Rosie the Riveter has given way to Sally the Sniveler.
During World War II, young Rose Will Monroe was the face of American women in adversity: strong, supportive and resolute against the enemy forces that threatened our existence. Tens of thousands like Rosie rolled up their sleeves, gritted their teeth, and flexed their muscles in factories and shipyards and arsenals across the country. They made rockets and rifles and bombs and boats. They painted and drilled and welded. When they got home to their kids, they cooked and cleaned and collapsed in bed after praying for their husbands and brothers and uncles on the battlefield. Rosie and her sisters in arms didn't have the luxury of complaining about their lack of "me time." There was a war to be won. And so, as this presidential campaign season has constantly reminded us, there is today.
But Rosie is gone. And in her place, we have Hysterical Women for Kerry.
They are self-absorbed celebrities who support banning all guns (except the ones their bodyguards use to protect them and their children). They are teachers' union bigwigs who support keeping all children hostage in public schools (except their own sons and daughters who have access to the best private institutions). They are sanctimonious environmentalists who oppose ostentatious energy consumption (except for their air-conditioned Malibu mansions and Gulfstream jets and custom Escalades.)
They are antiwar activists who claim to love the troops (except when they're apologizing to the terrorists trying to kill our men and women in uniform). They are peace activists who balk at your son bringing in his "Star Wars" light saber for the kindergarten Halloween parade (but who have no problem serving as human shields for torture-loving dictators). They are ultrafeminists who purport to speak for all women (but not the unborn ones or the abstinent teenage ones or the minority conservative ones or the newly enfranchised ones in Afghanistan).
In battleground states, the Kerry campaign has dispatched such incoherent nervous Nellies to scare the pantyhose off of young women and moms. Kerry's sister, Peggy, landed in Ohio at a Women for Kerry rally to scare up female votes to oppose President Bush's "war against women." At a time when Islamofascists are chopping off heads and kidnapping aid workers and plotting to kill schoolchildren, and at a time when untold numbers of malefactors are crossing into our borders, Peggy Kerry chose to whine about the alleged gender gap in white-collar salaries. "That is not fair," she said. "Let me tell you what my brother is going to fight for-pay equity." Meanwhile, a teacher for Kerry complained: "If we lose the White House again, it is very possible we will lose public education."
In Michigan, actress/legal observer Christine Lahti rallied Kerry women by warning: "Listen up. If (Bush) is re-elected, he will appoint a (Justice) Clarence Thomas clone and reverse Roe versus Wade." The Kerry campaign has also sent actress Sharon Stone-who recently blamed President Bush for preventing her from kissing fellow actress Halle Berry in the awful movie "Catwoman"-to drum up female votes in Pennsylvania and New Hampshire.
But if Hollywood had to crown a poster girl for the new Sally the Sniveler campaign, it would be Cameron Diaz. Rosie the Riveter delivered a unifying message to her fellow American women with simple, rousing clarity: "We can do it!"
In stark contrast, here's a painful partial transcript of Diaz's vote-beseeching appearance on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" last month:
Diaz: "We have a voice now, and we're not using it, and women have so much to lose. I mean, we could lose the right to our bodies. We could lo-if you think that rape should be legal, then don't vote. But if you think that you have a right to your body, and you have a right to say what happens to you and fight off that danger of losing that, then you should vote, and those are the . . .
Winfrey: "It's your voice."
Diaz: "It's your voice. It's your voice, that's your right."
We've come a long way, baby. The wrong way. Get a grip, girls. You are an embarrassment to a nation at war.
Posted by: Steve ||
10/20/2004 10:34:01 AM ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11127 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
No, Michelle, they are an embarrassment to the human race.
Too bad these chicks didn't get their heads ripped off in "Team America".....
#2
DB - Seen the 2 new Skeery ads on 9/11? One is wife, other a daughter, of victims of WTC attack. Both manage to blame Bush for their deaths. Truly disgusting shit - and this after the Dhimmidicks had squealed that Bush couldn't even refer to 9/11 in ad because it would be divisive / unfair somehow.
Living in a "battleground" state is bizarre. All I see are political ads, those smarmy prescription medicine ads (i.e. Cialis, heh), and Ginsu knife style kitchen gadget ads.
