter?
In addition to Egypt, the people have taken to the streets to varying degrees in Algeria, Jordan, Libya, Morocco, and Yemen. Local food riots have even broken out in rural China and other Asian locales.
Financial irresponsibility is not a conservative/progressive issue.
Eqypt's currency is pegged to the US $ and has been for some years. This link allows the US to basically export its inflation to vulnerable countries. Part of this mechanism is the flood of dollars being dropped from Bernanke's helicopter are being used to buy up commodities, hence prices are going up all over the world. 50 years ago in the USA, gasoline and fresh whole chicken were both 29 cents a gallon / pound. Places like Egypt where basic commodities use up almost all household income, a moderate rise in prices will cause immediate suffering.
[Ennahar] If the Iraqis got rid of Saddam Hussein in favor of an American invasion,
Is that what happened? Somehow I remember it differently.
other Arab people take their destiny in hand against regimes accused of using their absolute power to manage the state as their personal property, say analysts.
Bourhane Ghalioun, director of the Center for Arabic Studies at the Sorbonne in Gay Paree, noted the appearance of a "corrupt elite, backed by Western countries." "His only motivation was the accumulation of wealth, while their predecessors showed a willingness to change the lives of poor people," he said.
Huh? Clearly, I've lived in a different universe.
Here, try these rose-tinted glasses...
"In addition, leaders who cling for over 30 years in power want their offspring to succeed them. It is a provocation to the people," said the professor of political sociology of Syrian origin.
The fall of Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali after 23 years in power, and unprecedented challenge confronting geriatric President Hosni Mubarak is the sign of "failure of a model that combined a wild opening of the market with medieval despotism, "says he.
The democratic index established by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) in 2010 shows that "the Middle East and North Africa is the most repressive region in the world as 20 countries, 16 can be characterized as authoritarian."
Let's see: Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan -- but they're still at war... Turkey, perhaps?
Iraq, Leb, the Paleostinian Authority and Israel are considered "hybrid regimes", and all the other as authoritarian governments. All Arab countries arrive in the second half of the global picture, with 167 countries.
Interesting choices. But he does mention Israel and Iraq.
For Ghassan Salamé, professor of political science in Gay Paree, if the Arab world is familiar with tyranny since decolonization, there was a calamitous evolution over the past 30 years.
"Bourguiba and Boumedienne led an austere life and did not regard the state as their property," he says.
Perhaps that was a North African thing. The same cannot be said about Nasser, Arafat, Hafez al-Assad, Yasser Arafat, Saddam Hussein and his forgotten predecessor...
The father of the independence of Tunisia, Habib Bourguiba, has governed for 30 years from 1957 and Houari Boumediene has ruled Algeria from 1965 to 1978.
According to the expert of the Arab world, "it is from the 1970s that these regimes have begun to throw themselves in neo-liberalism to divert funds and establish corrupt governance by taking over whole sections of the economy".
Neo-liberalism? That's a fancy term.
The revolt is born of the refusal to see a minority in power richer while the majority live in poverty, and confiscation of speech.
"Arab societies were ready to explode for years, and it was by chance that the spark has occurred in Tunisia and the fire spread to Egypt," said Paul Salem, director of the Carnegie Center of Middle East based in Beirut.
"What is remarkable about these riots is that the slogans that have forced thousands of people to act in Egypt and Tunisia are the human rights ... which are not the same thing as individual rights, mind you... and those of citizen, social democracy and economic justice. It's a democratic and non-ideological program," he underlines.
While it is difficult to assess the wealth of these leaders for years have appeared dynastic republics. Bashar "Pencilneck" al-Assad ... hereditary dictator of Syria ... replaced his father who died in 2000, Hosni Mubarak wishes to hand over power to his son Gamal, and Libyan leader Muammar Qadaffy has the same ambition.
"These last 30 years, the only real opposition to authoritarian regimes was the Islamic movement, but in fact, movements in Egypt and Tunisia have been successful in a few weeks what the Islamic parties have failed to do for decades," says M. Salem.
"This proves that democracy has a current resonance stronger than Islamism, Arab nationalism or leftist ideas," he said.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/01/2011 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11135 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Has Jimmy Carter taken credit yet, for the "human rights" revolts?
With a 30-year time delay, of course.
Posted by: Bobby ||
02/01/2011 6:24 Comments ||
Top||
#2
The political elites in the west have looted far more than the political elites in the middle east.
It's just that we in the west are more productive, and so it shows less. Now the ability to borrow more debt has run out, we might see regime change in the west.
