Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 10/06/2004 View Tue 10/05/2004 View Mon 10/04/2004 View Sun 10/03/2004 View Sat 10/02/2004 View Fri 10/01/2004 View Thu 09/30/2004
1
2004-10-06 Home Front: Politix
Rangel votes against own draft measure
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2004-10-06 10:29:58 PM|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Really sucks when your party isn't in power, doesn't it, Charley?
Posted by PBMcL 2004-10-06 12:07:08 AM||   2004-10-06 12:07:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 What's the sound of one man voting? Flip flop flip flop.

Good night bloggers. Got to do a day gig early in the a.m.
Posted by John (Q. Citizen) 2004-10-06 12:16:40 AM||   2004-10-06 12:16:40 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Rangel, Rangel, Rangel....you're pathetic.
Posted by 2b 2004-10-06 12:35:04 AM||   2004-10-06 12:35:04 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 â€œIt should be subject to hearings and to expert testimony...”

He wants the three-ring circus, not the vote.
Posted by Pappy 2004-10-06 12:52:46 AM||   2004-10-06 12:52:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Rangel was dropped in the East River, on his head as a baby and never recovered.
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-10-06 1:12:29 AM||   2004-10-06 1:12:29 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 I appreciate Rangel's service to our country while he was in uniform. Since that time he has done a great many disservices to our country. I look for that trend to continue.
Posted by Super Hose 2004-10-06 3:49:43 AM||   2004-10-06 3:49:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Antiwar TROLL 2004-10-06 9:28:46 AM||   2004-10-06 9:28:46 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Well, there she is. C'mon, anti, you tricky, tricky girl. Time to change you. Pretty soon you'll be ready for adult diapers... and a fistful of barbituates.
Posted by tu3031 2004-10-06 9:57:54 AM||   2004-10-06 9:57:54 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 This was a smart move on the part of the Republicans. Rangel should be hauled before court on a treason charge for trying to sabotage the US armed forces in such a disgraceful way.
Posted by BH 2004-10-06 11:51:38 AM||   2004-10-06 11:51:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery

H.R.163

COSPONSORS(14), ALPHABETICAL [followed by Cosponsors withdrawn]: (Sort: by date)
Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1] - 1/7/2003
Rep Brown, Corrine [FL-3] - 1/28/2003

Rep Christensen, Donna M. [VI] - 5/19/2004 Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] - 1/28/2003

Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14] - 1/7/2003
Rep Cummings, Elijah E. [MD-7] - 1/28/2003
Rep Hastings, Alcee L. [FL-23] - 1/28/2003 Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2] - 7/21/2004

Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] - 1/28/2003 Rep Lewis, John [GA-5] - 1/7/2003

Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] - 1/7/2003
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] - 1/28/2003

Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13] - 1/7/2003
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12] - 1/28/2003
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes [DC] - 1/28/2003(withdrawn - 6/21/2004

bill had 14 cosponsors - but only 2 voted yea. Results not up yet.

Looks like campaign advertising material to me.

Cut to photos of young students walking the hallowed halls of high schools and universities.

"These Democrats want you to be drafted against your will. The Military has said they have met all of their recruiting goals, the Commanders have said the draft is unnecessary and unwanted...yet these (scroll names and photos) Democratic Representatives, who support John Kerry, want you to be forced to join. Why?


heh...heh.. No law says you have to provide the infor on who actually voted for and against -this list of who sponsored and co-sponsored works just fine. Put the smuckoids on the defensive.
Posted by 2b 2004-10-06 12:01:39 PM||   2004-10-06 12:01:39 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 This was an excellent move by the Republican leadership. You want to talk smack Charlie? You want to do an e-mail campaign based upon a lie Democrats? Well put up or shut up. BTW: Did you see this ANYWHERE today other than The Hill???? Doubt it.
Posted by remote man 2004-10-06 2:59:13 PM||   2004-10-06 2:59:13 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 The ad 2b suggests would be devistating. They'd call it a dirty trick of course, but the fact is this draft measure was a dirty trick to begin with.
Posted by RJSchwarz 2004-10-06 10:34:28 PM|| [http://politicaljunky.blogspot.com]  2004-10-06 10:34:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Antiwar 2004-10-06 9:28:46 AM||   2004-10-06 9:28:46 AM|| Front Page Top

10:10 Antiwar
05:49 Antiwar
05:48 Antiwar
10:09 Antiwar
05:52 Antiwar
05:53 Antiwar
09:21 Antiwar
09:19 Antiwar
09:18 Antiwar
09:28 Antiwar
09:25 Antiwar
09:23 Antiwar
15:52 lex
15:24 Joseph L.
07:03 MendoScot
06:27 Howard UK
06:01 Memesis
05:34 Sock Puppet of Doom
05:28 Memesis
05:14 Sock Puppet of Doom
05:12 Sock Puppet of Doom
05:07 Memesis
05:05 Bryan
04:55 Matt Helm









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com