[Free Beacon] A blog post published Thursday on the Huffington Post's South African version of the site advocated stripping white men of their right to vote.
Shelley Garland is an activist and feminist completing a Master of Arts degree in philosophy and "working on ways to smash the patriarchy."
"Could It Be Time to Deny White Men the Franchise?" she asked Thursday in the title of her blog post.
"It is time to wrestle control of the world back from white males, and the first step will be a temporary restriction of the franchise to them," according to Garland.
"If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened," she explained. "It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely‐the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world."
#2
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened,"
Well, Ms. Garland, you might consider moving to South Africa; it might be more to your liking. File under racist, sexist, white hater, misguided, misanthropic twit.
#4
In South Africa this is a real possibility, another step in the devolution of the country and a sign for the white folk to sell out for what they can get and take themselves elsewhere. But when the same thing is written in America, it is click bait and wishful thinking.
[Free Beacon] Hollywood celebrity Chelsea Handler has helped Georgia Democrat Jon Ossoff reach record fundraising levels with her contributions, but she doesn't even know when the election is.
Handler demonstrated this Tuesday when she invited her nearly seven million Twitter followers to get out and vote for Ossoff--even though the election isn't taking place until next week on April 18.
The errant message likely didn't cause too much confusion for southern voters in Georgia, who appear less energized about next week's election than residents of liberal bastions like Hollywood. Ninety-five percent of contributions to Ossoff's campaign--including $2,700 from Handler--have come from sources outside of Georgia.
Handler's sudden interest in the Southern election comes a year after she revealed in an interview with NBC's Matt Lauer that she associates racism with "really like dumb ... people from the South."
Handler is far from the only Hollywood celebrity who has taken an interest in the 30-year-old former congressional staffer and investigative filmmaker for Al Jazeera.
Other celebrities contributing to Ossoff's effort include Ashton Kutcher's Two and a Half Men costar Jon Cryer, Rosie O'Donnell, Debra Messing, George Takei, John Leguizamo, Sam Waterston, and Kristen Bell.
Ossoff has received financial support from less-well-known members of the Hollywood scene such as Shannon Fitzgerald, a reality television producer who claims to have "discovered the Kardashian family." Fitzgerald held a fundraiser for Ossoff last month in Los Angeles.
Fitzgerald cohosted the fundraiser with Rose McGowan, who made her film debut in Encino Man before starring in Jawbreaker and the television show Charmed.
#1
Hollyweird and the dems have flooded local Atlanta teevee with Ossoff adds. I don't believe the little 30 year old rodent has a snowball's chance in hell. He does however, bear a striking, younger brother resemblance to Carlos Danger.
#2
From his website: "Today, I lead a company that investigates corrupt politicians and organized crime." I wonder if he will turn his sights on the corruption in his own party? What was I thinking? Color me naïve.
#3
Chelsea Handler has helped Georgia Democrat Jon Ossoff reach record fundraising levels with her contributions, but she doesn't even know when the election is.
Thank God these Hollywood celebs would have trouble organizing a one-person parade.
#4
Hollywood celebrity Chelsea Handler has helped Georgia Democrat Jon Ossoff reach record fundraising levels with her contributions, but she doesn't even know when the election is.
Reasonably attractive lady, and on rare occasion even vaguely amusing, but she doesn't have the brains the Good Lord gave a softball.
Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski ||
04/14/2017 10:21 Comments ||
Top||
#5
Remember she called the FLOTUS an ignorant immigrant.
[Guardian] Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told. 'Played Crucial role?' I could have sworn less than a month ago, the Guardian printed a categorical denial of such monitoring activities. Yes, here it is, "Utterly Ridiculous" you say. Bloodly hell! I'll put 5 quid on 'Crucial Role' in the fourth at Fakenham.
Note the very passive voice. Who, pray tell, said or wrote the words about this thing that the Guardian is now reporting?
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious "interactions" between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added. Yes, 'routine', nothing special here. We always collect and disseminate the mundane and routine. Move along please.
Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said. A 'high five' to our perfidious cousins. Please keep up the effort and by the way, we may have some Requests For Information (RFI) coming your way.
#2
Note the very passive voice. Who, pray tell, said or wrote the words about this thing that the Guardian is now reporting?
Someone who knows they may soon be discovered and needs to install a bit of historical fact spiced with braggadocious smuggery as cover. 'First' I tell you, first, FIRST !
#3
GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious "interactions" between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.
Could you please flesh this out for the American people? You know answers to usual simple questions such as "Who? What? Where? When? Why? Impacts?" If this is not done, it is just innuendo, hearsay, and political smear.
