"Yar, we be the indigenous Pirates of Pennsauken."
The FCC yesterday shut down Pennsauken, NJ-based "El Sol 95.3," which began broadcasting 24/7 in January and could be heard throughout the Philadelphia area. According to AP, federal authorities seized equipment from the station, which had been the subject of repeated complaints from stations with similar frequencies located throughout the region. A group called The Moors operated El Sol, and the group claimed that U.S. laws do not apply to the groupâs members because they are indigenous Americans who, they claim, have lived on the continent since the beginning of time. A man representing the station told a visiting FCC field agent in January that El Sol was authorized under the "Great Seal" and offered a homemade document signed by "Queen Ali," according to a federal civil complaint filed May 17 in a Newark, NJ U.S. District Court. Members of the Moors, also known as the Al Moroccan Empire, were in summer 2003 accused of operating a money fraud ring.
Posted by: Seafarious ||
05/20/2004 11:04:10 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11130 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Wildstyle - Pirate Radio!
(Prize awarded for the first person to correctly identify this reference.)
Posted by: Chris W. ||
05/20/2004 11:18 Comments ||
Top||
#2
More on the Al-Moroccan Empire: [One of the ringleaders], the former head of the Atlantic City Housing authority, allegedly had run-ins with the law before. He had been charged with taking bribes in Atlantic City when James Usary was mayor, and stealing taxpayer funds when he was involved in rebuilding houses on Osage avenue that burned during the MOVE disaster.
A Google search on this group is quite eye-opening.
#3
A group called The Moors operated El Sol, and the group claimed that U.S. laws do not apply to the groupâs members because they are indigenous Americans who, they claim, have lived on the continent since the beginning of time.
I suppose the founder of the group was suckled from birth by a she-wolf, and is never without his rubber ducky?
Trouble at Euro 2004 could see England kicked out of the tournament. But the authorities say they have a better chance than ever of beating the hooligans. England have two chances of going down in history following Euro 2004. One is as the first England team to win the championships, the other is to be the first national squad thrown out because of its fans.
After trouble between England and Turkey fans during the qualifiers a year ago, Uefa warned it would not tolerate further violence, and the Football Association didnât take up its ticket allocation for remaining group matches against Turkey and Macedonia. Police have since been busily issuing hooligans with banning orders to prevent them joining real fans at the tournament. By the time England play their first game against France on 13 June, police expect some 2,500 people to have been tackled in this way.
Supportersâ groups have also been working to beat the problem of hooliganism, advising Portuguese authorities on the best way to police fans. Never has so much effort been put in to making sure a tournament passes off peacefully. Have the hooligans finally been trounced?
In a word: no. Damn shame the Turks arenât going.
Posted by: Howard UK ||
05/20/2004 4:36:06 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11128 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
I've heard of the "ugly American" but the "ugly Englishman?"
Police have uncovered evidence of fraud within Brazilâs department of health thought to run into hundreds of millions of dollars. It is alleged that civil servants were among those who profited from the purchase of blood supplies imported from abroad throughout the 1990s. On Wednesday 14 people were arrested in three Brazilian cities. The darkly named Operation Vampire has revealed fraud said by the Brazilian government to total $637m. The money was allegedly siphoned off by civil servants and others involved in the state purchase of blood supplies used to treat haemophilia.
From 1990 until 2002 Brazilâs department of health was buying the supplies from abroad for a fixed price of 41 US cents per unit. That figure seemed suspiciously high to the countryâs new government, which launched an investigation after taking office last year. Those detained include businessmen and civil servants, among them a senior accountant from the department of health. Exact details of the investigation are still emerging. But the allegation seems to be that government employees were buying blood at one price, invoicing the state for a higher amount and profiting from the difference. Announcing details of the arrests, Brazilâs justice minister said he was committed to fighting corruption whether it occurred inside or outside government.
Posted by: Mark Espinola ||
05/20/2004 11:29:58 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
True (and sad) story: My best friend in high school was a hemophiliac whose parents were missionaries in Brazil. When he was about 10 or so, Lance tripped and fell in the jungle, nearly bled out, and received blood and "blood products" from the Brazilians that infected him with HIV. Lance died of encephalitis a few months after graduation. Makes you wonder. RIP Lance, we still miss you.
Severely EFL
Press Briefing by Margot Wallström, European Commissioner for the Environment, Brussels, 18 May 2004 *snip*
The EU is determined to take the lead and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions. We are all in this together - Member States must support each other in their efforts to reduce emissions and each of them knows that for the single EU wide trading system to work they must all follow the same rules and criteria. Blah, blah, blah...
