Hi there, !
Today Sat 06/23/2007 Fri 06/22/2007 Thu 06/21/2007 Wed 06/20/2007 Tue 06/19/2007 Mon 06/18/2007 Sun 06/17/2007 Archives
Rantburg
533627 articles and 1861754 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 72 articles and 364 comments as of 22:39.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
Boom kills 78 in Baghdad
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
2 00:00 Silentbrick [2] 
0 [] 
14 00:00 Iblis [4] 
5 00:00 Tony (UK) [5] 
3 00:00 Pappy [2] 
19 00:00 Matt [1] 
7 00:00 twobyfour [2] 
1 00:00 Bobby [6] 
18 00:00 JosephMendiola [3] 
19 00:00 Icerigger [2] 
2 00:00 bigjim-ky [4] 
17 00:00 Zenster [6] 
6 00:00 Zenster [2] 
2 00:00 twobyfour [] 
2 00:00 ed [2] 
10 00:00 Liberalhawk [3] 
6 00:00 mhw [2] 
2 00:00 tu3031 [1] 
1 00:00 3dc [7] 
1 00:00 Shipman [2] 
0 [5] 
7 00:00 Ebbang Uluque6305 [3] 
1 00:00 tu3031 [] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
9 00:00 Mac [6]
3 00:00 mhw [6]
5 00:00 NYT Reporter [3]
15 00:00 Red Dawg [3]
5 00:00 Shieldwolf [1]
0 [4]
10 00:00 3dc [2]
4 00:00 Mac [2]
9 00:00 Zenster [3]
12 00:00 Zenster []
1 00:00 Red Dawg [4]
5 00:00 tu3031 [3]
1 00:00 Bobby [3]
2 00:00 tu3031 [2]
4 00:00 Shipman [4]
4 00:00 Shipman [3]
0 [3]
0 [5]
0 [2]
1 00:00 Red Dawg [3]
0 [6]
0 [1]
3 00:00 Glenmore []
1 00:00 trailing wife [2]
1 00:00 trailing wife []
3 00:00 Glenmore [3]
0 [2]
4 00:00 Shipman [4]
1 00:00 Jack is Back! [1]
1 00:00 Glenmore [4]
1 00:00 Glenmore [6]
14 00:00 Zenster [4]
Page 3: Non-WoT
13 00:00 Penguin [6]
8 00:00 occasional observer [3]
0 [2]
0 [2]
Page 4: Opinion
2 00:00 Zenster [2]
7 00:00 eLarson [1]
6 00:00 DMFD [4]
6 00:00 Harry Reid [1]
2 00:00 trailing wife [5]
2 00:00 Grumenk Philalzabod0723 [1]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
15 00:00 trailing wife [3]
5 00:00 Zenster []
1 00:00 3dc [2]
16 00:00 JosephMendiola [7]
5 00:00 mcsegeek1 []
7 00:00 Eric Jablow [8]
5 00:00 JAB [4]
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Did Osama bin Laden die of Typhoid earlier this month?
It's possible, but I doubt it. There are so many rumors about his health, welfare, and whereabouts that he'll probably be dead for a coupla years before anyone really believes it. That's what he's trying for, anyway.
Posted by: 3dc || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under: al-Qaeda

#1  I hope not. I am hoping he takes a frag round in the groin.
Posted by: anymouse || 06/20/2007 0:24 Comments || Top||

#2  I hope he's still alive. I want him to die of lead poisoning, if you get my drift.
Posted by: Dar || 06/20/2007 0:45 Comments || Top||

#3  Not again!
Posted by: Iblis || 06/20/2007 0:56 Comments || Top||

#4  I don't care if he lives or dies. His fans, acolytes & worshipers on the other hand...
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 06/20/2007 1:47 Comments || Top||

#5  His fans, acolytes & worshipers on the other hand...

And AH9418 wins handily by a full length.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 1:53 Comments || Top||

#6  The parent website to this story is good for quite a few laughs. (another 'spricies 'R Us site)
Posted by: 3dc || 06/20/2007 2:41 Comments || Top||

#7  The powerful Pakistani intelligence agency the ISI leaked that it was sneaky Geraldo Rivera Jerry Rivers who told them that Osama felt peaked in Jan 07..
Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 4:46 Comments || Top||

#8  I'm afrain lead poisioning might make him a martyr.

I hope - like the old soldier he is - that he just "fades away".

Apologies to the late General Douglas Mac Arthur.
Posted by: Bobby || 06/20/2007 5:46 Comments || Top||

#9  Not shot like a soldier, but hanged like the brigand he is.
Posted by: Mike || 06/20/2007 9:40 Comments || Top||

#10  Zombie Osama is coming for our infidel braaaaaaaaiins.
Posted by: DarthVader || 06/20/2007 9:55 Comments || Top||

#11  Live damn you! Live! Until you see the Kaaba turned into a brothel servicing American soldiers with the finest Saudi ex-princesses.
Posted by: ed || 06/20/2007 10:02 Comments || Top||

#12  LOL ... notice how the Binny's death would be a blow to those "sloganising Neo-cons."
Posted by: doc || 06/20/2007 10:02 Comments || Top||

#13  I maybe channeling my tin foil hat but I still think we bagged his a*s at Tora Bora. I don't buy the voice only messages. I believe his head in a freezer deep inside the Petagon.

I know some would say no way but you would have to agree if Bin Laden was confirmed dead the gen pop would have forgotten the WOT long before they did with him out there threating still.
Posted by: C-Low || 06/20/2007 13:51 Comments || Top||

#14  Find his dead bones and then hang his bones. Let the swine use his bones for toothpicks--if they will.
Posted by: JohnQC || 06/20/2007 14:43 Comments || Top||

#15  I'd much rather he died of syphilis, and that it took 24 long, painful months. Sepsis is also a good cause of death. Now if we could only find a way to inject Zawahiri with polonium...
Posted by: Old Patriot || 06/20/2007 14:57 Comments || Top||

#16  "Did Osama bin Laden die of Typhoid earlier this month?"

If he did (assuming he was still alive to begin with), hope it was very painful.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 06/20/2007 16:02 Comments || Top||

#17  Live damn you! Live! Until you see the Kaaba turned into a brothel servicing American soldiers with the finest Saudi ex-princesses.

I take it all back. ed wins by a country mile.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 16:21 Comments || Top||

#18  Osama's verfied corpus delicti will settle all questions.* "ISLAM SHALL CONQUER THE WORLD" > IOW, iff one believes that the EARTH NATURALLY PRODUCES = REPLENISHES ITS OWN OIL, then ala GLOBAL WARMING + "OIL CATACLYSM/SHORTAGE", etc.Islamist preachers are basically arguing that AS CIVILIZATION DECLINES DUE TO LACK OF OIL AN AGE OF GLOBAL? BARBARISM = PRIMITIVISM = MEDIEVALISM WILL ENSUE. ISLAM MAY WIN BECUZ CAMELS, ETC. IN NEW FUTURE DARK AGE(S)DON'T DEPEND ON OIL. Radical Islam doesn't need a giant asteroid.
Posted by: JosephMendiola || 06/20/2007 23:40 Comments || Top||


Africa Horn
Somalia: Conflict report workshop opens in Djibouti
(SomaliNet) Six-day workshop on conflict sensitive reporting arranged by the International Media Support (IMS) and the National Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ) has on Tuesday started in the Djiboutian capital of Djibouti.

The workshop, which will run from 19 to 25 June 2007 was attended by 20 journalists from different regions of Somalia comprising of editors, assistant editors, producers, presenters, reporters and rreelancers from print and electronic media sectors.

During the workshop, Ross Howard, veteran journalist who has been in the field for more than 30 years will give lessons of sensitive conflict reporting.

At the opening ceremony, Omar Faruk Osman, General Secretary of NUSOJ said the workshop is intended to upgrade the knowledge of Somali journalists towards reporting in conflict areas.

“As NUSOJ, our role is not only to protect the rights of journalists but to educate them as well, what we are trying to do is to get more professional journalists in Somalia,” said Faruk.

The training aims to help Somali journalists understand how conflict is resolved and the implications of this for how journalists work; examine the role and impact of journalism in reporting in conflict situations; develop skills for the practice of journalism in conflict situations; and provide a forum and process whereby Somali journalists can consider the ethical and professional challenges and issues surrounding reporting conflict. This is the first workshop of its kind held for Somali journalists in Djibouti.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Islamic Courts

#1  Okay. First Lesson: Boosh Bad!
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 8:58 Comments || Top||


Britain
BBC deliberately risked safety of troops
The BBC was accused last night of risking the safety of British forces in Iraq after trawling for information on troop movements in the war-torn country. Politicians reacted in disbelief to the revelation that for over two hours yesterday, the BBC News website carried a request for people in Iraq to report on troop movements. The request was removed from the website after it sparked furious protests that the corporation was endangering the lives of British servicemen and women.

But according to accounts last night, a story on a major operation by US and Iraqi troops against al-Qa'eda somewhere north of Baghdad contained an extraordinary request for information about the movement of troops. Last night the BBC confirmed the wording of the request was: "Are you in Iraq? Have you seen any troop movements? If you have any information you would like to share with the BBC, you can do so using the form below."

