Former Taliban Defence Minister, Mullah Obaidullah Akhund, had died on March 5th 2010 due to a heart attack in one of the Pak prisons in Bloody Karachi ...formerly the capital of Pakistain, now merely its most important port and financial center. It may be the largest city in the world, with a population of 18 million, most of whom hate each other and many of whom are armed and dangerous... , Taliban confirmed on Monday.
Mullah Obaidullah Akhund was captured on January 3rd 2007 by Pak security forces in Quetta city of Pakistain.
He served as the Taliban's Defence Minister from 1996 to 2001. Taliban's government was toppled by US-led operation in 2001 after deadly attacks targeted World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.
Details of the controversial death of Mullah Obaidullah Akhund, are still unclear, Taliban said in a statement. The statement called on Pak officials to provide full details about the death. His death might have occurred due to torture at the prison or an heart attack, the Taliban added.
Several high ranking Taliban officials have been captured by Pak security forces which made landmarks in the fight against insurgency.
Taliban who are accused of having strong ties with al-Qaeda have lost their key leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistain since the start of NATO ...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A single organization with differing goals, equipment, language, doctrine, and organization.... -led mission in Afghanistan. Most of the Taliban leaders have been killed in US drone strikes in Wazoo area of Pakistain where hideouts of most of the Taliban and other beturbanned goon groups exist.
Beats opening supermarkets. More seriously, there was a discussion ref the Falklands War, the last one, not the next one. The Argie generals, bashing about in their snappy uniforms and spit-shined stomping boots, with their mistresses and servants, figured two women, Thatcher and Elizabeth, were no match for such studs as they.
They were wrong, but the price was high for the rest of the folks. Them, too, come to think of it, but that was only fair.
Maybe having a couple of combat-experienced guys in highly visible and influential places in UK government might deter the next clowns trying to look macho by starting a war.
Posted by: Richard Aubrey ||
02/13/2012 8:16 Comments ||
That's like comparing a Ferrari to a delivery truck.
CARACAS: Venezuelans lined up to vote on Sunday in the countrys first-ever opposition presidential primary, choosing a single challenger they hope will have what it takes to finally defeat President Hugo Chavez after 13 years in office.
Opposition supporters seemed less interested in the proposals put forth by the five candidates competing in Sundays vote than their chances of defeating Chavez in Octobers looming presidential election. The outcome will set the stage for what many are billing as the most anticipated presidential vote since Chavezs first triumph in 1998, and Venezuelans on both sides of the nations political gap are eager to see who will emerge as the challenger.
For government foes, the primary results are vital to their efforts to unseat Chavez, an aim for which many have been yearning for more than a decade, and it appears to be a daunting task.
Chavez, however, proved himself a tireless campaigner as he easily sailed to election victories in 1998, 2000 and 2006. As the election season heats up, Chavez has said hes itching for a fight. During public events and marathon televised addresses, Chavez insists it doesnt matter who emerges as the oppositions candidate because hes confident none of his rivals are capable of beating him. He repeatedly taunts would-be challengers, portraying them as agents of Venezuelas wealthy elite and Washington.
These candidates are the empires candidates, Chavez told thousands of supporters at a rally this month in Catia, which is a government stronghold. We are going to give the unpatriotic bourgeoisie a beating.
Many in Catia have benefited from Chavezs social programs, which the government says are improving living conditions for the countrys poor majority.
Capriles has narrowed the gap behind Chavez to single digits in recent polls and is leading the opposition pack with about 40 percent support. Perez was trailing Capriles by about 10 percentage points in pre-election polls, with three other candidates garnering modest support.
Several voters said theyre optimistic the primary winner will have a strong shot at beating Chavez because the opposition is more united than in the past.
Presidential contender Maria Corina Machado, a congresswoman who has taken a hard line against Chavez, said she had heard from some government employees that they were afraid of possible repercussions if they vote.
Dont be afraid, Machado said on television as she arrived to cast her ballot. The government isnt going to know how you voted, but your children will and you will know for the rest of your life.
Despite lingering differences, the opposition candidates, along with many of their supporters, will likely throw their support behind whoever the winner is, driven by the conviction that Chavezs challenger will need an active, unified opposition movement backing him, said Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue, a Washington-based think tank.
The opposition is more unified than it has been in many years, Shifter said. To have a good chance of defeating Chavez, the losers in the primary election will not only have to unite behind a single candidate, but will have to do so enthusiastically and energetically.
Nonetheless, even some of Chavezs most fervent foes are skeptical a unified opposition movement will be enough to oust Chavez. Many voters said they think it will be key for Chavezs challenger to target poor voters and also not to take an overly hard line against Chavez, because such an approach hasnt worked well in the past.