Last year the Member States took the stupid unanimous decision to give up their sovereignty a central role to Emissions Trading as the key instrument for the EU to implement its Kyoto Protocol obligations. They made this choice because emissions trading is the most cost effective shell game way of meeting our international target of an 8% reduction in EU emissions. They also agreed that the Commission would act as a dictator "referee" to ensure that there is fair play between the Member States. *snip*
As you probably know, EU-15 Member States were required to submit their plans by 31 March and EU-10 by 1 May. To date we have received 12 plans. What, you mean some countries werenât obedient to their masters and didnât turn them in? For shame! *snip*
The total quantity of allowances is the key decision. My first impression is that many of the notified plans go for a rather high quantity of allowances. And you were surprised about this why, exactly?
This is entirely predictable disappointing and makes the Commissionâs scrutiny of plans all the more important. All markets require some scarcity to function. [Not scarcity imposed by the government, twit.]
The perceived lack of scarcity is being clearly reflected in the market price of allowances that are already being traded. The Commission has noted that the price of allowances has fallen from â¬13 in January to around â¬7 now. Too many allowances, and a resulting low price of allowances, will create little incentive to be obedient socialists change behaviour. In order to meet our Kyoto obligations we need to see investments in emission reductions so we need to jack up prices in our little shell game a meaningful price signal for CO2 emissions. *snip*
Therefore I have decided to begin to think about holding a committee meeting to plan a meeting, etc. preparations for infringement proceedings against those EU-15 Member States which have not yet submitted their plans. That would be Belgium, Greece, France, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. Our "friends" the Frogs didnât turn in their homework on time? Iâm shocked! (NOT) Plus câest change, plus câest meme chÃŽse
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 2:02:10 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
The EU is determined to take the lead and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
You can start with fewer self-congratulatory press briefings, Ms. Wallbanger. Think of all the oxygen you're wasting!
#2
Veeeery interesting! Since France and Belgium have highest percentage of power generation from nuclear fuel and very highly efficient electrified railways I wonder what the problem is here in getting a start?
Posted by: Jack is Back! ||
05/20/2004 14:55 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Jack is Back!: Hot air from their politicians? Too many farts? (But I repeat myself.)
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 15:32 Comments ||
Top||
#4
The EU is determined to take the lead and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
Barbara - Hot air from their politicians? Too many farts?
Remember that flatulance is essentially odorized methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
#6
BigEd - Yes, I know. That's why New Zealand demanded corks for cows and sheep (or something like that, anyway). :-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 15:47 Comments ||
Top||
#7
Oh, France is "special," all right . . .
Let's hope al-Q doesn't try lighting a match in Paris; half the continent would go up . . .
Posted by: The Doctor ||
05/20/2004 15:48 Comments ||
Top||
#8
Th politically correct term is "bio-efluent emmisions". They are the major source of volatile organic chemicals in the workplace. If there is not enough ventilition and they build up and there is an ignition source----BOOM. We should be so lucky that this would happen over there. Boomed by their own BEE's.
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
05/20/2004 17:26 Comments ||
Top||
#9
The EU is determined to take the lead and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
#2
All such statements are relative. What the Guardian is saying is American media is not as left wing as we are.
Also note the manufactured news item. Guardian gets x hits from the USA hence Americans are 'hungry' for left wing news. An equally plausible hypothesis is that educated right wingers like myself are just checking out news items.
Posted by: Phil B ||
05/20/2004 9:30 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Ok. So now we know of one person (the author of this piece, Jackie Ashley) who wants to bear Moore's love child.
#4
The only way I'll sign up for this club is if we put muck4doo in charge of re-spelling *HEART* into something I can live with. And shame on you CF for causing me to lose my appetite for breakfast.
#6
Is this the same writer who analysed the whole of America after visiting an Olive Garden??
If nothing else, this artice shows how clueless the Euro's are at understanding Americans.
Tip to Guardian - if the Sundance Festival gives someone a 20 minute standing ovation - you can rate their popular support by Americans as being equal to the support we gave to Air America ....(for the clueless - that would be .000001 percent of our population).
It's good for Bush, though. As the un-insane Dem's start to find themselves in the uncomfortable position of being the party of Michael Moore, Jerry Springer and Fat Bloated Ted, we conservatives are enjoying our new "morally superior" status.
Posted by: B ||
05/20/2004 12:33 Comments ||
Top||
...At a time of national self-doubt, the Massachusetts senator hopes to project an image of reassuring strength that melds âcan-doâ American optimism with a call for a return to the sense of community." Kerry said, "Talking about âLet America be America againâ is tapping into that value system that people think makes this country strong.
" ...And I have a long list of international leaders who are telling me how to do it! Why, just the other day, I was on the phone with Kofi Annan who was advising me on how the United States should conduct itâs affairs..."
Please, Senator Kerry, enlighten us as to which time period of American history you would return us? The Carter 70âs with itsâ double digit inflation, and pussified treatment of the Iran situation? Maybe the Clinton era of, "If everyone is making a lot of money, they wonât care that Iâm getting it on in the oval office?