The BBC confirmed last night that this form of words had appeared on the website from "late morning" until early afternoon. "It was down by 2pm," The Daily Telegraph was told.

A spokesman was unable to offer a detailed explanation of why anyone at the BBC should be seeking such information or whether any details on troop movements had been received. He refused to identify who put the message up but said that "the journalist" responsible had been reminded that "this is not a form of words we would use". However, in a statement, the BBC added: "BBC Online regularly asks visitors to its websites to supply information they may have relating to a specific story through a response form posted at the end of a news item.

"This particular page should not have been published. The BBC never broadcasts or publishes information which may put British troops at increased risk."

Since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, 151 UK troops have lost their lives, 115 of them in hostile action.

The Conservatives demanded an investigation be carried out into the information search and urged the BBC to make sure any information received had not fallen into the wrong hands.

Dr Liam Fox, the Shadow Defence Secretary, said, "I am appalled because it shows either a wilful disregard for the safety of our Armed Forces or a shocking lack of understanding about their safety. ... It makes me wonder who makes these decisions. The BBC now needs to have urgent discussions with the Armed Forces as to how this message came about."

The blunder sparked a flood of protests from army insiders and servicemen's relatives, posted on the Army Rumour Service website (www.arrse.co.uk). One woman, who described herself as an "Army wife", said she was "shocked and dismayed" that the BBC was asking people "to report our troop movements on an open forum which could be read by insurgent forces and/or their allies".

The BBC insisted last night that the information would not have been published, saying "this was not a blog".

But the woman went on: "Surely if you want reporting done, you have staff who are able to do that for you. Otherwise why do we pay over £100 in licence fees?"

Another wrote: "Did you realize that the BBC are now helping insurgents in northern Iraq with their intelligence?"
Posted by: trailing wife || 06/20/2007 09:47 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  Why would anybody be under the impression that the BBC was anything but the propaganda and intelligence arm of the enemies of the West?
Posted by: Jonathan || 06/20/2007 10:11 Comments || Top||

#2  From 1 April 2007 the licence will go up by 3% to £135.50 for colour (per TV) and £45.50 for black and white.

Or the British could eliminate the fee, buy a new 32" color TV every year, screw up enemy spying and propaganda and still have left over change.
Posted by: ed || 06/20/2007 10:19 Comments || Top||

#3  Different fees for BW and color TV's? That's ... unbelievably lame.

My thoughts on the BBC's request are unprintable in a family weblog.
Posted by: Seafarious || 06/20/2007 10:30 Comments || Top||

#4  "This particular page should not have been published. The BBC never broadcasts or publishes information which may put British troops at increased risk."

Yeah, I believe that.
When's Alan Johnston gonna be appointed Hamas's new Minister of Information?
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 10:46 Comments || Top||

#5  I wonder how much longer the average joe/jane will tolerate their tax dollars going for BBC/PBS propaganda for the terrorists.
Posted by: DarthVader || 06/20/2007 11:09 Comments || Top||

#6  Oh no Seafarious, you have it all wrong. It makes perfect sense, after all, you get 50% of the licence fee if you're blind...
Posted by: Tony (UK) || 06/20/2007 11:24 Comments || Top||

#7  I was on their website looking for the story. And I'm looking and looking and looking...
I'll keep looking.
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 11:25 Comments || Top||

#8  I s'pose it never occurred to Aunty to inquire after the troop movements of the insurgents...
Posted by: Seafarious || 06/20/2007 11:32 Comments || Top||

#9  Sounds like somebody needs to be locked up for espionage.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 06/20/2007 11:43 Comments || Top||

#10  Simply put these people are traitors and freedom of the press has nothing to do with it. They should be hung, shot and then burned at the stake. Just to make sure.

Also we need to keep in mind that our own PBS is joined at the hip with the BBC.
Posted by: Icerigger || 06/20/2007 11:57 Comments || Top||

#11  “I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast.”
- William Tecumseh Sherman
Posted by: Procopius2k || 06/20/2007 12:39 Comments || Top||

#12  My mother used to say that one should never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity... but in the case of the BBC, I'd be pleased to make an exception.

Sweet Jumping Jeebus on a pogo-stick, who ever posted that little request had better be hiding under their desk this morning. Hundreds of thousands of pissed-off friends and family of military members over there are on the warpath and looking to put his/her head on a stake.

Not that the Brits really go in for that these days... but again, for this kind of malign stupidity they might make an exception, also.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom || 06/20/2007 12:40 Comments || Top||

#13  Scurilous traitorous bastards.
Posted by: JohnQC || 06/20/2007 14:39 Comments || Top||

#14  A BBC staffer named... Moohamhead? It seems inevitable.
Posted by: Excalibur || 06/20/2007 15:58 Comments || Top||

#15  They should be hung, shot and then burned at the stake. Just to make sure.

You left out "torture". My own prescribed method has always been, "Shot and hung after torture." Burning at the stake is merely gilding the lily but, hey!, gilded lilies have their place in this world, too.

My mother used to say that one should never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity... but in the case of the BBC, I'd be pleased to make an exception.

Too right, Sgt. Mom! This sort of crapulence simply cannot be atributed to brain death. It is the sole product of calculated and vile treason.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 17:15 Comments || Top||

#16  Speculation, possible avenue of investigation: AQ leaders have lost contact with their own spy network because of the disruption caused by recent allied operations and a mole or sympathizer at Beeb has tried to take up the slack.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 06/20/2007 17:17 Comments || Top||

#17  Notice:

If you are in Iraq and have any information on the movements of BBC spies, scouts, and reconnaisance parties that you would like to share with CIA , MI-6, and the SAS, please post it here.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 06/20/2007 17:24 Comments || Top||

#18  Sorry, missed that one. How about forced to hand dig the graves of every fallen Allied solder.
Posted by: Icerigger || 06/20/2007 18:01 Comments || Top||

#19  #16 I don't get it. What's speculative about that?
Posted by: Matt || 06/20/2007 20:29 Comments || Top||


Britain slams suicide attack warning
Britain voiced “deep concern” on Tuesday at reported comments by Pakistani Religious Affairs Minister Ejazul Haq suggesting that author Salman Rushdie’s knighthood could justify suicide attacks, as protests mounted. The expression of worry came as British Muslim leaders condemned the award for the Indian-born author as a “provocation”, but urged restraint from Muslims in this country, rather than the outpourings of anger in Pakistan.
As Charles Johnson pointed out, keep an eye on Friday, after prayers.
A Foreign Office spokesman said British High Commissioner to Pakistan Robert Brinkley had made London’s position clear in talks at the Pakistani Foreign Ministry in Islamabad. “He made clear the British government’s deep concern at what the minister for religious affairs was reported to have said,” he told AFP. “The British government is very clear that nothing can justify suicide bomb attacks.”

“It is surprising that the British government is criticising me. I am the one who is heading the front-line ministry for the front-line state in the war against terrorism,” Haq told AFP. Haq said he had already withdrawn the comment, which he made in parliament on Monday, saying that he meant the knighthood could spark extremism.

Meanwhile, Pakistan summoned Britain’s ambassador to the Foreign Ministry on Tuesday. British High Commissioner Robert Brinkley had been called to receive a protest, High Commission spokesman Aidan Liddle told AFP without giving further details. Pakistan Foreign Office spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam confirmed that Brinkley had been summoned and said that he received a copy of resolutions passed by parliament against the knighthood. “The meeting has taken place. The high commissioner was called and he was given copies of resolutions passed. It was further conveyed to that Pakistan deplores and regrets the decision by the British government,” Aslam said. She said the award of the knighthood showed a “lack of sensitivity”.

“He was told the decision by the British government was contrary to objectives to bring about harmony between the faiths. He was told that the people of Pakistan and Muslims all around the world resent this decision.” Brinkley issued a statement late on Monday defending the award and saying it was “simply untrue that this knighthood is intended as an insult to Islam or Prophet Mohammed.” “Sir Salman’s knighthood is a reflection of his contribution to literature throughout a long and distinguished career which has seen him receive international recognition for a substantial body of work,” Brinkley said.

Meanwhile, legislators in the NWFP called for Pakistan to sever diplomatic ties with London over the Rushdi issue. In Lahore, around 150 hardline protesters torched an effigy of the British queen and called for Rushdi to be handed over to an Islamic court. “We want Rushdi to be handed over to Muslim country where he should be tried under Sharia law,” protest leader Shahid Gilani of the Shabab-e-Milli told the crowd. “The punishment for a blasphemer is death.” “We have also decided that we will from now on call every dog ‘Sir’,” he said.

Meanwhile the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), the main umbrella group of Islamic organisations, condemned Rushdie’s knighthood as a “provocation” but called for restraint from ordinary Muslims.

Author Salman Rushdi said on Monday he was “thrilled and humbled” to be awarded a British knighthood. In a statement issued by his agent in New York, where he lives, Rushdie said, “I am thrilled and humbled to receive this great honor and am very grateful that my work has been recognised in this way.”
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  Watch for Friday after prayers indeed.

