Posted by: jack salami ||
02/15/2010 5:33 Comments ||
Top||
#2
the WaPost had a front page article on the IPCC and climategate problems
it was well written but basically an apologia; that is, WaPo agrees that yes there were mistakes but that's too bad because we believe in man made climate change and further that such change requires coordinated world action
Posted by: lord garth ||
02/15/2010 8:14 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Ditto Jack. The "Climate Racket" is simply a money making means to numerous Liberal ends. The ultimate goal is power, control, and re-education via media CENSORSHIP! The BBC has long been the correct-speech, media scheme for Perfidious Albion's Liberals. We on this side of the pond should guard our conservative broadcasting venues with great resolve.
European wind developers are fleeing the EU's expiring wind subsidies, shuttering factories, laying off workers, and leaving billions of Euros of sovereign debt and a continent-wide financial crisis in their wake. But their game is not over. Already they are tapping a new vein of lucre from the taxpayers and ratepayers of the United States.
The Waxman-Markey Cap-and-Trade Bill appears to be politically dead since Republican Scott Brown's paradigm-shattering Massachusetts Senate victory. But alternative proposals being floated by Senator Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and others still promise billions of dollars to wind developers and commit the United States to generate as much as 20% of its electricity from so-called "renewable" sources.
The ghosts of Kamaoa are not alone in warning us. Five other abandoned wind sites dot the Hawaiian Isles -- but it is in California where the impact of past mandates and subsidies is felt most strongly. Thousands of abandoned wind turbines littered the landscape of wind energy's California "big three" locations -- Altamont Pass, Tehachapi, and San Gorgonio -- considered among the world's best wind sites.
Built in 1985, at the end of the boom, Kamaoa soon suffered from lack of maintenance. In 1994, the site lease was purchased by Redwood City, CA-based Apollo Energy.
Cannibalizing parts from the original 37 turbines, Apollo personnel kept the declining facility going with outdated equipment. But even in a place where wind-shaped trees grow sideways, maintenance issues were overwhelming. By 2004 Kamaoa accounts began to show up on a Hawaii State Department of Finance list of unclaimed properties. In 2006, transmission was finally cut off by Hawaii Electric Company.
California's wind farms -- then comprising about 80% of the world's wind generation capacity -- ceased to generate much more quickly than Kamaoa. In the best wind spots on earth, over 14,000 turbines were simply abandoned. Spinning, post-industrial junk which generates nothing but bird kills.
#3
yes, the 1st and second generation wind power generators didn't work well
and yes, once in a while a 3rd generation generator breaks
and yes, they don't work in light winds
notwithstanding that, the technology has improved enough that, if (maybe that should be 'when') power storage technology improves, wind power will, in many cases, be cost competitive with electricity from natural gas (OK, I realize I have 6 caveats in there)
and, furthermore, the income that farmers get from leasing their property to wind power companies does reduce the subsidies that the farmers require for other purposes
Posted by: lord garth ||
02/15/2010 9:05 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Over %50 of all electric power is lost in long distance transmission to local users...
HALF!!!
There are 2 possible solutions.
1) Superconducting transmission lines and transformers
2) Generate the power in the local neighborhood.
IF you had a nice Natural Gas Fuel Cell that could fit a neighborhood or home footprint... the effect would be massive! Add on to that natural gas generation from coal and natural gas powered autos and you can tell OPEC to take a hike!
As a practical matter though distributed generation won't happen any time soon due to the labyrinth of regulatory issues that work to preserve your power company's monopoly or the very limited oligopoly of which they are a part. The technical hurdles are miniscule compared to the this mess.
Glenn Reynolds' sensible account of the Tea Party movement notes that it is largely blogger-powered. My colleague Bob Wright would agree, but finds this technological development ominous. I dunno. Wright calls tea-partiers "Special Interest 3.0." But they look like people to me. Sure, they are not the majority--in that sense they are "special." But they are not "special" in that they seem to be representing their holistic interest as American citizens, not their partial identities as seniors, or union members, or veterans or employees of corporations. ...