No, Iâm sure you mean something like the Roosevelt Era, but of course, that would mean a no-holds-barred facing off against oppressive regimes with every resource at our disposal, and creative, bi-partisan efforts to right the countryâs financial problems. No? Oh, you mean like the Kennedy Era. Hmmm... okay. Well, putting aside his extramarital behavior I seem to recall a certain missile crisis, where if our country had so much as blinked in itâs resolve to oppose an evil regime, weâd all be speaking Russian now, or just glowing green in our graves. And hey, which president was so committed to fighting the spread of Communism, that he sent our first "advisors" over to Viet Nam to help out the French?
Well, at any rate, once youâre done consulting with just about everyone else in the world except Americans, on clarifying what America really needs to get back to, please clarify it for the rest of us. I wonât hold my breath though, you havenât the best record when it comes to clarity, or consistency.
Via Instapundit. EFL. From the "Lowdown" column by Lloyd Grove, New York Daily News, 5/19/04
Official respect for the First Amendment is apparently in steep decline. The other day, an intrepid journalist and truth-seeker was grilling a powerful public figure. But before the interview was over, the powerful public figureâs press aide abruptly broke in as tape rolled and stopped the interrogation.
Tim Russert interviewing Colin Powell?
Nope.
Try Brian Lehrer interviewing Tim Russert. Iâm shocked, shocked, I tell you! Read the rest. Of course, we all know that the rules made up by the anointed for other people donât actually apply to the anointed themselves.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 2:09:38 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11132 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Brian Lehrer - whose he?
Whoever he is, smooth PR move on his part.
Posted by: B ||
05/20/2004 14:56 Comments ||
Top||
FROM A DRUID PRAYER
May we be as trees:
Growing in strength and wisdom
Nourishing ourselves with the light of the sun, the food of the earth, the drink of the water, and the breath of the air.
Ever-reaching up, as much as we cast our roots down. Giving shelter and comfort to those who pass by. Being always there for someone to hug when they need it, A solid friend to talk to.
Via: realclearpolitics.com
But what did we hear from the crowd in Washington? Nothing but complaints. âThis is terrible.â âItâs the presidentâs fault.â âRaid the oil reserves.â âItâs a scandal to pay more than two bucks a gallon for gas.â Calm down. Please.
As my optimistic pumping pal predicted Wednesday morning, gas prices will eventually retreat. No, gas will never again cost 35 cents a gallon, as it did when I was in high school. But houses wonât ever cost $17,000 again, either. The New York Times attempted to put it in perspective when it reported Wednesday that âwhen inflation is taken into account, gasoline is cheaper than it was in 1981.â The Timesâ editorial page even harrumphed about âGasoline Hysteriaâ and gave a grudging nod of approval in the direction of the White House for continuing to build the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. While some phonies in the nationâs capital pretend to be panicked about gas prices, regular people seem a little more sanguine. While I was at the gas station yesterday, I spied the manager. âIs business slow because of that boycott?â I asked. He hadnât even heard about it. âItâs the darn dest thing,â he said, shaking his head and pointing toward the $2.15 sign. âWeâve been busier than ever.â
Posted by: badanov ||
05/20/2004 11:46:24 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11134 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
While some phonies in the nationâs capital pretend to be panicked about gas prices,
#3
Just in the spirit of pissing off some people brotherhood, I'd like to report that I paid $1.79 at Sheetz the other day when I filled up. I think it's since gone up to $1.85.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 14:12 Comments ||
Top||
#4
$1.82 here in S.C.........bwhahaha......I can think of a lot more things to piss & moan about then the price of gas.
#6
Precisely, spiffo. Much as the hand-wringing news media would like the opposite.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 15:37 Comments ||
Top||
#7
It's $2.50US/gal regular in Toronto Canada. BTW, up here, prices fluctuate about +/- 9 cents, sometimes on the same day. That's what pisses me off the most. One morning I was driving to work and out of sheer laziness I decided to fill up later that day. I remember thinking, even if it did increase, it would only do so by maybe 5 cents at the most. Coming back that same afternoon, the price went up 11 cents. F*cking bastards.
Posted by: Rafael ||
05/20/2004 18:29 Comments ||
Top||
#8
In Germany you are looking at about $5.40 a gallon... (â¬1.20 a liter)...
Just the blowoff...