And watch what happens if they burn another Union Jack.
Posted by: Excalibur || 06/20/2007 9:26 Comments || Top||

#2  “It is surprising that the British government is criticising me. I am the one who is heading the front-line ministry for the front-line state in the war against terrorism,” Haq told AFP.

And it's a bang up job you're doing, you little weasel.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 06/20/2007 11:48 Comments || Top||

#3  whaddya gonna do about it excalibur? blog about it?
Posted by: Jerese McCoy5255 || 06/20/2007 14:46 Comments || Top||

#4  Oh! Oh!
Posted by: JohnQC || 06/20/2007 14:52 Comments || Top||

#5  Nuke Pakistan, Britain, and I'll believe you mean what you say. Otherwise, you're a dhimmi, with little spine. I doubt Brown could do anything if he wanted to, and I doubt he wants to.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 06/20/2007 15:07 Comments || Top||

#6  whaddya gonna do about it excalibur? blog about it?

While I cannot say for sure, I'd pay good money to see what happened immediately after you said that to his face.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 17:07 Comments || Top||

#7  That might be about time for some soccer hooliganism.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 06/20/2007 17:54 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg leaves GOP
Posted by: Seafarious || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Was he ever in? So long RINO.
Posted by: Rex Mundi || 06/20/2007 0:02 Comments || Top||

#2  Cya, wouldn't wanna be ya...
Posted by: badanov || 06/20/2007 0:10 Comments || Top||

#3  Don't let my foot hit your ass on the way out, gun grabber.
Posted by: Secret Master || 06/20/2007 0:35 Comments || Top||

#4  Few more like this and the R's may be back in business. Can you hear me now John McCain?
Posted by: Iblis || 06/20/2007 0:57 Comments || Top||

#5  I thought he was a Democrat all along. Only now did the MSM reveal the truth!
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 06/20/2007 1:49 Comments || Top||

#6  It fits. Bloomberg News (founded by the mayor) doesn't have much in the way of reporters. It uses programs searching corporate reports and press releases to generate its stories with AI. So, one could rightfully say it is fluff too.
Posted by: 3dc || 06/20/2007 2:39 Comments || Top||

#7  NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg leaves GOP

from the little people then, get lost asshole soon we begin our Revolution, and you will leave then but under less favorable circumstances...

>:)
Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 4:54 Comments || Top||

#8  I saw a headline somewhere else (sorry, I was doing research!) this morning that suggested it was part of his presidential plan to run as a third-party candidate.

Hey! Maybe he and Al Bore will team up?
Posted by: Bobby || 06/20/2007 6:13 Comments || Top||

#9  Hes unknown outside of the NY media hype. He'll only take northeast votes from Her Thighness.
Posted by: BrerRabbit || 06/20/2007 7:58 Comments || Top||

#10  I've seen polls in which Nurse Bloomberg draws enough centrist votes to swing several states to the 'Rat. Of course, it's 2007, not 2008, so as he's better known, I expect that will drop.
Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds || 06/20/2007 8:32 Comments || Top||

#11  Bloomberg was a Democrat. He switched parties so he could ride Guiliani's coattails to the mayorship since a Dem had no chance in 2001. Must be deluded to run for prez as an independent, unless his intention is sabotage a candidate. Since I can't see Republicans voting for him, he must really dislike Hillary.
Posted by: ed || 06/20/2007 9:25 Comments || Top||

#12  Yeah, this is a root canal for the donks. No normal republican will ever vote for this jerk unless he is running against a donk as in his runs for NYC mayor.
Posted by: wxjames || 06/20/2007 9:33 Comments || Top||

#13  Good riddance.
Posted by: DarthVader || 06/20/2007 10:04 Comments || Top||

#14  "He switched parties so he could ride Guiliani's coattails to the mayorship since a Dem had no chance in 2001"

My understanding was that he switched cause the Dems wouldnt nominate him.

I dont think hes qualified for Prez. Might be an interesting candidate for Gov or Senate though.
Posted by: Liberalhawk || 06/20/2007 10:57 Comments || Top||

#15  So if Independent don't work for ya, Mike, what's it gonna be next? Communist? Whig? Dixiecrat?
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 11:19 Comments || Top||

#16  This guy is more fickle about his party affiliation than a teenage girl is about her boyfriends. He has always been a dhimmi in spirit and deed.
Posted by: JohnQC || 06/20/2007 14:48 Comments || Top||

#17  Bloomborg, may you get the reception you deserve wherever you go. If you can stomach that, you might be a worthwhile candidate - for dogcatcher in Newark. You and your money can't buy the presidency, like you bought the mayoralty of New York. You are useless, uneducated, and a bore to the rest of the nation. I hope you go bankrupt, swine.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 06/20/2007 15:13 Comments || Top||

#18  "NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg leaves GOP"

Mr. Nanny was never in the GOP - he just lied to get into power.

Like lots of Dems....
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 06/20/2007 16:01 Comments || Top||

#19  Waiting for one last announcement, "and joined CAIR".
Posted by: Icerigger || 06/20/2007 18:03 Comments || Top||


Netanyahu to meet Cheney, Clinton
Likud Chairman Binyamin Netanyahu flew to the United States on Tuesday night to meet with Vice President Dick Cheney, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton and New York state officials.
"Bibi!" (air kisses)
Netanyahu, who met with Clinton rival Sen. Barack Obama on his last visit to the US, will focus on the Iranian issue in the discussions. The Likud leader began a campaign several months ago to persuade the governors and legislators of American states to divest their pension funds from Iran. Florida and Ohio have already passed such measures and California is expected to do so this summer.
This article starring:
Likud Chairman Binyamin Netanyahu
Sen. Barack Obama
Sen. Hillary Clinton
Vice President Dick Cheney
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under:

#1  My vote is for Bibi...

did i tell yalls that igots me quadruple citizenship?
Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 4:58 Comments || Top||

#2  Why meeting with Her Thighness Clintoon? And Osama-bama?

Hmmm...

Posted by: twobyfour || 06/20/2007 5:10 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
Write a Marine
Matt at Blackfive sends the following e-mail to Kathryn Lopez of National Review:

At Blackfive, we have been trying to improve our relationship with the Public Affairs Officers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not surprisingly, the Marines have begun a really intense exchange of ideas with us. One Marine Combat Commander embraced our offer of support.

One of the requests that they had of us was to attempt to get 6,000 positive and supportive emails - one for each Marine, Sailor and Soldier in the Marine Regimental Combat Team - 6. Grim, our resident thinker and former Marine at Blackfive, has taken responsibility for this project. . . .

The Marines have set up a special email address to send a supportive message to the Marines is: RCT-6lettersfromh@gcemnf-wiraq.usmc.mil . The emails are being scanned by the PAO before being printed and distributed to individual Marines.

And, guess what?, the RCT-6 has a blog at http://fightin6thmarines.vox.com/

AFTER A FEW DAYS, WE HAVE ONLY GOTTEN THE MARINES ABOUT 2,000 EMAILS. WE COULD USE SOME HELP IN GETTING THE WORD OUT.

OK, kids, you know what to do.
Posted by: Mike || 06/20/2007 14:37 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Was a pleasure to do so! Heh -- I cheated. One from home and one from work.
Posted by: Sherry || 06/20/2007 16:07 Comments || Top||

#2  I already sent one when it was on LGF, but hey, I can send more! Only 2000 is a shame.
Posted by: Silentbrick || 06/20/2007 16:23 Comments || Top||


Sgt. Kyle Hausmann-Stokes puts the soldier’s life on film
Peter Sudeman, National Review

On a dusty landscape, camouflaged soldiers run in formation, then abruptly flatten themselves down on the ground to take cover and pop off shots from their rifles. A heavily armed chopper swoops overhead, and a man with a shoulder-mounted rocket launcher fires off a round into the air. In a flurry of speedy, MTV-style cuts, more tanks and soldiers whiz by, all set to the sounds of mid-‘90s heavy-metal acts Filter and Disturbed. No, it’s not a recruiting commercial, and it’s not a Hollywood production about Iraq (if only!).

It’s a homemade combat video called “Stryker Combat Rotation” made by Army Sgt. Kyle Hausmann-Stokes, a young man who, at 24, has managed to be both a soldier and a filmmaker, and has made it his mission to tell troop stories on the big screen. And with a showing of one of his films at the recent G.I. Film Festival in Washington, D.C., and a coveted spot in the film-production program at University of Southern California (USC), he’s got a real shot. But first, he’s heading to the front. . . .

Heading into his junior year, he’s got other plans. The military has him scheduled to go to Iraq. With a nod toward his contributions off the battlefield, the sergeant was given a deferment option, but he chose deployment. When he heads over, he’ll be working convoy security, making sure supplies make it safely from one point to another. But even this he thinks of as training. “Being a movie director is like being a sergeant. You have your men and you’re responsible for them. There’s a lot of barking commands.” And when he comes back, he’ll get his chance to put his battlefield experience to the test on the set: USC will be holding his place in the production program for him. . . .