Of course it would be easier to pass health care reform if all you had to do was cut a deal with labor unions and insurance companies and PhRMA--the o.g. lobbies of "Special Interest 1.0"--while ignoring the mass of individual voters. But you have to really contort yourself to think the replacement of narrow, economic interests with broader citizen interests is some sort of tragic turn of events. For decades good government types have been attempting to summon broad popular interests in order to defeat narrow economic interests. Now that it's happening they're having second thoughts (because they don't like the first result). ... Alternative theory: We got all the reforms we could get through old-fashioned interest group bargaining. The big reforms that have yet to be done are the ones that can't be accomplished that way. Empowering voters might ultimately be one way to achieve them. ...
Anyway, in the "good old days" of elite corporatist dealmaking you still would probably have trouble passing a giant piece of legislation that was 10 points underwater in terms of popularity. We had democracy even in 1950. ...
P.S.: Lots of intellectual effort now seems to be going into explaining Obama's (possible/likely/impending) health care failure as the inevitable product of larger historic and constitutional forces. There's something to this of course--the Framers went overboard in making it hard for the government to act, for example. But in this case there's a simpler explanation: Barack Obama's job was to sell a health care reform plan to American voters. He failed. He didn't fail because 55% of Americans can never be convinced of anything. It happens all the time. He just failed. . . . That's not constitutional paralysis or Web-enabled mob rule. It's just bad salesmanship. . . .
Posted by: Mike ||
02/15/2010 12:59 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
I might have helped if he'd had something decent to sell.
#4
It's strange, isn't it: most politicians, when something they propose doesn't go over well, generally react as a two-year old does when touching a hot stove: they cry and scream a lot but NEVER TOUCH THE STOVE AGAIN.
That is, after all, why reforming Social Security is so hard.
Bambi keeps grabbing the hot pan on the stove again and again. He doesn't learn.
Posted by: Steve White ||
02/15/2010 15:00 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Posted by: Gravinter Prince of the Antelope3830 ||
02/15/2010 19:14 Comments ||
Top||
Via New Zeal Blog
As a college student, Barack Obama expressed Marxist views, including the need for a new socialist U.S. government, according to a student who says he shared the future president's opinion at the time.
Such views by a college student may not be surprising. And like most students who hold radical views, Obama's positions, at least publicly, have evolved substantially.
However, this new window on Obama's youth and early political thinking demonstrates how little is known about the background of America's 44th president.
Dr. John C. Drew, a grant writing consultant in Laguna Niguel, Calif., tells Newsmax he met Obama in 1980 when Obama was a sophomore at Occidental College in Los Angeles. Drew had just graduated from Occidental and was attending graduate school at Cornell University.
Drew's then girlfriend, Caroline Boss -- now Grauman-Boss -- knew Obama because she shared classes with him at Occidental.
During Christmas break, Drew says he was at Grauman-Boss' home in Palo Alto when Obama came over with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, his roommate from Pakistan.
"Barack and Hasan showed up at the house in a BMW, and then we went to a restaurant together," Drew says. "We had a nice meal, and then we came back to the house and smoked cigarettes and drank and argued politics."
For the next several hours, they discussed Marxism. Also Video Interview
Posted by: ed ||
02/15/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under:
#3
Well... a number of people (not on the Burg) owe me apologies. He is still a volk-marxist, BTW- it comes out in his off-hand comments. He probably sees statism as a good start.
#4
Well he's a crony capitalist nowadays.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru
Sorry, nope g(r)omgoru . Democrats have "nationalized two automobile companies and want 1/6th of the American economy under "State" control via the "National Health Care Bill"; they are being influenced as a Marxist - Socialist Party as past experience has shown in 2009.
The Marxist conception of socialism is that of a specific historical phase that will displace capitalism and be a precursor to communism. The major characteristics of socialism (particularly as conceived by Marx and Engels after the Paris Commune of 1871), are that the proletariat will control the means of production through a workers' state erected by the workers in their interests. Economic activity is still organised through the use of incentive systems and social classes would still exist but to a lesser and diminishing extent than under capitalism.
#9
Socialism , the gateway drug to communism. Muppets fall for it every time , then whine and moan about government impositions on their life ..
BP's 'What's most interesting is how they afforded the BMW, had a nice restaurant meal and then ranted AGAINST capitalism!?' Is the one that stands out for me too .