...The single most important Public Diplomacy official in the government is the Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs. But Charlotte Beers left that job in March 2003 and wasn't replaced for nine months. Her successor, Margaret Tutwiler, an able diplomat and information specialist, made it clear she didn't want the job, She said last month she's leaving June 30. Meanwhile, the Board of Broadcasting Governors, which operates independently of the rest of the P.D. system and has a budget nearly as big as the State Department's, has closed the Arabic service of Voice of America and started Radio Sawa, which mainly plays pop music. An expensive U.S. satellite-TV network in the Mideast has promise -- but it's not clear whether its goal is to build audience or actually change minds. Public diplomacy today, as Woody Allen said in an utterly different context, is "a travesty of a mockery of a sham." But it requires only a single step to fix. Just as the President declared war on terror, he needs to declare a mobilization of public diplomacy to support that war -- to eviscerate our enemies in the battle of ideas and images. He'll find eager warriors in the public and private sectors. He should begin by naming a Cabinet-level counselor in the White House to set and monitor an overall P.D. strategy for State, Defense, broadcasting and the rest of government. It's incredible, but we don't have a strategy today. The U.S. is home to Madison Avenue and Hollywood, to the world's best political polling and commercial marketing. But we are failing miserably to win hearts and minds, not just in the Middle East but around the world. There's no excuse. None at all.
#2
Actually, I don't think that the USIA or Radio Free XXX ever had much of an effect on the Cold War. The Soviet Union won the propaganda battle consistently, with smaller resources, and with so many strikes against them that everyone but Robert Conquest lost count.
It was reality that did them in - the fact of US prosperity, of European prosperity, of Asian tiger prosperity. There is only so much damage a skewed press can do - a lot, but it can buck reality for only so long.
#3
I tend to agree w/the author on this one. As for the USSR, American t.v. and seeing/hearing commercials advertising unbelievable new products really helped us win that. The average joe communist learned through information flow both audio & visual how f*cked they really were. I say pursue this angle to the hilt.
#5
"I don't think that the USIA or Radio Free XXX ever had much of an effect on the Cold War."
So says someone who never lived in a society where all the information sources are controlled by the government. Guys, in the 1950s the "average joe communist" had NO source of non-party-approved information, other than rumor. (Old Soviet joke about the two principal Moscow newspapers: "There is no news in Pravda [Tr: "Truth"] and no truth in Isvestia [Tr: "News"].) Foreign broadcasts (including the American-backed radios) were the only exception, and they must have had at least some effect, because the U.S.S.R. and its satellites spent beaucoup bucks jamming them. (As for American TV getting into Russia, CNN-- the first network that had any penetration there at all-- didn't even go on the air until 1980.) Think of the US without the blogosphere. No, worse than that. No, even worse. (Any reader from the old Soviet bloc want to chime in on this?)
And as for "the Soviet Union won the propaganda battle consistently," many of the third-country Communist movements were Soviet funded. They made a lot of noise, and that made it difficult to find winners or losers. But think: It's amazing how many of these "popular movements" disappeared as soon as the funds dried up. (Seems like about the only people who fell for Soviet propaganda were the useful idiots among the western left.)
Posted by: Old Grouch ||
05/20/2004 21:26 Comments ||
Top||
#6
buwaya> if you look at even American t.v. which needs to show commercials to exist minus pbs - then that is US gov't PR. Your opinion maybe that VOA had no impact which is debateable (I've never lived in the bloc so can't say) but I'd say the best PR our gov't had in that situation was cnn showing American life.
It seems like everything is getting more expensive. A gallon of milk, a piece of lumber, a new mattress -- all have gone up in price in recent weeks. Production has not kept up with demand for everyday items, such as gasoline and milk, and, as a result, theyâre becoming more expensive. Right now, the power to set prices for key commodities belongs to suppliers, said Anne Davis, director of the Bureau of Economic Research at Marist College in Poughkeepsie. "So the suppliers can say, âAha! I can charge whatever I want,'" Davis said.
Consumers feel powerless. Michelle Ross, a Middletown cashier, looks for sales to trim money from her shopping bills. "We only get a raise once a year," Ross said yesterday. "I just buy whatâs on sale." But for products like milk, shoppers have no choice. "You need it, so you buy it, whatever it is," Ross said. "What else can you do?"
Hereâs whatâs going on:
Gasoline: A year ago, gas cost $1.71 a gallon in the New York metro area, according to the Automobile Club of New York. A month ago, the price was at $1.93 a gallon. Now gas is at a record high of $2.13 a gallon in the New York area. Yesterday, prices for a gallon of gas ranged from $2.09 in Matamoras, Pa., to $2.17 in Liberty. "We do not have enough refinery capacity to keep up with the increased demand for gasoline," said Robert Sinclair, a spokesman with the Automobile Club of New York. If a refinery went down or a pipeline broke, like in Arizona last year, Sinclair said there would be even higher gasoline prices. "Forty percent of the American population lives paycheck to paycheck," Sinclair said. "It makes it very difficult on the average American who just does not have the elasticity in their budget to deal with these fluctuating gas prices."
