Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 11/15/2009 View Sat 11/14/2009 View Fri 11/13/2009 View Thu 11/12/2009 View Wed 11/11/2009 View Tue 11/10/2009 View Mon 11/09/2009
1
2009-11-15 Science & Technology
Himalayan Glaciers Not Melting
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by crosspatch 2009-11-15 15:49|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 The Global Warming zealots always pick their data sets to advance the narrative. Lying beats studying. Green is just the latest camouflage for the totalitarians, protective coloration after the Reds collapsed.
Posted by rwv 2009-11-15 20:27||   2009-11-15 20:27|| Front Page Top

#2 The glaciers I visited in Norway are growing according to the nice park officials I talked to.
Posted by Free Radical 2009-11-15 20:30||   2009-11-15 20:30|| Front Page Top

#3 perhaps AlGore and environmental chicken littles should pay financial and academic credential penalties for the societal/economic damage their grant-whoring costs us?

/ know..dream on
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2009-11-15 20:50||   2009-11-15 20:50|| Front Page Top

#4 It doesn't matter if these glaciers are not retreating. Somewhere, there are glaciers that are retreating. That's the important thing!
/agw zealot
Posted by Rambler in Virginia">Rambler in Virginia  2009-11-15 20:53||   2009-11-15 20:53|| Front Page Top

#5 2 facts about Himalayan glaciers,

1. Their advance retreat is determined by monsoon precipitation. Monsoon precipitation is determined by how hot Central Asia gets. Thus global warming (were it too happen) would cause Himalayan glaciers to advance.

2. The rivers the glaciers feed, flood in late summer with the monsoon (some miles wide). Any changes due to glacier melt would be like taking an egg cup full of water out of an olympic swimming pool and measuring the decrease in height.

The ignorance about Himalayan glaciers is absymally low even by the already low standards of the AGW crowd.
Posted by phil_b 2009-11-15 21:29||   2009-11-15 21:29|| Front Page Top

#6 The IPCC put together some alarming sounds statements that didn't mean anything. But which got endlessly repeated as dogma by the ignorant.

Now that particular chicken is coming home to roost, because they can't now turn around and say (the truth as happens) that advancing Himalayan glaciers are a sign of global warming.
Posted by phil_b 2009-11-15 21:43||   2009-11-15 21:43|| Front Page Top

#7 "they can't now turn around and say (the truth as happens) that advancing Himalayan glaciers are a sign of global warming"

Give 'em time, phil - they're very creative.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut  2009-11-15 22:06||   2009-11-15 22:06|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:50 ed
23:38 trailing wife
23:31 lex
23:28 lex
23:26 Secret Master
23:20 Pappy
23:20 gorb
23:05 Pappy
23:05 49 Pan
22:53 Pappy
22:41 crosspatch
22:36 Aussie Mike
22:29 Aussie Mike
22:23 Cornsilk Blondie
22:14 M. Murcek
22:09 trailing wife
22:06 Barbara Skolaut
21:51 Angie Schultz
21:43 phil_b
21:43 crosspatch
21:42 crosspatch
21:42 Old Patriot
21:29 phil_b









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com