Hi there, !
Today Sat 02/05/2005 Fri 02/04/2005 Thu 02/03/2005 Wed 02/02/2005 Tue 02/01/2005 Mon 01/31/2005 Sun 01/30/2005 Archives
Rantburg
533608 articles and 1861736 comments are archived on Rantburg.

Today: 101 articles and 504 comments as of 18:47.
Post a news link    Post your own article   
Area: WoT Operations    Non-WoT    Opinion    Local News       
4 al-Qaeda members killed in Kuwait
Today's Headlines
Headline Comments [Views]
Page 2: WoT Background
5 00:00 phil_b [4] 
0 [2] 
1 00:00 gromky [4] 
0 [1] 
0 [11] 
1 00:00 John Q. Citizen [2] 
0 [3] 
5 00:00 Zenster [7] 
19 00:00 Crerert Ebbeting3481 [8] 
1 00:00 PlanetDan [2] 
0 [3] 
0 [2] 
7 00:00 Zenster [5] 
3 00:00 Barbara Skolaut [3] 
44 00:00 Aris Katsaris [4] 
3 00:00 mojo [3] 
3 00:00 Steve [3] 
3 00:00 Scooter McGruder [2] 
0 [2] 
0 [4] 
1 00:00 Theter Ebbomomp3141 [1] 
2 00:00 trailing wife [1] 
1 00:00 mojo [1] 
8 00:00 Dishman [1] 
11 00:00 OldSpook [2] 
3 00:00 trailing wife [2] 
0 [2] 
8 00:00 JFM [4] 
18 00:00 .com [4] 
1 00:00 2b [8] 
8 00:00 Shipman [1] 
7 00:00 Steve [15] 
1 00:00 trailing wife [2] 
3 00:00 mojo [2] 
3 00:00 nada [1] 
1 00:00 trailing wife [1] 
1 00:00 Shipman [3] 
3 00:00 Cyber Sarge [1] 
Page 1: WoT Operations
1 00:00 .com [4]
0 [3]
32 00:00 Zenster [7]
14 00:00 Sgt. Mom [4]
1 00:00 trailing wife [2]
17 00:00 Cyber Sarge [9]
0 [18]
2 00:00 Rightwing [14]
0 [4]
2 00:00 Hollowing Howard Dean [2]
2 00:00 mojo [2]
0 [2]
0 [2]
10 00:00 phil_b [6]
9 00:00 Alaska Paul [5]
2 00:00 john [4]
7 00:00 .com [4]
0 [3]
0 [5]
3 00:00 Bulldog [4]
0 [15]
0 [3]
3 00:00 trailing wife [6]
0 [2]
11 00:00 Mahmoud El Dead Guy [3]
3 00:00 Dishman [4]
7 00:00 Sock Puppet of Doom [3]
0 [2]
20 00:00 SwissTex [4]
5 00:00 Xbalanke [3]
4 00:00 Chuck Simmins [4]
0 [5]
2 00:00 Steve White [3]
3 00:00 Querent [4]
0 [3]
0 [3]
4 00:00 Spot [2]
0 [12]
Page 3: Non-WoT
5 00:00 Zenster [4]
18 00:00 Asedwich [1]
5 00:00 Cyber Sarge [1]
10 00:00 OldSpook [5]
7 00:00 BigEd [2]
10 00:00 tu3031 [2]
8 00:00 trailing wife [1]
2 00:00 Steve [2]
12 00:00 Sobiesky [2]
10 00:00 CrazyFool [4]
2 00:00 Anonymoose [1]
11 00:00 AJackson [2]
3 00:00 Tom [1]
3 00:00 Chris W. [12]
0 [3]
8 00:00 Dishman [4]
5 00:00 Parabellum [3]
Page 4: Opinion
1 00:00 .com [10]
7 00:00 Shipman [2]
7 00:00 ed [14]
Page 5: Russia-Former Soviet Union
1 00:00 Shipman [4]
11 00:00 jackal [2]
13 00:00 jackal [4]
2 00:00 Mike Sylwester [3]
7 00:00 Shipman [10]
-Short Attention Span Theater-
P. O. W. War Diary: Slinky Betrayed Cory
19 January 2005: The Slinky betrayed us. I should have known. I never trusted him. He was an unstable character, always going back and forth, back and forth, never showing a shred of backbone. "Come, senor, I know the way to the insurgents' headquarters," he rasped. The fact that he was an Arab toy speaking with a stereotypical Spanish accent should have tipped me off. But hindsight is always 20/20. Literally. I can turn my head 360 degrees.

I only knew my men by their code names, but even in that short space of time we shared a bond that only six-inch plastic combatants can truly understand. They were my family, my brothers in petroleum-based products. One night we all melted the tips of our fingers and became plastic brothers.

And I led those brave action figures into the trap.

"My spider-sense is tingling," muttered "Peter Parker," as he flexed his fingers on his M16. We were all on edge, and our quirks were coming to the fore. "Prince Adam" kept waving his weapon in the air, hollering "By the power of Grayskull!" Damn Wiccans. "Hugh Jackman" had huddled deeply into his trenchcoat, whispering "Am I Wolverine or Van Helsing?" to anyone who made the mistake of standing next to him. And "Elmo" kept singing his goofy song. "Elmo loves his rifle/His bullets, too "

The insurgents caught us by surprise in that deserted Iraqi backyard. BBs perforated the sullen quiet of the hot Iraqi afternoon. Firecrackers sizzled and roared around us in a symphony of extremity-disintegrating horror. Mean little kids stomped us with the hard soles of their brand-new Keds -- weapons of mass destruction. And the gentlest one of us all lost it completely. "Elmo is thinking about genocide!" he screamed, as he unleashed a hail of foam darts upon our adversaries. "Elmo is Death, destroyer of worlds!" War does awful things to toys.  

snip
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 02/02/2005 11:10:09 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


www.FreeGraner.com
www.FreeGraner.com

Chew toy, anyone?
Posted by: www.FreeGraner.com || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  No thanks, Free, the Abu Grabass dungeon-master and his creepy girlfriend are right where they need to be.
It's still an injustice though if they are not soon joined by B/Gen Janice "I zee nosssing" Karpinski, the bungling PC-promotion beneficiary who somehow wound up with the most sensitive security job in the Army.
Remember that Janice the K is also a reservist. By the strangest coincidence, her job in civilian life involved running "high-stress" train seminars in which the trainees were routinely cursed, screamed at and subjected to other kinds of degrading treatment. This sort of sadistic weirdness is quite popular in corporate "human resources" circles these days.
Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy || 02/02/2005 3:21 Comments || Top||

#2  Sure, go ahead and free him - just let us all know when and where he's to be released. This asshole caused more damage to the US than Saddams' disappearing Republican Guard. Graner and his crew are an insult to the uniform - and his asinine behavior and twisted mind were fodder for the assholes of the MSM, Congress, and professional wank-o-matics world-wide. I'd love to let him know how I feel, but I have the feeling that there are about 130,000 Americans in Iraq who would like first shot.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 5:32 Comments || Top||

#3  Could we free him back to Iraq? I saw mom/dad once on TV, they are sure that the blame lies squarely on Bush and those unknown CID guys. Whomever started this site really need to get a grip on reality, all but three guards copped a plea. Kind of makes it hard to imagine that those with the most serious crimes (with photos) are more innocent than those that plead to lesser charges. This guy is lucky we don't extradite his sorry ass back to Iraq and see how he does at Abu Grabass as a prisoner.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 02/02/2005 17:22 Comments || Top||


Arabia
Saudi intelligence a "critical problem"
RIYADH, Feb 2 (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia's main foreign intelligence service has become markedly less effective in recent years and its weakness has become a critical security problem, a U.S. think tank said on Wednesday. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said the Saudi General Intelligence Presidency (GIP) suffers from poor research and analysis which has left it unable to play a full role in tackling a wave of al Qaeda violence in the oil-rich kingdom.
"Considering the kingdom's vital strategic position in the international community, as well as its place at the centre of the global war on terrorism, such deficiencies are particularly dangerous," CSIS said in its report. "In general, the weakness of the GIP is one of the critical national security problems facing Saudi Arabia".
The CSIS report was released just days before Saudi Arabia hosts a counter-terror conference which it says aims to pool international experience in tackling terrorism worldwide. It also followed the resignation of GIP chief Prince Nawaf bin Abdul-Aziz who replaced Prince Turki al-Faisal shortly before the Sept 11 2001 attacks, carried out mainly by Saudi hijackers. Nawaf suffered a brain haemorrhage in 2002 but remained in post until his resignation last week. No replacement for Nawaf has been announced.
"The GIP has become markedly less effective since the departure of Prince Turki," the CSIS report said. "Most of the sophisticated networks that had been established over many years have deteriorated and hence the GIP's role in the global war on terrorism has been marginal at best". It said the head of the GIP, which has an estimated $500 million a year budget, is theoretically responsible for intelligence gathering and analysis and coordinating intelligence tasks of all Saudi intelligence agencies. But in practice "at the operational level there now is no real Saudi intelligence community". Efforts are being made to improve coordination and sharing of intelligence, it added.

Saudi Arabia is battling a 21-month campaign of suicide bombings and killing by militants loyal to al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who aim to expel non-Muslims from the world's biggest oil exporter and topple the ruling pro-U.S. Saud family. In December, militants detonated two car bombs near the Interior Ministry and an emergency forces building in the capital. They also stormed the U.S. consulate in the Red Sea city of Jeddah.
But Saudi security forces have killed or arrested many of the most wanted militants and the government says it has broken the back of their violent campaign.
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 2:28:41 PM || Comments || Link || [7 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Is this just a day for unfortunate headlines?
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 18:00 Comments || Top||

#2  LOL Steve!
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 18:01 Comments || Top||

#3  Saudis have intelligence?

Are you sure? ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 02/02/2005 21:34 Comments || Top||

#4  Efforts are being made to improve coordination and sharing of intelligence, it added.

How someone can share something that is not there?
Puzzled...
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 21:50 Comments || Top||

#5  Saudi intelligence a "critical problem"

Intelligence is always a "critical problem" for those who are utterly devoid of it. All we are seeing is the logical extension of what happens when "What, me worry?" is enshrined as an ideological centerpiece.

"The GIP has become markedly less effective since the departure of Prince Turki," the CSIS report said.

Considering that Turki was a direct conduit to mullah Omar and al Qaeda in general, I fail to see how his departure could make things much worse, save for our enemies.

Saudi Arabia richly deserves the mayhem they've so painstakingly bred up in their midst all these years. I hope the entire royal family dies slowly at the hands of their own servants. It couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.

Posted by: Zenster || 02/02/2005 22:35 Comments || Top||


Britain
Terror suspects may opt for jail
Posted by: tipper || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  So, living in prison is more congenial -- and less of a burden on the family -- than living at home, which appears to cause mental illness in these men.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 10:03 Comments || Top||


China-Japan-Koreas
Uranium testing indicates North Korean link to Libyan nuclear program
Scientific tests have led American intelligence agencies and government scientists to conclude with near certainty that North Korea sold processed uranium to Libya, bolstering earlier indications that the reclusive state exported sensitive fuel for atomic weapons, according to officials with access to the intelligence. The determination, which has circulated among senior government officials in recent weeks, has touched off a hunt to determine if North Korea has also sold uranium to other countries, including Iran and Syria. So far, there is no evidence that such additional transactions took place.

Nonetheless, the conclusion about Libya, which is contained in a classified briefing that has been described to The New York Times, could alter Washington's debate about the assessment of the North Korean nuclear threat. In the past, some administration officials have argued that there is time to find a diplomatic solution because there was no evidence that the government of Kim Jung Il was spreading its atomic technology abroad.

Nine months ago, international inspectors came up with the first evidence that the North may have provided Libya with nearly two tons of uranium hexaflouride, the material that can be fed into nuclear centrifuges and enriched into bomb fuel. Libya surrendered its huge cask of the highly toxic material to the United States when it dismantled its nuclear program last year. Now, intelligence officials say, extensive testing conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee over the last several months has concluded that the material did not originate in Pakistan or other suspect countries, and one official said that "with a certainty of 90 percent or better, this stuff's from North Korea."
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 3:00:26 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


USFK Deserter Speaks of Troubled Life in N. Korea
A former USFK soldier who deserted to North Korea in 1965 and is now settled in Japan with his wife and family has said he lived "like a dog" during his first 15 years in the North. Charles Robert Jenkins, 65, was giving his first press conference in his wife's hometown of Sado Island, Niigata Prefecture. He said his life changed greatly after he met his wife, Soga Hitomi, now 46, in August 1980. In interviews with some Western media outlets since last year, Jenkins has said that after defecting to North Korea he was confined along with other U.S. deserters to a room without beds or running water and beaten whenever he protested. "We never dreamed that [North Korean leader] Kim Jong-il would let us go," he added. Asked about the North Korean strongman on Tuesday, Jenkins said, "I've never met Kim Jong-il, but he is an evil man." About the North Korean system, he said, "It's a socialist country's system of exploiting and oppressing the people." Jenkins said he taught English conversation and comprehension to soldiers at the North Korean military academy. He said he longed to see his elderly mother in the United States. "She's 91 years old... I hope I can see her sooner (rather) than later." He told his mother and the rest of his family that he loved them.
Maybe they can come see you in Japan. We don't want you here.
Jenkins lived in the North with his wife, a Japanese abductee, and their two children until last year. Soga returned to Japan first, and last December Jenkins was re-united with her after a separation of two years and two months.
Posted by: tipper || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  A former USFK soldier who deserted to North Korea in 1965 and is now settled in Japan with his wife and family has said he lived "like a dog" during his first 15 years in the North.