Dairy: The prices for milk, butter, cheese and ice cream have all been going up recently. The culprit: fewer milking cows. "Typically in the U.S., milk production increases about 1 [percent] to 2 percent per year," said Larry Salathe, senior economist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "Last year we had no increase in milk production." In fact, milk production in the first quarter was down 2 percent and is expected to stay down, Salathe said. So prices will likely stay up. Also, dairy farmers are getting more money for milk, causing store prices to go up, said Salathe. The USDA increased the wholesale level of milk 52 cents per gallon for May. At ShopRite on Dolson Avenue in Middletown yesterday, a gallon of whole milk cost $3.49. Thatâs up from a national average of $2.91 in April and well over the previous record of $3 in February and March 1999.
Building materials: A hot housing market has caused prices of building materials such as lumber to go up 30 percent to 40 percent since the winter, said Monroe Levine of Fallsburg Lumber. Nationally, housing starts topped 2 million units in March, said Shawn Church, editor of Random Lengths, a newsletter publishing company in Oregon that tracks softwood lumber and panel markets. Thatâs up 15 percent from the March 2003 figure of 1.74 million housing starts. "This is as strong a home-building market as we have seen," Church said. "Especially when you consider that the houses built today generally are bigger than they were in past years." Softwood lumber prices are up 63.7 percent from $281 per 1,000 board feet a year ago to $460 per 1,000 board feet now, Church said. The price of plywood is up 123 percent from $264 per 1,000 square feet a year ago to $589 per 1,000 square feet now, Church said.
Furniture: Steel prices are up 30 percent since January, according to Reuters. One of the main reasons behind the increase is that China, which is doing a lot of building to prepare for the 2008 Olympics, is demanding more steel. As a result, furniture prices are up. Don Urmston, owner of Furniture Options in Goshen, is paying 7 percent more for mattresses. He expects the price of recliners to also increase. "Towards the fall, prices would jump up probably in the range of 5 percent," Urmston said of recliners. "But whether the retail consumer will see that, I donât know." One of Urmstonâs suppliers recently notified him that for a number of reasons, including oil and steel prices increasing, the price of all furniture could go up as much as 34 percent this year. Kevin Jacobs, manager of Royal Furniture in Port Jervis, has seen prices for everything from sofas to chairs go up. The average mattress is up about $40, from $699 to $740, Jacobs said.
Paper goods: This is a hike thatâs looming for consumers. Distributors are experiencing price hikes that will soon affect stores and eventually shoppersâ pocketbooks. The culprit here is higher prices for pulp and fuel. "Iâve seen a lot of increases in the past two, three weeks on almost all the products we buy," said Carl Morse, vice president of E.A. Morse & Co., a paper supply distributor in Middletown and Hudson. Last week alone, 25 different companies notified distributors like E.A. Morse that prices are going up, Morse said. Solo Cup Co. and Sweetheart Cup Co. increased prices of all paper products 8 percent on Sunday. Kimberly Clark raised prices 6 percent on certain products May 1. "The percentages of increase are from 3 percent and they go as high as 12 percent," Morse said. "We have to raise our prices."
Posted by: Mark Espinola ||
05/20/2004 11:08:00 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11135 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
I heard at a BBQ Sunday about the new pressure treated wood that will react poorly to standard galvinized hardware. The old stuff has been changed due to health concerns. The new stuff requires expensive stainless hardware and extra galvanized nails and screws. The new hardware is ten times more expensive. That deck may have to wait.
Anybody know whether this is true as this was keg banter.
#3
Lucky, ask and ye shall receive: Fasteners (and other metal products) for use with ACQ pressure-treated wood products: ⢠Hot-Dip Galvanized*
Fastener and hardware manufacturers have suggested the minimum Hot-Dip Galvanized requirements for use with treated wood should conform to the following ASTM Standards: ASTM-A153 (for Hot-Dip fastener products) and ASTM-A653 (Coating Designation G-185 for Hot-Dip connector and sheet products). ⢠Stainless Steel
Stainless steel fasteners and connectors are required for Permanent Wood Foundations below grade and are recommended for use with treated wood in other severe exterior applications such as swimming pools, salt water exposure, etc. - Type 304 and 316 are the recommended grades to use. ⢠Other fasteners and hardware as recommended by the manufacturer
There may be additional products (other than stainless steel or hot-dip galvanized) which are suitable for use with ACQ (Alkaline Copper Quaternary) pressure-treated wood. Please consult with the individual fastener or hardware manufacturer for recommendations for use of their products with ACQ pressure-treated wood. ⢠Aluminum should not be used in direct contact with ACQ (Alkaline Copper Quaternary) pressure-treated wood
Spacer materials or other physical barriers are recommended to prevent direct contact of ACQ pressure-treated wood and aluminum products.
Hot-dipped galvanized is ok to use, cheap surface-plated galvanized isn't. I'd never use plated anyway, it flakes off.
Posted by: Steve ||
05/20/2004 13:26 Comments ||
Top||
#4
I'd also recommend hitting that pressure treated wood on the deck with some sort of stain. I hit my front porch and back deck with this redwood Behr stain (from Home Depot; don't buy Behr paint, I'm told it sucks), looks much, much better than exposed pressure treated. Most people are convinced you don't have to hit pressure treated wood with this stuff. If you're so inclined, just wait 10-15 years when you're rebuilding your deck.
