[DENVER.CBSLOCAL] A CBS4 investigation has found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado months and in some cases years after their deaths, a revelation that calls into question safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences.
"We do believe there were several instances of potential vote fraud that occurred,"
No. If they were dead when "they" submitted their votes, that is actual vote fraud that occurred. The only potential is the number of times each of these known corpses voted, which unknown living people made it happen, and how many unknown corpses aided by unknown living people also voted unknown times.
said Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams after reviewing the CBS4 findings. "It shows there is the potential for fraud."
That, too. Which is why scrupulously keeping the voter rolls up to date, strictly limiting absentee voting, and requiring photo I.D. on voting day are all critical.
The cases of dead men and women casting ballots ranged from El Paso County in southern Colorado to Denver and Jefferson County. CBS4 discovered the fraudulent voting by comparing databases of voting histories in Colorado against a federal death database.
The CBS4 investigation has triggered criminal investigations in El Paso and Jefferson counties along with a broad investigation by the Colorado Secretary of State’s office.
"It’s not a perfect system. There are some gaps," acknowledged Williams.
One of the most glaring cases was that of Sara Sosa in Colorado Springs. She died on Oct. 14, 2009. However, you can observe a lot just by watching... CBS4 uncovered voting records that showed ballots cast for Sosa in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Her husband, Miguel, died on Sept. 26, 2008. But CBS4 unearthed records showing that a vote was cast in his name the next year, 2009.
Fascinating.
Posted by: Fred ||
09/24/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11126 views]
Top|| File under:
#1
"We do believe there were several instances of potential vote fraud that occurred..."
I'd bet dollars to donuts that the significant majority of the "several instances of vote fraud" voted Democrat.
#2
DENVER.CBSLOCAL] A CBS4 investigation has found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado months and in some cases years after their deaths, a revelation that calls into question safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences.
"We do believe there were several instances of potential vote fraud that occurred,"
Does the author of that statement mean that these dead people may actually have voted? This would be an important discovery of previously unknown powers of ghosts, and an exciting contribution to science.
If not, then the facts claimed by CBS4 mean there definitely was voter fraud.
Why the word "potential"? Does the author believes in zombies?
#3
6 months after any gubernatorial election all voter registrations are cleared. Everyone must re-register to retain the vote. That's a purge every 4 years to clean out the deadwood. Cross check it with DMV records (that include street IDs*) and jury duty files. That'll keep a lot of party hacks busy.
* many states have laws that require new drivers licenses if you change address.
Mentioned here repeatedly; as his Secretary of State, she had to be communicating with POTUS in some manner. If she had no active classified email accounts, that sort of narrows the available options. He's in it up to his neck and people within the inner circle and WH Communications Detachment are fully aware.
#1
It doesn't matter. We no longer have an "opposition party".
Its been said that Clinton could strangle an innocent on national television and still be elected. What hasn't been voiced strongly enough is that Obama could be recorded as laughing while watching and the do-nothing "opposition party" would make a meek statement of protest and subsequently withdraw from any further action.
Posted by: Penguin of the Desert ||
09/24/2016 1:13 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Precisely why nothing has been done or will be done about HRC's classified email scandal. The trail leads directly back to the Champ. He's her insurance.
How about some "context " on the particular postings ?
he used a "pseudonym" ? But you can't or won't tell us what it is. Or give us any context to the time and details of the postings .
Is there a reason for your discretion and tact? Who do you work for, who pays you ? Politico has an agenda, perhaps?
The server story had two components: the security breaking (which she got a pass on, and O therefore will too) and the the C.Foundation quid-pro-quo operations, which O may or may not have been involved with--and I think she's cunning enough to have kept him out of that loop.
Posted by: james ||
09/24/2016 16:59 Comments ||
Top||
[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] The GOP-led House approved legislation late Thursday to prohibit the United States from making cash payments to Iran and require that Congress be notified before any future claims settlements with Tehran are conducted. The bill passed by a wide margin, 254-163.
The measure, an election-year broadside, won ample support from Republicans aiming to rebuke the B.O. regime for paying Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year to settle a decades-old arbitration claim. Democrats have accused Republicans of trying to score political points with the bill.
Since the initial payment was made the same day Tehran agreed to release four American prisoners, GOP politicians decried the payments as ransom, a charge the White House has rejected. Citing Iran’s status as a leading state sponsor of terrorism, Republicans have contended the untraceable cash will be used to finance terrorism around the world.
Although the bill targets Iran, politicians also passed an amendment that would bar the US from paying cash to other designated sponsors of terrorism and North Korea. "Cash does not leave a paper trail," said Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the Foreign Affairs Committee chairman and the bill’s sponsor. "Cash is the currency of terror."
The B.O. regime has threatened a veto of the bill, calling it "an ill-advised attempt to respond to a problem - so-called ’ransom’ payments to Iran - that does not exist." House Democrats accused Republicans of trying to score political points. Rep. Eliot Engel of New York, the top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, said holding Tehran’s money until Iran released the Americans "was a pretty shrewd bargain."
But by using the word ransom, Engel said, Republicans turned the bill "into a political hot button - a poke in the eye of the administration." An initial $400 million payment in euros, Swiss francs and other foreign currency was delivered on pallets on Jan. 17, the same day Tehran agreed to release the prisoners. The remaining $1.3 billion was paid in cash installments made on Jan. 22 and Feb. 5.
The administration has said the arbitration payment and prisoner release were separate, but later acknowledged that the cash was used as leverage until the Americans were allowed to leave Iran. Republicans on a House panel pressed Treasury Secretary Jack Lew Thursday about the cash payments at a Financial Services Committee hearing on the condition of the financial system. The exchanges became heated.
Lew insisted the payment wasn’t ransom. He said it complied with sanctions rules and said settling a contract dispute for less than what the Iranians had claimed "saved the American people billions of dollars." Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, the committee’s chairman, cut him off. "Can you trace the money?" he demanded.
Posted by: Fred ||
09/24/2016 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11129 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Iran
#1
One side *might* step up and represent this country.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
[DENVER.CBSLOCAL] A CBS4 investigation has found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado months and in some cases years after their deaths, a revelation that calls into question safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences.
