Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 08/20/2008 View Tue 08/19/2008 View Mon 08/18/2008 View Sun 08/17/2008 View Sat 08/16/2008 View Fri 08/15/2008 View Thu 08/14/2008
1
2008-08-20 -Lurid Crime Tales-
Lawyer: Size matters; Court: Nah
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by tu3031 2008-08-20 15:52|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 All that money for legal fees, and the best they could come up with is "my client is hung like a flea"?
Posted by Swamp Blondie in the Cornfields 2008-08-20 16:57||   2008-08-20 16:57|| Front Page Top

#2 that which is alleged to have been exposed is too small to have been seen.

That's about the silliest unrealistic excuse I've ever heard. Even I am not so naive as to go into the woods with a total stranger, just for a conversation easily continued on a park bench. For that matter, why did the good doctor drive all the way to the park for a 20-minute conversation with a random stranger, when conversation can as easily be found in a grocery checkout line? Why did he not sit in the sun or shade outside his office with a good book? Why didn't he call his wife, who know doubt doesn't see nearly enough of him? By the logic of Occam's Razor, I declare the man a pathetic example of unrequited exhibitionism.
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2008-08-20 17:02||   2008-08-20 17:02|| Front Page Top

#3 In-line made me laugh, weep and then hic-up.
Posted by .5MT 2008-08-20 18:26|| www.cybernations.net]">[www.cybernations.net]  2008-08-20 18:26|| Front Page Top

#4 Would not jail be preferable to such a public humiliation?
How does someone sit in a courtroom while their lawyer says this?
Posted by john frum 2008-08-20 18:32||   2008-08-20 18:32|| Front Page Top

#5 This isn't the first time. There was a case we read in law school in which a sex offender's lawyer asserted, in defense to a charge of statutory rape, that his client's, er, equipment was "rag-like, lifeless, and useful only for connecting his bladder to the outside world."
Posted by Mike 2008-08-20 18:42||   2008-08-20 18:42|| Front Page Top

#6 Seriously, Mike? How on earth did y'all get through law school without terminal hysteria?
Posted by trailing wife ">trailing wife  2008-08-20 20:23||   2008-08-20 20:23|| Front Page Top

23:58 ed
23:58 liberalhawk
23:57 trailing wife
23:56 liberalhawk
23:52 liberalhawk
23:49 newc
23:44 Sgt. Mom
23:41 trailing wife
23:26 Muggsy Glink
22:48 3dc
22:48 ed
22:43 Pappy
22:42 liberalhawk
22:41 3dc
22:41 liberalhawk
22:40 Besoeker
22:39 ed
22:38 liberalhawk
22:32 Danielle
22:31 ed
22:30 liberalhawk
22:30 badanov
22:27 liberalhawk
22:27 Shieldwolf









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com