Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/31/2006 View Tue 05/30/2006 View Mon 05/29/2006 View Sun 05/28/2006 View Sat 05/27/2006 View Fri 05/26/2006 View Thu 05/25/2006
1
2006-05-31 Great White North
Canada pays for U.S. oil thirst
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by ed 2006-05-31 07:49|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Canada pays for U.S. oil thirst
I'm very confused : doesn't the oil-thirsty USA PAY for the canadian oil?
Posted by anonymous5089 2006-05-31 08:22||   2006-05-31 08:22|| Front Page Top

#2 Yes they do anon, at good prices too. But the anti-capitalist "evironmentalists" just HAVE to make a stink about it.

Shoot 'em.
Posted by DarthVader 2006-05-31 08:24||   2006-05-31 08:24|| Front Page Top

#3 Only MSN could take a subject like lessening our dependence on Arab oil and spin it against us.
Do I smell a pulitzer here?

Stinky aren't they?
Posted by bigjim-ky 2006-05-31 08:56||   2006-05-31 08:56|| Front Page Top

#4 And don't forget the enviro-terrorist have convinced Congress to keep nearly all the American continental shelf off limits for oil production. Time to end the game. Make it the responsiblity of the objectors to come up with new fields elsewhere when they shut out existing fields anywhere else. Don't have any. Objections overruled.
Posted by Slasing Spert8394 2006-05-31 09:01||   2006-05-31 09:01|| Front Page Top

#5 The major oil companies built some pilot 'synfuel' plants to exploit the huge Alberta tar sands back during the oil crunch of the late '70's to early '80's. Operating costs were high, capital investment costs were high, and extraction efficiencies were not so high. Projects were not really profitable once prices fell. Still, operation, experimentation, and test expansions continued, with the sure knowledge that prices would eventually rise. I doubt they expected the rate of price increase that happened. However, at $70 all those years of trial and investment are paying off fast. Plant capacities are doubling every year.
I am sure Canada, and even Alberta, have responsible environmental regulations. However, tar sand extraction is not a lot different from strip mining coal in terms of environmental impact. I am sure that the 'boom' expansion of the industry has put a load on environment, and on those who are trying to protect it (both the regulators and in the companies themselves) - no one has the numbers of experienced people available, either engineers or inspectors, to cope with the radically increased scale of operations. No doubt the environment is degraded in some areas, and given how nice it was, I am sure the change is very noticable. If the development was in the 'old' New Jersey Meadowlands, it would probably seem like an improvement.
Posted by glenmore">glenmore  2006-05-31 09:10||   2006-05-31 09:10|| Front Page Top

#6 Build a nuke plant to make the steam. That should satisfy the enviromentalists.
Posted by ed 2006-05-31 09:23||   2006-05-31 09:23|| Front Page Top

#7 producing large amounts of gases linked to global warming

Like water vapor.
Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford  2006-05-31 09:35|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/]  2006-05-31 09:35|| Front Page Top

#8 Even if true, consider the alternatives.
Posted by gromgoru 2006-05-31 10:33||   2006-05-31 10:33|| Front Page Top

#9 ...taking an unexpectedly high environmental toll, sucking water from rivers and natural gas from wells

Save the wells?!
Posted by eLarson 2006-05-31 13:35|| http://larsonian.blogspot.com]">[http://larsonian.blogspot.com]  2006-05-31 13:35|| Front Page Top

#10 Of course this is all America's fault and Bushes plan to destroy the world. This says nothing about CANADIAN GREED that is driving the rape of their own land. Over 90% of Canada's population is along the US border, why, because that is where the money is! If Canada really gave a damn about their environment they would have stopped this years ago. But no they continue to take our money and talk bad about us in the press. They can be worse than Mexico some times.
Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan  2006-05-31 14:12||   2006-05-31 14:12|| Front Page Top

#11 It's true, SU and ERF pay me, but the Canucks take their tax every month.
Posted by anonymous2u 2006-05-31 16:14||   2006-05-31 16:14|| Front Page Top

#12 We stand ready to do what's necessary. Altho, I must admit the men are still weary from the assault on Beale Street.
Posted by Task Force Dothan 2006-05-31 17:48||   2006-05-31 17:48|| Front Page Top

00:02 JosephMendiola
23:48 Pappy
23:48 Silentbrick
23:47 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:47 CrazyFool
23:40 Glains Threrese9277
23:28 borgboy
23:27  Barbara Skolaut
23:20 anonymous2u
23:15 RWV
23:15 JosephMendiola
23:10 Anonymoose
23:05 JosephMendiola
22:54 Cyber Sarge
22:52 Frank G
22:51 Frank G
22:51 bombay
22:28 JosephMendiola
22:18 JosephMendiola
22:15 Zenster
22:15 Scooter McGruder
22:14 Zenster
22:13 Old Patriot
22:12 Broadhead6









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com