You are a f*cking dog, traitor, and don't ever forget it.
Posted by: BH || 02/02/2005 10:19 Comments || Top||

#2  Sucked, Bob, huh?
Good.
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/02/2005 10:23 Comments || Top||

#3  Where'd I leave my nano-violin?...
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 13:10 Comments || Top||


North Korea to return to talks after Bush's union address
Gosh. Is it Wednesday already?
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  The reclusive communist state has said it would wait to see the shape of US policy towards it under the re-elected Bush administration
Hey Lil' Kim, meet the new shape, same as the old shape!
Posted by: Spot || 02/02/2005 8:21 Comments || Top||

#2  The Policy is clear. Two down, one to go.
Posted by: Glereper Thigum7229 || 02/02/2005 9:57 Comments || Top||

#3  Where's the Kimmy graphic from Team America?
Posted by: nada || 02/02/2005 12:57 Comments || Top||


Down Under
Al-Qaeda still active in Australia
THE al-Qaeda terror group remains active and has Australia on its radar, a parliamentary inquiry has heard. The parliamentary joint committee on ASIO, ASIS and DSD met in camera yesterday to review the listing of six terror groups outlawed in Australia. A written submission from Attorney-General Philip Ruddock, which formed the basis of the review, said credible intelligence sources had assessed that al-Qaeda was continuing to plan terror acts. "In furthering its international objectives, Australia is seen as a legitimate target by al-Qaeda and associated groups," the submission said. "Since 11 September 2001, Australia has been named as a target in five public statements by Osama bin Laden and one by his deputy Ayman al Zawahiri. Australia has also figured in media and internet statements by al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremist sources."

The submission said ASIO had confirmed a small number of Australians had trained in bomb-making and assassination techniques in al-Qaeda's terror camps in Afghanistan. As many as 20,000 Islamic radicals had trained in such camps. "ASIO assesses that al-Qaeda is continuing to prepare, plan and foster the commission of acts involving threats to human life and serious damage to property," the submission said.

A separate submission said the terror group Jemaah Islamiah also presented a "serious risk" to the safety of people in Australia, the Philippines, Singapore and Indonesia. Other terror organisations reviewed were the Abu Sayyaf Group, Armed Islamic Group, Jamiat ul-Ansar (JuA) and Salafist Group for Call and Combat. The committee will report to Parliament on the relisting of the groups on March 14. To date, 17 groups have been proscribed as terrorist organisations in Australia. All but one, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, are also listed by the UN Security Council as terrorist organisations.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:20:44 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  just let Israel and India make nuclear tests in the proximity of Australia -
Posted by: Melika || 02/02/2005 11:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Already done. The nuclear tsunami is just a taste of what is in store for you and your backward religion. Tremble before the power of Circumcized Shiva.
Posted by: Hinjoo || 02/02/2005 12:34 Comments || Top||

#3  Wonderful, Hinjoo!
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 18:29 Comments || Top||


Europe
Bonn Koran school under renewed pressure
BONN - A Koran school in the German city of Bonn has come under renewed official pressure with the revelation that a staff member's son-in-law supported al-Qaeda and was planning to blow himself up in a terrorist attack in Iraq. The infants-to- cannon fodder teens King Fahd Academy narrowly escaped closure last year after education officials discovered teachers were calling for a holy war against Christendom at school assemblies and the children spent more time in indoctrination than on the three Rs.
"King Fahd Academy", need we say more?
Though reading, writing and arithmetic were well behind the standard at German state schools, hardline Islamists from around Germany were moving their families to Bonn to enrol children at the school.
Juergen Roters, chief of regional government in Cologne, demanded that the Riyadh-funded school dissociate itself from anybody supporting terrorism after police established that a terror suspect arrested in Bonn last month was married to the teacher's daughter.
Riyadh-funded school dissociate itself from anybody supporting terrorism , I guess we all see the irony in that statement
Yasser Abu-Shaweesh, a 31-year-old Bonn medical student, is alleged to have volunteered to perform a suicide bombing in Iraq. He was recruited by a German-based Iraqi militant, who reportedly trained in a Qaeda camp in Afghanistan and is also under arrest. Police say that recently married Abu-Shaweesh was born in Libya but is stateless and carries Egyptian travel documents. His wife and father in law are both Syrian born.

"Police intelligence gives me grounds for concern that there are links between the Islamist clientele of the King Fahd Academy and the school itself," said Roters. He demanded the 300-pupil school sack any teachers with pro-terrorism associations. German intelligence agencies have closely scrutinized the school and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder been to Riyadh to complain to Saudi leaders about it. Government officials only let the school continue so as to avoid a foreign-relations crisis.
This article starring:
YASER ABU SHAWISHal-Qaeda in Europe
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 12:18:53 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  narrowly escaped closure last year after education officials discovered teachers were calling for a holy war against Christendom at school assemblies and the children spent more time in indoctrination than on the three Rs.

!!!!!?????

huh? do they have to actually kill people to be tapped for closure?
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/02/2005 14:35 Comments || Top||


President Bush thrilled Europeans
Posted by: anonymous2u || 02/02/2005 00:11 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  In France, Germany and Britain, [Rice] will meet in closed session with leading academics and intellectuals.

Oh, to be a fly on the wall at those sessions!
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 0:54 Comments || Top||

#2  In France, Germany and Britain, [Rice] will meet in closed session with leading academics and intellectuals.

Oh, to be a fly on the wall at those sessions!
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 0:54 Comments || Top||

#3  So? There are three sessions, after all, and I only posted the comment twice ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 0:55 Comments || Top||

#4  There is a fly :-)
Posted by: True German Ally || 02/02/2005 17:18 Comments || Top||

#5  Will the fly be commenting on what he overhears?
Posted by: Dave D. || 02/02/2005 17:26 Comments || Top||

#6  I'd love to see it, too, tw. Condi seems very articulate and intelligent and has a backbone. I hope she sets their a**es straight. That's probably just wishful thinking, though. It would be great to have flesh and blood partners with both intelligence and conscience, but instead we have holographs.
Posted by: Jules 187 || 02/02/2005 17:52 Comments || Top||

#7  TGA, I am your adoring fan! Please ask your fly to share, if it would, general impressions. I assume that anything more detailed would be breaking confidences, although I am greedy enough to wish for it.

Immer Deine,
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 18:36 Comments || Top||

#8  Gratitude in advance for any general impressions TGA's fly might glean and pass along.

I am one American who would like to see the transAtlantic alliance continue in whatever form and to whatever sustainable degree it can.
Posted by: rkb || 02/02/2005 19:49 Comments || Top||

#9  The fly has met her already, in 1990, discussing Soviet issues.

The fly can't say no more... well, maybe a little :-)
Posted by: True German Ally || 02/02/2005 20:06 Comments || Top||

#10  LOL! You're a tease, at heart!
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 20:11 Comments || Top||

#11  All I can say is that RB will be mentioned...
Posted by: True German Ally || 02/02/2005 20:14 Comments || Top||

#12  W00t, pass us around like a party girl, lol! RB is unique in many ways, heh, not least of which is the ease of feedback and the breadth of news covered. And we have big tits, too!

Seriously, it would be great if you had like-minded colleagues you could engage here - and we could be the fly on the wall.

I recognize the severe limitations, but whatever you'd feel comfortable sharing would be far more valuable to understanding issues and positions than what we get from the news outlets, of course. You're a rock. I know you'll be circumspect.

Thanks, bro.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 20:23 Comments || Top||

#13  I'll do my best but I guess I leave out the big tits feature :-)
Posted by: True German Ally || 02/02/2005 20:34 Comments || Top||

#14  Good idea; it'll make us seem more serious...
Posted by: Dave D. || 02/02/2005 20:43 Comments || Top||

#15  Whatever you do, don't mention AR-15. He's too serious.
Posted by: Tom || 02/02/2005 20:46 Comments || Top||

#16  "I tried him with mild jokes, then with severe ones."
-Twain, A Deception (sketch)
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 20:55 Comments || Top||

#17  Ssssh the President is speaking now!
Posted by: True German Ally || 02/02/2005 20:57 Comments || Top||

#18  People with ink-stained fingers showing the Prez as he comes down the isle. Love it.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 21:02 Comments || Top||


Fifth Column
Jesse Jackson joins effort to free contractor held hostage in Iraq
Posted by: anonymous2u || 02/02/2005 00:12 || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Start simple, Jesse. See if you can free G.I. Joe.
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/02/2005 8:46 Comments || Top||

#2  But is he going to help free Cody?
Posted by: Spot || 02/02/2005 8:46 Comments || Top||

#3  freecody.org is avilable....
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 10:01 Comments || Top||

#4  I think SPoD ought to grab this. :)
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 10:02 Comments || Top||

#5  Wow I just was thinking that I hadn't heard from Jesse 'Shakedown' Jackson in a while. I think we should turn Jesse loose in the Sunni Triangle and let nature take it's course. Has he stopped the charade and dropped the "Reverand" from his name? I guess Sharpton was getting too much coverage over the KFC chicken shakedown. I suspect Sharpton is an expert on KFC chicken.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 02/02/2005 10:18 Comments || Top||

#6  ima thought this gonna be on the gi joe again. sharpton dont needer be em expert on 16 herbs and spices to kno sumthin rong with kfc.
Posted by: muck4doo || 02/02/2005 12:08 Comments || Top||

#7  "I am please asking for help because my life is in danger because it's been proved I worked for American forces," he said.

I dunno, but something about that just sounds weird.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama || 02/02/2005 13:57 Comments || Top||

#8  Too bad Jesse Jackson sucks at freeing hostages. Now if Jesse James joined the effort that would bringf real results.
Posted by: JFM || 02/02/2005 14:37 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Politix
President Bush's State of the Union Address
Mr. Speaker, Vice President Cheney, Members of Congress, fellow citizens:

As a new Congress gathers, all of us in the elected branches of government share a great privilege: We have been placed in office by the votes of the people we serve. And tonight that is a privilege we share with newly elected leaders of Afghanistan, the Palestinian territories, Ukraine, and a free and sovereign Iraq.

Two weeks ago, I stood on the steps of this Capitol and renewed the commitment of our nation to the guiding ideal of liberty for all. This evening I will set forth policies to advance that ideal at home and around the world.

Tonight, with a healthy, growing economy, with more Americans going back to work, with our nation an active force for good in the world, the state of our union is confident and strong. Our generation has been blessed by the expansion of opportunity, by advances in medicine, and by the security purchased by our parents' sacrifice. Now, as we see a little gray in the mirror or a lot of gray and we watch our children moving into adulthood, we ask the question: What will be the state of their union?

Members of Congress, the choices we make together will answer that question. Over the next several months, on issue after issue, let us do what Americans have always done, and build a better world for our children and grandchildren.

First, we must be good stewards of this economy, and renew the great institutions on which millions of our fellow citizens rely.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: Annie Onomous || 02/02/2005 10:25:25 PM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  It is time for an immigration policy that permits temporary guest workers to fill jobs Americans will not take, that rejects amnesty, that tells us who is entering and leaving our country, and that closes the border to drug dealers and terrorists. About time!
Posted by: phil_b || 02/02/2005 23:10 Comments || Top||

#2  If he really means it and it does not end up yet-another-amnesty program and the illegal aliens (both existing and new) are still allowed a free pass.

I'm not big on the guest worker program but if he closes the border and starts withholding federal funds form 'sanctuary' cities and counties then I might be able to swallow it. If they also start arresting and sentencing people (including elected officals) who knowingly hire and shelter illegal aliens it would be easier.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 02/02/2005 23:14 Comments || Top||

#3  He throws down the glove to Syria and Iran (not to mention our "allies" in the Magic Kingdom and Egypt) while explaining the Grand Neocon Plot at length, and all y'all can talk about is immigration?
Posted by: someone || 02/02/2005 23:16 Comments || Top||

#4  "y'all" LOL! You're not a Southerner, lol!

There is much in there to think about and be happy about. Indeed, he put several parties on notice, Syria, Iran, Saudi, and Egypt, in particular. I was happy hearing it - and reading it in detail will be interesting - and I'm sure that it should be reposted tomorrow so we can all have a good shot at the content.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 23:21 Comments || Top||

#5  Politics IS demographics.
Posted by: phil_b || 02/02/2005 23:22 Comments || Top||


U.S. voters to switch to Inky Fingers?
Won't stop the Machine; the dead don't need inky fingers.
Posted by: Radio Guy || 02/02/2005 09:57 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Photo ID and paper ballots are also necessary. Altogether, they would reduce 90%+ of voter fraud and Democrat office holders.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis || 02/02/2005 11:17 Comments || Top||

#2  Man - I saw "stinky fingers" for some reason.

Glad I was wrong.
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 13:14 Comments || Top||

#3  Watching the Iraqi election, I thought that's exactly what we need. And a photo ID before voting - every time.

