Article

2005-10-01 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Identity crisis: Why one man's UAV is another man's cruise missile.

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by DanNY 2005-10-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Bwahahaha, guess they don't want to ever bring up Project Pluto again. Theres your ultimate UCAV bomber/cruise missile right there, goes hypersonic right into enemy territory, has intercontinental range, and a loiter time ranging up to a month, and best of all can drop 10-12 megaton range nukes. PC friendly it was NOT.

Posted by Valentine 2005-10-01 02:25|| 2005-10-01 02:25|| Front Page Top

#2 The proposed use for nuclear-powered ramjets would be to power an unmanned cruise missile, called SLAM, for Supersonic Low Altitude Missile. In order to reach ramjet speed, it would be launched from the ground by a cluster of conventional rocket boosters. Once it reached cruising altitude and was far away from populated areas the nuclear reactor would be turned on. Since nuclear power gave it almost unlimited range, the missile could cruise in circles over the ocean until ordered "down to the deck" for its supersonic dash to targets in the Soviet Union. Once powered up, the unshielded half-gigawatt nuclear reactor would emit highly lethal radiation in a large radius; such a vehicle could not possibly be human-piloted or reused. Indeed, some questioned whether a cruise missile derived from Project Pluto would need a warhead at all; the radiation from its engine, coupled with the shock wave that would be produced by flying at Mach 3 at treetop level, would have left a wide path of destruction wherever it went. Contrary to some reports, the exhaust of the engine would not itself be highly radioactive. Also, the nuclear engine could in principle operate for months, so a Pluto cruise missile could simply fly a long and winding pattern over enemy territory to cause incredible damage. The SLAM as proposed would carry a payload of many nuclear weapons to be dropped on multiple targets, making the cruise missile into an unmanned bomber.
Project Pluto wikipedia ;)

//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

Posted by Red Dog 2005-10-01 02:37|| 2005-10-01 02:37|| Front Page Top

#3 Sounds even better than the fabulous Navaho.

Posted by Shipman 2005-10-01 08:25|| 2005-10-01 08:25|| Front Page Top

#4 Idiots. Cruise missile trips are strictly one-way, while UAVs are designed, flown, and intended to be recovered and reused.

Posted by Ptah">Ptah 2005-10-01 21:45|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org] 2005-10-01 21:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Cruise missiles don't have to be one way. They can be upgraded to drop submunitions, return, and recovered by parachute.

Posted by ed 2005-10-01 21:52|| 2005-10-01 21:52|| Front Page Top

23:14 Oldun
23:01 RWV
22:59 Frank G
22:55 Frank G
22:51 Classical_Liberal
22:36 Anonymoose
22:30 Biff Wellington
22:27 Frank G
22:25 Frank G
22:18 .com
22:16 Sock Puppet OÂ´ Doom
22:16 Robert Crawford
22:08 Robert Crawford
22:03 Silentbrick
21:57 Alaska Paul
21:52 ed
21:48 Al Aska Paul
21:45 ed
21:45 Ptah
21:42 Flinelet Sherong3513
21:40 Flinelet Sherong3513
21:40 Flinelet Sherong3513
21:39 Frank G
21:38 Flinelet Sherong3513