#5
And if I was the President and the Congress called my name
I'd say who do, who do you think you're foolin'?
I got the Presidential seal
up on the Presidential podium
and my mama loves me, she loves me,
she get down on her knees and hug me,
she love me like a rock ...
#7
I'd call it a "mandate from heaven" if lightning struck him a half dozen times in succession while he was standing at the podium. Otherwise, seals falling to the floor are just poor site preparation, or maybe a practical joke, by the flunkies assigned to such work.
As both parties begin thinking about the 2012 presidential race, we already know that President Obama will have to give up on the support of one particular person: Perez Hilton. Hilton, who oversees the gossip site PerezHilton.com, told POLITICO that "the president fails to inspire me on all fronts, from his smoking to his lack of support for Latinos and gays. I am very much looking forward to 2012!" "My God, Mr. President, we've lost Perez Hilton. If we've lost Perez Hilton,..."
Posted by: Mike ||
10/06/2010 06:24 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11129 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Quite frankly I've always found solace and encouragement in his Lucky Strikes.
#3
Loss or poten loss of their "Lucky Strikes" account is what caused certain Men on TV'S "MAD MEN" Show to panic + turn to alcoholism, insomnia, + perhaps eating NOT-A-FEW-PIES to relieve the stress.
Put it all together, and what the rally lacked most was life. That became painfully clear during Sharpton's remarks, when he tried to illustrate the Democratic coalition's current plight by telling a Bible story.
"They say we're apathetic," Sharpton told the crowd. "They say we're not energized. Well you know, I'm a preacher. There's a story in the Bible about a man named Ezekiel. Ezekiel saw a valley full of dry bones. Somebody said, 'Can these bones live?' And the way he made them live was he started connecting them together."
Sharpton suggested that the different parts of the Democratic coalition -- black, white, Latino, Asian, straight, gay, immigrant, natural-born -- are like those dry bones. "If we can connect these bones," he said, "we can make America breathe and America live as one nation under God."
Put aside a few details -- in the Bible, it was God who brought the bones to life as Ezekiel watched -- and you're left with Sharpton's striking image of the Democratic Party as a bunch of old, dry bones. Could anything be more disheartening? In the Ezekiel story, it took a miracle to make the bones come to life. But there were no miracles to be found Saturday at the Lincoln Memorial.
Posted by: Fred ||
10/06/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11130 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Anybody know where I can hear Reverend Sharpton preach his next sermon?
#2
Sharpton suggested that the different parts of the Democratic coalition -- black, white, Latino, Asian, straight, gay, immigrant, natural-born -- are like those dry bones.
Maybe most people are fed up and tired of the fraud that has been perpetrated on the U.S. for too many years. Sharpton failed to mention the Democratic Socialists, Progressives, Muslims and Communists who were part of this coalition.
Maybe it had to do with the corruption of the labor unions and the high costs they have shoved on society? Maybe it had something to do with SEIU corruption. Maybe it has something to do with union corruption and obscene public union pensions.
Maybe it has something to do with phony hypocritical environomentalists who are too damn lazy to pick up after themselves after the rally.
Maybe it had something to do with these groups undermining and destabilizing the country. Maybe it has something to do with the greed of these groups. Maybe it has something to do with these groups hating and wanting to destroy America.
Rep. Anh "Joseph" Cao (R-La.) has been a model of bipartisanship during his short tenure in the House. Being from a heavily black, heavily Democratic district in New Orleans certainly contributes to this no doubt but if there's anyone who can truly be said to be someone who "reaches out to the other side," it's Cao. He voted for the Obama health insurance bill the first time it came up in the House, supports carbon taxation regimes and has said how he "loves" President Obama.
Unfortunately for Cao, however, that love does not seem to be reciprocated by the Democratic party or by Obama himself. In his first general election advertisement, Obama took the opportunity to endorse Cao's Democratic opponent, Cedric Richmond, a move which incensed Cao. He seems mystified Obama did this and has, according to Fox News, been desperately trying to reach the president to talk about what he seems to think was just an honest mistake.
Posted by: Fred ||
10/06/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Obama putting his party first? Didn't see that one coming.
Posted by: Mike ||
10/06/2010 6:33 Comments ||
Top||
#2
He and all his friend across the aisle in contestable seats were cannon fodder for Nancy's agenda. She didn't give a rat's ass about their future either even though they were actual party members. Isn't bi-partisanship fun?
#3
Everyone knew Cao was toast from day one no matter what he did, so I can only hope he voted his conscience. The end result of his bi-partisanship is that he's lost what little support he had on the right and gained none on the left. But he was not going to get re-elected no matter what.
Here is the nub of a broadcast email I got from his opponent (Mr. Richmond): I am honored and humbled to be on the ballot for the US Congress, but this campaign has never been about me. It's about you and the people in our district. We have not been properly represented by a Republican, who disrespects our will (Health Care Reform), votes against our president (Health Care Reform and Women's rights for equal pay) and who doesn't understand our needs or our culture.
(I assume Mr. Richmond is referring to the culture of my Irish ancestors. Cead Mille Failte, dude.)
Posted by: Matt ||
10/06/2010 10:35 Comments ||
Top||
#4
Good thing nobody's paying the "race card", or anything like that.
Picture Daddy Murkowski dressing down Lisa after she loses the primary. He screams at her that the seat has been in the family 30 years. It's their seat, and he'll be damned if he's going to let some Palin flunky take it away from them! She had better go out and do whatever it takes to keep that seat dammit, or there will be Hell to pay.
Asked about the most important lesson he learned from losing the Republican majority of 1994, Boehner replies, "Our team failed to live up to our own principles."
He points to recent votes as proof "we have learned our lesson" -- Republicans stood together and voted unanimously against the stimulus (twice), the Obama budget (twice), health care reform and almost all Republicans voted against cap and trade.
Boehner suggests that unity will carry over to what he hopes will be a second chance at a GOP majority.
He promises a freeze on any new federal programs and to undo those that aren't working, cost too much, or are outdated. "Congress hasn't done a good quality job of oversight in a long time," Boehner says. "I came here for a smaller, less costly and more accountable government, and that has not been what's been happening. We don't need any more programs; we need to undo a lot of programs."
Where to start? Both parties know Social Security and Medicare are in need of drastic reform. What would a Republican majority do with these nearly bankrupt programs?
Having learned from President George W. Bush's attempt to reform these spending monsters, Boehner maintains, "You can't lead with your chin. [Bush] led with a solution to a problem people didn't understand."
Instead, Boehner wants "an adult conversation" to "lay the problem out. Then you can be able to talk about an array of possible solutions." Only after people get it, he says, can you attempt "what's doable."
Boehner says part of the conversation will remind the public exactly how much their government is spending and in terms they can understand, instead of speaking about trillion-dollar debt.
He puts it this way: "Forty-one cents of every dollar the federal government spends we have to borrow from our kids and grandkids. So I think the test is real simple. You go through every damn program, every line item in the budget and you ask this question: 'Is this spending so important that we're willing to ask our kids and grandkids to pay for it?' If it doesn't meet that test, then why are we doing it?"
Posted by: Fred ||
10/06/2010 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11123 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
Instead, Boehner wants "an adult conversation" to "lay the problem out. Then you can be able to talk about an array of possible solutions.
The successful Donk model is the scare the crap out of people even if there isn't a 'crisis' and then offer up the 'magic opiate' that solve it all. Seems to work very well for them.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.