Chavez endears many Venezuelans with his folksy, humorous personality, and gained millions of backers by starting social programs for the poor, building low-income housing, offering low-interest loans to cash-strapped farmers and confronting the United States a proven means of boosting nationalistic sentiment among citizens and the countrys leftists.
But hes also given adversaries many reasons to loathe him: His governments expropriations of buildings, parking lots and farmland have angered many Venezuelans who claim private property rights have been violated. The presidents failure to tackle rampant crime has angered relatives of tens of thousands of murder victims. Others accuse Chavez of wasting this oil-rich countrys wealth during years of high world prices on populist programs and regional efforts to win political support, rather than helping the country develop.
And his crude manner of dealing with critics irks Venezuelans who recall the days when political opponents were seen as rivals rather than enemies.
For nearly a year now, House Oversight Committee Chair Darrell Issa (R=CA) and Attorney General Eric Holder have locked horns over Operation Fast and Furious. Throughout this time we have seen heated exchanges between the two during Congressional hearings, watched the DOJs narrative change more than once, and wondered why Holder has thus far been allowed to dictate the speed at which the committee can investigate him.
As of late, when Holder dug in and simply refused to the turn over the documents the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed, the contest between he and Issa turned into nothing less than a battle of wills. And Issa upped the ante when he drew a line in the sand and gave Holder until 5 pm on February 9th to comply with the subpoenas or face charges of contempt of congress.
And so they squared off, and for any of you who wondered which man would blink first the answer has been revealedIssa blinked, and gave Holder & Co. a time extension for turning over the documents.
Keep in mind, that throughout the time the back and forth has been taking place, the DOJ has given the House Oversight Committee just 6,000 documents, but theyve provided their internal IG with 80,000 plus. The bottom line: time hasnt been the issue, rather, the refusal to comply has. Nevertheless, Issa has given in and provided Holder with more time anyway.
And to make matters worse, as of today the extension has no time limit on it.
So as it stands, Holder has from now till the cows come home to play it his way.
Issa doesn't have the votes in the Senate for contempt of congress. The donks will circle the wagons and that'll be the end of it. Unless, of course, Issa finds some other way to prove that Holder was involved. What would the cops do? Start with the little fish and work their way up the food chain, right? Or do I watch too much TV?
...just remember that timely due process enjoyed in America has no counterpart in other places of the world, like Mexico. Delay all you want, it just moves the future venue to another jurisdiction. Holders best protection is to hope that a conviction in the US that is not pardoned is good enough to appeal for protect from extradition under the double jeopardy proviso of the Constitution [of course being a living breathing document, that might not apply]. Though a trade-in-kind in exchange for some cartel bosses for prosecution here might be worked out.
I'd trade Holder for a good bottle of mescal, or an Elvis painting on black velvet....even the fat Elvis
Posted by: Frank G ||
02/13/2012 19:03 Comments ||
One important thing. While impeachment and conviction takes both houses, citations for contempt of congress only take place in one house.
First the committee votes, then the house or senate votes. Then, if the contempt citation rises to the level of a criminal act, it is forwarded by that body to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.
Since in this case it would be an obvious conflict of interest, the House would have to create a special prosecutor by authorizing a federal judge to appoint him.
Importantly, the president *cannot* pardon someone cited for contempt of congress.
Give Issa some credit. He'll do what he can, when he can, as powerfully as possible. He's no dummy, and no lapdog for Obama/Holder
Posted by: Frank G ||
02/13/2012 20:31 Comments ||
As for the double jeopardy issue, it seems to me that there is the concept of separate sovereigns. For example, the cops in Rodney King case were acquitted on state charges, but retried in federal court. Since the state and the federal government are separate sovereigns, it was not considered double jeopardy. So it would seem to me that if Holder is tried and acquitted in the US, he could still be tried in Mexico.
IANAL. Your mileage may vary.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia ||
02/13/2012 21:09 Comments ||
Rambler: IAAL, and correct, that's the separate sovereigns doctrine. The protection against double jeopardy is actually quite narrow. It doesn't come into play at all unless and until an accused has been acquitted, and then only within the same "sovereign" (state or federal). It has zero applicability with respect to foreign jurisdictions and extradition treaties.
Doesn't matter what happens to Holder in the US. I hope the Mexican government hires Dog Chapman to drag his ass to trial in a country with a lot more experience meting out his brand of "justice."
[Dawn] The father of an army brigadier against whom the army initiated court martial proceedings has requested the government to hold an inquiry into his son's arrest and direct the concerned authorities to release him.
Brig Ali Khan and four other officers were jugged in May, 2011 for suspected links to Hizbut Tahrir. ...an al-Qaeda recruiting organization banned in most countries. It calls for the reestablishment of the Caliphate... Brig Khan was working at the army's headquarters in Rawalpindi at the time of his arrest.