Posted by: Oscar ||
02/15/2010 8:08 Comments ||
Top||
#10
As one of the biggest B.S. artists around in my teens and twenties, I become serious in equal measure to my former B.S. ways in my thirties. Which is exactly why Obama never fooled me, it takes one to know one.
Posted by: Marilyn Thrineper8949 ||
02/15/2010 9:23 Comments ||
Top||
#12
Eh, Alan, I wouldn't go so far as to call crony capitalism "synonymous" with fascism, or even with corporatism. They're both characterized by an emphasis on rent-seeking over competitive activities, but crony capitalism tends more towards private corruption, whereas corporatist rent-seeking relies on "a place at the table"-type public corruption.
I'd say that Geithner and Paulson were crony capitalists, and that Summers and Reich are corporatist.
I'm not sure that Obama's economic personality is well-developed enough to accurately diagnose his rent-seeking condition, but limited evidence from his time in Chicago suggests he's a crony capitalist in private life and a corporatist in public affairs. Giannoulias and Ayers, in other words, are the mobbed-up and Maoist angels on Barrack's shoulders.
Posted by: Mitch H. ||
02/15/2010 10:28 Comments ||
Top||
#13
What's most interesting is how they afforded the BMW, had a nice restaurant meal and then ranted AGAINST capitalism!?
No doubt it was young Mr. Obama's friend's car, just as no doubt said friend paid for the dinner, just for the pleasure of Mr. Obama's conversation. This is the same friend, after all, who took him pheasant shooting over Christmas break back home in Pakistan. And no doubt Mr. Obama tactfully refused to take notice of the sordid financial transactions occurring under his nose as he pontificated so charmingly.
#15
Mitch, IIRC Mussolini invented the term and corporatism and fascism and they were used at the time interchangeably with fascism.
The key identifier is that Profit is privatized and Loss is socialized all under the heavy regulatory hand of gov't. Ownership in the socialist/communist sense is not all that important if the government controls whatever gets done anyway.
In our system we are slipping farther and farther down that slide. This is not only a Democrat feature but it is primarily so. They are the ones that insist on using Federal Tax funds to protect their cronies from loss with the likes of FDIC, Fannie & Freddit.
#1
It is my opinion that President Obama and many of his closest advisers live in a fantasy world. They are adherents to academic theories that have never seen practical application being administered by people who have no practical experience at applying anything at all. But they seem to behave as if they all just "believe" hard enough, it can be made to come to pass.
They live in a Peter Pan world of economics and social policies at a time when we are under severe economic threat and face real threats to our physical security.
They have practically no alternative other than to fail. If their theories are even fundamentally correct, they are still doomed to failure because even the most correct initial theories require tweaking due to various unforeseen failures that occur only once they are put into practice. And if the theories are perfect they are still doomed to fail because the people putting them into practice have no experience in administration of anything beyond activist groups or political campaigns.
In sort, it will be a real miracle if Obama and his cronies don't do severe damage to this country. I see no way they can help but fail. They have neither the doctrine nor the experience with any track record of success at anything other than winning an election.
We're being walked over the cliff by an idiot and his band if jesters.
#2
Wehell, lessirree, what will be ISRAEL = TEL AVIV's reaction iff PRO-AL QAEDA JIHADI SALAFISTS suborn or otherwise destroy HAMAS, PLO, + GAZA-WEST BANK PA, which in turn invites a hardline response from ANTI-HAMAS, ANTI-AL QAEDA, PROTO-NUKE ISLAMIST IRAN VIA NASRALLAH + HIZBOLLAH???
As the saying goes, ISRAEL > "DAMNED IFF IT DO, DAMNED IFF IT DON'T", save now wid [post-2012]IRANIAN + FUTURE MILTERR NUKES ON TOP.
#3
FYI JUST TO BE FAIR, WORLD NEWS > CHECHEN REBEL LEADER [Doku Umarov] VOWS TO ATTACK RUSSIA'S CITIES; + CHECHEN LEADER: WE WILL SPREAD JIHAD TO RUSSIA'S CITIES, HEARTLAND.
#2
At Hot Air one of the most interesting comments made was this:
Forget for a moment the immorality of her actions consider the stupidity! Who in their right mind leaves Dartmouth Grad Army Officer for Marxist Bookstore Clerk??