#5
Amen, 2b. She rocks like an earthquake! I tell you, I'm extremely happy (fortunate!) that I find myself on the same side as Michelle in every issue where I've read her offer her opinion - whew! Very den Beste-like in her logical arguments.
#7
.com - No, haven't seen them, but then again I'm not watching much TV these days. Every time a political ad comes on, I start swearing at the set. Freaks out the new hubby to hear his (usually) sweet tempered girl start shouting "F*** off and die, bastard!!" at the commercials.
But you gotta admit, it is pretty funny to see an ad for one of these schmucks followed by an ad for heartburn or insomnia medications!
And I used to vote Democrat......sigh.
#8
CF - No - I'm a phreakin' expert on them, now - unfortunately for me, lol!
DB - Lol! I'm alone, but I do have to wonder if my apartment neighbors can hear me shout the same sort of epithets at the TV, lol! Used to scare the hell out of my daughter (I was a very happy Single Dad with custody for 10 yrs) when I'd talk to the TV. She "got it" later on: it's a way to reduce the stress of so much idiocy going unchallenged!
#9
.com, that's why I'm soooo glad that 1) my neighbors are mostly elderly, and 2) the apartment building is masonry construction. They can't hear much. Oh, and everyone thinks my big ol' rottie/shepherd mix is mean when they first meet her (I do have to yank on Cookie's leash, only so she doesn't bowl people over to love on them.....)
#12
I'm not sure if my husband will be glad or sad when this election is over. Glad because he's limited to what channels he can watch without me saying things like - "Bring up Cambodia, Bill, bring up Cambodia!!" Ohhhh!! CAN YOU BELIEVE he didn't bring up Cambodia???? - before I dramatically storm off to be consoled by my friend, the Internet.
Glad because I won't spend 654 hours a day on the internet, flipping from site to site...hoping to find that one little nugget of information that will assure me that that GW indeed has this in the bag, (that and oooh..lookie what's going on in Fallujah - such an interesting 20 page article)... what the..OMG!! [looks up from screen - eyes spinning in circles - back aching from spending day slouched in chair staring at the screen] Is that the garage door opening? Oh &^%$! I better get dressed before he makes it up the stairs!!!
Of course, it's equally possible that he will be sad when it's over, because I won't be spending 625 hours on the Internet every day...and thus allowing him complete control over the remote and being blissfully unaware of everything that we should be doing around the house.
AS the presidential election approaches, the cynical charges of "failure" in Iraq obscure a fundamental truth: The conflict has improved our military dramatically. War teaches. And we're very good learners. We already had the best-trained, best-equipped armed forces in the world. Now we have the most experienced troops, as well. With enduringly high morale. Operation Iraqi Freedom and the subsequent occupation swept away a pile of dangerous nonsense. We found again that airpower alone cannot win wars and that the infantryman remains as indispensable in the 21st century as he was in the bronze age.
Ralph Peters is an excellent analyst who is strongly biased in favor of infantry. He believes Air Force claims of being able to defeat armies w/out ground troops are ridiculous and he sometimes goes overboard.
If I remember correctly,"Shock and Awe" was going to be a 3 day intense aerial bombardment before the troops went in.It never took place because info on Saddam's whereabouts caused the whole plan to be changed as a strike on Saddams supposed location prematurely started the war. All of which showed the quality of Gen. Franks-he lost his Northern attack at last minute,his air plan was thrown in toilet,and his ground assualt had to start days before he planned.How much or little he actually had to do w/planning,he controlled his battle and didn't let anyone panic.
Posted by: Stephen ||
10/20/2004 21:20 Comments ||
Top||
#8
I like that Ralph pointed out that our combat units have ALL had significant action. The entire US Army and Marines are basically combat vets. A look at the past 100 years of our military, you will see that almost every unit was skittish in their opening engagements. That is no longer the case. Can you imagine having the 3rd and 4th Infantry Divisions on the Iraq-Syria (or Iran-Iraq) border? How much CRACK there would be in that whip? 50,000 of the best-trained, best-equipped AND most experienced troops lookin' at the border in an obvious way? They'd be quakin' in their f*cking boots. Singing the Jihidi Lament (JDAM version).
This is a new strategic and tactical benefit we have from opening this new front on the Islamofascists. A military that can absolutely obliterate any enemy imaginable. Just let you know where you are............
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.