Former army official Mehr Khan in his letter written on Feb 11 to Defence Secretary Nargis Sethi expressed concern ...meaning the brow was mildly wrinkled, the eyebrows drawn slightly together, and a thoughtful expression assumed, not that anything was actually done or indeed that any thought was actually expended... s for his son's life and requested the concerned authorities to issue his release orders.
The letter said that Brig Khan was perturbed over the May 2 attack in Abbottabad ... A pleasant city located only 30 convenient miles from Islamabad. The city is noted for its nice weather and good schools. It is the site of Pakistain's military academy, which was within comfortable walking distance of the residence of the late Osama bin Laden.... and during a meeting at the General Head Quarters (GHQ) raised serious questions over the incident.
He also suggested during the meeting that all senior officers of the army should return plots and agricultural lands, it added.
The letter claimed that he was placed in long-term storage after the meeting and kept in solitary confinement.
The letter further indicated that he suffered a heart attack and alleged that he was not given proper medical treatment.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/13/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Govt of Pakistan
KARACHI Leaders of religio-political alliance on Sunday vowed that Nato supplies would not be allowed to resume at any cost and urged the masses to lay siege to Parliament House on February 20, during a rally attended by thousands at Bagh-e-Qaid in Karachi.
The speakers also demanded immediate end to drone attacks, have relations with United States on equal terms, release of Dr Aafia Siddiqui and measures to solve the worsening situation in Balochistan.
No, no, no, and who cares?
The 44-party alliance top leaders including Jamat-e-Islamis (JI) Syed Munawar Hassan, Jamiat Ulema Islams (JUI) Maulana Samiul Haq, Jamaat-ud-Daawa Amir Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, Sheikh Rashid and Ejazul Haq addressed the gathering and all of them condemned foreign meddling in the country. They warned against the possible reopening of the Nato supply and PPP-led governments policies leading to corruption and rampant inflation.
Whenever the terrorists and their sympathizers complain bitterly, you know it's a very effective tactic for which they have no answer for, except to try and stir up the masses against these attacks.
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani, in an interview broadcast on Saturday, said corruption charges against Pakistan's president were "politically motivated" and that the president had immunity as head of state.
In the wide-ranging interview with Al Jazeera television, he also criticized US drone attacks on militants near the Afghan border as counterproductive and said Pakistan never authorized them. Pakistan, he said, backed any Afghan-led peace plan to establish peace in the neighboring country and in no way supported Taleban insurgents.
Gilani's statements were aired on the eve of a hearing at which the premier faces indictment for contempt of court over his refusal to request the reopening of corruption cases against President Asif Ali Zardari, co-chairman of the premier's Pakistan People's Party (PPP).
"There had been a lot of cases against him, and they were all politically motivated," Gilani said, referring to Zardari. "He has got immunity. And he has not got immunity only in Pakistan, he has transnational immunity, even all over the world."
Asked if he would rather resign for the sake of the president, Gilani said if convicted of contempt, he would automatically lose office, so there was no need for him to quit.
Monday's expected indictment of Gilani pushes Pakistan's political crisis into a new phase. It is unlikely to lead to the fall of the government, but will continue to paralyze the country and further empower its military, analysts say.
"The Court is neither likely to trigger a collapse of the PPP government nor lead to military intervention," wrote Shamila Chaudhary in an analysis for Eurasia Group. "But the judiciary will remain a critical factor in Pakistani politics for the duration of the election cycle that ends in February 2013."
The civilian-judicial confrontation stems from thousands of old corruption cases thrown out in 2007 by an amnesty law passed under former military president Pervez Musharraf. Zardari is its most prominent beneficiary and the main target of the court, which voided the law in 2009 and ordered the re-opening of cases accusing the president of money laundering using Swiss bank accounts.
Gilani and his advisers have refused to ask the Swiss to reopen the cases. The prime minister had appealed the court's decision to charge him with contempt, but on Friday that appeal was dismissed, paving the way for the indictment.
"There's no way Zardari will allow his party to write a letter that will incriminate him in any significant way," said Najim Sethi, editor of the weekly Friday Times. "And that's exactly what the Supreme Court wants."
The continued defiance could benefit the PPP ahead of a widely expected lower-house election in October, said Salman Raja, a Supreme Court lawyer and constitutional expert. Raja said any proceedings against Gilani would likely take until July and result in a short jail sentence -- "no longer than a week or 10 days."
The party could then campaign on the notion of a biased court doing the work of the military and "persecuting an elected prime minister, and that rhetoric gets reemphasized."
But a PPP win could be a Pyrrhic victory. Infighting and confrontations with the military have consumed the nuclear-armed country in recent years, preventing it from addressing poverty and other economic ills or containing a rampaging insurgency that is endangering the US-led war effort in Afghanistan.