I can hear the Donks screaming now. If they can't cheat, how would they get votes? ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut || 02/02/2005 18:18 Comments || Top||


Home Front: WoT
Freedom House Report on Saudi Propaganda
For those who missed it:WASHINGTON, DC, January 28, 2005- Freedom House's Center for Religious Freedom released today a new report exposing the dissemination of hate propaganda in America by the government of Saudi Arabia. The 89-page report, "Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques," is based on a year-long study of over two hundred original documents, all disseminated, published or otherwise generated by the government of Saudi Arabia and collected from more than a dozen mosques in the United States. Link to 89 page .pdf file HERE
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 2:34:27 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Surprise, surprise. Cynicism meter goes off the scale.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen || 02/02/2005 15:16 Comments || Top||


AP: Videos Show Guantanamo Prisoner Abuse
EFL. Look! G.I. Joe's beating up that Osama Bin Laden with Kung Fu Grip doll!
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - Videotapes of riot squads subduing troublesome terror suspects at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay show the guards punching some detainees, tying one to a gurney for questioning and forcing a dozen to strip from the waist down, according to a secret report. One squad was all-female, traumatizing some Muslim prisoners.
Oh, my heavens!
Although the report cited several cases of physical force, reviewers said they found no evidence of systemic detainee abuse, according to the six-page summary dated June 19, 2004. An official familiar with the report authenticated it, speaking to AP on condition of anonymity. AP also reviewed an unclassified log of the videotape footage.
So...ummmmmmmmmmmmmm...what's your point?
The tapes raised questions about mistreatment and misconduct, however, said the investigators, who suggested some clips needed more scrutiny to rule out abuse. The military has cited 10 substantiated cases of abuse at Guantanamo, and announced Tuesday an extension would be granted for an investigation to interview of witnesses in the United States and abroad.
Keep digging until you find something! Anything!
One such clip the investigators flagged was from Feb. 17, 2004. It showed "one or more" team members punching a detainee "on an area of his body that seemingly would be inconsistent with striking a pressure point," which is a sanctioned tactic for subduing prisoners. In five other clips showing detainees who appeared to have been punched by team members, the investigators said: "The punching was in line with accepted law enforcement practice of striking the pressure point on the back of the thigh to temporarily distract the detainee."
Again, your friggin point here?
In other "questionable" cases, reviewers said a video showed a guard kneeing a detainee in the head, while another showed a team securing a detainee to a gurney for an interrogation. A separate clip captured a platoon leader taunting a detainee with pepper spray and repeatedly spraying him before letting the reaction team enter the cell, reviewers wrote.
Investigators also noted about a dozen cases where detainees were stripped from the waist down and taken to the "Romeo block," of the camp. No female guards were involved, they said.
Romeo block is a camp section where prisoners were often left naked for days, according to two former detainees, Britons Shafiq Rasul and Asif Iqbal, who were released last year.
Although no female guards were videotaped in any of the stripping cases, investigators cautioned the U.S. government about using the all-female team to handle disruptive detainees, citing religious and cultural issues. Many of the prisoners are Muslim men and under strict interpretations of Islam view contact with other women other than their wives as taboo.
We kinda think it's against our cultural beliefs to behead and disembowel people. But how DARE we offend their cultural beliefs!
"Several detainees express displeasure about female MPs either escorting them, or touching them as members of an IRF team," the report says. "Because some have questioned our sensitivity to the detainees' religion and culture, we believe that talking points are appropriate to address incorporation of female soldiers into the guard force."
Oh, fuckin PUH-LEEZE!!!!
In one video clip of the reaction teams, the memo says, "A detainee appears to be genuinely traumatized by a female escort securing the detainee's leg irons. In another video, inexplicably an all-female IRF team forcibly extracts a detainee from his cell." While stating that female troops have a right to serve as equals alongside their male counterparts, investigators warned the all-female team could create the perception that the gender of the squad was taken into consideration for the Muslim population.
Who are these "investigators" by the way? The Board of Directors of CAIR?
"By forming an all-female IRF team for use with one detainee we potentially undercut our position that we do not distinguish between male and female soldiers. Clearly, the soldiers' gender did play a role in forming the all-female IRF team," the memo says.
Hey, Mahmoud. We're sending in the chicks to kick your ass again.
The memo suggests that military "personnel showing the IRF videos outside of (Defense Department) channels should be prepared with talking points to refute or diminish the charge that we use women (against) the detainees' culture or religion."
The U.S. military wouldn't comment on whether there's a specific strategy involved in using an all-female response force but said female guards — who serve on mixed reaction teams as well — comprise about 20 percent of the guard force.
"As a matter of policy, we do not discuss specific Immediate Response Force composition or methods, but they are consistent with those used in the corrections profession and are always carried out with the security and safety of detainees and troopers in mind," said Lt. Col. James Marshall, a spokesman at U.S. Southern Command.
Prisoners released from Guantanamo have accused the extraction teams of abuse and one former U.S. National Guardsmen received brain damage after posing undercover as a rowdy detainee and being beaten by teammates.

"The obvious problem with our armed forces is their inability to comply with international law," said Arsalan T. Iftikhar, national legal director for the Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations. "Many of us thought that the Abu Ghraib scandal in Iraq was going to shake us into awakening but it seems like the things we keep learning about Guantanamo indicate there was, in fact, systematic abuse."
Oh, there they are!
Joe Navarro, a former FBI interrogator who has taught questioning methods and is familiar with Guantanamo, said treating prisoners poorly makes them more stubborn and unwilling to talk.
Then feed them to the sharks.
"The military has been cavalier in their attitudes toward these individuals to the point that it has been detrimental to the overall mission," Navarro told AP.
Read all about it in my soon to be released book...
The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a Freedom of Information Act request asking for all photographs and videotapes depicting the treatment of the detainees. Although a court ordered the government to comply with the ACLU request and turn over documents — thousands of which the ACLU has received — the government has refused to provide videos, citing privacy concerns, said Jameel Jaffer, an ACLU attorney.
We're...ummmmmmmmmmm...working on it, Jameel.
Although the extraction team actions are videotaped, interrogations with detainees aren't. The use of female guards and interrogators has created controversy.
A former Army linguist who served at Guantanamo as an Arabic translator from December 2002 to June 2003 wrote in a draft manuscript that female interrogators tried to break Muslim detainees by sexual touching, wearing a miniskirt and thong underwear and in one case smearing a Saudi man's face with fake menstrual blood. The draft written by former Army Sgt. Erik R. Saar was obtained by AP, which reported on its contents last week.
Eeeeeeeeewwwwww!!!! Yucky Infidel Temptresses!!!!
About 545 prisoners from some 40 countries are being held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, most accused of links to Afghanistan's ousted Taliban regime or al-Qaida terror network.
That's a lotta shark food.
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/02/2005 1:18:53 PM || Comments || Link || [8 views] Top|| File under:

#1  hey i know, lets just throw marshmellows at them next time!
Posted by: legolas || 02/02/2005 13:36 Comments || Top||

#2  Fly Chynna and the ladies of the WWF to Guantanamo to show these Masters of the Ummah what submission really means.
Posted by: ed || 02/02/2005 13:43 Comments || Top||

#3  I read through the entire article, and maybe I missed it, but I can't seem to find mention of what the prisoners actions were that caused the Immediate Response Force to be called in the first place.
Posted by: Nick || 02/02/2005 13:48 Comments || Top||

#4  Nick, nope just the blood thirsty actions of our drug-deranged MPs on the harmless prisoners. I love the 'all-women' team designed to 'hurt' the muslim sensitivities. This yahoo is a big commie reporter who gets all of his info from ex-prisoners and now a lone guard who heard (but never saw) about unusual interrigation methods. I bet he was the one wearing the mini skirt! Now that might may Achmed talk!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge || 02/02/2005 14:00 Comments || Top||

#5  Crying wolf again.
Posted by: 2b || 02/02/2005 14:15 Comments || Top||

#6  Well, let's make them a deal. If they behave, we won't send the icky girls in there to whomp their sorry asses, AND we'll give them ice cream too.

Posted by: Desert Blondie || 02/02/2005 14:23 Comments || Top||

#7  One squad was all-female, traumatizing some Muslim prisoners.

Ah, the sweet sounds of the press crying about American women beating up big bad Islamic terrorists. If I had the video I'd FedEx it straight to al Jazeera, the Arab world *really* needs to see this.
Posted by: Thraing Uloluper1664 || 02/02/2005 14:34 Comments || Top||

#8  CAIR and the ACLU WTF?

I know not one person who contributed to this story knows anything about prisons and their operation just from reading it.. They are just out to distract people from the fact these “prisoners” are murdering terrorists. They are in what in a civilian setting would be a super max facility. The ACLU doesn't have a good track record when it comes to helping prisons be safe places for prisoners and the people who work there.

An all female squad is exactly what you would want to get compliance. Their religious phobia is fair game for use against them. If they behave and do as they are told they don't have things they don't like done to them. Extracting a prisoner from a cell is dangerous and violently swarming the clown inside that isn't complying is necessarily violent. These "prisoners" would be in administrative segregation in the real world. They would be treated the same way if they didn't get with the program. No one thing I read is illegal in the “real world” let alone a military prison setting.

Freaking foolish people.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom || 02/02/2005 14:55 Comments || Top||

#9  Reminds me those photos of the Suez War: the Iraelis were so short of man power they had to resort to woman power for guarding their (thousands of ) POWs.
Poor Egypatians, first their moms didn't love them and then that: being guarded by Israeli girls.
Posted by: JFM || 02/02/2005 15:02 Comments || Top||

#10  Hell, worse than that JFM a lot of them Israeli gals were JOOOOOOOOS!
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 15:23 Comments || Top||

#11  With the result that today many Egyptian men of a certain age remember being forced to drink a quart of hot chicken soup and feel vaguely guilty about something.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 15:26 Comments || Top||

#12  I hear some of those female CIA interogators down there are big fat Mamma's who are as nasty as they are ugly. Good.
I still say shoot them all, the only good Islamist is a dead Islamist - problem solved.
Posted by: JerseyMike || 02/02/2005 15:27 Comments || Top||

#13  Now , now, JerseyMike. We must respect their multicultural diversity. You forget their standard of beauty is 5'0" and 100kg. Think of Suha in a Hefty bag.
Posted by: ed || 02/02/2005 15:36 Comments || Top||

#14  i have an idea, when we are through interrogating them just shoot em in the head and push em the nearest hole let the ACLU bitch about that
Posted by: Thraing Hupoluper1864 || 02/02/2005 17:26 Comments || Top||

#15  In the immortal words of James Mason:
"Some problems are best disposed of from a great height - over water."
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 17:27 Comments || Top||

#16  * Yawn! *
Posted by: DMFD || 02/02/2005 18:08 Comments || Top||

#17  I can chop all your infidel heads off but you will never see my peepee!
Posted by: Jihadist || 02/02/2005 20:10 Comments || Top||

#18  We can see it with a microscope.
Posted by: nanotechie || 02/02/2005 20:15 Comments || Top||

#19  I am tortured by the AP and the rest of the MSM.
Posted by: Crerert Ebbeting3481 || 02/02/2005 18:01 Comments || Top||


Soddy al-Qaeda member trained with US Air Force
The FBI last year quietly nabbed a Saudi military official who had ties to al-Qaida - just after he finished training in this country with the U.S. Air Force, the New York Daily News has learned.

The Saudi allegedly had knowledge of al-Qaida safe houses and plans in the kingdom, intelligence sources said.

FBI agents stopped and quizzed the suspect and his family at a U.S. airport as they were leaving the country. The military man was allowed to return to Saudi Arabia, where he was detained and interrogated further, sources said.

As a result, arrests of other al-Qaida operatives were made overseas, sources said.

"An al-Qaida sympathizer who was in the Saudi military was here in training,'' said a senior U.S. official briefed on the case. "There were some significant rollups because of this.''

The FBI discovered the man's ties to al-Qaida and brought in Air Force Office of Special Investigations agents because he had attended one of the service's schools, the sources said.

Saudi Embassy officials in Washington did not return calls seeking comment Monday.

The incident was disclosed in an OSI publication in a year-end column written by the group's commander, Air Force Brig. Gen. Eric Patterson.

"We spearheaded a successful anti-terrorism operation with the FBI, which identified an active al-Qaida sympathizer who attended training at an Air Force technical school,'' Patterson wrote in Global Reliance magazine, a bimonthly read by OSI agents.

"We have since established a process to screen and monitor activities of foreign students to focus on early discovery of other possible penetrations. In addition to capturing that al-Qaida member in the United States, 51 others were arrested overseas,'' Patterson wrote.

Other sources expressed skepticism that the number eventually collared was as many as Patterson claimed.

An OSI spokesman wouldn't say what type of Air Force training the Saudi officer got, but confirmed that an identified al-Qaida sympathizer "was sent back to the host nation.''

"Saudi Arabia continues to be the single biggest producer and fund-raiser of terror,'' said Rep. Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., after learning of the case from a News reporter. "When will we learn?''
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:54:56 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "These people are not your friends."
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 14:12 Comments || Top||


Southeast Asia
8 Killed in Jolo Clan War
At least eight people were killed in a week-long gun battle between two feuding Muslim clans in the southern Philippine island of Jolo, officials said yesterday. Officials said the fighting broke out in the town of Luuk on Jan. 24 and sporadic clashes have already killed at least eight people on both sides. It was not immediately known what triggered the violence, but officials said the motive of the fighting was political rivalry as leaders of the protagonists are known politicians in the town. One of them, identified only as Angao, a councilor, was killed in the fighting.

"The fighting have already left eight people dead on both sides. We have given the protagonists an ultimatum and we will arrest all of them if they don't lay down their arms and stop fighting," the island's military commander Brig. Gen. Agustin Dema-ala told the Arab News. The skirmishes temporarily stopped on Tuesday after Gen. Dema-ala met with the leaders of the warring groups in Luuk. Troops were also sent to the town and put up checkpoints to prevent the entry of illegal weapons. Blood feud, locally known as "rido", is common in the Muslim world southern Philippines and in many instances, the violence could drag on for years, sometimes even for decades, with the killings targeting every member of a feuding family or clan.
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 9:59:22 PM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Indonesia doubts Dulmatin's toes up
Indonesian Foreign Minister, Hasan Wirayuda, has reportedly expressed doubt about reports that a key Bali bomber has been killed in a military airstrike in the southern Philippines. A Philippine military official said over the weekend that Dulmatin and fellow Indonesian, Mohammad Ali Abdul Rahiman, were among those killed when aircraft targeted a meeting on the island of Mindanao.
This article starring:
DULMATINJemaah Islamiyah
MOHAMAD ALI ABDUL RAHIMANJemaah Islamiyah
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 3:06:14 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "There is a Bene Gesserit saying," she said.

"You have sayings for everything," he protested.

"You'll like this one," she said. "It goes: Do not count a human dead until you've seen his body. And even then you can make a mistake."

Frank Herbert _Dune_
Posted by: James || 02/02/2005 15:27 Comments || Top||

#2  Uh oh..... Rand and Dune on the same day... this is a sign.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 15:40 Comments || Top||

#3  There was a line in one of the Matt Helm books that went something like this: "I'll believe someone's dead when I bury him myself. Even then, I like to dig them up every once and awhile, just to make sure."
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 16:33 Comments || Top||


Filippinos warn of MILF attacks as peace processor resumes
Silvestre Afable, the government's chief peace negotiator, warned on Wednesday that hard-core militants may step up attacks in Mindanao to try to sabotage talks with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).

Afable, who is also communications director for President Arroyo, said informal talks hosted by Malaysia would resume in the next few days despite clashes last month that tested a truce in place since July 2003.