Oil prices were on the skids today as traders took profits on speculation that supply may not be so tight in coming months, writes Jane Padgham. The worldâs largest oil exporters are planning to step up production in an effort to dampen spiralling prices, according to reports. Saudi Arabia appears to have persuaded even the most reluctant members of the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to agree to lift the cartelâs output quota by 6 percent, or 1.5 million barrels a day, when they meet in Amsterdam on Saturday. But some, including Venezuela and Iran, do not want to give the impression they are caving in to pressure to lower prices. They are expected to argue the final decision should not be taken before Opecâs next formal meeting, in Beirut on 3 June.
US crude fell 45 cents to $40.09 a barrel, extending yesterdayâs losses which saw it dive more than a dollar after hitting a record $41.85 on Monday. In London, Brent crude fell 35 cents to $36.60. "Thereâs a lot of bullish news factored into the price and the market is vulnerable to any moderation in demand and/or pick-up in supply," said David Thurtell, commodities strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Analysts expect data due today to show a rise in US gasoline stocks ahead of the key summer driving season. Meanwhile, the FTSE 100 share index was expected to open 10 points higher at 4424, after a robust performance by the Dow last night.
Posted by: Mark Espinola ||
05/20/2004 11:11:54 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11129 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Also heard at that BBQ about how SA is going to increase oil production just before the election to help GWB get reelected. Boy that made me giggle.
I asked him where he heard that and he said he read it on the web.
But from what I understand, much of the run up of oil prices has been due to speculative buying. I'm not a commodity expert and I'm not sure of the correct terms but it was stated that if up front cost of this speculative buying was increased there wouldn't be this much pressure on prices, among other things.
#3
Part of pressure on oil prices is increasing Chinese demand for oil.In a few years China went from oil exporter to huge importer.
BTW,it would be interesting to know if there is any capital flight from Suadi Arabia to Swiss banks.Recently Saudis dumped Euro and insisted OPEC raise production after steadily year of demanding cuts in production.Almost sounds like someone wants some ready cash in near future that is spendable anywhere.
Posted by: Stephen ||
05/20/2004 15:15 Comments ||
Top||
Excerpt...
The media slant towards the enemy is a problem that does not require a military solution. Speeding up the kill, as Peters suggests, will only lead to greater and greater inaccuracies in who we kill, leading to more reporting on this type of âcollateral damageâ that is so damaging to our warfighting efforts. Speed is a combat multiplier, yes, and we go for speed whenever we can. But the speed of the operation must be driven by METT-T (mission, equipment, tactics, terrain and time), not by whose camera crew is closest. If we kill faster, but sloppier, we will have worse press, not better.
There will always be wavering partners in the WOT. They will come and go depending upon their own countryâs view of what they have to gain, and what they have to lose, in the overall effort. The recent actions by the Spanish government are a great example. They chose to leave the WOT not because of something the US Army did, but because of something al Queda did. Would the Spanish have left the Coalition earlier if the Abu Ghraib story was out? Maybe, but in the end, those partners who are of limited belief are also of limited use. We can use them if they want to be part of our effort, but they will never be the deciding factor in whether victory is ours.
#1
I found this link at instapundit; the author is arguing that Ralph Peters has the wrong solution to the problem.
Posted by: Phil Fraering ||
05/20/2004 21:25 Comments ||
Top||
#2
I quite like Ralph Peters, but agree with the author's point in this case.
The solution to the media problem is better media efforts by the military and the administration.
F'rinstance: where is the video footage of the attack on the "wedding party" ? If it was in fact a raid on a safe house, as seems likely, some footage would be useful in dispelling the propaganda about the slaughter of innocents celebrating a wedding.
Posted by: Carl in N.H. ||
05/20/2004 22:58 Comments ||
Top||
#3
I've actually sided with Peters in being disgruntled, but I propose an alternate solution -- how about the release of gun camera footage? I remember the infamous ABC video of an Apache gunship's 30mm chaingun at work, but it convinced me that those men were legitimately assumed threats ...
Posted by: Edward Yee ||
05/21/2004 0:27 Comments ||
Top||
I've come up with what I think is a good analogy that may help your listeners understand the significance of the Sarin gas shell that was recently found in Iraq.
We are all familiar with the Mars robots that are cruising around the Red Planet looking for signs of life. Suppose that they were unable to find a single bit of evidence for it; no water, no carbon, no primitive fossils, nothing. Then, on the last day of their exploration, one of them finds... a spoon.