"It's a creeping kind of a coup," Raja said. "Effectively they've crippled the government."
This is like a tree falling in the forest, but nobody hears.
[An Nahar] Arab foreign ministers meeting in Cairo on Sunday supported a Paleostinian request for an international peace conference aimed at reaching a comprehensive solution to the Israeli-Paleostinian conflict.
In a statement after talks, they stressed "the importance of holding an international peace conference on the Paleostinian issue."
The international meeting would seek "an end to the occupation of Paleostinian territories and to reach a comprehensive solution to the issues of borders, security, Jerusalem and refugees based on the Arab peace initiative."
The statement came after Paleostinian President the ineffectual Mahmoud Abbas ... a graduate of the prestigious unaccredited Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow with a doctorate in Holocaust Denial... addressed the Arab League ...an organization of Arabic-speaking states with 22 member countries and four observers. The League tries to achieve Arab consensus on issues, which usually leaves them doing nothing but a bit of grimacing and mustache cursing... 's Follow-Up Committee, which tracks Israeli-Paleostinian peace efforts.
The League statement also called on its members to contribute financially to support the Paleostinian Authority with $100 million a month.
The 22-member body said the funds were needed "in light of the financial strain on the Paleostinian leadership and Paleostinian people, with Israel not transferring the rightful money of the Paleostinian Authority."
Posted by: Fred ||
02/13/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Palestinian Authority
RAMALLAH, West Bank - A mounting rebellion by Hamas leaders in Gaza against a breakthrough power-sharing agreement with ineffectual Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas highlights a potentially fatal flaw -- the deal never spelled out how the Western-backed leader can take charge again in Gaza, the territory he lost to a violent takeover by the Islamic militants.
Former bitter foes Abbas and Khaled Mashaal, Hamas' top leader in exile, signed the Qatar-brokered deal in Doha last week, saying they are committed to a true partnership. As part of the agreement, Abbas is to head an interim unity government that replaces rival administrations in the West Bank and Gaza and leads the Palestinians to general elections.
Abbas needs to strike a delicate balance to make it work. The Palestinian leader has to satisfy international demands that the interim government -- to consist of politically independent technocrats -- not be a front for Hamas, shunned by the West as a terror group. If it is seen as too close to Hamas, the Palestinians would likely lose hundreds of millions of dollars in Western aid.
At the same time, he risks sabotage from Hamas leaders in Gaza if he tries to strip them of too much of their power. In the nearly five years it ruled the territory, Hamas hired some 40,000 civil servants and security forces, many of them supporters of the movement, while 62,000 troops and civil servants forced out by the 2007 takeover -- many of them pro-Abbas -- are waiting to return to their old government jobs.
Sounds like you boys can't work together. Too bad, so sad. Might as well go back to killing each other. The Zionists can help with that...
They'll take it in turns to go without pay? Because there isn't the funds to meet current expenses -- donor fatigue and the fragile situation in Europe, donchaknow.
Gaza leaders of Hamas have voiced their misgivings in increasingly strident tones. The Hamas bloc of legislators last week said the deal is illegal because Abbas cannot serve as both president and prime minister.
On Saturday, the Hamas strongman in Gaza, Mahmoud Zahar, complained that Mashaal did not consult with other leaders in the movement before signing the deal and that the decision-making Shura Council should meet to correct what he termed a mistake.
"We feel there is a real crisis concerning the Doha agreement, and that this problem should be resolved within the institutions of the movement," he said in comments published by the Egyptian news agency MENA.
Across the board, Hamas lawmakers in the Abbas-run West Bank rushed Sunday to support the agreement, siding with Mashaal against the Gaza rebels. "Reconciliation is our strategic choice and we should go for it without hesitation." said Hamas legislator Mona Mansour.
Such public airing of disagreements is rare for tightly organized Hamas, a Gaza offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the pan-Arab movement that scored post-Arab Spring election victories in Egypt and Tunisia. It is still unclear whether the internal dispute is only about protecting Hamas' interests in Gaza or also the change in direction recently advocated by Mashaal.
The unity deal, first reached in principle last year, was made possible by a narrowing of the political differences between Hamas and Abbas, said Mustafa Barghouti, an independent from the West Bank who has played a key role in reconciliation.
Mashaal, while not formally renouncing violence, has embraced the idea of "popular protests" against Israeli occupation as a gesture to Abbas, Barghouti said. And while Hamas has long opposed Abbas' talks with Israel on the terms of a Palestinian state, Abbas now seems to have given up hope he can reach a deal with the current rightist Israeli government.
Israel, which has refused to halt construction, has condemned the reconciliation. A text message statement from the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Abbas' insistence on a settlement freeze meant he was "turning his back to peace."
