Please do. You were gonna lose your safe seat in a Red State. Loser Asshole
Retiring Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake on Sunday wouldn't rule out a 2020 run against President Trump, saying the commander-in-chief is "inviting" a challenger with his politics of division and narrow appeal to a diminishing base of older, white men.
"I don't rule anything out, but it's not in my plans," Flake, a Republican, told ABC's "This Week." "But I wanna see my fave in the paper and will continue to bash Republicans and Conservatives"
"But I do believe if the president is running for reelection, if he continues on the path that he's on, that that's going to leave a huge swath of voters looking for something else."
Flake said he expects Trump could have challengers from multiple sides: Democrat, independent and even from his own Republican Party.
"I think he's inviting that," Flake said.
Posted by: Frank G ||
12/25/2017 09:14 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11128 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
The problem up to this point is that when you went to vote, they were all flakes.
This just makes it official policy.
Posted by: ed in texas ||
12/25/2017 10:04 Comments ||
Top||
#2
Flake said he expects Trump could have challengers from multiple sides: Democrat, independent and even from his own Republican Party.
"I think he's inviting that," Flake said.
I'm all for shattering the core parties into their little tribes and let them fight each other. Trump's core voters will still vote for him.
Oh and Flake, expect to lose you donkey-fluffing fuck.
The best way to campaign is to spend lots and lots of money, take a second and third and fourth mortgage, take out massive loans, accept tons of money from George Soros. Spend the money like there's no tomorrow. It's the only chance you have. In fact, if you send me large amounts of money in small, unmarked non-sequential bills, I will have certain associates be certain to give you consideration. (I really need some new guns and LOTS of ammo)
I look forward to receiving your 'assistance' in this matter Senator. Do it for the children!
#7
Speaking of Soros, he is bankrolling McCain's "foundation", so beware of that coming into use as a one-world progressivist tool. And watch for Flake's invite to run it.
#10
Senator Jeff Flake makes a desperate bid to be invited to the cool parties run by liberals (with drugs and hookers and shit) before shuffling off to retirement.
[DAWN] HONOLULU: A US federal appeals court panel ruled that President Donald Trump ...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States... once again exceeded the scope of his authority with his latest travel ban, but the judges on the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals put their decision on hold pending review by the US Supreme Court, meaning the ban involving six majority Moslem countries will remain in effect.
The 77-page ruling released late Friday says Trump’s proclamation makes no finding whatsoever that simply being from one of the countries cited in the ban makes someone a security risk.
Hawaii, which is suing to stop the ban, has argued that it will be harmful because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court lifted temporary lower court orders that had prevented the latest ban from taking effect.
The status quo was maintained when the 9th Circuit stayed its decision, said Carl Tobias, a professor at the University of Richmond School of Law.
The ruling was unusual, but it’s a unique case, he said, noting the Supreme Court has not set argument dates because it has not yet decided to grant an appeal.
"Given the shockingly rapid volley of executive actions and court decisions, this is surely just the latest in a long series of battles to come."
Mary Fan, a University of Washington law school professor, said about immigration ban litigation.
The judges focused on whether Trump had made a required finding that the entry of people affected by the ban would be detrimental to US interests.
Posted by: Fred ||
12/25/2017 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11124 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Therefore Obama exceeded his authority when he established DACA.
#2
The judges focused on whether Trump had made a required finding that the entry of people affected by the ban would be detrimental to US interests.
I'll bet they wake up every morning surprised to find their nose in the middle of their face every morning as well. That water is still wet, and Fire still burns....
And it seems Obama wielded that same 'authority'...
#5
because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered
This has nothing to do with the power of the POTUS to limit access of foreigners to the USA.
#6
Hawaii, which is suing to stop the ban, has argued that it will be harmful because families will be separated and university recruitment will be hampered.
You do know that is how the scum that have launched the latest attacks got in, right?
We should drop all these idiot liberal fucks in Syria and let nature take its course.
#7
Guess what Hawaii? You gave up your ability to run your own foreign policy when you became a state. How anyone could find this suit having merit or standing is an exercise in leftist mind-twisting.
#9
We really need a three strikes your out policy. If your judicial opinion is overturned by the Supreme Court Three times you get disbarred and lose your judgeship. Some of these activists might start thinking twice to protect their phones Bologna jobs.
[Ynet] A federal judge in Seattle on Saturday partially lifted a Trump administration ban on certain refugees after two groups argued that the policy prevented people from some mostly Moslem countries from reuniting with family living legally in the United States.
US District Judge James Robart heard arguments Thursday in lawsuits from the American Civil Liberties Union and Jewish Family Service, which say the ban causes irreparable harm and puts some people at risk. Government lawyers argued that the ban is needed to protect national security.
Robart ordered the federal government to process certain refugee applications but said his directive did not apply to people without a "bona fide relationship" to a person or entity in the United States.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