"We feel that as the peace talks move forward and any substantive success is gained, the more we face the risk of extremists who would want to derail the negotiations," Afable told a briefing for foreign media in Manila.

"Terrorism is one of the challenges we are facing -- not only as a threat to law and order but as a threat to peace in Mindanao."

He said the regional militant network Jema'ah Islamiyah (JI) and other groups, working with small factions of local rebels, opposed the talks between the MILF and the government.

While the MILF leadership insists its ranks are solid in the march towards peace, security analysts also see risks that some rebels will break away as a deal draws nearer.

The rebels deny any formal ties to the al Qaeda-linked JI, blamed for the Bali bombings in October 2002 and other attacks in the region. But analysts say personal connections remain strong between some MILF commanders and the foreign militants.

A peace settlement with the 11,000-member MILF would help to counter security concerns among foreign investors and stimulate development of the resource-rich southern Philippines.

The informal talks in Malaysia are designed to tackle issues such as ancestral land, security and rehabilitation of conflict areas before a formal deal is signed to end a 35-year separatist insurgency that has claimed 120,000 lives.

Afable said the upcoming meeting in Kuala Lumpur would focus on the agenda of setting aside land for at least four million Muslims from 13 tribal groups in the southern Philippines.

Some local companies and individual property owners, many of them Christians, oppose the idea of giving up their land.

The government and the MILF agreed on the cease-fire and rehabilitation during previous sessions. Plans for projects and funding are being drawn up with help from the World Bank.

The Philippines began negotiating with the MILF in 1997 after signing a peace deal with the more secular Moro National Liberation Front in September 1996.

But the talks bogged down after soldiers attacked and occupied the MILF's main base in Camp Abubakar in July 2000.

Arroyo restarted the peace process after she took office in early 2001, inviting Malaysia -- a mainly Muslim nation -- to broker the talks.

A 17-month cease-fire was technically broken in January when a band of rogue rebels attacked an army outpost and the military bombed what it said was a hideout used by the renegades.

The government and the MILF have said the clashes would not derail the talks, which had earlier been expected to resume on February 1.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:22:27 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "MILF"?

I think that acronym is already taken...
Posted by: Jeff || 02/02/2005 12:08 Comments || Top||

#2  This is stupid. Obviosly the 'MILF' is in no position to impose any agreed upon pease upon it's followers. They can't even enforce a cease fire. The Arroyo administration must understand this - I dont think they are *that* stupid.

The 'Peace Process' is just a means for the MILF to rearm and the Arroyo administratio to 'look' like they are doing something.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 02/02/2005 12:12 Comments || Top||

#3  Jeff, I think the Moro's got the acronym first... they've been rebelling since the 1940s - at least!

The pr0n crowd only picked it up a couple years ago, IIRC.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder || 02/02/2005 13:59 Comments || Top||


Bashir denies ties to Bali, Marriott bombings
Islamic cleric Abu Bakar Bashir formally denied in court Tuesday any involvement in the Bali and J.W. Marriott Hotel bombings, saying the attacks that killed 214 people in total ran counter to his principles.
"Nope. Nope. Wudn't me."
Testifying at his trial in a Jakarta court, the 66-year-old Bashir also denied he knew anything about Jemaah Islamiyah, the al-Qaeda-linked regional terror group that he is accused of leading. "I could not have supported the Marriott and Bali bombings because they were committed in places of peace and not conflict zones," the white-bearded Bashir said. Bashir has insisted he is innocent and that he's being prosecuted for his critical views of the United States. His denials usually come during comments to reporters or in response to witness testimonies. Tuesday was the first time Bashir directly addressed the accusations in court after prosecutors read out the charges. He told the South Jakarta District Court that the bombings were against his doctrine of "jihad" which he described as an act of self defence.
Which, of course, depends on your definition of "self defense."
Bashir was arrested and convicted shortly after the Bali bombings on immigration charges, and was in prison at the time of the Marriott attack. He completed his sentence in April but was re-arrested immediately for alleged involvement in the bombings. Bashir said he was not even aware of Jemaah Islamiyah until he went on trial. "I only heard the term Jemaah Islamiyah in my trials. Even during my 15-year stay in Malaysia, I never heard that term," said Bashir, who had fled to Malaysia in 1983 to escape imprisonment for alleged subversion during the rule of then President Suharto.
"We used to call it La Cosa Nostra. I always thought using Italian was kinda exotic. It used to get chicks, y'know?"
Bashir returned in 1998 after the dictator's downfall and was cleared of the charges. He remained free until his troubles began in 2003. The hearing was adjourned until next week when prosecutors are scheduled to submit their sentencing demand. The United States and Australia, which lost scores of citizens in the Bali carnage, have publicly accused Bashir of being a key terror leader. But only one of the scores of prosecution witnesses has implicated Bashir in any terrorist activity.
This article starring:
ABU BAKAR BASHIRJemaah Islamiyah
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:24:32 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:


Government truce with MILF hurting military's ability to pursue JI, Abu Sayyaf
THE CEASEFIRE between the government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) is causing problems in the military's campaign against the Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah, General Efren Abu, armed forces chief of staff, admitted to reporters. Since the military is required to forewarn the MILF before attacking its territories, Abu Sayyaf and JI members in the area are able to flee before government forces can strike, Abu said. "Well, it (ceasefire) is not very effective but we have to work with the constraints. We do not want the peace talks to bog down," Abu said in Camp Aguinaldo Tuesday evening.

To ensure success, Abu said the military would inform the MILF shortly before an attack on its territories where the terrorists are believed to be staying. "If you tell them very much early, nothing will happen," Abu said.

The MILF has long been accused of coddling the Abu Sayyaf and the JI -- alleged affiliates of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda terrorist network. The rebel group's leaders have consistently denied this, saying only breakaway MILF commands were in cahoots with terrorists.

Last week, the military bombed MILF territory at the Butilan marsh in Datu Piang town, Maguindanao province where renegade MILF commander Wahid Kalil Tondok was allegedly hiding Abu Sayyaf and JI members. The military's Southern Command (SouthCom) claimed 40 bandits, including two Indonesian JI members, were killed in the air raid. Abu however clarified on Tuesday that only 11 bodies were actually recovered.

Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Avelino Cruz said peace talks between the government and the MILF would push through in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in February. "We are serious in reaching an (peace) agreement (with the MILF) as soon as practicable," Cruz told reporters Tuesday evening.

Cruz said international organizations were only waiting for a peace agreement to be drafted before they send aid to Mindanao. "They're itching to send development funds to conflict areas," Cruz said but he declined to name the donors.
This article starring:
WAHID KALIL TONDOKMoro Islamic Liberation Front
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:32:35 AM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:


Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Russia to launch Iran spy satellites
MOSCOW - Russia plans to launch later this year Iran's first two satellites which were built to gather intelligence from space, the business daily Kommersant reported Wednesday. Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov has signed a directive permitting the Russian defense ministry to launch the two satellites, named Mesbah and Sinah-1, from the Plesetsk launch site in the far north of the country, the daily said.

A copy of the government directive obtained by AFP confirmed that Russia planned to launch the two Iranian satellites as well as six others from countries including China, Britain, Norway, Germany, Japan and the European Space Agency. The three-point directive, dated January 24, also stipulated that "foreign specialists" would be given access for the launches to the Plesetsk site, traditionally a closed military facility.

Russia has made no secret of its plans for commercial development of the Plesetsk space launch site as an alternative to its Baikonur site which is located in Kazakhstan but which Moscow has retained control over since the breakup of the Soviet Union under a long-term lease agreement.

Kommersant said the two Iranian satellites were due to be launched between April and June of this year and said they were designed for "distant examination of the earth's surface," a term the daily said was the common idiom for intelligence gathering.
Excellent -- two live-fire opportunities for ASAT testing.
A government spokesman contacted by AFP was unable to confirm the purpose of the Iranian satellites and the Fradkov directive described them only as built for "scientific purposes." The satellites were to be launched aboard Russian-built Kosmos-3M rockets and would be placed in a low geo-stationary orbit, Kommersant said.

Iranian media reported Sunday that Tehran and Moscow had signed a 132-million-dollar contract for construction of a new Iranian telecommunications satellite, the Zohreh (Venus). That satellite would be used to bolster Tehran's telecommunications infrastructure by handling data, audio and video signals, and is to be operational within two and a half years, the Iranian news agency IRNA said.
Posted by: Steve White || 02/02/2005 11:01:24 AM || Comments || Link || [5 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Think of it as an opportunity for live-fire tests of our ASAT systems...
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 11:51 Comments || Top||

#2  What do they mean by "low geostationary orbit"? A geostationary orbit is some 35,000 km above the equator. Maybe they have conflated this with a low earth orbit.
Posted by: Grunter || 02/02/2005 13:31 Comments || Top||

#3  Grunter, these are reporters -- they have no fooking idea what the difference is between "low-earth orbit" and "geostationary orbit".
Posted by: Steve White || 02/02/2005 13:34 Comments || Top||

#4  It's to find and track those UFOs they've been seeing.
Posted by: anonymous2u || 02/02/2005 13:59 Comments || Top||

#5  COSMOS br549
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 15:41 Comments || Top||

#6  I wonder how those Mecca moon satellites are coming along...
Posted by: Seafarious || 02/02/2005 15:55 Comments || Top||

#7  Yet another prime example of Russia feeding the hand that bites them.

When RasPutin finally realizes that Iran is no sort of friend, things will get a little better. Until then, it is best to class Russia with our enemies.
Posted by: Zenster || 02/02/2005 22:51 Comments || Top||


US still working with Syria to stop terror financing
The United States is working with Syria to stop cash from flowing to terror groups, the Treasury Department's top terror funding cop said on Tuesday.

Speaking with reporters after an anti-counterfeiting conference in New York, Assistant Treasury Secretary Juan Zarate said the United States was continuing to "work with the Syrian government and encourage it to take appropriate steps" to stop the flow of funds to insurgents in Iraq."

But Syria still had more to do, said Zarate, who heads Treasury's anti-terrorist finance section.

Earlier this month, the Treasury said it was considering new economic and other sanctions to push the Syrian government to stop suspected financial flows to Iraqi insurgents.

Syria has denied serving as a conduit for terror funds.

The Treasury recently ordered U.S. banks to freeze the assets of Sulayman Khalid Darwish, saying the Syrian financier backs the organization of Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Zarate said Syria had been helpful in U.S. efforts to stop Darwish's activities, and said it was a "first step."

In an address to the conference, Zarate said the U.S. government wanted to find ways to get enough data from the financial institutions to curtail funding to militant groups without overburdening banks.

"The government cannot simply arrest assets and individuals involved in terrorist financing. We must build systems that filter out tainted capital," he said.

Lawmakers passed the USA Patriot Act after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in an effort to thwart future anti-U.S. militant activity. That law requires more collaboration and more information sharing between the government and financial businesses.

Zarate said terror groups had become more sophisticated in funding their activities as the United States and other countries cracked down on banks and other financial institutions to counter money laundering.

The production and sale of counterfeit goods are one of the methods used by terrorists to raise cash, he noted.

Zarate said the Treasury had "seen examples where traded goods have been used to support terrorist groups." But he added that it was often quite difficult to draw clear lines between the counterfeit trade and terrorists.

New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, speaking at the same conference, said there was evidence that counterfeiters operating in New York City had sent money to Hamas and Hezbollah, groups designated as terrorist organizations by the United States.

"But we have not yet seen any link to al-Qaeda," Kelly said.
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:49:53 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Maybe one of the " evil " nations is finally listening that we mean business.
Posted by: Bill Clinton || 02/02/2005 9:15 Comments || Top||

#2  They'll listen when the American forces start to form up in the staging areas just east of the Syrian border.
Posted by: Glereper Thigum7229 || 02/02/2005 10:07 Comments || Top||

#3  "...or, we could just revoke all Syrian banks' codes for bank-to-bank transfers. I'm sure that being forced to tote huge piles of cash around wouldn't bring your economy to a screeching halt or anything..."
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 11:27 Comments || Top||


EU rejects Iran call to speed up nuclear talks
The EU rejected on Tuesday a call by Iran to speed up talks on its disputed nuclear programme, insisting the pace of negotiations was right and that the dialogue was on track. Iran, which denies US accusations that it is seeking nuclear weapons, has agreed to freeze potentially arms-related uranium enrichment activities while the talks continue but has shown impatience with the dialogue launched last December. Gholam Reza Aqazadeh, head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, told reporters after meeting EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana that he had called for an acceleration of the talks. "The issue is not pace but substance," Solana's spokeswoman Cristina Gallach said in response. "We say that this is the right pace. On our side, we say the process is on track," she added.
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 || Comments || Link || [8 views] Top|| File under:

#1  these talks are humiliating the EU and exposing its impotence. Why would they want to speed them up?
Posted by: 2b || 02/02/2005 8:58 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
The funniest yet -- GI John "Cody" Adams story --
Toy Soldiers
By Douglas Kern Published 02/02/2005


19 January 2005: The Slinky betrayed us. I should have known. I never trusted him. He was an unstable character, always going back and forth, back and forth, never showing a shred of backbone. "Come, senor, I know the way to the insurgents' headquarters," he rasped. The fact that he was an Arab toy speaking with a stereotypical Spanish accent should have tipped me off. But hindsight is always 20/20. Literally. I can turn my head 360 degrees.

I only knew my men by their code names, but even in that short space of time we shared a bond that only six-inch plastic combatants can truly understand. They were my family, my brothers in petroleum-based products. One night we all melted the tips of our fingers and became plastic brothers.

And I led those brave action figures into the trap.

"My spider-sense is tingling," muttered "Peter Parker," as he flexed his fingers on his M16. We were all on edge, and our quirks were coming to the fore. "Prince Adam" kept waving his weapon in the air, hollering "By the power of Grayskull!" Damn Wiccans. "Hugh Jackman" had huddled deeply into his trenchcoat, whispering "Am I Wolverine or Van Helsing?" to anyone who made the mistake of standing next to him. And "Elmo" kept singing his goofy song. "Elmo loves his rifle/His bullets, too
"

The insurgents caught us by surprise in that deserted Iraqi backyard. BBs perforated the sullen quiet of the hot Iraqi afternoon. Firecrackers sizzled and roared around us in a symphony of extremity-disintegrating horror. Mean little kids stomped us with the hard soles of their brand-new Keds -- weapons of mass destruction. And the gentlest one of us all lost it completely. "Elmo is thinking about genocide!" he screamed, as he unleashed a hail of foam darts upon our adversaries. "Elmo is Death, destroyer of worlds!" War does awful things to toys.