"Instead of entering a negotiation that will bring an end to the conflict, (Abbas) prefers to align himself with the Hamas terror group, the same Hamas that embraces Iran," it said.
Progress on reconciliation has been slow, a sign of continued distrust. Hamas complained that West Bank security forces loyal to Fatah have reneged on promises to release dozens of Hamas prisoners, and that only a few were freed. Election officials say that in apparent retaliation, Hamas in Gaza prevented them from trying to update voter records ahead of the planned votes for president and parliament.
Following last week's agreement, Abbas is to put together his transition government. He says however he does not want to announce the composition of his government until he is sure he can hold elections -- a task complicated by ensuring his elections commission can work in Gaza and in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem.
Once a unity government is in place, Abbas' biggest challenge would be to establish a single security service out of two rival forces. In the West Bank, many of Abbas' forces have undergone training by the U.S. and have cooperated with Israel in reining in Hamas, while the Hamas government in Gaza, with a force of 18,000, receives funding from Iran. Last year's initial unity deal called for a gradual blending of the security forces, but did not say how much of that would take place before general elections. However, the West might balk if troops closely linked to Hamas continue to control Gaza.
Abbas might also be held responsible by Israel if smaller militant groups tolerated by Hamas continue to fire rockets from Gaza at Israel from time to time. In recent years, Israel has praised the level of security cooperation it has received Abbas in the West Bank, and a loss of a good working relationship with Israel could make it very difficult to run a Palestinian entity that is still very dependent on its neighbor.
The delicate reconciliation arrangements seem to require an extraordinary amount of good will from Hamas leaders in Gaza -- and that seems in short supply.
In the midst of a triumphal Ynet editorial going on about how current events around the Middle East demonstrate that it never was about Israel, comes this tidbit
:When the entire Mideast is burning, the Palestinian issue comes off the agenda. This is the reason why international networks such as CNN or France2 are leaving Israel at this time or closing down their offices. The Israeli conflict is not longer a story, with the focus shifting to Damascus, Cairo and Tripoli.
There may be more to it than that. CNN isn't shutting down its Israeli office, but it laid off all of its Jewish and Israeli workers there, some who had been with the network for a decade or more. Yet they retained all of the Arab Muslims in the Israeli office.
To report on Israeli and Middle East affairs. In an unbiased fashion.
There is a chance that middle eastern madmen will launch at Israel. Of course the brave folks in the press corps are getting out of there. Has little to do with Palestine, they'll be back to beat that dead horse when they feel safe.
Malaysia's government on Monday defended its decision to deport a young Saudi journalist 23 year old Hamza Kashgari, a muslim of Uyghur descent who, on Feb 10, tweeted the following,
"On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you've always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you.
On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more.
On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more."
who may face persecution at home for allegedly insulting the Prophet Muhammad on Twitter. HRW view
Human Rights Watch slammed Malaysia's failure to respect human rights. It said Kashgari was kept incommunicado and denied access to lawyers and the U.N. refugee agency. Police also told lawyers that Kashgari was still being held after he already had been forced on a plane, it said.
"By its actions, the ministry of home affairs once again showed that it believes rule of law is whatever it says and that it is more than willing to be totally opaque in its operations to maintain its flexibility to do what it wants when it wants," said Phil Robertson, its Asia deputy director.
"If he (Kashgari) faces execution back in Saudi Arabia, the Malaysian government will have blood on its hands," he said. Amnesty Intl view
Amnesty International has called Kashgari a "prisoner of conscience."
A government-appointed committee set up to compensate and rehabilitate people affected by violence in the strife-torn deep South has resolved to pay up to 7.5 million baht in compensation each to families of those killed during eight years of violence. The committee on rehabilitation of people affected by southern violence yesterday approved a compensation package for affected people, including families of dead victims, the injured and the suspects.
It sounds to me like most of the people getting compensation will be victims of the people fighting the insurgency in southern Thailand.
"Families of authorities killed in the violence are not entitled to compensation this time, but consideration will be made later, under the same framework," according to the article. What does any of this spending do to finish off the insurgency?
According to Mehr News Agency, sources within Iran revealed that there will be an announcement in a few days that the previously secret nuclear site, the Fordow nuclear enrichment facility, is now fully operational and enriching uranium at a 20% level.
The world learned about the existence of this site in 2009 when the Iranians disclosed it to the IAEA right before President Obama, Prime Minister Gordon Brown of the United Kingdom, and President Nicolas Sarkozy of France made statements at the G-20 summit in Pittsburg that referenced the secret Iranian site.
The site is built deep into a mountain on a Revolutionary Guards' base near the city of Qom.
