Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 02/03/2019 View Sat 02/02/2019 View Fri 02/01/2019 View Thu 01/31/2019 View Wed 01/30/2019 View Tue 01/29/2019 View Mon 01/28/2019
1
2019-02-03 Home Front: Politix
Is the collusion theory dead?
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Frank G 2019-02-03 12:13|| || Front Page|| [9 views ]  Top

#1 Hell, it was never alive

all just democrat lies as usual
Smears
Posted by newc 2019-02-03 13:09||   2019-02-03 13:09|| Front Page Top

#2 Fascinating to read this in The Hill, which isn’t one of the so-called far-right alternative media news outlets that will be blocked as fake news by the Microsoft’s new NewsGuard browser extension, but along with the Washington Post is read by Deep State insiders. Are they preparing their readers for a soft landing on this thing? The piece winds up as follows:

The last two years often seem like a concerted effort to disprove “Occam’s Razor,” the theory that the simplest explanation is usually the right one. As long hoped for links fell through, more complex theories filled the void of collusion. Yet, the simplest explanation still remains most likely, that the Trump campaign, like virtually every reporter and political operative in Washington, wanted to see the WikiLeaks material and any dirt on the Clintons, just as the Clinton campaign paid for any dirt on Trump. The Russian efforts to influence our elections also is neither novel nor new.

Indeed, the United States has engaged in hacking not just our enemies but our allies, as well as intervening in the elections of other countries, just as many of those same countries attempt against us. There is nothing “tantalizing” or “mysterious” in such an explanation, because it is more factual than aspirational. The boring truth here is that criminal collusion theories are weaker today than they were a year ago. While Mueller has found ample basis to charge people with false statements, the record of these filings shows more confusion than collusion in the Trump campaign.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-02-03 15:16||   2019-02-03 15:16|| Front Page Top

#3 TW - It's an op-ed by Jonathan Turley, who is sane, and not a Never-Trumper
Posted by Frank G 2019-02-03 15:33||   2019-02-03 15:33|| Front Page Top

#4 Ok, Frank, but they chose to publish it, and it has over two thousand fevered comments and a similar number of shares.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-02-03 15:54||   2019-02-03 15:54|| Front Page Top

#5 I agree, just saying...not an internal staff Op-Ed
Posted by Frank G 2019-02-03 16:16||   2019-02-03 16:16|| Front Page Top

#6 A palpable point.
Posted by trailing wife 2019-02-03 19:40||   2019-02-03 19:40|| Front Page Top

23:53 imoyaro
22:59 newc
21:10 newc
20:41 Neville Glolutch8436
20:23 Anomalous Sources
20:06 Silentbrick
19:40 trailing wife
19:27 Anomalous Sources
19:10 trailing wife
18:58 gorb
18:55 gorb
18:50 Whavick Snaiper3151
18:27 Anomalous Sources
18:15 Beau
18:12 Anomalous Sources
18:06 Injun Bucket8891
18:04 Injun Bucket8891
18:02 Injun Bucket8891
17:48 Neville Dark Lord of the Wee Folk7365
17:48 Frank G
17:34 Anguper Hupomosing9418
17:33 Procopius2k
17:33 Anguper Hupomosing9418
17:30 Procopius2k









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com