I tried to remember my training. My old drill sergeant, G.I. Joe, had put me through worse than this. "Are you gonna MOR yet, maggot?" he would scream, as he tied me to the wheel of a 10-speed Schwinn. (MOR: Melted On Request.) 'Sir, no, sir!" I would scream, even as the gravel scraped the paint off my face. He pushed me and prodded me, but he made me the action figure I am today. Just before Water Survival training, he gave me a piece of advice I'll always remember: "Son, when you get right down to it, you have no nerve endings." Then he flushed me down the toilet.

A repulsive splatting sound above my head brought me back to the present. "Gas! GAS!" We scrambled in vain for our gas masks as a haze of vaporous death descended upon us. Mustard gas? Try beans and broccoli. The last thing I remember was the leering visage of our hated enemy, the puppet master of al Qaeda, peering down on us.

The CIA lied. The bombs in Bora Bora hadn't killed him after all.

Evil Bert. The legends were true.

24 January 2005: The interrogators were relentless. But I gave them only my name, rank, and UPC code.

They mocked my fear. "It better here than American prison, yes? We read all about atrocities performed on Iraqi action figure POWs."

"What happened at the Island of Misfit Toys," I hissed, "was not policy. That was just some crazy rogue reindeer, screwing around unsupervised. Santa Claus will still be confirmed by 75-80 votes in the Senate."

As I huddle in the shoebox that will soon define the four corners of my world, my thoughts turn to my wife, Barbie; my brother, Fireman Rescue Hero; and my son, Lego Luke Skywalker. I must be strong for them.

I've had to be strong all my life. It's hard to be a poor plastic kid in a video-game world, and even harder when you're an immigrant -- I was made in China. My mother was a Chinese novelty factory and my father was a petroleum by-products distributor who just played around with my mother and then disappeared. Nobody wanted a soldier toy in Clinton's nineties, so I made my way playing minimum-wage gigs like "Thug #3" in the Hudson Hawk action figure line. But after a shameful night of drinking nail polish remover and driving a Mattel remote-control car full of underage Jem sidekicks into a telephone pole, a judge gave me a choice: an Army enlistment, or a Goodwill box. I chose the former.

The elite Action Figure corps took me for my menacing glower, sculpted abs, and gift for languages. After taking several crash language courses at the Army facility in Monterrey, I could speak all the major tongues. Monchichi. Teddy Bear. Cabbage Patch. Smurf.

The rubber bands chafe my wrists, and I haven't had a decent meal from an Easy-Bake oven in days. My Eastern-European-looking guard is clear proof that the Russians are helping the insurgents. He's always shrieking "One! One captured American soldier! Ha ha ha!" Then he counts my grenades, over and over again.

I'll get you for this, Evil Bert.

31 January 2005: Today my captors took my picture outside, in front of a special banner that was deliberately repetitive and misspelled in order to honor the stuttering illiterates of Iraq.

"Is good," said Evil Bert, sounding like a cross between Andy Kaufman and Dr. Nick Riviera. "Now decadent American press will see picture on our website and report that live American soldier held captive. Momentum from election blunted. Boxer-Kennedy win in 2008!"

"No chance, you unibrowed monster," I growled. "There's no way that America's mainstream media would ever fall for such a ruse. The second you post that picture on the Internet, crack investigative teams from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune and The New York Times and, above all, CBS News will be on hand to check facts, verify data, and offer uncompromising insights into the validity of your photograph, even if doing so will force them to lose a potential scoop while indirectly aiding the Bush administration."

"No, no," replied Evil Bert, "American soldier not use humor to build bond between himself and captors. You funny guy, soldier boy, but we still gonna blend you in Cuisinart."

"It doesn't matter what you do, because the validity of those elections still stands. You think all of those blue fingers are manufacturing defects? Iraq has embraced democracy, Mr. What's-Your-Thing-With-Ernie, and the fate of one action figure won't change anything."

Evil Bert grabbed his turban from his head and threw it to the ground. "Screw you, action figure! There was no real election
 the TV footage is all fake! Blue ink is easy to distribute! And election invalid anyway because not enough Sunnis voted. And Supreme Court may call for recount. And New York Times still not convinced. And
and
Jews! All their fault! Everything their fault! Jews! And Ernie only Platonic friend! Backrubs and handholding not any big deal! Ooooh
stupid American!" He stormed off.

1 February 2005: I have bribed a guard to fax this document. (The guard seems to be a hairy Mediterranean fellow with big buggy eyes and a passion for cookies. Strange.) I am sending this fax to the only person I can trust: Lucy Ramirez, somewhere in Texas. If this document appears elsewhere, you'll know that the lying irresponsible blogosphere is to blame.

I've slipped a sharpened staple into my boot. Soon I'll break out of here. I'll get new, better accessories, the kind that aren't legal in the US. Maybe a plastic missile that shoots out of my butt. Yeah, that's the ticket.

I will put out the eyes of Iraqi insurgents with my unsafe features. I will carry on the fight for freedom, one poorly-balanced step at a time. And I will fight for freedom wherever there's trouble.

I am John "Cody" Adam. Soon-to-be-former hostage. American action figure. And damned proud of it.
Posted by: Sherry || 02/02/2005 4:31:47 PM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  That would have been funnier if it were much, much shorter.
Posted by: gromky || 02/02/2005 22:06 Comments || Top||


Iraq hero joins hallowed group - Medal of Honor
President Bush will present America's top award for bravery to the family of the sergeant who died defending his soldiers.

Sgt. 1st Class Paul R. Smith, who spent his boyhood in Tampa, became a man in the Army and died outside Baghdad defending his outnumbered soldiers from an Iraqi attack, will receive America's highest award for bravery.

President Bush will present the Medal of Honor to Smith's wife, Birgit, and their children Jessica, 18, and David, 10, at a ceremony at the White House, possibly in March.

The official announcement will come soon, but the Pentagon called Mrs. Smith with the news Tuesday afternoon.

"We had faith he was going to get it," Mrs. Smith said from her home in Holiday, "but the phone call was shocking. It was overwhelming. My heart was racing, and I got sweaty hands. I yelled, "Oh, yes!' ... I'm still all shaky.

"People know what's he's done ... people know that to get a Medal of Honor you have to be a special person or do something really great."

What Paul Smith did on April 4, 2003, was climb aboard an armored vehicle and, manning a heavy machine gun, take it upon himself to cover the withdrawal of his men from a suddenly vulnerable position. Smith was fatally wounded by Iraqi fire, the only American to die in the engagement.

"I'm in bittersweet tears," said Smith's mother, Janice Pvirre. "The medal isn't going to bring him back. ... It makes me sad that all these other soldiers have died. They are all heroes."

With the medal, Smith joins a most hallowed society.

Since the Civil War, just 3,439 men (and one woman) have received the Medal of Honor. It recognizes only the most extreme examples of bravery - those "above and beyond the call of duty."

That oft-heard phrase has a specific meaning: The medal cannot be given to those who act under orders, no matter how heroic their actions. Indeed, according to Library of Congress defense expert David F. Burrelli, it must be "the type of deed which, if he had not done it, would not subject him to any justified criticism."

From World War II on, most of the men who received the medal died in the action that led to their nomination. There are but 129 living recipients.

Smith is the first soldier from the Iraq war to receive the medal, which had not previously been awarded since 1993. In that year, two Army Special Services sergeants were killed in Somalia in an action described in the bestselling book Black Hawk Down.

The officer who called Birgit Smith on Tuesday nominated her husband for the medal.

Lt. Col. Thomas Smith (no relation) sent in his recommendation in May 2003, beginning a process that involved reviews at 12 levels of the military chain of command before reaching the White House. On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Smith expressed satisfaction that the wait was over, and great admiration for his former subordinate.

In the Army, he said, you hear about men who won the Medal of Honor. "You think they are myths when you read about them. It's almost movielike. You just don't think you'd ever meet someone like that."

Paul Smith, he said, was not a "soft soldier" who suddenly got tough under fire. "This was a guy whose whole life experience seemed building toward putting him in the position where he could do something like this. He was demanding on his soldiers all the time and was a stickler for all the things we try to enforce. It's just an amazing story."

Lt. Col. Smith commanded the 11th Engineer Battalion, 3rd Infantry Division, during the American attack on Iraq, which began March 20, 2003. On the morning of April 4, the engineers found themselves manning a roadblock not far from Baghdad International Airport.

A call went out for a place to put some Iraqi prisoners.

Sgt. Smith volunteered to create a holding pen inside a walled courtyard. Soon, Iraqi soldiers, numbering perhaps 100, opened fire on Smith's position. Smith was accompanied by 16 men.

Smith called for a Bradley, a tank-like vehicle with a rapid fire cannon. It arrived and opened up on the Iraqis. The enemy could not advance so long as the Bradley was in position. But then, in a move that baffled and angered Smith's men, the Bradley left.

Smith's men, some of whom were wounded, were suddenly vulnerable.

Smith could have justifiably ordered his men to withdraw. Lt. Col. Smith believes Sgt. Smith rejected that option, thinking that abandoning the courtyard would jeopardize about 100 GIs outside - including medics at an aid station.

Sgt. Smith manned a 50-caliber machine gun atop an abandoned armored personnel carrier and fought off the Iraqis, going through several boxes of ammunition fed to him by 21-year-old Pvt. Michael Seaman. As the battle wound down, Smith was hit in the head. He died before he could be evacuated from the scene. He was 33.

The Times published a lengthy account of the battle, and Smith's life in January 2004. It can be seen at www.sptimes.com/paulsmith

Sgt. Matthew Keller was one of the men who fought with Smith in the courtyard. "He put himself in front of his soldiers that day and we survived because of his actions," Keller said Tuesday from Fort Stewart in Georgia. "He was thinking my men are in trouble and I'm going to do what is necessary to help them. He didn't care about his own safety."

Some of the men who fought alongside Smith were sent back to Iraq last month. Keller, 26, is scheduled to return Feb. 15, but was scrambling Tuesday to delay his deployment to attend the medal ceremony in Washington.

"I want to be there to support the family and show thanks for what Sgt. Smith did," Keller said.
snip
Posted by: Sherry || 02/02/2005 4:06:25 PM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:


Kurds Set To Win Two-Thirds Of Vote In Kirkuk
SULEIMANIYAH, (Southern Kurdistan), Feb 1 (AFP) - The main Kurdish alliance is set to win two-thirds of the vote in Iraq's tense northern oil centre of Kirkuk, reports said Tuesday, fanning Turkish fears about Kurdish ambitions for the ethnically divided city. The alliance is also set to take a quarter of the seats overall in Iraq's new national assembly, giving the long-oppressed minority a major say in the drafting of a new post-Saddam Hussein constitution, one of its leaders told a Kurdish daily.

With just one district still to complete its count of Sunday's ballots, the Kurdish alliance has won 68 percent of the vote in Kirkuk, the Kurdish weekly Hawlati (Citizen) reported. If confirmed, the result would give the Kurds 26 of the 41 seats on the provincial council, the paper said.

The leader of one of the two factions that make up the alliance -- the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan -- said a higher-than-expected turnout across Kurdish areas was set to give it a quarter of the seats in the new assembly. "Turnout exceeded our hopes and reached 90 percent in some areas," Jalal Talabani told his party's Kurdistani Nwe (New Kurdistan) newspaper. "We're expecting to take 25 percent of the seats."

But Talabani sounded a conciliatory note towards Iraq's other ethnic and religious groups, promising that the Kurds would not abuse their weight in the new assembly. "Its most important task will be to draw up a constitution and we are counting on it taking into account everybody's wishes," he said.

Kurdistani Nwe editor Sherko Mangure said the Kurds now represented a "powerful force which needs to be taken into account in rebuilding Iraq." "We are in position to defend our rights in the drafting of the constitution," he told AFP.

The two former rebel factions are determined to consolidate their hard-won autonomy in northern Iraq and extend it to all traditionally Kurdish-inhabited areas, including Kirkuk. "The Kurdish districts must be returned to Kurdistan among them Kirkuk, If not, we will no longer be Iraqis," Top PUK deputy leader Noshirwan Mustafa warned. Note the repeated use of 'including Kirkuk'.
This is a great story, but Jihad Watch reported a couple days ago that the Kurds deliberately kept the Assyrian Christians from voting...not that Xtian votes would please the Turks much more.
Posted by: phil_b || 02/02/2005 4:15:08 PM || Comments || Link || [11 views] Top|| File under:


Israel-Palestine
Set the Peace Processor on 'puree'
Posted by: mojo || 02/02/2005 13:05 || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:


Counterterror fantasy camp lures weekend warriors
Israel's international reputation as a target for suicide bombings and terrorist infiltrations has scared off tourists for years. But now, that might be what brings them back. The Israel Challenge Experience's (ICE) army fantasy camp, to open in May, lets tourists spend a week getting "anti-terror training" from the IDF experts.
This is an incredibly sensible idea. A pack, not a herd. Let's just hope they are screening the "tourists" carefully...
"Unfortunately Israel has become the world leader in fighting terrorism. Who better to train with than the people who have written the book on antiterror warfare?" asks ICE president Ben Goldstein, a Memphis native who made aliya and served in the Givati Brigade. So while Israelis jet off to Istanbul and Goa to get away from it all, foreigners can plunk down $3,600, plus air fare, and take a relaxing break in the thick of terrorist warfare. In seven days, participants are trained in shooting, hand-to-hand fighting, surveillance, hostage rescue and more, culminating in a staged battle on the final day.
Continued on Page 49
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 11:47:46 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:


Terror Networks & Islam
When Muslims Convert
Daveed Gartenstein-Ross is a senior analyst at the Investigative Project, a terrorism research center in Washington, D.C. Here is a brief excerpt, more at the link:
In the bustling religious marketplace of modern America, conversions out of one faith and into another are not exactly news. They happen every day, across the full spectrum of belief. But some conversions resonate more than others, especially at a time when the U.S. finds itself at war with terrorists who draw their inspiration from one of the world's great religions.

