Article

2005-02-21 Europe

WaPo: Why is Europe Eager to Sell Arms to China?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-02-21 5:35:15 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Whoa! This is from the Washington Post ... not the Times! I wonder what goaded them into printing this?

Posted by trailing wife 2005-02-21 6:33:08 PM|| 2005-02-21 6:33:08 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 Fear Madam, fear.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2005-02-21 7:15:36 PM|| [http://www.slhess.com] 2005-02-21 7:15:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 The US has no right to to insist France and Germany not sell weapons to China. But they also have no right to sell BMWs, Airbus, cosmetics or anything else to the US. In addition, they should have no expectations that energy imports will be protected or otherwise not molested. They should have no expectations that US relations, forces and trade won't be shifted to states with a less than satisfactory history with France and Germany. Finally, France and Germany have no right to insist that the US not sell to Taiwan, or any other country threatened by Chinese expansionism, long range missiles that can reach out and touch Paris and Berlin.

Posted by ed 2005-02-21 7:38:18 PM|| 2005-02-21 7:38:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Medium-range missiles to Ivory Coast, ed?

Posted by Tom 2005-02-21 7:44:11 PM|| 2005-02-21 7:44:11 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Ed, ever hear of the WTO? The problem is to get them not to sell to China, not to get them to replace us in NATO with China.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-02-21 7:49:38 PM|| 2005-02-21 7:49:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 OK, a few comments (some info from the Munich Security Conference where the issue was raised in private conversations):

The (sort of) official Schroeder position (given by defense minister Struck) is that lifting the embargo is a largely symbolic act as the "stringent" EU rules for arms exports would kick in and China wouldn't be likely to receive high tech stuff without a (secret) nod from the U.S. anyway. (Germany would never make arms deals with China that the U.S. clearly objects to). Schroeder believes that the embargo that makes it impossible to export a single pistol "offends" the Chinese sensibilities. He believes that Germany's (non arms) business with China will improve if this issue is resolved.

The German position may be only naive, the French position (given by defense minister Alliot-Marie) is not. She claims that China will be able to produce all those high tech weapons itself, so why not sell the stuff to them before and make some profit. (What she did not say of course that it suits France's idea of a multipolar world).

Interestingly enough the British who have the closest collaboration with the US in weapon technology seem no longer to oppose the lifting of the embargo (for reasons closer to the German positions), but will probably want very strict control and will not agree to selling anything that could worry the U.S.

One position shared by all three nations was that measures should be taken to avoid a closer military relationship between China and Russia. Mr Ivanov provided some interesting insights in that matter.

Posted by True German Ally 2005-02-21 8:00:32 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:00:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 So everybody has a good reason, once again, to ignore the security concerns of the U. S. Isn't anybody over there worried about the Americans doing something stupid, like getting fed up with the Europeans? The Democrats are going to be desparate to get in the White House in '08. The Republicans will have no obvious candidate. This will be the first election since 1968 that both Parties' nomination will be up for grabs. It is not outside the realm of possibility that one could run on an anti-European isolationist platform. The good guys need to win in '06 and put a stop to this nonsense.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-02-21 8:15:19 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:15:19 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 typical French - he was gonna get it somewhere, why shouldn't I bend over and make some money at it...there's a word for that - whores

Posted by Frank G 2005-02-21 8:15:57 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:15:57 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 OK, I just found out that Alliot-Marie gave an interview published by the Financial Times and Les Echos making her points:

"Alliot-Marie argued in the interview also published in French economic daily Les Echos that the country would soon be able to develop such technology itself, regardless.
"China is rapidly developing its industry, and today our experts say that in five years China could make exactly the same arms that we have today," France's first female defence minister told the British newspaper.
"And they will do it if they cannot import," she said.
"So maybe if we can sell them the arms, they will not make them. And in five years' time they will not have the technology to make them."

I think it's not necessary to comment...

Posted by True German Ally 2005-02-21 8:45:37 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:45:37 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 OK, I can't resist: Let's sell nuclear arms to Iran so they wont make them themselves.

Posted by True German Ally 2005-02-21 8:48:32 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:48:32 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 OK, I can't resist either: One more f'ing French a$$hole that's never gonna visit the ranch.

Posted by Tom 2005-02-21 8:53:07 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:53:07 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 j'accuse - I rest my case LOL

Posted by Frank G 2005-02-21 8:58:28 PM|| 2005-02-21 8:58:28 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Having seen Chinese manufacturing, I can say that it is much better to let the Chinese make their own military hardware, rather than letting them import top-quality foreign stuff.

It's a stereotype, but my experience is that Chinese manufacturers are great at making things that are already known, and terrible at innovating new goods. You give them some plans and a target date, and they'll whip things into shape and deliver on time and on budget. But throw them into a conference room together and demand a list of new ideas...I think most of them would chuckle to themselves if they considered the idea of making a new product all by themselves.

Posted by gromky 2005-02-21 9:34:04 PM|| 2005-02-21 9:34:04 PM|| Front Page Top

23:29 AzCat
23:17 Sobiesky
23:04 Sobiesky
23:03 crazyhorse
22:52 Beau
22:50 trailing wife
22:48 Frank G
22:46 trailing wife
22:36 trailing wife
22:36 trailing wife
22:30 Frank G
22:29 Brett
22:24 Aris Katsaris
22:23 Frank G
22:23 mhw
22:22 Frank G
22:19 Alaska Paul
22:13 Anonymoose
22:10 John in Tokyo
22:09 trailing wife
22:07 mom
21:54 Frank G
21:46 Aris Katsaris
21:44 3dc