More of Sgt. Hausmann-Stokes' videos are available for downloading here, including the delightfully-named "Fun With Tanks." Also, check out his G.I. Film Festival short "Unwelcome Home."

Hope we see him at the multiplex someday.
Posted by: Mike || 06/20/2007 12:42 || Comments || Link || [0 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency


Army Considers Longer Combat Tours Again
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Army is considering whether it will have to extend the combat tours of troops in Iraq if President Bush opts to maintain the recent buildup of forces through spring 2008. Acting Army Secretary Pete Geren testified Tuesday that the service is reviewing other options, including relying more heavily on Army reservists or Navy and Air Force personnel, so as not to put more pressure on a stretched active-duty force.

Most soldiers spend 15 months in combat with a guaranteed 12 months home, a rotation plan that has infuriated Democrats because it exceeds the service's goal of giving troops equal time home as in combat. In coming weeks, the Senate will vote on a proposal by Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., that would restrict deployments.

``It's too early to look into the next year, but for the Army we have to begin to plan,'' Geren told the Senate Armed Services Committee. ``We have to look into our options.''

Army spokesman Paul Boyce said, ``If the future were to require such an option, it would be the last option on the list.''

Gen. David Petraeus, Iraq war commander, suggested Sunday that conditions on the ground might not be stable enough by September to justify a drop in force levels, and he predicted stabilizing Iraq could take a decade. Earlier this year, Bush ordered the deployment of some 30,000 additional troops as part of a massive U.S.-led security push around Baghdad and the western Anbar province. There are about 156,000 U.S. troops in Iraq.

When asked by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., whether maintaining the force buildup would affect soldiers' 15-month combat schedules, Geren said he was unsure and cited ``numerous options'' available, including a ``different utilization of the Guard and Reserve'' and relying on the other services for help. ``We're committed to filling the requirements that the combatant commander asks,'' Geren said. ``We have been able to do so up until now, and we will continue to do so.''
Posted by: Steve White || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  a rotation plan that has infuriated Democrats because it exceeds the service's goal of giving troops equal time home as in combat

Horse hockey. It infuriates me because the more ways we can limit our war-fighting abilities, the more seats Chuck Schumer and I can add to our little power base in the Senate.

Hey! You don't suppose Chuck wants to be Majority Leader, do you?
Posted by: Harry Reid || 06/20/2007 6:00 Comments || Top||

#2  Since each soldier is given 2 weeks leave halfway through, why not cut deployment times in half and rotate the whole unit home like the Marines?
Posted by: ed || 06/20/2007 9:35 Comments || Top||


India-Pakistan
Mohmand tribesmen protest arrest of elders
Enraged protesters smashed the gates of agency offices, fired shots in the air and blocked the Peshawar-Bajaur highway for four hours on Tuesday in reaction to police action against tribal elder Malik Rehman and his brother Malik Abdul Ahad, who were arrested after a scuffle with a levies official in the tehsildar office.

A few days ago Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) Halimzai tehsil ameer Roohullah reportedly found a levies official, Wajid, selling fake currency in the bazaar. He handed the official over to political authorities along with the counterfeit money. The political authorities, however, released the official. The JI ameer and the tehsildar exchanged heated words over the issue. Consequently, the tehsildar ordered the JI leader’s arrest. The JI leader fled the scene.

Later, tribal elder Malak Rehman, and another levies official, Amjad Ali, became entangled in another heated exchange over the arrest order for the JI ameer. This led to the political authorities arresting Rehman and his brother.

Locals took to the streets when they heard about Rehman’s arrest. They attacked agency offices in Ghalanai, resorted to aerial firing and staged a sit-in in front of the political authorities’ jail. Political Agent Sher Alam Mehsood released Rehman at around 4:00 pm. After his release, Rehman announced that this marked the end of cooperation with the political authorities, and called for a strike in Mian Mandi bazaar until Assistant Political Agent Islam Zeb was transferred.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  from wikipedia:

A tehsildar is an Indian revenue administrative officer. The name is of mughal origins.

A present-day equivalent position in the Indian government would be a District Collector. A District Collector is a Central Indian Government appointee who is in charge of the governance of a district in a state.

District Collectors are officers of the Indian Administrative Service and are the most powerful government officials of the district. They are entrusted the task of handling law and order, revenue collection, taxation, the control of planning permission and the handling of natural and man-made emergencies. A collector was a crucially important colonial officer placed at the district level and entrusted with the responsibility of revenue collection and other civil duties.
Posted by: 3dc || 06/20/2007 2:31 Comments || Top||


Interior Ministry agrees to rebuild seven mosques
The Interior Ministry and Wafaq-ul-Madaris have agreed to rebuild seven mosques in the capital, said Minster for Religious Affairs Ejaz-ul-Haq at a press conference on Tuesday.

Haq said PML President Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain had visited the Lal Masjid three times to reach an amicable solution to the issue. He said Hussain had assured the Lal Masjid administration that the demolished mosques would be reconstructed.

He said the matter had been resolved through consensus and reconciliation, and CDA had issued a notification for the mosques’ reconstruction. The minister said that reconstruction of mosques should no longer be an issue.

The minister for religious affairs expressed dismay over the continued occupation of the children’s library by the Lal Masjid administration. He asked the Lal Masjid ulema to end the occupation immediately and show flexibility.

The minister also condemned the British government’s award of a knighthood to Salman Rushdie. He said such actions by the British government badly hurt the sentiments of Muslims.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad


Iraq
Marines to Comfy at Iraq Bases
Conway: Marines too comfy at Iraq bases

By Kimberly Johnson

Marines are getting too comfortable at their dug-in bases in Iraq, the Corps’ top officer told an audience at the Naval War College on June 13.

“Due to the available infrastructure in the Al Anbar and the longevity of our presence, Marines are getting used to living at fixed bases and with more comforts of life than we really need,” Commandant Gen. James Conway said in comments provided to Marine Corps Times.

Larger, more fortified Marine bases in Iraq, such as Al Asad Air Base in Anbar province, have amenities that stand in stark contrast to more remote outposts. Those amenities include a post exchange, fast-food restaurants and a movie theater.

Keeping the Corps light and agile in combat is an increasing challenge, Conway said.

“Because of the force-protection requirements in the Middle East, we are getting ‘heavier’ in terms of vehicle weight and equipment,” he said.

Conway’s comments point to thinking beyond Iraq, said his spokesman, Lt. Col. T.V. Johnson.

“The comforts and the infrastructure of large bases in Iraq are a byproduct of our sustained presence there, and certainly do contribute to the morale of our Marines. However, Marines must guard against complacency and the expectation that tomorrow’s fight be marked by equally hospitable operating bases,” he said.

“The ability to operate, fight and win in austere environments is a Marine hallmark,” Johnson said. “We can ill afford to lose that edge.

“We have to ensure the gear we procure today marries up well with the methods of transporting it to tomorrow’s fight in significant quantities,” Johnson added. “We must incorporate the lessons learned in Al Anbar while thinking and planning beyond Iraq.”

Conway has expressed concern over the Iraq war’s effect on the Corps’ traditional missions, saying the focus has shifted almost entirely to counterinsurgency. In his remarks, he admitted that “current operations have produced a strain on our people and our institution as a whole.”

Later that day, Conway met with spouses of deployed leathernecks at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, N.C., and conducted similar town hall meetings last Thursday in Jacksonville, N.C., and Beaufort, S.C.

During his first few weeks as commandant, Conway visited with Marines at a number of facilities, Johnson said.

“Now, he wants to talk to the spouses who have been doing the heavy lifting while the Marines have been gone,” he said. “It’s a good chance for him to hear their concerns and address them.”

If the gunts are going to be miserable, lets all be miserable!
Posted by: 0369Grunt || 06/20/2007 11:45 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Iraqi Insurgency

#1  Yeah, yeah, yeah - I heard the same crap in Nam, mostly by Army bigwigs that spent all their time in the DC area. The effectiveness of US military personnel depends upon training, not quarters and "amenities". Why should troops be miserable just because they're in a combat zone? Troops have a habit of turning wherever they are into "home", complete with whatever luxuries they can buy, build, borrow or steal. Remember the article a few months ago about a Special Forces base in Afghanistan that included "showers"? Case in point. This idiot needs to be demoted, retired, and shipped somewhere where his words won't harm anyone. He's just another parasite in "public service".
Posted by: Old Patriot || 06/20/2007 15:32 Comments || Top||

#2  There is an advantage to being nimble.
Posted by: newc || 06/20/2007 18:26 Comments || Top||

#3  Troops have a habit of turning wherever they are into "home", complete with whatever luxuries they can buy, build, borrow or steal.

Yes. In this case, it's being supplied.

And these are Marines, not Army. All the difference in the world.
Posted by: Pappy || 06/20/2007 21:23 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Carter Loves Genocidal Terrorists

A new LOW, even for Jimmah....
IT’S EITHER AN UNPRECEDENTED LOW IN PARTISAN DISCOURSE OR POLITICAL SURREALISM worthy of André Breton: on Tuesday, former president Jimmy Carter, speaking on foreign soil, denounced the policies of his successor as “criminal” because they fail to subsidize a genocidal Islamic terrorist organization that has killed Americans. Then, he blamed internecine Palestinian warfare on Americans and Israelis.