The Iranian leaders had intended to transfer much of their low-enriched uranium stock from Natanz to Fordow and to start the process of enrichment at a much higher level with protection against any attack.
It is reported that the site cannot be destroyed even with the current bunker-buster bombs kept in the U.S. military's arsenal.
It should be noted that the Fordow facility can only house 3,000 centrifuges, and is therefore useless for providing fuel for a nuclear power plant. The only purpose is for clandestine use or for making a nuclear bomb. It is also important to note that enriching uranium to the 20% level is 9/10 of the way to weaponization.
> ISRAEL + Iran can have Nukes by or very shortly after January 2013.
> VARIOUS NET PERTS > Ditto 2012 NLT 2015.
Taken collectively, iff there is going to be a de facto US-Israel-Iran War, IMO casualty-conscious/mindful US Govtcritters will likely go for milstrike + dedicated ground invasion of Iran ASAP later this year while Iran seemingly still has very few NucMats andor alleged NucBombs.
EITHER THAT, OR [grudgingly] ACCEPT A NUKE-ARMED IRAN [+ by extens Radical Islam].
Iran has issued major reforms to its penal code that ban death by stoning and forbid the execution of minors.
Local Iranian media reports that the changes were approved by the guardian council, a body tasked with ensuring that the country's judicial laws do not contravene Islamic law.
The legislation now requires only the signature of the president to be enshrined into law.
Prior to the reforms, Iran has the record for executing more juveniles than any other country in the world. A report published human rights group Human Rights Watch earlier this year stated that more than a hundred children are currently on death row. Most are not executed until they turn 18.
Stoning is usually reserved for men and women found guilty of adultery. At least 99 people have been stoned to death in Iran since 1980.
Drewery Dyke, an expert on Iran at Amnesty International, warns that due to quirks of the Iranian legal system, the reforms are not as clear cut as they appear.
"Execution is a specific legal concept in Iran. Punishment for murder in Iran under Islamic law is termed 'retribution of the soul'," Mr Dyke explains, adding that children may still be killed if charged with murder.
"Similarly with stoning, they have removed the punishment of stoning for adultery but we still don't know what manner of punishment will be proscribed in the new law. There is more to his than meets the eye the reforms do allow for a backdoor application of stoning."
Execution sentences are routinely meted out for crimes of murder, homosexuality, adultery, drug smuggling, espionage and any perceived disruption to the economic and civil wellbeing of the country.
They'll stone you when you're trying to be so good
They'll stone you just like they said they would
They'll stone you when you're trying to go home
They'll stone you when you're there all alone
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
They'll stone you when you're walking on the street
They'll stone you when you're trying to keep your seat
They'll stone you when your walking on the floor
They'll stone you when your walking to the door
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
They'll stone you when you're at the breakfast table
They'll stone you when you are young and able
They'll stone you when you're trying to make a buck
They'll stone you and then they'll say good luck
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
Well They'll stone you and say that it's the end
They'll stone you and then they'll come back again
They'll stone you when you're riding in your car
They'll stone you when you're playing you guitar
Yes But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
Well They'll stone you when you are all alone
They'll stone you when you are walking home
They'll stone you and then say they're all brave
They'll stone you when you're send down in your grave
But I would not feel so all alone
Everybody must get stoned
A second Buyan class corvette has entered service with the Russian Caspian Flotilla, according to web reports.
The RFS Volgadonsk entered service with the Caspian flotilla to join her sister ship, the Astrakhan, which entered service September, 2006.
The Buyan class has the tonnage of a corvette at 550 tons, but is classified by the Russian Navy as a small artillery ship. It is the second largest combat ship inn the Caspian Flotilla with one Gepard class frigate, the Tartarstan at 1450 tons, being the largest.
The Buyan class is armed with one 100mm autocannon, two 30mm AK-630 autocannons, one 40 A-215 "Grad-M" artillery rocket system. One more ship, the Mahachkala is slated to join the other two in the flotilla in December, before two modified and heavier Buyan-M Tornado class ships are expected to be complete.
The modified Buyan-M class will be heavier at 950 tons and will replace the artillery rocket launchers with eight SS-N-27 (Kalibr) anti-ship missiles with a vertical launch tube. Two of the newer design, the Uglich and the Grad Sviyzhsk are due to join the Caspian Flotilla, the Uglich this year.
This ambitious launch plan for the Buyan follows the Russian navy program to begun building as many as 30 surface combatants by 2014.
The Buyan carries a heavier armament with the 10mm naval gun, but the addition of the antiship missile system will change its role.
The Buyan class as an artillery ship could be used in counterterrorism and coastal operations, but it would need either air cover or a missile boat for cover against light Iranian missile boats. Both the Russian navy and the Russian air force have an airfield in Dagestan to serve the needs of its ships at sea.
