Article

2005-01-14 Home Front: Tech

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by God Save The World & Bernie 2005-01-14 9:11:45 PM|| || Front Page|| [8 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Sounds more like a queer bomb to me. Wouldn't work on Arabs and muzzies.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2005-01-14 12:11:52 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com] 2005-01-14 12:11:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 ... a pilgrimage to remember...

Posted by Dishman 2005-01-14 1:33:31 AM|| 2005-01-14 1:33:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 "Queer eye for the bad guy"?

Posted by Stephen 2005-01-14 2:20:17 AM|| 2005-01-14 2:20:17 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Uh, you people do know that the Muslims, at least the Arabs, are already there, doncha? The Middle East has the heaviest concentration of male homosexuality on the planet, hands down, bar none.

Posted by .com 2005-01-14 4:32:59 AM|| 2005-01-14 4:32:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 #1 "Wouldn't work on Arabs and muzzies."
Therefore not?

Posted by gromgorru 2005-01-14 4:37:02 AM|| 2005-01-14 4:37:02 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 I understood that in the Middle East, only the one on the receiving end is considered homosexual. The other one is merely making use of a substitute for his missing sheep. Am I wrong, .com?

Regardless, suddenly feeling an overwhelming attraction to the grungy person in the next foxhole would have to be disconcerting.

Posted by trailing wife 2005-01-14 7:13:50 AM|| 2005-01-14 7:13:50 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Wonder if this idea originated with the intern staff in Bill Clinton's Oval Office?

Posted by Mike 2005-01-14 7:18:32 AM|| 2005-01-14 7:18:32 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 tw - Lol - Sooo sorry, but I no thinka lika imam on fatwa Friday... I have no doubt that they could split hairs and spin it like that to justify themselves - that's sooo very Arab, lol! When I stumbled across this shit, and I did a few times, I did not interrupt them to ask.

Posted by .com 2005-01-14 9:22:06 AM|| 2005-01-14 9:22:06 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Just drop a few thousands of 'The Girls of Tehran' Playboy issue (and a few 'boys life' thrown in for good measure) on them and there you have it.

Plus its not a 'chemical' weapon....

Posted by CrazyFool 2005-01-14 9:28:01 AM|| 2005-01-14 9:28:01 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Would the sex bomb work if the muzzie is on outpost with his camel--or does one not need to drop the sex bomb in this case?

Posted by John Q. Citizen 2005-01-14 10:56:05 AM|| 2005-01-14 10:56:05 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 Some GI friends came back from Afghanistan and told me about Man Days. He said it was so bad Coalition Forces had to stay out of sight or risk being harrassed or even worse raped. Tell me these people are normal. Sex Weapons won't work in Afghanistan, but may help population control which is the only way to keep these people in check.

Posted by Rightwing 2005-01-14 11:04:11 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:04:11 AM|| Front Page Top

#12 The Southeastern portion is Afganistan is heavily populated with homosexuals. This information was provided by a US interrogator. They had to take precautions against the homofreaks.

Posted by Captain America 2005-01-14 11:19:41 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:19:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#13 Abu: Achmed.
Achmed: Yes Abu?
Abu: You're looking particularly buff today, your buttocks, they are like that of 13 year old boy.
Achmed: Thanks for noticing, your so sweet, the 6km runs every morning are doing me well.
Abu: I thought you were doing the Atkins diet?
Achmed: Oh no, I tried that, a damn zionist plot I tell you, I like the zone diet personally.
Abu: I hear the zionists are making a new chemical weapon to corrupt us.
Achmed: I've heard the same, apparently they want us to become over enchanted with members of the same sex.
Abu: Is that all? I thought it was to make us crave pork?
Achmed: Oh no, now that would be disgusting.

Posted by Jarhead 2005-01-14 11:23:15 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:23:15 AM|| Front Page Top

#14 Jarhead, I think you are onto something: "The crave pork bomb."

Posted by John Q. Citizen 2005-01-14 11:27:28 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:27:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#15 Q, now that would be deliciously evil would it not? (no pun intended)

Posted by Jarhead 2005-01-14 11:29:49 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:29:49 AM|| Front Page Top

#16 So this would be wasted on them... (NSFW)

Posted by .com 2005-01-14 11:43:35 AM|| 2005-01-14 11:43:35 AM|| Front Page Top

#17 Actual words to an old Afghan folk song:

"There's a boy across the river with an arse like a peach,
but I cannot swim."

Probably sounds better in Pashtun.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2005-01-14 10:59:29 PM|| 2005-01-14 10:59:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#18 On a more serious note.
Though an excellent resource in many ways, New Scientist is a de facto auxiliary of the British academic establishment. It must therefore be regarded as susceptible to Islamist, Marxist, or Hate-America media cult influence. Any of its stories that reflect poorly on the US or, especially, the US military, must therefore be viewed with the utmost scepticism until fact-checked by objective media.
Remember that it was The Lancet, a nominally far more rigorous publication than New Scientist, that published the incredible Goebbels-inspired fantasy alleging that 50,000+ Iraqis had been killed in US air strikes.

Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2005-01-14 11:24:59 PM|| 2005-01-14 11:24:59 PM|| Front Page Top

#19 Holy Keeerist, Fred. Thanks (not) for the graphic

Posted by Frank G 2005-01-14 11:55:39 PM|| 2005-01-14 11:55:39 PM|| Front Page Top

23:58 Barbara Skolaut
23:56 Frank G
23:55 Frank G
23:54 Frank G
23:51 Atomic Conspiracy
23:51 Barry Bonds
23:47 Dishman
23:39 Aris Katsaris
23:36 Angash Elminelet3775
23:35 Alaska Paul
23:33 Aris Katsaris
23:33 lex
23:24 Atomic Conspiracy
23:16 Anonymoose
23:11 Karl Rove
23:09 Dishman
23:09 lex
22:59 Atomic Conspiracy
22:54 SwissTex
22:50 Captain America
22:48 lex
22:47 Frank G
22:46 anon
22:44 Frank G