Consider the case of Jean-Michelle Ajon, the subject of a 2002 article in the women's fashion magazine Marie Claire. Raised a Catholic in New York City, Ajon had been thinking about converting to Islam during the summer before 9/11. After the attacks, a remark that she overheard while working in Manhattan—"We should bomb everyone, the whole Arab world"—strengthened her resolve, and she soon made her shahadah (declaration of faith), thus entering the fold of Islam. Her new faith, Ajon explained to Marie Claire, had improved her life. "I used to be very aggressive," she said. "Now, I am more patient—and spiritually fulfilled."

Ajon's story—no doubt seen by her editors as an inspiring antidote to widespread anti-Muslim bigotry in the United States—has been multiplied by many other, similar stories over the past several years. But far less attention has been paid to voyages in the opposite direction, that is, outward from Islam. In fact, thousands of Muslims in the West embrace Christianity each year, and the courage they must muster to do so is of an entirely different order from the bravado of someone protesting against supposedly pervasive social prejudice. These converts stand accused, rather, of apostasy, a transgression against Islam whose consequences, even in the sheltering confines of the West, are always serious—and sometimes deadly.
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 9:56:48 AM || Comments || Link || [4 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Prince Charles raised this issue a few weeks ago (this is the only good thing I can remember Prince Charles ever doing).

I hope this issue reaches cable news soon. It is long past time.
Posted by: mhw || 02/02/2005 10:43 Comments || Top||

#2  It is a weakling faith that must protect itself by killing/punishing/terrorizing/ostracizing those who want to leave it.

I personally dont see how muslims can leave this practice behind when their own so called prophet explicitly taught and practiced the killing, punishment and harrassment of those who tried to leave islam.

But i guess even so, this must not be the so called "real" islam, right? Because the "real" islam is no better no worse than any other faith (sar)

Jesus never taught that apostasy was punishable by the death penalty or any other penalty. This is why Christians could leave behind such laws which were instituted by Christian leaders long after Jesus. Christians can go to our foundational teachings and find no such laws or practices. muslims can't so they are forced to try and justify them somehow and are forced to force these laws on our nations.

PS,

Unfortunately, I must add what should simply be understood about me by now. Just because I believe my faith to be the best faith does not mean that I must necessarily think that no other faith has any value or that they do not also have wisdom. Maybe this will head off the usual off- topic arguments and keep this thread on track.

Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 11:34 Comments || Top||

#3  “I used to be very aggressive,” she said. “Now, I am more patient—and spiritually fulfilled.”

She apparently patiently awaits the moment when she can project sanctioned aggression in slicing kufr's throat to exercise her spiritual fulfillment.
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 11:48 Comments || Top||

#4  The only branch of Islam where there's no penalty for apostasy ('s between you and god) is Ahmadiyya.
But then, they are considered kufrs by all other.
They can't even list their religion as Islam and are subject to blasphemy laws upon drop of a hat on whimsiest pretexts, like greeting someone with "Salaam Aleikum".
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 12:03 Comments || Top||

#5  Freedom of religion. You are free to convert to Islam, and there ends the freedom. Is this just the Islamofascists, or is it the main (silent)body of adherents to the religion of peace?
Posted by: Hank || 02/02/2005 12:11 Comments || Top||

#6  Isn't it odd how CAIR and the MSM leave this little tidbit of information (that leaving Islam is a death sentence) from their 'Islam means peace!' pronouncements?
Posted by: CrazyFool || 02/02/2005 12:15 Comments || Top||

#7  I remember this article. I also fisked it quite handily. Apparently this woman does not get along with her devoutly Catholic mother and she wears some muslim thing on her person around her mother even though her mother is clearly distressed by it.

It just screams out from the article that this person has never really stopped rebelling against mommie and this is just the latest manifestation. I'll bet that she was raised by her mom with no father too and islam is now her daddy.

She also strikes me as an incredible flake. But thats par for the course.

I have also wondered about the role that mild depression may play in conversions of any kind. So often the converts describe feelings of emptiness in their previous situations. Its possible that it isn't because the new religion is so true and good but because the simpl change in life patterns and environment was the thing needed to break that particular cycle of the blues. This is then blown up into some kind of life changing experience.

Now when someone's life really changes as in being a criminal to never committing another crime again or as in an addict suddenly being healed of their addictions etc then that is a different order of life change. Unfortunately we dont see much of this in the "testimonies" of muslim converts. Their criminal converts most of the time just end up committing different crimes ala Richard Reid and Jose Padilla and if they were addicts it was prison that dried them out not islam. Flaky lefties or radical law and order righties with vague feelings of emptiness and wrongness seem to be pretty much par for the course otherwise.
Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 12:48 Comments || Top||

#8  What would you expect from a religion whose very name means "submission"? CAIR means "peace" through submission. Like a peaceful slave.
Posted by: Tom || 02/02/2005 13:03 Comments || Top||

#9  I'm probably in a tiny minority, not only on Rantburg but more generally, in that I think the only way for Islam to save itself is for a massive apostacy movement to be created. IMO, only under the an existentual threat can Islam deal successfully with the Islamofacism threat.
Posted by: mhw || 02/02/2005 13:29 Comments || Top||

#10  mhw,

you're not alone. This could well be the key. Only I am pretty sure that islam would not survive the freedom to convert out of it and still be as major a religion as it is today. It would take a while for sure but it would probably drop to the next tier as a sizable faith but not in a competetive position anymore. This is not to say that Christianity would become overwhelmingly dominant in the world as former muslims could easily swell the ranks of other faiths as well. I think that a good balance might come of such a movement and the world would be much better off. islam gets more problematic the larger and more dominant it gets. If it was cut down several notches it would probably not present as many problems.
Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 13:42 Comments || Top||

#11  seems islam keeps people islamic through fear (of the consequences of leaving the faith) and hate (of others). How enlightened.

What would a religion be like if it based itself on "love thy neighbor." Hmmm . . . .
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/02/2005 14:40 Comments || Top||

#12  Planet Dan,

Or how about one based on this

"Love thy enemy and pray for those who persecute you"

Ooops! I think we are talking about the same one! ; )
Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 15:54 Comments || Top||

#13  Peggy, "love thy neighbor" is fairly easy to achieve in comparison with "Love thy enemy and pray for those who persecute you".

I am content with the fact that I must be somewhat un-enlightened by considering your version a bit unpractical. I would probably pray for those that prosecute me, though. Does it matter what would be the subject of the prayer? I have some ideas. :-)
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 16:01 Comments || Top||

#14  Hmmmm

Now how is this for contrast? A religion which can be summed up as the following:

"Love only thy co-religionist neighbors. Treat them extra special. But if they want to change their mind about believing, then you can kill them. Also, be extra nice to those who aren't in your religion in order to make your faith look good to them so that they'll buy the whole thing. Love the whole world unless it gets in the way of the spread of the truth of our faith. Then you may lie to and kill whoever gets in the way and do whatever it takes to win. Since all of these teachings came right out of the mouth of our founder you can be sure that it would be blasphemy to say that he was wrong and if you do you will be killed with the rest of the uppity infidels who dont realize what a good deal it is to be second class citizens in our system."

I wonder what faith that could be?

Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 16:11 Comments || Top||

#15  Sobiesky,

"Love thy enemy" may be a high ideal for us but the founder of the Christian faith lived it and died it. So have many saintly Christians since.

Jesus didn't talk out of both sides of his mouth. He didn't receive some convenient new teaching to justify himself every time he did something that might be considered immoral by any objective standard. He didn't hair split saying its best to tell the truth but if you get in a real jam then its ok to lie etc. Although he knew most of his followers would disappoint him, and we mostly have in spectacular fashion, he nevertheless refused to water down his ideal or let us off the hook. No Christian can ever be comfortable with how we measure up to Christ. Thanks be to God.
Posted by: peggy || 02/02/2005 16:20 Comments || Top||

#16  There have been a few conversions to Islam for people in prison in the U.S. The religion seems to attract those that are despondent. Islam also seems to attract young people here with screwed up family backgrounds. I cannot see that Islam is a religion of love and peace. This woman who converted seems to be adolescent and "flaky" as someone said. I also don't see a revolt (apostasy) in Islam.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen || 02/02/2005 16:25 Comments || Top||

#17  This must be one of the stories where Muslims change when pigs fly.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen || 02/02/2005 17:14 Comments || Top||

#18  ...are subject to blasphemy laws upon drop of a hat on whimsiest pretexts, like greeting someone with "Salaam Aleikum".

Can you elaborate? Why would this be blasphemy? Doesn't it mean something like "peace be with you"? Are only Muslims supposed to greet people with this phrase?
Posted by: Angie Schultz || 02/02/2005 19:06 Comments || Top||

#19  In Saudi, once familiar enough and comfortable in doing so, expats greet their Muslim "friends" with the phrase - so I think Sobiesky is referring to known "kufr Muslims" (Ahmadiyya) using it and generating a response that it's blasphemy coming from this source.

I think a close-to-home parallel for this attitude might be that it's okay for a black man to call another black man "nigger", but...
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 19:13 Comments || Top||

#20  NY Times reprint
Dr. Shaikh is one of several hundred people facing execution in Pakistan from this modern Islamic Inquisition. Many are religious minorities who sometimes are sentenced to death simply for using the standard greeting of the Islamic world, "as-salaam aleikum." That means "peace be with you," but militants say the phrase is reserved for Muslims.
Posted by: ed || 02/02/2005 19:15 Comments || Top||

#21  I think another example would be if some Eurodinkfuckchildwannabee from Grease started referring to everyone in RB as "yall" or assumed he could lecture Americans on the subtleties of our politics, culture, language, etc. never having been here or knowing dick about what he's saying.

[ed not: nobody in the South would ass the apostrophe - the subtle test for kufr Rebels, lol]
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 19:20 Comments || Top||

#22  [ed note: nobody in the South would add the apostrophe - the subtle test for kufr Rebels, lol]

Preview is your friend, they say.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 19:21 Comments || Top||

#23  Wouldn't it be more like non-muslims under muslim control (heretical Ahmadiyyas or Pakistani Christians) but not westerners whose government could bring heat upon the Islamist miscreants? Seems if you can fight back, you can call them anything you want.
Posted by: ed || 02/02/2005 19:26 Comments || Top||

#24  Well, I was referring to an interchange between "friends", ed. I don't think the politics had anything to do with it.

Come to think of it, even non-friends were pleased by it - when I went to buy a truck in '92 I was greeted with the phrase and reciprocated with the reverse, "Alikum Sala'am" - which made the salesman smile and immediately offer me tea. If you don't want tea and endless (4 hrs, lol!) haggling mixed with conversation and you're willing to pay top dollar, you can get out with your vehicle in, say, 2 hrs tops, lol!
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 19:39 Comments || Top||

#25  Islam never had a Protestant Reformation - they need their Martin Luther. THe refomation spawned independant Protestant churches, and it forced Catholicism (up until that time Catholicism = Christianity) to look at its self harshly and reform if it were to survive.

The Reformation was good for all concerned in the long run.

Islam has no central ideaology - and is split into 2 camps (Sunni, Shiite) that can only seem to get ahead by "out-fundamentalizing" each other. No room for a reformation without getting killed by both of the main sides.

Until there is someone pwoerful, brave and wise enough to reform Islam, we will continue to see abominations liek Salafi, Tawhid and Wahbbism eating away at the world like a cancer based on hate of anyeon that believes even one bit differently.
Posted by: Johnny 5 || 02/02/2005 20:40 Comments || Top||

#26  Angie, Can you elaborate? Why would this be blasphemy? Doesn't it mean something like "peace be with you"? Are only Muslims supposed to greet people with this phrase?

If you wanna beat a dog, you'll always find a stick.

Here is the word of mooselimb expert:

The name al-Salaam is a Name of Allaah, may He be exalted, so the meaning of the greeting of salaam which is required among Muslims is, "May the blessing of His Name descend upon you." The usage of the preposition 'ala in 'alaykum (upon you) indicates that the greeting is inclusive.

This is a very very good greeting words to use. Kufirs can not use the greetings of peace to one another because they are not at peace with each other. Therefore there would be absolutely false greeting if the world would try greeting each other with peace. Especially the Western world. Therefore the greeting of peace is the greeting of those whom we call the righteous, who are always at peace with God, and at peace with man, and peace with himself. Therefore they are justified in using this greeting of peace which is the greatest greeting words that we know of.
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 21:21 Comments || Top||

#27  Kufirs can not use the greetings of peace to one another because they are not at peace with each other.

The reason I ask, see, is because (if I recall correctly) Robert Fisk, just before his world-famous whuppin', greeted a crowd of Afghan refugees in Pakistan with this phrase.

If the Afghans took this greeting business very seriously, then that might have been what set them off, not their generalized hatred of Westerners. (That, and the giant KICK ME written on Fisk's psyche.)

.com's Saudi acquaintances were probably pretty cosmopolitan and tolerant, compared to those refugees.
Posted by: Angie Schultz || 02/02/2005 21:42 Comments || Top||

#28  nobody in the South would add the apostrophe

Well that's the kind of commentary that make me an authority in comparison to you, even about your own nation.

or assumed he could lecture Americans on the subtleties of our politics, culture, language, etc. never having been here or knowing dick about what he's saying

As opposed to being constantly lectured by y'all about Europe on our horrible and dhimmi-like we all are? Or as opposed to having the Greece stereotyping/homosexuality insinuations been the first kind of "argument" Rantburgers used against my posts in this forum?