Now, on its face, it's an insignificant find. Just a common eating utensil. But do you think the folks at NASA will consider it insignificant? Of course not; it would be a monumental find. Imagine the implications! That one spoon would provide evidence for fully developed extraterrestrial life, hominid life forms, interplanetary space travel, a functioning industry, economy, and government base which is not of earthly origin... The list could go on and on.
Likewise, with that single chemical warhead we know several things. First and foremost, that it must be the product of a Saddamist government program, it could not have been something that was mixed up in someone's garage with fertilizer and gasoline. Also, it gives evidence of a chemical warfare industry in Iraq, as well as a dedicated military program. The fact that it was used by agents who didn't really know how to use it is particularly chilling, as it may indicate that the shells are so numerous that almost anyone can get their hands on them. Again, as with the spoon on Mars, the list of implications goes on and on. It's no wonder that the liberal press has so carefully avoided mentioning it. After all, according to them, Bush has been lying about WMD's, and this artillery shell doesn't fit with the story they've been telling.
Thanks for your program Hugh; keep slugging away at the lefties.
Sincerely,
Stephen M. Young, LtCol (Ret), USMC"
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/20/2004 20:08 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11140 views]
Top|| File under:
Something is rotten in the state of Atropia. Neighboring Badaria has massed its troops on its western border with Atropia, and with 4,000 ethnic Badarians having formed an illegal militia on the Atropian side of the border, the Atropian government was increasingly nervous about a possible Badarian incursion. Amid escalating tensions, it was time to call for backup from the United Nations. On Thursday, U.S. and Russian brigades under UN authority pulled off a joint operation to secure the Atropian border zone and round up members of the illegal Badarian militia. A real, full-blown international crisis, or a sequel to the Hollywood black comedy "Wag the Dog"? Well, actually, it is neither. Atropia and Badaria are, of course, fictitious countries, and the operation was held at the Russian Army's well-known Vystrel training center 30 kilometers west of Moscow. It was part of the first-ever command post exercise by U.S. and Russian officers designed to practice the joint defense of a third country. The Torgau 2004 exercise, which began Monday and will run through Saturday, involves more than 100 officers from the Russian Ground Forces' Combined Arms Academy, the U. S. Army Southern European Task Force (Airborne) and the U.S. 7th Army Training Command.
Hey! Joe Browne! Are you reading? You owe me ten bucks!
Via Country Store EFL. Paul Ehrlich has never been right. Why does anyone still listen to him? Because theyâre stupid?
Environmentalist Paul Ehrlich has proved himself to be a stupendously bad prophet. In 1968 he declared: "The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s, the world will undergo famines--hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death." They didnât. Indeed, a "green revolution" nearly tripled the worldâs food supply. In 1975, he predicted that, by the mid-1980s, "mankind will enter a genuine age of scarcity," in which "accessible supplies of many key minerals will be facing depletion." Far from it. Between 1975 and 2000 the World Bankâs commodity price index for minerals and metals fell by nearly 50%. In other words, we abound in "key minerals." Naturally, Mr. Ehrlich has won a MacArthur Foundation genius award--and a Heinz Award for the environment. (Yes, that Heinz: Teresa Heinz Kerry is chairman of the awardâs sponsoring philanthropy.) Surprise, surprise (NOT)
So why pay him any notice? Because he is a reverse Cassandra. In "The Iliad," the prophetess Cassandra makes true predictions and no one believes her; Mr. Ehrlich makes false predictions and they are widely believed. The gloomier he is and the faultier he proves to be as a prophet, the more honored he becomes, even in his own country. At least among the glitterati - the rest of us have more sense. Read the rest. If Erlichâs predicting doom, Iâm more optimistic for the worldâs future than ever.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut ||
05/20/2004 1:52:48 PM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11128 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
As the article points out we do have enviormental problems facing us. But they are not the ones that people like Erlich fear.
#2
I've had a few dealings with Ehrlich (and his wife) over the years. They are ideologues and very arrogant...also wrong on almost everything they've ever predicted...but he was great on Johnny Carson (where his reputation was built)
#2
"I want factions. Not a simple alien vs. humans vs. bugs three-way war orgy. I want to share the map with powerful forces who are not friend or foe or anything else, a News Media, Private Corporations, asshole allies and friendly enemies, everyone jockeying for their own interests and me unable to bend over at any moment without turning my codpiece around first. I want a France"
LOL
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/20/2004 14:28 Comments ||
Top||
#3
"I want mutinous units that chainsmoke hash and frag their Sargents and sell Heroin on the side and rogue commanders who go mad and shave their heads and set up fortresses in the jungle decorated with human skulls. I want to have to send a CIA assassin in to take him out. And then they chop up a donkey, for some reason."
Posted by: Steve ||
05/20/2004 15:28 Comments ||
Top||
#4
LMAO! This guy is a GENUIS!
Posted by: Charles ||
05/20/2004 15:52 Comments ||
Top||
#5
That was freakin' hilarious! Warning...put down all beverages before reading. Also...wasn't there some donkey chopping in Blood?