We still haven't heard anything about any investigations into Hillary's relationships with Russia such as the selling to them of 20% of our uranium.
#6
I still want to know why we're all pretending that what Hillary did to GIVE AWAY national security secrets isn't worth a trial and then followed by a sentence commensurate with the crimes committed?
[Intellectual Conservative] It has been an interesting couple of weeks to say the least. The collusion being endlessly touted by the progressive/socialists and the media between the Trump administration and the Russians has been blown out of the water. CNN, NBC, ABC, and the New York Times are all showing righteous indignation about the collusion that never was. Yet they are unsurprisingly quiet about the information that Nunes may have. They will be vocal about how he got the information, in the hope to drown out what that information may say.
In the lead is Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democrat that shills from California and ranking member of the House Intelligence committee. He declared to all that there Circumstantial evidence of collusion and direct evidence of deception. After the release of the papers that Rep. Nunes was given, Schiff now says there is no definitive proof. Of course, the media played tape constantly of Schiff in the beginning, but have strangely gone silent now. Even members of the entire Intelligence committee have said that they doubt they will find a smoking gun. Perhaps that is because there isn’t one.
The White House invited members of both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees to view the documents. There has been no word from Congressman shill Adam Schiff on whether it was the "more than circumstantial evidence" that he claimed to have.
And then there is Evelyn Farkas, a former member of the Obama administration and a Clinton campaign adviser who admitted to urging the Obama administration to gather intelligence on the Trump administration it could find. It appears that the past administration had already started before this, but this is just another example out in the open of the crimes committed by the Obama administration. In her own words-
"I was urging my former colleagues and, frankly speaking, the people on the Hill, to get as much information as you can, before President Obama leaves office, Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior Obama people who left so it would be hidden away. That the Trump folks-if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with the Russians they would try to compromise these sources and methods"
Now why would someone such as Ms. Farkas, who was no longer in government have any information pertaining to intelligence gathering, and have the ability to send such a message to those in intelligence communities and those on "the Hill"?
#2
The progressive/socialists are adept at spin and lying to achieve their ends. Once they put the lie in the echo chamber of the left-controlled MSM, some begin to fall for the lie--It's right out of Goebbel's playbook.
An interesting take on the events
When you boil Syria down to its principal players, there are only three: Russia, the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran. With Assad’s chemical attack, people have been misdirected from the reality by blaming the powerless Assad. But Assad doesn’t mvoe without direct Iranian permission. So, the real question is why did Iran launch a chemical weapons attack?
The answer is simple: Iran desperately needs Russia and the United States to get into a hot war in Syria so as to enable Iran to pick up the shattered pieces. In contrast, the United States and Russia desperately need each other to defeat Iran’s waxing neo-Safavidic Empire from stretching from Iran to the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Not sure I'm going with this - if there's a hot war between Russia and USA in Syria,
there will be no pieces to pick up
Posted by: g(r)omgoru ||
04/14/2017 02:57 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[11128 views]
Top|| File under: Govt of Iran
#1
I think this is entirely plausible. Iran's desire to control topography from Tehran to Med is well-known. Also well-known: Arab hostility to that happening. USA and Russia have at least equal reason to defeat Salafi Jihad and Iranian Jihad. Russia even more than USA, perhaps, considering Europe is now Salafi, mirroring Salafi threat to Russia's east.
So this man's analysis, which I read through, makes sense to me. It also calls to my mind the Three Brothers Doctrine I have mentioned in these precincts once or twice before: http://theological-geography.net/?s=three+brothers
[The Hill] CIA Director Mike Pompeo on Thursday hammered WikiLeaks, calling the organization a "non-state hostile intelligence service."
Certainly 'hostile' to the Deep State. Sadly, the agency 'Obama hold-over' assimilation program appears to be working.
#3
Had Assange not spilled the beans and released Podesta's emails, we would have ended up with Hillary as POTUS. What would that be like about now? IMO, we'd all be seeking shelter somewhere. Soros' crazy progressive notions would be making huge inroads into gnawing away at our culture and society. We'd be flooded with illegals from everywhere. The Clinton Foundation and its corruption would be on steroids.
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
Hollyweird and the dems have flooded local Atlanta teevee with Ossoff adds. I don't believe the little 30 year old rodent has a snowball's chance in hell. He does however, bear a striking, younger brother resemblance to Carlos Danger. 
[The Hill] CIA Director Mike Pompeo on Thursday hammered WikiLeaks, calling the organization a "non-state hostile intelligence service." 