On more important matters, this will require some heavy-duty doublethink for the so very nice people of this forum to rationalize away: 'New Europe' Slovenian Parliament ratifies European Constitution, 79 to 4

Cheers, y'all.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 21:54 Comments || Top||

#29  Two drinks and one double big drink.
Posted by: badanov || 02/02/2005 22:03 Comments || Top||

#30  Johnny5
I'm going to disagree with you. In a sense Islam had its Martin Luther. It led to Wahabaism - a 'pure form of Islam devoid of mystic, philosophical, or cultural synthesis.

What Islam already has are an Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov and an Alexander Solzenitzen (they have Ibn Warraq and Ali Sina). What needs to be done is get these two people on FoxNews and get them on repeatedly.
Posted by: mhw || 02/02/2005 22:05 Comments || Top||

#31  Aris, and that they ratified that means what?

In a decade, it would mean exactly a rat's ass.
Posted by: Sobiesky || 02/02/2005 22:05 Comments || Top||

#32  cripes, those were bitter, badanov!
Posted by: Frank G || 02/02/2005 22:07 Comments || Top||

#33  Aris, and that they ratified that means what?

One of three possibilities:
1) They are servile dhimmies, having 79 to 4 chosen to sell away "the key to their national sovereignty"
2) They are blind, not seeing that they sold away the key to their national sovereignty.
3) That ratification of the European Constitution doesn't indicate either servility nor blindness.

I'm with (3), which one are you?
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 22:20 Comments || Top||

#34  Lol! You really are the biggest Attention Whore on the 'Net. It's true, by the way, that Southerners don't consider "yall" a contraction of "you all" - that's an affectation of the AP Style Book and, thus, used in the MSM and copied by the lame - your primary source of info about the vast universe. You don't know - simply because you're too conceited to listen to those who do.

You get 99.99% of your info second or third or fourth hand. It's often tripe. That you are so certain, and perhaps proud of this tainted and flawed version of reality, it's little wonder you're a walking (I assume) talking fuckwit of half-truths and pure unsubstantiated opinion. You're truly a sad and pathetic little boy. So full of yourself, so full of shit, but that's redundant - it's just you being yourself. Perhaps you'll get a lesson, the hard one, soon. One can hope, for your sake. But for Rantburg, it's irrelevant - it's your personality disorder and should be dealt with offstage. You are typical of a guest on Jerry Springer.

Pure pontification. Aris, your true name is impotent conceit - for that is the one indisputable trait that identifies you.

No one gives a fuck what you think. No one gives a fuck why. No one gives a fuck if you live, die, or admit you're a dull gay blade who sucks cock better than Divine Brown and Linda Lovelace put together. No one gives a fuck about Greece, about their opinions, their government, their attitudes, their lives, their deaths. No one cares if it falls into the ocean or is swept clean by the next tsunami. No one would notice. No one cares if the EU builds a military or continues to suck tit. No one cares if they accept or reject a constitution. No one cares what you think about international institutions. No one cares about what you think makes America tick. No one cares what you think Red State and Blue State mean. No one cares what you think of American idiomatic or colloquial speech. No one cares what you're *sure* or *fucking clueless* about. No one cares. Because you are no one. Fuck, less than no one.

It boggles how you pontificate, posture, preen and pose, yet you're impotent and imminently irrelevant. The only unique thing about you is your massive tumorous conceit - perhaps an achievement in your environs, but of no consequence outside your infantile mind. You're merely the arrogant little L'enfante terrible of conceit, endlessly blathering from the hinterhindquarters of the swampy lowlands of nowhere muttering to yourself - signifying nothing. Your opinion is of no consequence, nor is it worth the bandwidth or the time. Impotent. And that's why you post, your terminal case of LSM (Little Man Syndrome) simply overwhelms what logical faculties you might have, swamping your entire being in rage and hopeless helplessness.

Sucks to be you, I'd wager, LEECHBOY.

All:
Impotent conceit. That sums up all aspects of Aris. He can affect nothing. He has no power. He isn't capable of anything except yapping - like the little dogs who get so excited they pee themselves. Ignore it and it will implode. Irksome, but terminally Irrelevant. Impotent. Insignificant. Inconsequential. Yap! Yap! Infantile. Inane. Yap! Insane. Idiot.

Ignore it, folks. Forever. As of now, I will.
Posted by: .com || 02/02/2005 22:22 Comments || Top||

#35  Yup, you don't care, that's exactly why you spend so much time talking about it.

Cheers, love. As for the 'y'all', when I know real-live Southerners that use it with an apostrophe it makes no difference as to whether it's a contraction of "you all" or not.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 22:34 Comments || Top||

#36  *wow*
Posted by: Frank G || 02/02/2005 22:34 Comments || Top||

#37  I think Aris just got Rachel Corried™
Posted by: Frank G || 02/02/2005 22:35 Comments || Top||

#38  "I'm with (3), which one are you?"

Hmmm... I'm with:

4) Aris needs to ask his psychiatrist to help him understand what drives him to spend countless hours hanging around with a bunch of people who despise him.

Goodnight, all.
Posted by: Dave D. || 02/02/2005 22:36 Comments || Top||

#39  4) Aris needs to ask his psychiatrist to help him understand what drives him to spend countless hours hanging around with a bunch of people who despise him

I think it's the same kind of drive that leads the USA to only invade hostile nations that oppose it, not friendly ones that support it.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 22:43 Comments || Top||

#40  Applause .com
Posted by: 11A5S || 02/02/2005 23:01 Comments || Top||

#41  What the hell is that buzzing sound? Is Aris still buzzing the light bulb?

.com, I am in Awe! Haven't seen a better flame since about 20 years ago.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 02/02/2005 23:09 Comments || Top||

#42  CF, content-wise it was mainly repetitious of flames he's made before, though he certainly seems to have reached new level of mania about it all.
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 23:13 Comments || Top||

#43 
.com occasionally tries to chase me off Rantburg too. I can get an ordinary snit-fit out of him with no effort at all, but I've never been able to provoke a tantrum as furious in #34.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester || 02/02/2005 23:24 Comments || Top||

#44  If I can make a wild guess at a pattern for his behaviour (admittedly from a very small number of sampled "snit-fits" and their circumstances, as I can remember them) he tends to go on such rants when he seriously feels cornered, losing ground and generally impotent.

This specific tantrum was probably provoked by the fact I've intentionally used the word "y'all" after he spent a post mocking me for doing it. That would annoy him -- if he can't bully via mockery in even as tiny a matter as this, how could he ever succeed in bullying on issues that matter? He might need to use (*gasp*) persuasion, instead of mockery instead -- and if he's a weakling in mockery, he's utterly impotent in the use of actual arguments.

I also go into the occasional rant but generally about matters that I believe are crucial to the survival of our civilization and the idiocy of people who don't get their importance -- I don't go into rants about matters I claim to be utterly trivial and insignificant.

How's that for psychoanalyzing .com? On a strictly quid-pro-quo basis, of course. :-)
Posted by: Aris Katsaris || 02/02/2005 23:59 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Iraqi leaders say US force shouldn't be cut too soon
Iraqi officials awaiting election results began Tuesday to grapple with the issue of how long American troops should remain in the country.

At a news conference Tuesday, the interim president, Sheik Ghazi al-Yawar, said it would be "complete nonsense to ask the troops to leave in this chaos and this vacuum of power," a position similar to that taken last week by Ayad Allawi, the interim prime minister.

Both men are hoping to retain their posts in the new government, which appears likely to be a coalition of groups with differences on other key issues - including the role of religion in politics - but a common acceptance of the need for continued American military power in the battle with Sunni insurgents.

The first official returns from the voting, including an announcement of the turnout and some initial vote breakdowns, are likely to be released Wednesday, according to officials of the Iraqi election commission. Complete results are expected to take as much as another week, but preliminary skirmishing has already begun in the contest for prominent positions in the new transitional government.

And just as the elections gave new momentum to the debate in Washington about eventual American troop withdrawals, the imminent creation of Iraq's first fully elected government in decades has stirred fresh discussion of the issue here. Mostly, Iraqi politicians who have spoken out on the issue have emphasized the need for caution, with any reduction in American troop levels linked to progress in building effective Iraqi security forces.

Another leading figure, Defense Minister Hazim al-Shalaan, said at a separate news conference on Tuesday that a withdrawal of the 150,000 American troops serving in Iraq would be "very dangerous." He added: "The American forces cannot leave Iraq now. They will leave when security is established and there is a strong army and police force."

The commander of the new Iraqi Army, Gen. Babakir Zebari, also weighed in, telling reporters that some withdrawals could begin within a year. "In six months, or maybe at the end of the year, the construction of the Iraqi Army will be finished and our forces will be capable of guaranteeing security," he said.

A Shiite vice president, Ibrahim Jafari, leader of the powerful Dawa religious group, warned there could be civil war if American troops left prematurely.

The positions the Iraqi leaders staked out on American force withdrawals appeared to align closely with that of United States commanders, who have said they hope to see enough progress in the building of Iraq's new forces that they can begin reducing troop levels, or at least pulling troops back to bases outside the major cities and towns, by late this year or early in 2006.

American officers who have been disappointed by many of the Iraqi security units in the past said they were pleased with their performance on Sunday, when they were assigned responsibility for the close protection of more than 5,300 polling stations, and stood their ground under a wave of insurgent attacks.

The statements came on another day, the second since the elections, with a low level of insurgent attacks in Iraq. On Sunday, according to figures provided by the American military command, insurgents mounted 260 attacks, the highest number on any day since American troops captured Baghdad nearly 22 months ago. The attacks, including suicide bombings, killed about 50 people, but failed to have more than a marginal impact on the voting, in which about 8 million Iraqis cast ballots out of more than 14 million who were eligible, according to the estimate given by top officials of the election commission as the polls closed.

There were fears that insurgents would begin a wave of reprisals on Tuesday, when tight security restrictions imposed for the elections were lifted. The actions included an easing of night curfews, the removal of many temporary checkpoints, the reopening of the borders and a resumption of commercial flights at the Baghdad airport.

But scattered reports from across the country indicated that there had been no new major bomb blasts, and there were no reports of killings of voters, although it could be a day or two before any violence in outlying towns and cities becomes known. A report from the Kurdish city of Erbil in the north said two Iraqis were killed by a roadside bomb on Tuesday. The Associated Press reported that it had obtained a videotape in which a group calling itself the Battalions of Holy Jihad in Iraq said it had captured four members of the Iraqi National Guard and threatened to inflict "the punishment they deserve for their treason against the country and its people."

The same group posted a claim on the Internet that it had captured an American soldier and said it would behead the captive within 72 hours unless the United States released members of the group being held in detention, but there were indications that the claim might have been false. The Web site involved posted a still photograph of the man said to have been captured, instead of the shaky video film usually used to announce hostage-takings.

The man, identified by the militants as John Adam, was shown seated on the ground with his arms behind his back. He had an almost lifeless stare, and the body armor and boots he was wearing appeared to differ from those worn by most American soldiers in Iraq.

The Pentagon said it was checking, but had no reports of any soldiers missing. A possible explanation was offered by the Drudge Report, a Web site that specializes in media issues, which posted an article under the headline, "Did Iraqi militants take 'toy' hostage?" The site posted the photograph of the soldier said to have been captured alongside photographs of a toy soldier set that included a soldier doll with a strikingly similar stare, and a toy M-16 rifle of the kind carried by American soldiers. A similar weapon was pointed at the man who was shown in the photograph of the supposed hostage, but the weapon appeared suspended in air, with no hand visible holding it.

The haste with which some of the country's leading politicians have staked out their positions on the issue of American troops offered a foretaste of the maneuvering that lies ahead over the composition of the new government.

Western officials here have welcomed the political flurry, saying that it is further evidence, on top of the high voter turnout, that Iraqis have a fresh sense that with a new government, this time with a popular mandate, they will increasingly be in charge of their own affairs.

Those officials have also noted calls from across the spectrum of political groups for the new government to contain a broad ethnic and religious mix. On Tuesday, Sheik Ghazi, the interim president, said he intended to make a renewed push to get Sunnis involved, including participation in the drafting of a new constitution, even if the turnout among Sunni voters proved to be low.

He predicted that the new government would maintain the same ethnic balance in its top posts - a Sunni as president, a Shiite as prime minister, and a Shiite and a Kurd as the two vice presidents - as was the case in the departing administration.

From the evidence so far the leading contenders in the battle for top posts are likely to be drawn from the largest coalition of Shiite parties, the United Iraqi Alliance, centered on powerful Iran-backed religious parties but also including a wide array of secular and independent candidates. Another important force is likely to be Dr. Allawi's Iraqi List group, a secular coalition that includes not only Shiites like Dr. Allawi but also many Sunnis.

A key to what may happen on the issue of American forces, and on the formation of the new government, lies in the attitudes of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, leader of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, the most powerful of the religious groups in the Shiite alliance.

He was quoted on Tuesday by the Agence France-Presse news agency as having said that his group would not seek to establish a Shiite state, "but to have a government whose priority is to respect the people's opinion, to organize elections and to have a government in favor of everyone's participation."
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 2:40:57 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Toy Solider? Looks like it me.
Posted by: Theter Ebbomomp3141 || 02/02/2005 9:02 Comments || Top||


Internal politicking begins among Iraq Shi'ites
The ballots are still being counted, but the hard bargaining to form a new Iraqi government has begun.

Less than a day after millions of Iraqis flocked to the polls, the leaders of the major political parties said they were reaching out to potential allies in what is almost certain to be a coalition government. Between rivals, candidates signaled that the battle lines had been drawn.

The most likely contest, political leaders here say, will pit the largest coalition of Shiite parties, the United Iraqi Alliance, against a group led by the interim prime minister, Ayad Allawi. The struggle, in addition to setting the composition of the next government, will raise fundamental questions about the nature of the new political order. Principal among them, these political leaders say, will be the role of Islam in governing the country and the relative influence of the United States and Iran.

On Monday Dr. Allawi, a secular Shiite and close ally of the United States, stood before television cameras and offered himself as a leader who could hold this fractious country together. The speech appeared as a direct challenge to the United Iraqi Alliance, which is likely to be a big winner. Much of its popularity is due to the backing of Iraq's pre-eminent Shiite cleric, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani.

"It is time to put the divisions of the past behind us and work together to show the world the power and potential of this great country," Dr. Allawi said. "The whole world is watching us."

