Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 10/12/2007 View Thu 10/11/2007 View Wed 10/10/2007 View Tue 10/09/2007 View Mon 10/08/2007 View Sun 10/07/2007 View Sat 10/06/2007
1
2007-10-12 Home Front: Politix
Hildebeast Says She'd Negotiate With Iran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve White 2007-10-12 00:00|| || Front Page|| [7 views ]  Top

#1 What is it going to take for these fìckwits to understand that there is no negotiating with Muslims? One merely need examine the history of all Palestinian negotiations with Israel and the Quartet to understand this. To even think it is possible goes so far beyond naive as to be dangerous. In some respects this is yet one more byproduct of Bush's tragic failure to adequately use propaganda. By now, the general American public should be so aware of taqiyya and kitman that even hinting at negotiations with Iran would evoke nothing but scorn and derision. Had this vital groundwork already been laid, there would also be a far more developed comprehension of why military conflict with Iran is a foregone conclusion.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-10-12 00:26||   2007-10-12 00:26|| Front Page Top

#2 we don't really understand how Iran works. We think we do, from the outside, but I think that is misleading

do you really think the Smartest Woman In The World™ meant "we" in any part of that sentence? "You lesser dipshits" must not have polled well, but that's what she meant
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-12 06:04||   2007-10-12 06:04|| Front Page Top

#3 I bitterly hate to agree with this wench, but she's dead right about Obama being "naive and stupid." She just conveniently left off the "stupid." As far as die Hildebeast "negociating" or making a deal with Iran, well, quite honestly, deal making and compromise are a way of life with the Clintons, a survival method, a raison d'être. The phrase "we don't really know how Iran works" conveys her own shallow understanding of the threat. Who is "we".... foreign policy advisor Sandy Berger and die Hildebest? Wahhahhaha.
Posted by Besoeker 2007-10-12 07:01||   2007-10-12 07:01|| Front Page Top

#4 Steve,
"They're stealing pretty much everything that isn't nailed down. They're running the economy for their own benefit. They're putting their trusted lackeys, friends and children in charge of everything."
Up to this point they sound a lot like our own government, don't they?
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2007-10-12 07:04||   2007-10-12 07:04|| Front Page Top

#5 Bill Clinton won two Presidential elections by running in the in the center of the USA's political spectrum. Within the Democratic Party, he is far into its right wing. He supported the death penalty, welfare reform, a balanced budget and many other positions that put him at odds with the Democratic Party's left wing.

Hillary Clinton is similar, and that is why she has a strong potential to win the Presidential elections in 2008 and 2012.

On the issue of Iraq in particular and national security in general, Hillary Clinton is most definitely in the Party's right wing. That puts her in the middle of the USA's political spectrum.

She has flip-flopped on Iraq, but so has a large portion of the public. Many people supported our invasion initially and then turned against it and now are granting it a favorable reconsideration. Therefore many voters in the decisive middle of the electorate will identify with her easily.

With regard to our policy toward Iran, much of the public is alarmed by talk and indications that the USA might bomb or even invade that country too. Compared to that possiblity, Hillary's talk about negotiating without preconditions will seem relatively harmless to many voters, especially to those who are wobbly on our invasion of Iraq.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2007-10-12 07:24||   2007-10-12 07:24|| Front Page Top

#6 GOD they are all idiots. and i don't give a shit what anyone thinks about this comment if this nation is stupid enopugh too elect a muslim i'm moving
Posted by  sinse 2007-10-12 07:42||   2007-10-12 07:42|| Front Page Top

#7 He supported the death penalty, welfare reform, a balanced budget and many other positions that put him at odds with the Democratic Party's left wing.

Caution, revisionist history 101 at work.

Clinton objected to welfare reform till the Trunks got power in Congress and the polls demonstrated that the general public favored reform . He then switched his tune and coopted the movement. The initiative was the Trunks not Willy‘s.

With the Trunks in their initial years in Congress holding to the old standard of controlled spending, the President had no alternative other than to cut back spending requests. Both parties did so at the cost to military readiness as they both drew down the active Army from 750,000 to just under 500,000. It’s something in the wake of the whining and bitching about ‘not enough soldiers’, I wouldn’t want to bring up if I were them.