Hopefully away from the rent-seeking under and upper classes.
#3
The number of elite lackeys and their ostentatious displays were, I think a significant factor in the Tunisian and Egyptian situation. So was the fact that the suppression was clumsy rather than efficient.
BTW, this article attempts to smear the west by concocting a term 'neoliberalism' to mean corruption of society.
The article also attempts to downplay the distance between Israel and the Arab world by lumping the ntimidated by a militia Lebanon govt
and the Paleo 'Abbas hanging around without a mandate' govt with Israel's parliamentary democracy.
Posted by: Lord Garth ||
02/01/2011 9:14 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Mubarak may be a special case. Here is an article from the Telegraph detailing the wealth his family has accumulated while President of Egypt.
He, his wife and his children are worth 20 billion pounds ($32 billion at current rates). That's Bill Gates type money. He is originally from a small village in the Nile Delta. He is a career officer in the Air Force. His wife is a half-English woman from south Wales. (i.e. almost all his money has come since he became Air Marshall in 1973).
Unlike Bill Gates, who has changed the world, what has Mubarak done? You can expect that the vast majority of his money was siphoned off from government contracts or are bribes from businessmen. This vast graft is one of the main causes of the Egyptian protests.
Posted by: Frozen Al ||
02/01/2011 13:18 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Unlike Bill Gates, who has changed the world, what has Mubarak done?
Oh, I dunno. Kept Egypt from making war on Israel? (Muslim Brotherhood can't tell you how many Egyptians are alive today because of that. Not to mention how many Israelis.) Kept Hamas from getting all the weapons they want? (How many Palistinians would have died? Not to mention how many Israelis.) Survived numerous assassination attempts? Kept the oil flowing through the Suez Canal? For 30 years? So that's about a billion a year.
So he wasn't perfect. His successor won't be either. You want democracy? I think that's a pretty tall order in a Muslim country. As far as corruption goes, I think we have enough in this country so we don't have to go looking for it in Egypt.
Sorry for the rant. I'm just not all that crazy about Bill Gates.
#6
#5 - your points are excellent. Government by consent of the governed and Islam/Shariah are not compatible until proven otherwise. The same criticisms used against Mubarak can be used against the mad Mullahs of Iran.
#8
The main source of the Egyptian protests are the failure of the Egyptian economy to produce jobs for the huge cohort of young men of combat age. There would be far fewer in the street if they were all busy making money. That's the secret the Chinese learned. Their problem will come when their bubble bursts and their young men can't find either jobs or brides.
#9
All the accomplishment you guys mention are great for foreigners, not so much for Egyptians.
I'm not as worried about the Muslim Brotherhood as many other 'burgers, since alot of the "conflict" with Mubarak is like professional wrestling. I don't think the MB will do well without Mubarak's secret games.
As for Bill Gates: Don't be so hard on him. How many 'burgers would know the joys of the "Blue Screen of Death" if it wasn't for his software? :p
Posted by: Frozen Al ||
02/01/2011 17:08 Comments ||
Top||
#13
I dunno. When people think of the benighted finally getting themselves some of that good democracy, they think it means the lucky country will become like, maybe, Long Island.
What it means, if it works, is that the people get the government and the society the majority wants.
The question is...what does the majority want in Egypt? Sharia? The Bill of Rights? Peace with Israel?
Posted by: Richard Aubrey ||
02/01/2011 22:10 Comments ||
Top||
#14
...is that the people get the government and the society the majority wants.
People get the government they tolerate.
. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed - Declaration of Independence.
Risk analysts and intelligence agencies fear that Egypt's uprising may set off escalating protests in the tense Shia region of Saudi Arabia, home to the world's richest oilfields.
#2
Ash Sharqiyah would be the Republic of Eastern Arabia if we had a CIA that was as audacious as the OSS.
Posted by: Steve White ||
02/01/2011 13:53 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Good thing we started building nuke plants left and right after Sept 11. Oh, wait, we didn't. Crap. Egypt alone will send oil up because of the Suez, who knows what will happen if folks worry about Saudi oil. Of course the Saudis are probably
willing to hose down rioters.
#6
it would be 10 years before anything came online We are now completing the 10th year since the WOT began. What a wasted opportunity to become less dependent on terrorist oil.
#7
PEOPLES DAILY FORUM > EGYPT UNREST GROWS WORLD'S ENERGY RISK, espec via SUEZ CANAL international trasnshipments as Egypt is a major exporter of Oil-Gas + Cotton [textiles] despite not having a large domestic economy.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