Speaking in Ireland at the eighth annual Forum on Human Rights – without an apparent hint of irony – Carter said the Bush administration had sinned against heaven and earth in its decision to withhold direct aid to Hamas once that group came to power in the Palestinian Authority. “That action was criminal,” he said. The Palestinian people had elected Hamas fair-and-square in elections his Center described as “orderly and fair.” (Carter said the same of Hugo Chavez’s election.) He deemed Hamas “shrewd in selecting candidates.”

The world’s most famous Sunday School teacher further praised the genocidal terrorist organization, at a human rights conference, by citing its penchant for bloodshed. Hamas, Carter doddered, was more orderly than the rival Fatah organization, which Hamas demonstrated in military clashes that showed its “superior skills and discipline.” (The Jerusalem Post reported his argument thus: “Carter said Hamas, besides winning a fair and democratic mandate that should have entitled it to lead the Palestinian government, had proven itself to be far more organized in its political and military showdowns with the Fatah movement of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.”) One can only imagine how impressed he would have been by the “efficiency” of the SS.

Sounding like a junior anchor for al-Jazeera, the Nobel Peace Prize winner incredibly blamed the Palestinian civil war on Crusaders and Zionists. “The United States and Israel decided to punish all the people in Palestine,” he said, “and did everything they could to deter a compromise between Hamas and Fatah.” He continued:

This effort to divide Palestinians into two peoples now is a step in the wrong direction. All efforts of the international community should be to reconcile the two, but there’s no effort from the outside to bring the two together…I don't see at this point any possibility that public officials in the United States, or in Israel, or the European Union are going to take action to bring about reconciliation (between Fatah and Hamas).

Thus, the Americans and the Jews are to blame for divisions between groups of Palestinians that chuck fellow Palestinians out of windows. Only in the most fevered Islamist media are Muslims so excused from personal responsibility for their brutality toward one another.

Carter does not persuasively explain why Israel would want to “reconcile” terrorist groups bent on jihad. (Few things reconcile Palestinians more than dangling an unarmed Jew in front of them.) The Hamas Charter instructs, “There is no other solution for the Palestinian problem other than jihad.” Killing infidels is “an individual duty binding on every Muslim man and woman; a woman must go out and fight the enemy even without her husband’s authorization, and a slave without his master’s permission.” This makes jihad nearly the only thing she can do without her husband’s permission. But Carter, who once lectured Pope John Paul II for his “perpetuation of the subservience of women” and blasted “the mandated subservience of women by Christian fundamentalists” wants us to fund this misogynist death cult. You’ve come a long way, Baby....

Carter skirts the fact that Hamas is not merely a threat to Israelis; the group has claimed the lives of numerous Americans. Its ever-expanding U.S. infrastructure may one day conduct terror strikes on U.S. soil. Authorities nabbed Hamas member Ismail Selim Elbarasse in August 2004 for videotaping Maryland’s Bay Bridge in what authorities worried constituted “a potential link between Hamas and al-Qaeda.” Last October, a Hamas commander ominously told Time magazine, “We shouldn't stand by idly while the Americans are plotting against us.” But Carter has indicated the Bush administration is criminal for not supporting this stouthearted nationalist.

“Criminal” might better describe the workings of any government in the Muslim world, so conspicuously over-represented in the Carter Center’s donations – nations in which, for instance, its elected officials have to consult with and bribe a departed leader’s widow to find out where he hid billions of dollars of their people’s assets. Nonetheless, the U.S. is sending barrels of greenbacks and weapons to the kleptocratic Fatah, whose membership largely overlaps with that of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, the group responsible for the Mickey Mouse Murder Hour. Condoleeza Rice has also announced the U.S. is shipping tens of millions of dollars to the UNRWA, where future terrorists are incubated. Yet Carter denounces his own country for failing to establish a Marshall Plan for totalitarian murderers.

Thus concludes a rational progression for Jimmy Carter: in the 1970s, he blundered into establishing terrorists as Iran’s all-powerful theocratic rulers. In the 1980s and ‘90s, he wrote speeches for Yasser Arafat and defended extremists around the globe. Now, he calls the U.S. president a pariah for refusing to underwrite unrepentant jihadists dedicated to spilling as much infidel blood as possible.

Thus, Man from Plains confirms what many long suspected: the Worst President of the 20th Century does not want the United States to end the War on Terror. He merely wants us to switch sides.
Posted by: Whomoger Ulaviper3109 || 06/20/2007 12:33 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  There are a lot of genocidal terrorists out there to love. You are really big-hearted Jimmy. Personally, I would take the whole lot of them and flush them down the toilet.
Posted by: JohnQC || 06/20/2007 14:51 Comments || Top||

#2  Like shooting fish in a barrel when this useless little man opens his yap...
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 15:41 Comments || Top||

#3  Jimmy Carter - the stupidest Genius the US has ever spawned. May he live in the land of goats and camels the rest of his life, as a dhimmi, and may he be reborn as an Arab woman in Soddy Arabida. It wasn't enough that he nearly destroyed the US economy and set up the current problems in the muddled east, he wants us to join with the muzzies in destroying the only practicing democracy in SouthWest Asia. He doesn't deserve to be allowed back into the United States.
Posted by: Old Patriot || 06/20/2007 15:43 Comments || Top||

#4  Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

"And then the UFOs will smite all Republicans and the Joos!"
Posted by: Anonymoose || 06/20/2007 16:15 Comments || Top||

#5  “That action was criminal,”

I'd wager that more than a few extremely pissed off Americans view Carter's actions as falling to that category.

This shit-for-brains asshole has been kissing Arab ass for so long that he blows his nose with toilet paper.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 17:04 Comments || Top||

#6  Jimmy Cater has to be under the control of SOMETHING



The Plains Eel is a parasitic inhabitant of the Plains Georgia area, and is attracted to peanut plants. It was sent by the Ayatollah Khomeni, and is infesting the brain of the former president. These Plains Eels incubate their larvae between protective plates that line their backs. The slime-covered larva will seek out a larger animal, such as local former presidents, enter its skull through the ear and wrap itself around the cerebral cortex. This causes the subject intense pain and makes them susceptible to suggestions from others perple infested such as the Nobel Prize committee, or Michael Moore. As the larva grows, the host suffers from increasing insanity and eventually, total dementia.



Posted by: BigEd || 06/20/2007 17:06 Comments || Top||

#7  From Dictionary .com:

trea·son /ˈtrizən/ –noun
1. the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.
[Origin: 1175–1225; ME tre(i)so(u)n < AF; OF traïson < L trāditiōn- (s. of trāditiō) a handing over, betrayal. See tradition]

—Synonyms 1. Treason, sedition mean disloyalty or treachery to one's country or its government. Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one's government. Sedition is any act, writing, speech, etc., directed unlawfully against state authority, the government, or constitution, or calculated to bring it into contempt or to incite others to hostility, ill will or disaffection; it does not amount to treason and therefore is not a capital offense. 2. See disloyalty

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 06/20/2007 17:10 Comments || Top||

#8  Jhimma loves ANYTHING that can hurt or kill Americans.
Posted by: DarthVader || 06/20/2007 17:34 Comments || Top||

#9  Carter deserves to be stripped of citizenship and thrown out of the U.S. permanently, and I suggest that only because I know we couldn't manage to get him shot for treason.
Posted by: Mac || 06/20/2007 17:42 Comments || Top||

#10  I'll quietly celebrate when this dirtbag is no longer among us.
Posted by: Crusader || 06/20/2007 19:21 Comments || Top||

#11  Carter said the Bush administration had sinned against heaven and earth...

Ugh.

Imagine if a Republican had made the same comment about a Democrat's policy.
Posted by: Rob Crawford || 06/20/2007 19:29 Comments || Top||

#12  It sounds to me like CAIR just picked up a new member.

Jimmy Carter should be stripped of his U.S. citizenship and deported to the Gaza strip today.
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723 || 06/20/2007 19:33 Comments || Top||

#13  That photo in #4 needs a better caption:

"It was no ordinary rabbit. It was the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on!"

(Fred, that photo needs to be in the permanent collection. It'll come in handy.)
Posted by: Mike || 06/20/2007 20:02 Comments || Top||

#14  Does he love them, or does he loooooove them?
Posted by: Iblis || 06/20/2007 23:06 Comments || Top||


Gaza Christians warned to submit to Islam
Gaza-based Muslim groups affiliated with Hamas and possibly Al Qaeda have warned local Christians that Hamas' military conquest of the volatile coastal strip means they must now fully submit to Islamic ritual law. In an interview with WorldNetDaily, Sheikh Abu Saqer, leader of the group Jihadia Salafiya, said that Gaza's Muslims “expect our Christian neighbors to understand the new Hamas rule means real changes. They must be ready for Islamic rule if they want to live in peace in Gaza.”

