Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 09/18/2004 View Fri 09/17/2004 View Thu 09/16/2004 View Wed 09/15/2004 View Tue 09/14/2004 View Mon 09/13/2004 View Sun 09/12/2004
1
2004-09-18 Home Front: WoT
Army: Re-up or Else?....
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-09-18 12:35:12 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 While in Vietnam (1966) I received this order:
"Invol ext 4 months IAW 10 USG 5538 & ALNAV-45-65".Instead of being discharged June 1966,I was discharged 28 SEPT 1966.Net total active duty:
04 years, 03 months,07 days.
Posted by crazyhorse  2004-09-18 11:33:59 AM||   2004-09-18 11:33:59 AM|| Front Page Top

#2  I call BS on this one.
Posted by 98zulu 2004-09-18 12:21:32 PM||   2004-09-18 12:21:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Major B.S. is the right call. Reinlisting for another three years will absolutely guarantee another tour in Iraq, Afghanistan, or the Bulkans, reguardless of which unit they end up serving. I ETS next June, and I've been told I have to go back for 6 months. If I reinlisted, I'd be back there TWO more times, maybe three. Sorry logic there.
"We have a whole platoon who refuses to sign,"
Whole platoons don't EST at the same time.
Posted by Homer  2004-09-18 2:55:22 PM||   2004-09-18 2:55:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 What they're obviously trying to do with 3rd Brigade Combat Team is to bring all the release dates in line so that the unit will be formed an demobilized as a single entity.

At first glance that's my read on it too. This is a major initiative of the Army designed in part to allow families to move less often.
Posted by rkb 2004-09-18 3:41:47 PM||   2004-09-18 3:41:47 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 The Army is attempting to "stabilize" personnel in units for a 3 or 4 year cycle. They will train up, deploy, return, and stand down together. This also allows them to keep a cadre of personnel together to rebuild the unit for it's next cycle. The report is true but the point of view is all wrong. BTW - the Army has always had the "needs of the Army" reenlistment option. (Been there - got the lapel pin!)
Posted by mock360 2004-09-18 6:35:25 PM||   2004-09-18 6:35:25 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 We can only hope that the better bloggers -- instapundit,com comes to mind -- will soon be able to bring cases like this to national attention. Unfortunately for these soldiers, no national news organization has the ability to report this story in terms they would accept, or maybe even understand, and no blogger has the audience to make such idiocy a national affair. Is this happening elsewhere? And how can we protest REMF pettiness without being co-opted? While we wait, if someone would provide us with a few email addresses, at least we can do something. So who do I write?
Posted by Madprof 2004-09-18 10:41:35 PM||   2004-09-18 10:41:35 PM|| Front Page Top

17:32 Anonymous6537
17:32 Anonymous6537
17:13 Anonymous6535
17:13 Anonymous6535
15:08 Anonymous6532
15:08 Anonymous6532
01:11 Anonymous6530
01:11 Anonymous6530
07:59 .com
06:46 trailing wife
06:35 trailing wife
02:50 Sock Puppet of Doom
01:49 Phil Fraering
01:41 Phil Fraering
00:24 RWV
00:16 RWV
23:07 Frank G
22:59 tipper
22:49 PBMcL
22:42 RWV
22:41 Madprof
22:36 3dc
22:20 whitecollar redneck
22:19 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com