The heavier Buyan-M class should be an effective counter to the newest addition to the Iranian navy in the Caspian fleet, the Moudge class, which entered service in 2010 in the Caspian Sea. The Iranians classify that ship as a light frigate at 1420 tons, although it could be classified as a heavy corvette.
The Moudge ship, named the Jamaran, carries lighter armaments than its Russian counterparts with four C-802 anti-ship missiles, one 76mm Fajr-27 naval gun, one 40mm Fath-40 AAA gun, two 20mm cannons, four SM-1 SAMs and two triple 324mm torpedo launchers.
There does seem to be a quiet arms race in the Caspian. I'm thinking it's for the oil that has to be under the seabed. When I look at various maps, it seems that every square meter of the Caspian is divided up -- Russia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan each have a piece. But perhaps someone is thinking of moving the lines around.
Posted by: Steve White ||
02/13/2012 8:25 Comments ||
I'm thinking it's for the oil that has to be under the seabed.
Exactly. Iran claims 1/5th of the Caspian Sea (5 nations) while it's shoreline is a small percentage. There are huge oil and gas reserves and Iran has already threatened the other (not Russian) Caspian nations.
Oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea
[An Nahar] Hizbullah deputy leader Sheikh Naim Qassem ... the Grand Vizier of the Hezbullies... on Sunday hailed the army for "protecting the Lebanese border" and rejected alleged efforts to transform Leb into a launchpad for settling political scores.
During a ceremony held in the Ghobeiri neighborhood of Beirut's southern suburbs, Qassem "saluted the Lebanese army that is safeguarding the Lebanese border, particularly in the northern areas."
His comments came amid large-scale criticism by the March 14 Those are the good guys, insofar as Leb has good guys... -led opposition of what it called raids carried out by the army in northern towns and villages.
The coalition says the military leadership decided to deploy troops in the North to arrest gunnies allegedly belonging to the rebel Free Syrian Army which is fighting Syria's government troops.
"We reject to transform Leb into a launchpad for attacks against others, a place where to score political gains or implement the projects of the United States and Israel," the Hizbullah secretary-general said.
Turning to the government crisis, he reiterated that "it was in everybody's interest to continue (the work) of the cabinet that has provided political and security stability to Leb."
He urged it to resume sessions and resolve its problems calmly away from the media glare.
President Michel Suleiman ...before assuming office as President, he held the position of commander of the Leb Armed Forces. That was after the previous commander, the loathesome Emile Lahoud, took office as president in November of 1998. Likely the next president of Leb will be whoever's commander of the armed forces, too... suspended cabinet sessions on Feb. 1 upon the request of Premier Najib Miqati after he bickered with Free Patriotic Movement Despite its name a Christian party allied with Hizbullah, neither free nor particularly patriotic... ministers on posts in state institutions.
Miqati is insisting not to call for government sessions unless he receives assurances from the ministers that the cabinet would be productive.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/13/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Hezbollah
Ross Perot was wrong. That sucking sound wasn't coming from Mexico. It comes from Sheikh Qassem's lips firmly planted on Syrian and Iranian sphincters.
[An Nahar] Head of the Mustaqbal ... the Future Movement, political party led by Saad Hariri... parliamentary bloc, ex-PM Fouad Saniora, on Sunday strongly condemned the latest deadly festivities in the northern city of Tripoli ...a confusing city, one end of thich is located in Lebanon and the other end of which is the capital of Libya. Its chief distinction is being mentioned in the Marine Hymn... , stressing that the Mustaqbal Movement rejects "any act that could lead to unrest or a civil strife among the Lebanese, from whichever side it comes."
Hitting back at those accusing Mustaqbal of arming itself, Saniora said "those voicing these remarks are trying to justify their armament and possession of arms," noting that the movement is "against any form of armament" and that it wants the state to be in full control of security in the country.
"The possession of arms must be exclusively limited to the Lebanese state, and when we demand that we are also practicing it ourselves and we call on others to practice it," Saniora told a Mustaqbal delegation at his Sidon office.
A ceasefire was announced on Saturday between the rival Tripoli neighborhoods of Bab al-Tabbaneh and Jabal Mohsen under the army's sponsorship after fierce festivities that erupted Friday killed and maimed a number of civilians and troops.
The Sunni-majority coastal city has in the past few years been the scene of intense festivities between Sunni supporters of the anti-Syrian opposition and Alawite Moslems loyal to a Hizbullah-led alliance backed by Iran and Syria.
Syrian Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad Before going into the family business Pencilneck was an eye doctor... , who is fighting an unprecedented revolt against his regime, hails from the Alawite community, an offshoot of Shiite Islam.
