Article

2012-06-16 Home Front: Politix

The Constitution of the United States of America

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Matt 2012-06-16 13:14|| || Front Page|| [7 views ] Top

#1 I suspect the Constitution is regarded by Obummer and his minions as is the Ten Commandments or the Lord's Prayer. They selectively obey what is convenient or not at all. Probably view such things as antiquated or historical mistakes. The Constitution is so un-European in their view.

Posted by JohnQC 2012-06-16 14:56|| 2012-06-16 14:56|| Front Page Top

#2 It's just like everything else. If they cannot make political hay out of it, it serves no purpose.

Posted by newc 2012-06-16 15:22|| 2012-06-16 15:22|| Front Page Top

#3 Plus, it is old. Like one hundred years old. /liberal

Posted by DarthVader 2012-06-16 15:29|| 2012-06-16 15:29|| Front Page Top

#4 If the constitution was the official structure of a bank, and the president acted in such a way, the government would shut the bank down.

What sux furthermore, is el prez is supposed to be this scholerly scholer of constitutional law-theory, yet all we have been priviliged to are decrees about police searches and homeo-diddling legality, no real lectures or ideas from his hard hitting times as a substitute notegiver. Gonna sell the brand as warrior-poet, where's the damned poetry? Reading a screen, thanking the corpsemen, and splitting on bills don't quite cut it..in fact it looks at sharp as a bowling ball, promptly rolled into the gutter and quitting after 7 frames then blaming the special olympics.

Posted by swksvolFF 2012-06-16 15:34|| 2012-06-16 15:34|| Front Page Top

#5 Answer to the quiz: d (at least for these clowns)

Posted by Barbara 2012-06-16 16:16|| 2012-06-16 16:16|| Front Page Top

#6 Well, regardless, I expect President Romney to issue amnesty to all those who fail to register for individual mandates and employers who fail to comply with Obamacare. It's fundamentally the same principle. So much for a nation of laws.

Posted by Procopius2k 2012-06-16 16:27|| 2012-06-16 16:27|| Front Page Top

#7 You mean like sebilius already has, except not cherry picking who is in and who is out?

A law passed by lawmakers who, if they even read the bill, fail to understand and communicate what that law is. The de-facto leader of the bill passage actually bragging that as a sales point.

Then, law is circumvented by the HHS, the executive blatently stating which laws it will or will not enforce.

Its a bum law, not evenly enforced, or even defined, let to be defined by fine, fiat, and fortune. Its no way to tile a bathroom, nevermind forcing a behavior by penalty onto people.

Posted by swksvolFF 2012-06-16 16:41|| 2012-06-16 16:41|| Front Page Top

#8 It is not his decision to make, At all. The POTUS is bound by laws. Yet he, the lawless one continues to oversee lawlessness.

Posted by newc 2012-06-16 23:15|| 2012-06-16 23:15|| Front Page Top

23:15 newc
22:40 JosephMendiola
22:22 JosephMendiola
21:54 Dale
20:11 abu do you love
19:33 Rjschwarz
19:19 Deacon Blues
18:19 Zhang Fei
18:15 crosspatch
18:12 American Delight
18:00 Zhang Fei
17:59 Charles
17:58 Abu Uluque
16:41 swksvolFF
16:38 Steve White
16:37 Steve White
16:27 Procopius2k
16:18 AlmostAnonymous5839
16:16 Barbara
16:13 Barbara
15:34 swksvolFF
15:29 DarthVader
15:22 newc
15:17 newc