He did join the Trunks in pushing NAFTA, against the wishes of his general party membership, which at the time we didn’t understand meant the importation of several million helots laborers. Then, again, the Donks traditionally are fond of plantations, real or virtual, so it wasn’t really that hard of a fit. It has since exposed many of the Trunks as betrayers of the founding principles of their party.

What the record shows is that Clinton understands how to obtain and retain power. It show no values much beyond that because the record is rife with inconsistency and political tap dancing [no Craig reference intended]. Sell your bridge elsewhere.
Posted by Procopius2k 2007-10-12 09:42||   2007-10-12 09:42|| Front Page Top

#8 #5 Mike Sylwester:

Hillary's a centrist like I (@ 5' 9" and 200-too-damn-much) take my bike for a little jaunt up the Alpe d' Huez every morning before breakfast. Make no mistake - she's a Chomskyite radical leftist who thinks Amerikkka is steeped in evil and must be removed from the world stage. If she gets elected, look for her to be Stalin at home and Neville Chamberlain overseas.
Posted by Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo) 2007-10-12 09:47||   2007-10-12 09:47|| Front Page Top

#9 Nice summary, Ricky. That's a keeper!
Posted by BA 2007-10-12 13:05||   2007-10-12 13:05|| Front Page Top

#10 Make no mistake - she's a Chomskyite radical leftist who thinks Amerikkka is steeped in evil and must be removed from the world stage. If she gets elected, look for her to be Stalin at home and Neville Chamberlain overseas.

"But, Ricky, I wanna be on the show!"
Posted by Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton  2007-10-12 13:33||   2007-10-12 13:33|| Front Page Top

#11 Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-10-12 14:33||   2007-10-12 14:33|| Front Page Top

#12 Excellent post, Ricky bin Ricardo.

Mikey, ju got sum esplaning to dooooo.....
Posted by mcsegeek1 2007-10-12 14:38||   2007-10-12 14:38|| Front Page Top

#13 Negotiating with Iran with the present regime would seem to be a waste of time. How about a regime change with some regime that is not nuts?
Posted by JohnQC 2007-10-12 17:44||   2007-10-12 17:44|| Front Page Top

#14 Anymoose, I worry that she is going to bite through the restraining straps someday.
Posted by JohnQC 2007-10-12 17:46||   2007-10-12 17:46|| Front Page Top

#15 moose, where did you get that pic? LOL.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2007-10-12 19:05||   2007-10-12 19:05|| Front Page Top

#16 it's obviously photoshopped. Hildabeast would NEVER be the submissive
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-10-12 19:17||   2007-10-12 19:17|| Front Page Top

#17 Lest we fergit, and whether for or againt him as a US voter or citizen, BILL CLINTON himself disavows any responsibility for the US economy of the 1990's + admits to being POTUS by elex fraud. "Tis why the Dems could NOT claim any credit for Amer's prosperity during the Clinton 90's.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2007-10-12 20:08||   2007-10-12 20:08|| Front Page Top

#18 Hillary's talk about negotiating without preconditions will seem relatively harmless to many voters Iran.

Fixed.
Posted by Mike N. 2007-10-12 20:34||   2007-10-12 20:34|| Front Page Top

#19 No surprise here. Just like her husband. A man who'd have sex w/a snake if he could find someone to hold its head.
Posted by Broadhead6 2007-10-12 22:30||   2007-10-12 22:30|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:40 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:31 Broadhead6
23:28 Swamp Blondie
23:19 Anonymoose
23:11 Broadhead6
23:07 Sherry
22:44 Broadhead6
22:43 Broadhead6
22:37 Broadhead6
22:31 Silentbrick
22:30 Broadhead6
22:27 twobyfour
22:26 mft
22:21 Zenster
22:16 mft
22:06 DMFD
21:50 Zenster
21:28 JosephMendiola
21:15 wxjames
21:10 wxjames
21:06 Nimble Spemble
20:59 wxjames
20:59 Darrell









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com