Also on Saturday, Rifaat Eid, deputy head of the Arab Democratic Party which is politically and militarily in control of Jabal Mohsen, accused Mustaqbal of operating an arms depot in the Tripoli neighborhood of Abi Samra which saw a deadly accidental blast on Friday.
In remarks to An Nahar daily on the seventh anniversary of ex-PM Rafik Hariri's 2005 liquidation and a year after former PM Saad Hariri Second son of Rafik Hariri, the Leb PM who was assassinated in 2005. He has was prime minister in his own right from 2009 through early 2011. He was born in Riyadh to an Iraqi mother and graduated from Georgetown University. He managed his father's business interests in Riyadh until his father's liquidation. When his father died he inherited a fortune of some $4.1 billion, which won't do him much good if Hizbullah has him bumped off, too. 's government was toppled, Saniora said: "The March 8 experience in power led to a failure after another."
"The experience with the government of Hizbullah says that it succeeded in spreading misery, poverty, confusion, economic regression, political failure and nothing more," he said, adding "the Lebanese want results."
He also accused the Hizbullah-led March 8 coalition of being involved in several scandals such as alleged violations carried out by the energy and telecommunications ministries and the rejection of Labor Minister Charbel Nahhas to sign the transportation allowance decree linked to a recent official wage hike.
Posted by: Fred ||
02/13/2012 00:00 ||
Top|| File under: Hezbollah
TEHRAN - Iran has further restricted access to the Internet and blocked popular email services for the past few days, in a move a top lawmaker said could cost the regime dearly, media reports said on Sunday.
Millions of Iranians have been unable to log onto their accounts on popular email websites such as Googles Gmail, Yahoos Mail and Microsofts Hotmail since Thursday without any official explanation, the Arman newspaper reported.
But the Mehr news agency said the restrictions were not related only to email.
It has been a while that Internet users have had difficulty accessing domestic and news websites as well as foreign search engines and email services, it said on its website. These difficulties include low speed, outage and blocking of websites, Mehr said.
A top conservative lawmaker, Ahmad Tavakoli, criticised the new annoying filtering and said it should be explained.
The explanation is obvious...
The new filtering measure and cutting of access to the services used by most people without prior notice... will raise the ire of educated people, he told Mehr. Such annoying filtering will cost the regime dearly.
Control over the flow of information is a key issue for Iran home to most Internet users in the Middle East with more than 36 million people out of the 75-million populace online. Access to many globally popular websites, including Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, is blocked in the Islamic republic.
The Internet played a major role in the wave of anti-government protest that rocked the country after the disputed re-election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009.
Tehran also blocks most foreign news websites, accusing the Western media of taking part in a plot against it by the United States, Israel and Britain-led Europe.
TEHRAN: Irans parliamentary Speaker Ali Larijani warned Iran will not forgive Gulf Arab nations if they continue backing US plots against Tehran, local media reported on Sunday.
We recommend to some of the countries in the region who were siding with (Iraq dictator) Saddam (Hussein) and now are siding with the US plots against the Iranian nation to give it up, he was quoted as saying. Iran will not forgive them again. There will be consequences in the region if new plots against our nation are carried out, Larijani said.
Larijani was referring to the generous financial aid and political support provided by Gulf Arab states, to the Iraqi regime during the 1980-1988 war against Iran.
His comments come at a time when the United States and the European Union have imposed new sanctions on Irans central bank and oil exports in January over its controversial nuclear program.
The Gulf Cooperation Council comprising of Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, have called on Iran to stop interfering in the internal affairs of their nations. The worsening ties continued after the six Gulf nations ordered their envoys home from Syria and expelled Damascuss ambassadors, joining mounting pressure on Syrian President Bashar Assad over the killings of civilians.
German Defense Minister Thomas de Maiziere said he is not worried about an Israeli military strike against Iran because the chances of an attack succeeding are highly unlikely, in an interview with German newspaper the Frankfurter Allgemeine published Saturday.
In addition, the potential political fallout of launching an attack would likely prevent a strike, according to the report. European sanctions will begin to work in July when an oil embargo takes effect, he added.
The German defense minister also cast doubt on comments attributed to US Defense Minister Leon Panetta ...current SecDef, previously Director of the Central Intelligence Agency. Panetta served as President Bill Clinton's White House Chief of Staff from 1994 to 1997 and was a member of the United States House of Representatives from 1977 to 1993.... , in which he reportedly said Israel would attack Iran in the coming months. "I have personally spoken with Mr. Panetta," de Maiziere said, adding that the prediction was only reported by a journalist and did not come directly from the US defense minister.
On Friday, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu also warned against an attack on Tehran, saying it would be catastrophic for the region.
"A military strike is a disaster. It should not be an option," he said during an appearance at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Especially at a historic turning point in our region, we do not want to see another huge tension."
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.