As to those young, funny, book-reading guys she hung out with (and slept with, Id be willing to bet, though she doesnt mention that) while her husband was defending our country (and her children were doing what, exactly?) Honey, they *all* have dissertations on U.S. imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which is why theyre unemployable except at independent bookstores.
Theyll be just the same at 50 as they were at 20, but they wont be so young and it wont be so funny that theyre still making $10 an hour and ranting self-righteously about imperialism whenever you try to watch a movie, cook dinner, go trick-or-treating, or attend the school talent show.
Oh, and she has no right to complain if her new husband does unto her as she did unto others and leaves her for a 19 year old barista working toward her degree in Poststructural Feminism.
#3
Um...coming from a stepfather of a Sapper currently serving his 2nd tour, who's wife had the audacity to tell him she was leaving him on the MORNING of his deployment, I withhold my comments here and suggest interested Rantburgers utilize (as I will) the email this POS Courtney Cook advertises on her blog:
cc@courtneycook.us
#5
I had a bash at her too - what is she, the volunteer pinata of the week? I would hope that in real life, for the sake of her family and friends that she is not really so toweringly self-centered, and callous as she came off in her essay, but I'm not holding my breath on it.
#6
I suspect that what we have here is an even stranger psychology than what appears.
While some women are attracted to men they think are "fixer uppers", that they can "reform" into Prince Charming (and are invariably disappointed), some leftist women equate "fixer upper" with military men.
They think that by using copious amounts of their feminine wiles, as it were, they can convince ROTC cadets to drop out, grow long hair, and become leftist hippies. Seriously.
I saw this back in the 1980s. Among cadet girlfriends, the majority were military-friendly, but there were a few wild radicals who dated cadets with the idea of "converting" them.
It never happened, and eventually the groupie would hook up with some manifesto-carrying beard and leave the AO. Only the pro-military girls ever married into the military, and they were quite happy there.
In the long run, the soldier is probably much better off, though he doesn't think so right now.
#8
Unless they changed the law, a minimum of 10 year of service before she can latch on to part of the retirement. Alimony and privileges are only via minor children if she has legal guardianship. They get 'em though she 'chaperons'. When they turn 18 or 21 if attending college, that access disappears as well.
#9
...oh, and the last time I checked in, there was a case in the court pending the process where a service member choose to allow his contract to end without applying for qualified retirement so that there was no hit on that by the ex. She was appealing the act and seeking access.
#10
Sounds like this broad saw "Coming Home" on the Late Night movie and thinks she's Jane Fonda.
Good to see the kid tuck it to her. Probably drove her nuts.
The wheel turns and karma is a bitch. She'll get her's someday...
#11
No doubt tough for hubby, but in the long run, a major improvement in his life.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey ||
02/15/2010 12:21 Comments ||
Top||
#12
What she has to say for herself in a followup post:
So I published this article on Salon last week and it got some attention. I got a lot of comments on the piece itself and some blogs picked it up too. It was a bizarre trip into online publishing. One thing I discovered is that if you publish online there are people who have never met you who will address you by your first name and curse you in the most vile possible way. A lot of readers keyed on the lead which was quite obviously ironic nothing important is ever simple, especially not the break-up of a marriage.
Jezebel linked to it and their commenters raised interesting things about the behavior of soldiers on deployment I had never thought about. Several military spouse blogs like LeftFace linked to it, and Im still surfing an intense, profane, hate-filled anger from many (though not all) of those readers. I also heard directly from many current and ex-military who thanked me for telling my story. My family including my ex-soldier and my friends read it and understood it but they already knew me.
What I wanted to shed a light on was how two decades of military involvement overseas has been disproportionately hard on American service members and their families including mine. What I hadnt planned on was that the word marxist would be so incendiary, nor that a womans wanting to define her sexuality on her own terms would be considered selfish. Salon picked the title. I wanted to call it On Leaving a Soldier.
I have never thought of anybody a "piece of shit" before. Now I have.
#13
And, having thought of somebody as a "Piece of Shit", I have to do some serious repenting. Pray for those who are so blind that they will not see, and for those expressing judgmental attitudes.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.