“Missionary activity” will no longer be tolerated, and those suspected of trying to covert local Muslims to Christianity will be “harshly punished,” said Abu Saqer. Additionally, the consumption of alcohol is now prohibited in Gaza, and all women must fully cover themselves in public.

In order to ensure compliance with these regulations, Abu Saqer announced the formation of a new “military wing” that will a close eye on the subjects of “Hamastan.”
A committee for the protection of virtue!
Following last week's unprovoked assault on a Catholic church and school in Gaza City, most are unconvinced that even full submission to Gaza's new conservative Muslim overlords will afford any degree of peace and security to the area's tiny Christian population.
The Christians can move to the U.S. on a 1:1 exchange basis with Paleo Muslims currently here. Start with the ones on student visas.
Posted by: Steve White || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Christian for Muslim exchange a nice idea, but watch for the Muslims "see the light" & declare themselves converted.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 || 06/20/2007 1:44 Comments || Top||

#2  I don't know, Anguper Hupomosing9418. Apostacy means death, and how are the members of the muttawa to differentiate between true conversion and taqqiyah?
Posted by: trailing wife || 06/20/2007 2:04 Comments || Top||

#3  "Yeah, where's your Messiah now, Flanders Palestinians?"

Paging Pope Benedict to the white courtesy phone.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 3:05 Comments || Top||

#4  “expect our Christian neighbors to understand the new Hamas rule means real changes."

We've got you "LIMA CHARLIE" on that one, whahaha.
Posted by: Besoeker || 06/20/2007 3:26 Comments || Top||

#5  Like nobody could see this coming. Sheesh.

You got the ratio wrong Steve, 1:100 is a much better start.
Posted by: Tony (UK) || 06/20/2007 5:39 Comments || Top||

#6  the consumption of alcohol is now prohibited in Gaza

With CD's, Televisions and haircuts to follow... Enjoy!
Posted by: Howard UK || 06/20/2007 7:08 Comments || Top||

#7  the consumption of alcohol is now prohibited in Gaza

With CD's, Televisions and haircuts to follow... Enjoy!
Posted by: Howard UK || 06/20/2007 7:08 Comments || Top||

#8  Make the consumption of food and water forbidden and we'll be making progress.
Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds || 06/20/2007 8:33 Comments || Top||

#9  Oh, we loves our Christians. Bout as much as we loves our Nigras and Jooos...
Posted by: Jihadia Salafiya || 06/20/2007 9:06 Comments || Top||

#10  Imagine if any "Christian" government anywhere - is there such a thing? - demanded the same of its local Orcs.

Pope Benedict: As the closest thing Christendom has to a leader I beg of you - as a devout Protestant, I beg of you - for the love of everything we have made, of everything we cherish and of everything holy... for the love of God call for a Crusade. Do not let this stand. Enough.
Posted by: Excalibur || 06/20/2007 9:14 Comments || Top||

#11  Ouch! *rimshot*
*cymbal crash*
Posted by: bigjim-ky || 06/20/2007 9:14 Comments || Top||

#12  Send Pelosi to Gaza now. Rice too, who else wants to go ?
Posted by: wxjames || 06/20/2007 9:40 Comments || Top||

#13  " Sheikh Abu Saqer, leader of the group Jihadia Salafiya"

this is Haniyahs problem. Even if we wants to restrain shit like this, for PR purposes, he doesnt control every Islamist loon in Gaza. Can he afford to crack down on them, even if he has the sense to do so?
Posted by: Liberalhawk || 06/20/2007 10:56 Comments || Top||

#14  We should warn them to convert to democracy and civil rights. Otherwise, they are going to achieve room temperature real quick.
Posted by: DarthVader || 06/20/2007 11:52 Comments || Top||

#15  Pope Benedict: As the closest thing Christendom has to a leader I beg of you - as a devout Protestant, I beg of you - for the love of everything we have made, of everything we cherish and of everything holy... for the love of God call for a Crusade. Do not let this stand. Enough.

Others here have called for embracing Muslims and trying to get them to convert away from Islam. I truly must wonder if they have fully considered the concept of taqiyya and all that it implies. While Benedict has shown some spine where his predecessors most definitely did not, more than that is now required.

Christianity again faces its oldest and most voracious foe. While this assault has been ongoing for several centuries, at no time has it ever approached the scale of threat we now see. Assisted by the media and large numbers of both misguided and ill-intentioned liberals alike, the Church of Christ must finally reconsider its own doctrine of acceptance.

Christians may well need to face up to the fact that there are some who simply cannot be salvaged or rescued from their own intellectual wreckage. As someone who believes in the perfectability of man's spirit, this is a difficult notion to embrace. Yet, we are confronted with a cult whose murderous intentions simply knows no bounds.

Death of others, death of self, death of children, death, death and more glorious death. There are limits to what can be tolerated and this is certainly one of them. Being fixated upon destruction of mind, body and soul is something that cannot be ignored as a passing fad.

Pope Benedict seems to be doing this. He has the ultimate bully pulpit. His flock is in dire peril. If there is a God, His work on this earth is threatened with total annihilation by a rapacious enemy. Much like how Muslim silence has transcended consent and become a lie, so has Christian denial of the danger that Islam poses. Either Christianity embraces the sin of willful suicide or gets up on their hind legs and rallies against its most dire foe. All other options have left the building cathedral.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 16:55 Comments || Top||

#16  Zenster, Christianity's oldest foe has been in the field far longer than Islam.

Christians believe that no one is beyond God's mercy, not even the hippenest, hoppinest imam in Peshawar. The Judeo-Christian ethos is one of love and mercy and there is no room innit for writing out any group of people, no matter how vicious or cruel they are. We love life and despite our sinful natures, we do (or should do) our best to save lives. The Cathechism of the Catholic Church describes in detail the justifications for the use of force in the defense of life - for nation-states as well as individuals.

Roman Catholicism is not a pacifist faith.
Posted by: mrp || 06/20/2007 21:46 Comments || Top||

#17  The Judeo-Christian ethos is one of love and mercy and there is no room innit for writing out any group of people, no matter how vicious or cruel they are.

I realize this and it absolves Christianity of a host of sins committed earlier in its history. That said, Christians and members of other faiths need to get on the same page about dealing with the threat of Muslim violence. Islam is not going to magically renounce its quest for global domination all by itself. The outside world will have to put a gun to the ummah's collective head and have the will to pull the trigger if cooperation is not forthcoming. There is no other form of persuasion that holds the least promise. Were it not for weapons of mass destruction there might be time to see if Islam's own wickedness might neutralize itself. However, no such luxury exists. Wishing things were otherwise merely plays into Islam's hands. It is beyond difficult to envisage anything but overwhelming force being required to assure a positive outcome.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 22:26 Comments || Top||


Israel allows first food into Gaza since Hamas takeover
JERUSALEM - Israel allowed 12 truckloads of desperately needed food and medicines to cross into Gaza Tuesday in the first real easing of the blockade it imposed after Hamas’s takover of the impoverished territory. The army also allowed five seriously wounded Palestinians to be brought to Israel for treatment but maintained its refusal to allow hundreds of Gazan asylum-seekers stranded in no-man’s land to cross to the occupied West Bank.

Ten trucks of food and two of medical supplies were delivered to Gaza through international organisations at the southern Kerem Shalom checkpoint, Israeli military spokesman Shlomo Dror said. ‘This is the first time we’ve managed to bring supplies... It went very well,’ Dror told AFP, saying that possibilities of shipping aid by sea or parachute into the Gaza Strip had earlier been discounted as alternatives.
How 'bout telling the Gazans to fend for themselves?
He said the aid was delivered without contact with the Palestinian Authority or Hamas, which Israel boycotts as a terrorist organisation. ‘We don’t speak to the Hamas people and I don’t see any change to manage to do something with them,’ he said.

Tuesday’s trucks were the first to drive into the Gaza Strip since Hamas took control, Dror said, adding that three small carloads of medical supplies had been delivered through the Erez crossing on Monday.
Posted by: Steve White || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  I hope gro*m is protesting this development down at the checkpoints.

Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 5:04 Comments || Top||

#2  Oh, good. I'm sure they'll be really grateful...
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 9:03 Comments || Top||

#3  Let them reap what they have sown. Those greenhouses the Israelis left them should provide food enough.
Posted by: Excalibur || 06/20/2007 9:15 Comments || Top||

#4  They've been getting handouts for 50 years, what have they accomplished?
Nothing, because they have this insane belief that they will destroy Israel and reclaim it in it's entirety.
Let them live in squalor for another 50 years while they hatch their devious little plans.
Posted by: bigjim-ky || 06/20/2007 9:26 Comments || Top||

#5  a half dozen kassems landed in Sderot and vicinity in the past two days

I would try to find a way to put a lot of fertility depressant in the food and water Israel send them.

or if that's too much for the Israeli conscience I would start a rumor that Israeli water had anti Islam germs or something.
Posted by: mhw || 06/20/2007 18:19 Comments || Top||

#6  File under: Feeding the Hand That Bites Them
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 21:22 Comments || Top||


Olmert: We cannot keep Gazans from entering Israel
While in New York, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said that there was no way of preventing Gaza refugees from crossing into Israel via Erez crossing. He added, however, that the IDf had to ensure that no terrorists got through. Olmert also stated that an IDF operation in Gaza would not be the correct way to deal with the Hamas
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Well, if the refugees are getting more than lunch and free ride to the West Bank. I would say that you're too kind.
Posted by: Mike N. || 06/20/2007 0:13 Comments || Top||

#2  Why can't they?
Posted by: trailing wife || 06/20/2007 1:52 Comments || Top||

#3  As is so often the tragic case, an Israeli grafitti pertains:

SHARON, WAKE UP! OLMERT IS IN A COMA!
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 1:55 Comments || Top||

#4  is gr*om sleeping too?
Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 5:02 Comments || Top||

#5  Olmert said that there was no way of preventing Gaza refugees from crossing into Israel via Erez crossing

I think that we need to employ a similar graphic like was on LGF a while ago, "Arafish says...", in this case "Olmert says...". Not any less fishy, if you ask me.

Where there is a will there is a way. I can come up with at least a dozen simple ways to do the job, with minimal increase in resources and manpower.
Posted by: twobyfour || 06/20/2007 5:18 Comments || Top||

#6  He's right. They just want to come to do jobs Israelis won't do.
Posted by: Jorje Arbusto || 06/20/2007 8:34 Comments || Top||

#7  I'm all for letting, say doctors, out of Gaza (and into West Bank).
Posted by: gromgoru || 06/20/2007 8:39 Comments || Top||

#8  That works for me. Anything that further cripples their infrastructure.
Posted by: Pappy || 06/20/2007 9:22 Comments || Top||

#9  What a gutless pussweed.
This guy should take his balls out of Condi's purse and kick some paleo ass.
Posted by: bigjim-ky || 06/20/2007 9:28 Comments || Top||

#10  Israel has no interest in letting folks running from Hamas starve at the border. They are holding them back at the behest of Abbas, who probably A. Wants civvies unhappy with Hamas to stay in Gaza and be a problem for Hamas and B. Is afraid pro-Hamas folks are among the "refugees" While thats understandable, why the hell should Israel take the PR hit for Abbas? If he doesnt want them coming to the WB, he either has to say so, or he has to offer the Israelis something in return.
Posted by: Liberalhawk || 06/20/2007 10:53 Comments || Top||


Egypt pulls embassy out of Gaza Strip
In a stark sign of its rejection of Hamas's takeover of the Gaza Strip, Egypt announced it was moving its embassy from Gaza to the West Bank, headquarters of Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, a foreign ministry statement said Tuesday.

A group of Egyptian diplomats have already left for the West Bank town of Ramallah, the statement said, ending a 15-year presence in Gaza. The Egyptian ambassador is due to arrive in Ramallah in the coming days, it added.

After Gaza's takeover by Hamas gunmen on Thursday, Abbas dismantled his Fatah party's coalition government with Hamas and installed a new emergency Cabinet.

Hamas has refused to acknowledge the legitimacy of the new government, and insists the old government remains in place.

Egypt, the regional powerhouse, withdrew its mediators from Gaza on Friday, and Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said Saturday his country opposed any attempt by Hamas to set up a separate government in the Gaza Strip after its military takeover of the territory.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Its obvious now that the main financial backing of Gaza is going to some from Iran. It would appear that they've just purchased themselves a welfare state.

We might be able to watch them sink themselves. Heh.
Posted by: Mike N. || 06/20/2007 0:03 Comments || Top||

#2  The objective should be to cause financial ruin a little closer to the source, Mike.
Posted by: Pappy || 06/20/2007 1:01 Comments || Top||

#3  Too rich. Egypt laboriously stokes the flames and then runs away squealing like a stuck pig pulls back when the fire gets too hot.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 2:03 Comments || Top||

#4  Egypt pulls embassy out of Gaza Strip

it just ain't fair damn it!! LMAO!
Posted by: Red Dawg || 06/20/2007 5:07 Comments || Top||

#5  "Mubarak effendi, what we do?"

"Let me check, hmmm... our irony meter got broken... tough one... how to know... Pull out of Gaza!"
Posted by: twobyfour || 06/20/2007 5:31 Comments || Top||

#6  Hamas is being rejected by Abbas and Mubarak but being sucked up to by Jimmy Carter.

In a sense, it's rhetorical popcorn.
Posted by: mhw || 06/20/2007 14:33 Comments || Top||


West 'backing illegitimate gov't'
Hamas says the West is using the issue of Palestinian aid to "manipulate the Palestinian people and distance them from the Hamas movement."

"By announcing their political and financial support for the Palestinian Authority, the West is backing an illegitimate government," AFP quoted Hamas Spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri as saying on Tuesday.

The United States and European Union restored direct aid to Palestinians on Monday in a show of support for Palestinian Authority Chief Mahmud Abbas, who set up an emergency government.

EU and US support for the government of Prime Minister Salam Fayyad was "an attempt to manipulate the Palestinian people and distance them from Hamas," Zuhri said, adding that the strategy would not work.

The EU and the US froze ties and suspended direct aid to the Palestinian people when Hamas swept to power last year after a shock win over Fatah in January 2006 elections.

However, the boycott deepened the desperate economic plight of Palestinians, particularly in the Gaza Strip, one of the most densely populated areas on the planet where 80 percent of the population relies on aid.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Gaza Strip, one of the most densely populated areas on the planet where 80 percent of the population relies on aid.

Population of what? Leeches?
Posted by: twobyfour || 06/20/2007 5:22 Comments || Top||

#2  Let 'em eat Korans...
Posted by: tu3031 || 06/20/2007 9:08 Comments || Top||


Hamas defies Abbas, proposes talks
Hamas rejected on Tuesday President Mahmoud Abbas’s decree outlawing the group’s Executive Force and said the real Palestinian government was still headed by Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh of Hamas. Senior Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya told reporters in Gaza the Islamist group was ready to hold talks with Abbas’s Fatah faction to try to find common ground.
"We talk, you agree. What's not to like?"
Fatah rejected dialogue with the group, which won Palestinian parliamentary elections in 2006, following its violent takeover of Gaza.

“Hamas rejects the decision by Abu Mazen (Abbas) to outlaw the Executive Force because his decision contradicts the law,” Hayya said. “The current government of national unity is the legitimate caretaker government and we do not recognise the emergency government.” “The Fatah central committee decided today not to convene any dialogue, or any contact or any meetings with the Hamas movement,” the Fatah committee said in a statement.
And in other news:
Meanwhile, dozens of Fatah loyalists, including security men, entered Egypt from Gaza overnight fearing they may be targeted by Hamas Islamists, Egyptian security officials said on Tuesday. They said about 70 men were found by border agents on the Egyptian side of the Gaza-Egypt frontier on Monday night, and that some were police officers with their weapons. More than 340 Palestinians have now taken refuge in Egypt since last week’s Hamas takeover of Gaza, while 108 others have returned to Gaza after Hamas agreed to re-admit them provided they left their guns in Egypt, the officials said.

Separately, Israel plans to tighten a financial clampdown on the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip that would choke off all but humanitarian and basic supplies, senior Israeli and Western officials said on Tuesday. While opening the funding taps to the Western-backed emergency government set up by President Mahmoud Abbas in the occupied West Bank, Israel and the United States want to isolate Hamas financially, diplomatically and militarily in the Gaza Strip.

To that end, two senior Israeli officials said the plan was to bar Palestinian tax funds transferred to Abbas from reaching Gaza to run Hamas-led agencies and pay workers. The Israeli officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Israel was discussing with the United States the scope of their Gaza embargo. Israeli and Western officials said humanitarian supplies would not be cut off and may be increased.

Hamas spokesman Fawzi Barhoum called the financial sanctions a “failed policy” and part of a “Zionist-American plot”, adding: “Any siege on the Gaza Strip will beget an explosion in the faces of all of those who took part in imposing the siege.” Palestinian Information Minister Riyad al-Malki said the emergency government knew of no Israeli conditions on the tax funds which Israel collects on the Palestinian Authority’s behalf. “We will not accept any conditions. We determine how we will spend it,” he said.

Meanwhile, an aide to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said on Monday Iran had encouraged Hamas to use violence to take control of the Gaza Strip. “Iran supports non-democratic groups in Palestine, Lebanon and in Iraq and we hold Iran responsible for encouraging Hamas to carry out its coup in Gaza,” senior Palestinian official Yasser Abed Rabbo said.

