Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 01/26/2013 View Fri 01/25/2013 View Thu 01/24/2013 View Wed 01/23/2013 View Tue 01/22/2013 View Mon 01/21/2013 View Sun 01/20/2013
1
2013-01-26 China-Japan-Koreas
China Successfully Tests 'Carrier Killer' Missile In The Gobi Desert [REPORT]
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Uncle Phester 2013-01-26 00:00|| E-Mail|| Front Page|| [275 views ]  Top

#1 Nice flat area to test it.

However, as the article states tracking this over water vs desert is entirely different game, and the Chinese still don't have a very good system for doing it.
Posted by DarthVader 2013-01-26 00:35||   2013-01-26 00:35|| Front Page Top

#2 Of course we have one too! U.S.S. Desert Ship at White Sands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Desert_Ship_(LLS-1)
Posted by George Glaigum7976 2013-01-26 07:54||   2013-01-26 07:54|| Front Page Top

#3 "You sank my bactrian!"
Posted by swksvolFF 2013-01-26 11:30||   2013-01-26 11:30|| Front Page Top

#4 You sir, on on a roll.
Posted by Shipman 2013-01-26 12:15||   2013-01-26 12:15|| Front Page Top

#5 I don't see the big deal. They hit a stationary target. How is that different from every other ballistic missile test? The problem for ballistic missiles is being able to hit moving targets. That's hard to do with a non-nuclear warhead.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2013-01-26 13:56||   2013-01-26 13:56|| Front Page Top

#6 I think they would have been better off paving a big chunk of the desert, driving a remotely controlled truck loaded with sensors back and forth to mimic the movements of a carrier, while having several observation aircraft taking video of the area and recording the distance between missile impact and the location of the truck/carrier. Sounds like an extremely preliminary test.
Posted by Zhang Fei 2013-01-26 14:11||   2013-01-26 14:11|| Front Page Top

#7 "We aimed at the desert and, by gum, we hit it! That's a success in my book" - the Chinese
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2013-01-26 15:20||   2013-01-26 15:20|| Front Page Top

#8 Perhaps they are betting on a set of Rules Of Engagement which will prevent the Carrier from moving out of the way - without prior approval from the lawyer types and ACLU back in Washington D.C.
Entirely possible.
Posted by CrazyFool 2013-01-26 15:32||   2013-01-26 15:32|| Front Page Top

#9 There is no carrier.
Posted by Shipman 2013-01-26 16:27||   2013-01-26 16:27|| Front Page Top

#10 The intent is there. They have to start somewhere. Humble beginnings. Insufferable if they are encouraged by success ....
Posted by gorb 2013-01-26 17:51||   2013-01-26 17:51|| Front Page Top

#11 Carrier of what, AIDS? The clap? Typhoid Mary?
Posted by Cheaderhead 2013-01-26 21:16||   2013-01-26 21:16|| Front Page Top

#12 China knows its new CVT is toast once the US formally decided to intervene on behalf of Japan in the ECS - diplomacy + LRBMS aside, the best it can do right now is vie LR PLAAF + PLAN Submarines.

The real fight for China will be for the ROK + ultimately TAIWAN. China has times made it clear that ...

> it is willing to accept prohibitive casualties in any effort to forcibly militarily conquer
Taiwan.
> it is willing to risk NUCLEAR WAR agz the US or US-Allied for control of Taiwn or to prevent any dedicated Enemy(s) from using Taiwan in milstrikes agz mainland China.

Remember, China desires the Senkakus + Okinawa to guard the approaches to, from TAIWAN, besides also for strategic access into WESTPAC. WIDOUT TAIWAN, IN CHINA'S MIND THERE IS NO "POST-US", FUTURE "WORLD#1", "MANIFEST DESTINY" FOR CHINA.

NOT in the 21st century anyway [2050 < 2100].

IFF MSM-NET CRITICS ARE TO BE BELIEVED, CHINA'S GREATEST WEAPON IS NOT MILITARY, NUKE, OR ECON POWER, BUT POLITICAL, I.E. THE PRO-DIPLOMACY/
COMPROMISE POTUS BAMMER + ADMIN.

Aka alleged Far Left to Commie, Anarchist-for-anti-US-OWG/Globalism POTUS Bammer.

Winning agz China by losing, or vice versy.

Iff China refuses to back down vee Japan, the only way the Bammer may avoid a Limited or Full Nuclear war agz China is to either ...

> Remain neutral, i.e. NOT militarily intervene on the side of Japan or other, despite the US-Japan Security Treaty.
> Force Japan to permamently give up sovereignty over the Senkakus/Daoyus to China.
> Besides getting the Senkakus/Daoyus, China may demand regional de-militarization, espec as per USFK + USFJ [Okinawa] + PHIL.
> Handover of Taiwan, irregardless iff local Taiwanese want it or not - OR, in the alternate, NO US MIL INTERFERENCE IFF CHINA SENDS THE PLA TO "PEACEFULLY" TAKE CONTROL OF TAIWAN ["Hong Kong" Scenario]???

By the above it is clear that it will likely be the US = US-Allies that will be doing the bulk of unilateral concessions in favor of mainland China, NOT China itself as per anti-NucWar
"Price for Peace/World Peace". THE SAME IS IRONICALLY CONSISTENT WID THE BAMMER'S ALLEGED "ANARCHIST" AGENDA, FAR/ULTRA-LEFTIES = COMMIES, AS WELL AS THAT OF "ANTI-US GLOBALISTS".

Pray hard + keep your fingers crossed this 2013.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-01-26 21:59||   2013-01-26 21:59|| Front Page Top

#13 FYI WAFF > RUSSIA WILL NOT SELL Tu-22M3's TO CHINA.

Iff true, just got more difficult for China vee Japan + US Navy, + more likely China will have to resort to using LRBMS + strategic bombers, Subs agz Japan + US???

The more instability in the DPRK, the closer China + PLA will be to Japan + ultimately Taiwan.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2013-01-26 22:22||   2013-01-26 22:22|| Front Page Top

23:02 junkiron
22:45 JosephMendiola
22:34 JosephMendiola
22:28 ZZMike
22:26 JosephMendiola
22:22 JosephMendiola
22:18 Frozen Al
22:13 junkiron
21:59 JosephMendiola
21:53 Pappy
21:30 Dino Shomomp7692
21:30 Thrineger Thurong3165
21:23 Thrineger Thurong3165
21:16 Cheaderhead
21:15 SteveS
21:12 Cheaderhead
21:11 SteveS
21:10 Cheaderhead
21:06 Thrineger Thurong3165
21:04 Thrineger Thurong3165
21:00 Thrineger Thurong3165
20:36 Bangkok Billy
20:35 KBK
20:26 KBK

Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
54.81.166.199


Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com