Posted by: Rex Mundi ||
05/20/2004 16:18 Comments ||
Top||
#6
RTS are stupid. Try some realistic wargames, like Combat Mission, or The Operational Art of War, or Highway to the Reich, or even Panzer General. If you want grand strategy and politics and such, try Hearts of Iron (unfortunately Paradox is working on version two of this, instead of a cold war or WOT game) I understand Supreme Ruler will take be set in 2010, and will include some contemporary issues.
#10
Nothing on computer has come close to Advanced Squad Leader in terms of detail, but moving stacks of those little counters was a real pain.
Posted by: Rex Mundi ||
05/20/2004 16:55 Comments ||
Top||
#11
Liberalhawk, all of those games you listed are "beer-n-pretzels" games. Lightweights, really. Pretty damn far from anything realistic. Start at TacOps (which *does* represent journalist units) and go from there. Be warned you may not be able to purchase these games at Electronics Boutique down at the mall.
#12
I'm a Civil War reenactor and around here we hold unscripted games with umpires. You can't have unlimited ammunition and you have to figure out how to supply you troops as well as communicate with all your units. I am a seargent in a cavalry company and we can only take what we can carry on our horses. The infantry has it worse as they can only take what they can carry. It gets colder than a fart in a dead Eskimo at night in December in East Tennessee, but it is fun and inlightening.
Posted by: Deacon Blues ||
05/20/2004 18:37 Comments ||
Top||
#13
Brilliant, but too close to the truth to be funny.
Posted by: Phil B ||
05/20/2004 19:41 Comments ||
Top||
#14
LH - I'd take you in ten seconds in UT2004 with any weapon you choose. They're only stupid til you get good enough to win heh heh
Posted by: Frank G ||
05/20/2004 19:55 Comments ||
Top||
Ladies and Gentlemen, from the lovely Rachel Lucas, I give you the official Michael Moore Range Target. A thing of beauty designed by Libbo at Lagmonkey.
Posted by: Steve ||
05/20/2004 11:40:11 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
I would increase the scores to 10 for the paraparazzi as well.
#6
I think of Michael Moore kinda like our Sun about five billion years from now, as it begins to exhaust its supply of hydrogen: a bloated, swollen giant red gasball, giving off little light but enormous amounts of heat, destroying everything that comes near.
Posted by: Dave D. ||
05/20/2004 17:15 Comments ||
Top||
#7
From "Monty Python's Meaning of Life" - Supernovae near!
Posted by: Mark Espinola ||
05/20/2004 23:32 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11133 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
"Philadelphi Road", picture #,2 could be used as I said yesterday, to hunt for "GOPHERS". Well placed sticks of dynamite underground could induce cave-ins, and bury some netharious characters as well.
Posted by: marek ||
05/20/2004 20:28 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Seaking of rats - Why don't we hear our inquisitive, freedom loving, press ask a few questions like this:
Israeli government minister Effi Eitam "There is something so cynical. You need to ask what are little children doing in the street full of bombs in an area where there is shooting, armed men among them. What were they doing there in general? Why weren't they sitting at home?"
Posted by: Rock ||
05/20/2004 21:55 Comments ||
Top||
Posted by: Fred ||
05/20/2004 08:46 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11128 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Any word on whether India will (or seek to) drop its draconian tax regarding importation of used capital equipment into the country for industrial ventures? It is something like 50% of the equipment's sale price. I experienced their tangle of extortionate tax code first hand while participating in a corporate venture there.
Essentially, India forces companies to import all brand new and costly equipment only to force these ventures out of business and reversion into direct Indian ownership. Companies that continue to outsource so much of their operations to India really need to reconsider the wisdom of rewarding a country that maintains such a disincentive to real foreign investment in their infrastructure.
A football team from an Arab town has won Israelâs main football cup for the first time in the countryâs history. Arabs throughout the northern Galilee region celebrated on Tuesday night as Bnei Sakhnin defeated Hapoel Haifa 4-1 in the State Cup final. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon congratulated club chairman Mazen Ghnaim and promised to help to build a new stadium in the town. Bnei Sakhnin will now play in next seasonâs Uefa Cup. "Iâm sure they will represent Israel honourably in Europe," Mr Sharon said in a statement. Palestinian Cabinet minister Saeb Erekat said the achievement brought "honour to the Palestinian people". Israeli Football Association chairman Itche Menachem said the victory was a "bridge for peace and co-existence between our peoples... and a great celebration for Israeli soccer". An interesting away fixture for UK teams next season... may have to start making strips in kevlar.
Posted by: Howard UK ||
05/20/2004 6:37:45 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11130 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Israeli Arabs? Football / soccer?
Ow. My head hurts.
Posted by: Chris W. ||
05/20/2004 10:59 Comments ||
Top||
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.