Also, Israeli troops were moving on Tuesday towards the northern Gaza Strip, witnesses and security sources said.
Posted by: Fred || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under: Hamas

#1  Hamas rejects the decision by Abu Mazen (Abbas)

How does one know which name to use? Is the nom de-muz preferable to the given? More familiar like du instead of Sie?
Posted by: Shipman || 06/20/2007 13:00 Comments || Top||


Olde Tyme Religion
Robert Spencer: Blogging the Qur’an
Bookmark it and check back for new chapters.
Posted by: ed || 06/20/2007 12:10 || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under: Global Jihad

#1  I am NOT going to read that damn devil's book.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 06/20/2007 15:14 Comments || Top||

#2  I have a parallel project where I piss on the Koran one sura at a time.
Posted by: Excalibur || 06/20/2007 16:01 Comments || Top||

#3  If I could run toilet paper through my printer I'd print the Koran on it.
Posted by: Zenster || 06/20/2007 18:02 Comments || Top||

#4  Zen every time we wipe we are by default writing the words of Muhamhead.
Posted by: Icerigger || 06/20/2007 18:06 Comments || Top||

#5  Err, this is Robert Spencer, of JihadWatch. I don't think that it's going to come off lightly ;)
Posted by: Tony (UK) || 06/20/2007 23:33 Comments || Top||


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran buying Russian 96K6 Pantzyr systems via Syria
Posted by: 3dc || 06/20/2007 02:59 || Comments || Link || [6 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Iran

#1  I wonder how these things work on cruise missles?

O.K., then, how about ballistic missiles?
Posted by: Bobby || 06/20/2007 5:49 Comments || Top||


Iran Protests Israel's Military Threat
TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- The Iranian ambassador to the UN, in a letter to the secretary-general, complained that the UN Security Council has done nothing to stop Israel's "unlawful and dangerous threats" against Iran. Javad Zarif protested yesterday a recent statement from Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz that Israel has not ruled out military action against Iran to disable its nuclear program. He also referred to a similar statement that Zionist regime's Prime Minister Ehud Olmert made in April.

"I wish to inform you that, emboldened by the absence of any action by the Security Council, various Israeli officials have unabatedly continued to publicly and contemptuously make unlawful and dangerous threats of resorting to force against the Islamic Republic of Iran," Zarif said in the letter, dated June 11. He also sent a copy to the president of the Security Council.
Have to admire the chutzpah. To an extent. Wonder if he knows the word?
Zarif faulted the council for not condemning the statements and for "pushing for statements against Iran based on various distortions and unsubstantiated allegations ... in a failed attempt and tired smokescreen to distract the international community's attention from the real and serious threats that the (Israeli) regime poses to international and regional peace and security."
Posted by: Steve White || 06/20/2007 00:00 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under: Govt of Iran

#1  Oh, come on! What do the Iranians have to fear? They have the most powerful force in the universe - the Mighty Mad Mullah Mighty Military Machine. One little squeak and Israel's wiped off the map! Right, guys?
Posted by: Bobby || 06/20/2007 6:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Yeah, the Israelis are always spouting off about how Iran will be wiped off the earth, and how the countdown to Iran's destruction has begun. After what those poor Iranians have been put through, they should get some well deserved UN money.
Posted by: bigjim-ky || 06/20/2007 9:11 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
Should National Lampoon Make ’72 Virgins’?
For a little fun on a Tuesday morning, the folks over at National Lampoon need your help. They are considering making a feature length film that is basically a modern version of their successful hit from the ’70s “Animal House” with a terrorist tilt. However, they want the public's opinion as to whether or not they should make this film, and have created an online poll to assist them with their decision.

Lampoon’s website describes the premise of the comedy (video link available after the break due to the somewhat crude and vulgar content, h/t Charles at LGF):

Two idiot college students unwittingly join an Al Qaeda cell in order to get the 72 virgins promised to terrorists when they die. From the makers of Animal House, Van Wilder, and the Vacation movies.

Those interested can view the preview available here, and vote here. Vote early, vote often!

Post facto question: Regardless of the voting, would the folks at Lampoon dare making this film given the volatile subject matter? Just imagine the outcry from Islamic groups like CAIR. Would they risk such negative publicity? After all, this is not a population that has presented itself as being tolerant of jokes directed at it, or have you forgotten the violence in Europe subsequent to the publishing of a few comic strips?
Posted by: ryuge || 06/20/2007 08:11 || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  I think the Zucker bros would be happy to collaborate. I say GO!
Posted by: doc || 06/20/2007 8:24 Comments || Top||

#2  Unfortunately, this is not a ready for Homeland Security event. They can't handle a few mall shooting, how are they going to handle a bomb threat in a movie parking lot? Doubt too many theater owners want that opportunity. Only safe on broadband internet. Facts of life created by your CYA overlords bureaucrats.
Posted by: Procopius2k || 06/20/2007 8:54 Comments || Top||

#3  The only way they could pull this off and be funny would be to use caricature villains as comic foils to serious comedians. The problem as it now stands is both that their villains look realistic, and the two college boys aren't funny--they just act stupid and dull.

The lead villain should look like Anton LaVey with a red silk turban and lots of "Bwahahas":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Szandor_LaVey

with an accent like Bela Legosi. His henchman should be a cross between Marty Feldman and Peter Lorre, and his followers a collective of ninja-dolts like a moronic 'Foot Clan' version of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, who invariably injure only themselves, and ignorantly and accidently worship anything they think they are supposed to worship. All the bad guys are terrified of women and pigs.

There could be all kinds of sight gags like Anton eating a ham sandwich while drinking MD 20/20 (cheap Mogen David kosher wine), and smoking a lot of drugs.

The two Americans can only be a Dumb and Dumber team if they are being used as patsies by some super secret government anti-terrorist organization that is using just a sickening level of surveillance on the terrorists. Lots of scatological humor potential there.

But the movie has to be more like a Zucker movie with multiple high-speed gags going on continually so that any jokes that don't work are quickly forgotten.

The villains target has to be something equally ridiculous, such as the largest pureed pork products company in the US, owned by pig obsessed rednecks who are armed to the teeth with all kinds of heavy weapons.

The background for the movie would be a mix of "The President's Analyst", "Airplane!", "The Man With One Red Shoe", "Hot Shots" and even "Scary Movie".

They could have lots of comedy and horror movie homages and just make it as surreal and nonsensical as possible.
Posted by: Anonymoose || 06/20/2007 11:54 Comments || Top||

#4  Absolutely. This death cult needs all the ridicule we can possibly heap upon it if we ever expect it to go away like it should. Even if the theater has to be ringed with FBI agents. Even if the movie is dumber than dirt. And apart from the ridicule aspect, the right to free speech needs to be asserted. They need to understand that we can say whatever we want and if they don't like it they can FOAD.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 || 06/20/2007 11:59 Comments || Top||

#5  Moose, you forgot JOHN GOLDFARB, PLEASE COME HOME!
My thoughts on this kind of movie is to have the terrorist comment on how the US gov't policies protect them. In my movie just when the bad guys are to be overrun by the gun toting Bubbas. They are rescued by the FBI and taken to GITMO for a tropical vacation.
Posted by: bruce || 06/20/2007 17:44 Comments || Top||

#6  Spot on Bruce but a couple more. The terrorist should be shown praying to the moon, having 9 year old wives, having the Democrats constantly calling them for poll information, receiving big checks and bomb materials from Saudi Arabia, joking that they have been there for years without a visa and have a huge picture of Jimmy Carter nude over their beds.

Two last things, they should have a running joke about being scared to the point of looking over their shoulders of Little Green Footballs and Rantburg.
Posted by: Icerigger || 06/20/2007 17:59 Comments || Top||

#7  Heh, looks like RB is a repository of movie-making talent. Just to find a way to utilize it....
Posted by: twobyfour || 06/20/2007 18:22 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
21[untagged]
17Iraqi Insurgency
11Hamas
4Global Jihad
4Islamic Courts
3Taliban
2Thai Insurgency
2Fatah al-Islam
2Govt of Iran
1al-Qaeda in Arabia
1al-Qaeda
1Jund al-Shams
1PFLP
1PFLP-GC
1Fatah

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Wed 2007-06-20
  Boom kills 78 in Baghdad
Tue 2007-06-19
  Pakistan: U.S. Missile Kills 32 Hard Boyz
Mon 2007-06-18
  Abbas' new PM outlaws Hamas
Sun 2007-06-17
  Looters raid Arafat's house, steal his Nobel Peace Prize
Sat 2007-06-16
  US launches new offensive around Baghdad
Fri 2007-06-15
  Abbas dissolves unity govt
Thu 2007-06-14
  Beirut boom kills another anti-Syrian lawmaker
Wed 2007-06-13
  Qaeda emir in Mosul banged
Tue 2007-06-12
  Hamas Captures Fatah Security HQ in Gaza
Mon 2007-06-11
  Gunmen fire on Haniyeh's house in Gaza; no one hurt
Sun 2007-06-10
  Hamas-Fatah festivities renew in S Gaza, only 2 killed
Sat 2007-06-09
  Olmert 'offers Golan Heights in peace deal'
Fri 2007-06-08
  Lebanon Security Forces find 3 car bombs in Bekaa village
Thu 2007-06-07
  HuJi boss Hannan, 5 others to be charged
Wed 2007-06-06
  Kabul to trade Deadullah's carcass for hostages


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
13.59.231.155
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (32)    Non-WoT (4)    Opinion (6)    Local News (7)    (0)