The question is if the American public will have the attention span...
A large majority of voters believe Hillary Clinton did something either unethical or illegal in her use of a private email system for government business, according to a new McClatchy-Marist Poll.
A total of 68 percent believe that what she did was wrong in one way or the other.
The biggest bloc, 40 percent, say she acted unethically, though legally. That includes large numbers of Democrats and independents.
The second biggest, 28 percent, believe she did something illegal.
The third, 27 percent, believe she did nothing wrong.
The results suggest that even as Clinton builds her lead for the Democratic presidential nomination over rival Bernie Sanders, a sizable number of voters have lingering questions about her behavior as secretary of state that would follow her through a general election campaign.
The ranks of those saying she acted unethically if legally includes a surprising number of voters of her own party or those not affiliated with any party. Forty percent of Democrats and 46 percent of independents say she did something unethical but not illegal. Unethical is a congenital trait for her, like her serial lying
Posted by: Frank G ||
11/12/2015 14:33 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
crap. Could swear I hit Sleazy Pols. Mods, plz move. Thx
Moved at 2:55 p.m. ET.
--tw
Posted by: Frank G ||
11/12/2015 14:37 Comments ||
Top||
#2
"Majority think"
That right there is an untested hypothesis doomed to fail.
#7
The majority are not keen on gay marriage, Obamacare, ending the death penalty, etc. When has that stopped the ruling caste from getting what they want?
#1
$25 billion, paid for with very high tax rates on businesses and people. Almost guaranteed to go past the original $25 billion price tag and punch a hole so massive in the state budget that you could pass Pluto through it.
If passed expect in 10 years to see the state so far in the red it is thinking bankruptcy, businesses fled and people moving away as fast as they can.
#3
So the Laficornia expats who fled to Colorado to escape the high taxes will now vote "yes" on this measure.
In a few years to escape the taxes they'll move to .. where? Let me know because I don't want to be in the same state as these folks.
Posted by: Steve White ||
11/12/2015 13:32 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Fortunately it won't be New Mexico, not enough money and resources to steal. That's helped by their brethren Greenies who won't allow fracking in the state (but the Texans just across the border by meters are drilling and generating revenue). Economics of the Left is defined by their 'magic money tree' fantasy universe.
#5
That's good news for Vets in CO -- they won't have to suffer under the VA. Or will they? Let's have a two tier single payer system. Wait, where are all the taxpayers going?
Hm.
Maybe all the details haven't been worked out yet. Pass me the bong, will ya?
Posted by: regular joe ||
11/12/2015 14:58 Comments ||
Top||
#6
It shouldn't surprise anyone the lengths people will go to avoid O-care.
#7
That's the ultimate goal of O-care from the beginning. It's impossible to believe that it would succeed. They planned for failure so the only out would be single payer
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