Dr. Allawi's speech drew the immediate attention of Shiite leaders, who are worried that their sprawling coalition could be picked apart by a savvy and aggressive politician. Of the United Iraqi Alliance's 228 candidates, about half are unaffiliated with a political party, and the coalition's leaders worry that those independent candidates might be wooed by promises from other politicians.

Shiite leaders acknowledge the fragility of their coalition.

"Yes, we are concerned that the coalition could come apart," said Ali Faisal, a senior leader of the Party of God, a member of the Shiite coalition. "But we don't think it will fall apart for Allawi."

Shiite leaders say they are confident that the United Iraqi Alliance will end up the leading vote getter, even if it does not capture an outright majority in the new assembly. The alliance, dominated by the largest Shiite parties, Dawa and the Supreme Council for the Islamic Republic of Iraq, or Sciri, has declared its commitment to a secular Iraqi state. Despite its religious roots, fewer than a half dozen of the 228 candidates it fielded are clerics.

Still, even if the Shiite coalition captures a majority of the votes, and hence a majority of the seats in the 275-member assembly, that would not be enough to form a government. For that, the coalition would need to be able to secure a two-thirds majority.

The reason lies in the complicated rules in the interim constitution.

Under the charter, the national assembly must first pick a president and two deputies by a two-thirds majority. The president and deputies then pick a party or coalition, along with its choice of a prime minister, to form a government. In practical terms, that means the group that ultimately takes power needs the same backing as the president the deputies: two-thirds of the assembly.

Shiite leaders believe they have a formula for securing the necessary two-thirds majority: through a deal with Kurdish leaders.

So if Dr. Allawi's slate of candidates, called the Iraqi List, or a coalition that he patches together wins just one-third of the assembly seats, he would be in a position to block the ascension of the Shiite coalition to power. Then, political leaders here say, Dr. Allawi could be in a position to offer himself to the coalition as a candidate for prime minister, or he could try to pick off members of the Shiite coalition and cobble together a coalition for himself.

Barring that, Dr. Allawi could use his effective veto power to extract political concessions from any new government.

"Everything will depend on how Allawi does relative to the Shiite coalition," said an aide to an Iraqi political party leader, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "Allawi's chance will come if the Shiite coalition breaks up."

To prevent that from happening, the leaders of the United Iraqi Alliance are working feverishly to shore up their group.

It is ungainly alliance: secular technocrats, like Adil Abdul Mahdi, the current finance minister, and Ahmad Chalabi, the exile leader, as well as acolytes of Moktada al-Sadr, the rebel cleric who led several armed uprisings against American forces. In addition, Dawa and Sciri, the two main Shiite parties in the coalition, are longtime rivals.

Shiite leaders are hoping that the same powerful force that brought the Shiite coalition together, Ayatollah Sistani, will be able to hold it together once the ballots are added up.

"Sistani is blessing this list," said Adnan Ali, a leader of Dawa. "If anyone makes a side deal, he will lose in the eyes of society."

One of the main stresses inside the Shiite coalition stems from a division over the group's choice for prime minister. The two main candidates are Dawa's leader, Ibrahim Jafari, and Mr. Mahdi of Sciri. Leaders of both parties have begun making deals to gain the support of their candidates within the coalition.

The struggle for the prime minister's job does not end there. Two other leaders of the Shiite coalition who are not affiliated with either Dawa or Sciri, Mr. Chalabi and Hussein Shahristani, are also said to be seeking the job.

"Believe me, the back-room dealing has already begun," said a senior leader of the Shiite coalition, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

As he hinted in his speech on Monday, Dr. Allawi may try to offer himself as a secular alternative to the Shiite coalition, and as someone unlikely to fall under the influence of the Iranian government.

Some Iraqi political leaders, especially Sunnis and the Kurds, have expressed concerns that some of the principal members of the Shiite coalition, like Sciri's leader, Abdul Aziz Hakim, are too close to the Iranian government, which supported Sciri in exile during the years of Saddam Hussein's rule.

Some also worry that the Shiite coalition could ultimately come to be dominated by clerics like Mr. Hakim and Ayatollah Sistani from behind the scenes.

"Perhaps the majority of the members have connections with religious groups," Adnan Pachachi, a secular Sunni political leader, said of the Shiite candidates.

Dr. Allawi, a former member of the Baath Party and a confidant of the Central Intelligence Agency, casts a wide political net. As a counterweight to the United Iraqi Alliance, he could, Iraqis say, draw together a coalition of Sunnis, secular Shiites and possibly Kurds.

The problem for Dr. Allawi is that however solid such a coalition may look on paper, in practice it could prove difficult to bring together. Dr. Allawi's relations with the Kurds, for instance, have been strained over the ethnic issue of Kirkuk, the ethnically mixed northern Iraqi city that Kurdish leaders want to bring under their control.

"The secular element is not unified," Mr. Pachachi said. "It does not work as one."

The prospect of having Dr. Allawi loom as a big player in the next government has prompted irritation from some members of the Shiite coalition, who say his popularity stems largely from an expensive television campaign. One of Dr. Allawi's critics is Mr. Chalabi, a cousin and a political rival.

"I don't think it was a massive endorsement," Mr. Chalabi said of the voting. "Everyone knows that his mandate is a Madison Avenue mandate."
Posted by: Dan Darling || 02/02/2005 3:03:31 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  democracy, messy and wonderful.

I cant see say a Dawa-Allawi-kurd-sunni coalition to put Allawi back as PM. My money is on a Shia-Kurd coalition, which can then play Allawi off against the Sunnis, to ensure two thirds. For PM, probably Sharistani, which settles the Dawa-Sciri problem (I doubt Chalabi will end up as PM)
Posted by: liberalhawk || 02/02/2005 9:58 Comments || Top||

#2  Hurray! Bargaining instead of bullets -- what a concept.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 10:33 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Tech
Rumsfeld wants to restore bunker busters
US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld has asked for the restoration of a supersecret research program designed to create a new type of nuclear weapon capable of destroying hardened underground targets.

Mr Rumsfeld made the request in a letter sent to then energy secretary Spencer Abraham on January 10, in which he insisted funds for studying the feasibility of the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP) be restored, a Pentagon official said today.
"The defence department does support completion of the penetrator study," department spokesman Major Paul Swiergosz said.

"We can't necessarily match Cold War weapons to the new threats. We have to adapt capabilities that we have to meet the threats."

A spokesman for the energy department, which runs US nuclear weapons research, declined to say what the response would be.

Samuel Bodman replaced Mr Abraham on January 11.

Military experts said they were expecting a new attempt by the administration of President George W. Bush to revive the "bunker buster" nuclear weapons program shelved by Congress late last year under growing international and domestic criticism.

Republican David Hobson, who chairs an appropriations sub-committee in the House of Representatives, quietly removed $US27.5 million ($35.4m) earmarked for the bomb study from a mammoth spending bill that was being rushed through Congress.

The White House apparently made an election-year decision not to hold up the Budget because of one contentious item, and let it pass.

But the Pentagon wanted the money back because the bomb could be useful against underground enemy weapons depots and command posts, Maj Swiergosz said.

"I think we should request funds in (fiscal years 2006 and 2007) to complete the study," Mr Rumsfeld wrote to Mr Abraham, according to published excerpts of the letter, the accuracy of which was confirmed by the spokesman.

"Our staffs have spoken about funding the (RNEP) study to support its completion by April 2007."

Mr Rumsfeld also assured Mr Abraham and his successor they could count on his support for "your efforts to revitalise the nuclear weapons infrastructure and to complete the RNEP study".

The program, involving leading US nuclear weapons laboratories such as Los Alamos and Livermore, sought to find the possibility of converting into bunker busters two existing warheads — the B61 and B83, according to administration officials.

The B61 is a tactical thermonuclear gravity bomb that can be delivered by strategic as well as tactical aircraft — from B-52 and B-2 bombers to F-16 fighter jets.

The B83 is designed for precision delivery from very low altitudes, most likely by B-2 stealth bombers, military experts said.

Prior to the program's suspension, scientists were working on finding ways to harden the bombshells so they could survive penetration through layers of rock, steel and concrete before detonating, the experts said.

Bunker busters are seen by some experts as important tools for waging preventive wars against enemies that are secretly building arsenals of weapons of mass destruction.

At least 10,000 bunkers exist in more than 70 countries around the world, the Defense Intelligence Agency said.

More than 1400 of the bunkers were used as strategic storage sites for weapons of mass destruction, concealed launch pads for ballistic missiles as well as leadership or top-echelon command and control posts, the agency said.

However, International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed ElBaradei warned this week the bunker buster program was sending "the wrong message" and could hinder international non-proliferation efforts.

"You can't tell everyone 'don't touch nuclear weapons' while continuing to build them," Mr El Baradei said in an interview with The Washington Post and Newsweek.

Posted by: God Save The World || 02/02/2005 3:15:43 AM || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  "... a supersecret research program..."

Surely you must have heard of it; it's the most closely guarded of government secrets.

(Paraphrased from one of the Sherlock Holmes stories.)
Posted by: jackal || 02/02/2005 9:33 Comments || Top||

#2  "...supersecret research program..." with special editorial comment by Mohamed ElBaradei was brought to you today by news.com.au and "correspondents in Washington" and funded in part by "Hot Deals from Dell". Stay tuned for "Violent Planet" coming up next on this PBS station.
Posted by: Tom || 02/02/2005 10:01 Comments || Top||

#3  Next, they'll be telling us about Uncle Sam's supersecret nuclear triad. And the supersecret anti-ballistic missile program. And the supersecret CIA, which tries to obtain *secrets* about friendly and hostile governments alike.
Posted by: Zhang Fei || 02/02/2005 10:33 Comments || Top||

#4  As a taxpayer, I'm totally ok with the open secret that if you are an "evil doer" there is no hole deep enough to protect you or your stuff.
Posted by: Classical_Liberal || 02/02/2005 11:08 Comments || Top||

#5  Wonder if Kimmie reads the Aussie papers? Or the Iranian mullahs?
Posted by: tu3031 || 02/02/2005 11:14 Comments || Top||

#6  """You can’t tell everyone ’don’t touch nuclear weapons’ while continuing to build them," (the idiot) Mr El Baradei said ..."""

Building new and better nukes while making sure others do NOT - that's exactly what we can and should be doing.
Posted by: Glereper Craviter7929 || 02/02/2005 12:58 Comments || Top||

#7  In an ideal world, all things being equal, it is wrong to build more nuclear weapons. The problem in reality is that there are people that have publically stated that they wish to destroy us by any means possible. People in most modern societies cannot bring themselves to believe that there are people that will do that without compunction.

So the path becomes for us, "Hope for the best and plan for the worst." Right now we have nuclear weapons that are mainly designed for air or surface burst. If we were forced to use these weapons, we are talking about a lot of extra collateral damage and fallout. The bunker buster nuclear weapon will minimize these effects and will achieve the goal of destroying underground facilities by heat, radiation, or shock wave.

It comes down to this, would you like the Big Bad USA to deal with this, or would you like Big Bad Iran or North Korea, or another country to commit nuclear blackmail or destruction? I am sure that the LLL will go apesh*t over this but that is the reality facing us.
Posted by: Alaska Paul || 02/02/2005 16:14 Comments || Top||

#8  "But we deserve it!"
Posted by: Dishman || 02/02/2005 18:05 Comments || Top||


Home Front: Culture Wars
US Military to Leftist Law Schools: The 1st Amendment Applies to Us Too
Don't ask. Don't tell. Having no desire to crash our e-mail server, we'll save discussion of gays in the military for another day. Rather, today's subject is lawyers in the military. Surely Americans of all points of view can agree that in an age of Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, the military can use the best attorneys it can get.
Attorneys, my ass. They can use some information warfare people to counter the incredible amount of lying eminating from our fifth column press.
So it's a disgrace that some of the nation's law schools, objecting to the Pentagon's "discrimination policies," refuse to permit military recruiters to make their pitch on campus, relegating them instead to unofficial off-campus venues. Law students pondering their first career move can be wined and dined by fancy firms that set up recruitment tables at campus job fairs, but they have to stroll over to the local Day's Inn to seek out the lonely military recruiter.

To put it another way, the same liberals who object that the military includes too many lower-class kids won't let military recruiters near the schools that contain students who will soon join the upper-class elite. It's almost enough to make us contemplate restoring the draft, starting with law school students.
I'd say commanders would reject that saying they don't need a fifth columnist in their rear if they can avoid it
Needless to say, such scholastic shenanigans don't go down well with Congress, which in 1994 passed the Solomon Amendment, named for the late New York Republican, Gerald Solomon. The law requires schools that receive federal funds to provide equal access to military recruiters. Today, the House is scheduled to vote on a resolution brought by Alabama Republican Mike Rogers that would restate the House's support for the Solomon Amendment. Something similar passed the House and Senate by overwhelming margins last year and was incorporated into the Defense Authorization bill.

The impetus for Mr. Rogers's move is a November ruling by the federal appeals court in Philadelphia in favor of a group of law schools and legal scholars that had contested the Solomon law. The 2-1 opinion found that the Solomon Amendment violates the schools' First Amendment rights to free speech and association. Next stop is the Supreme Court, which is expected to take the appeal that the Justice Department plans to bring.
First amendment only applies to us leftists, not to anyone we disagree with
There are many peculiarities to this lawsuit, starting with the fact that the group that brought it--the Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights--declines to release the names of the 26 law schools and faculties that belong to its coalition. Some of the participants (New York University and Georgetown, for example) have outed themselves since the suit was brought in 2003, but others steadfastly maintain their own don't-ask-don't-tell policy.
Of course. They can't be good elitists if they do the right thing and expect everyone to do it as well.
In any event, there should be no legal question about Congress's right to put conditions on grants of federal funds to universities. It does this all the time--including requirements that colleges adhere to certain civil rights and gender standards. With a few exceptions, universities have no trouble going along and courts have no problem letting them.
I say f*ck law schools. Take away the federal tit and THEN send in recruiters
If, as is likely, the Supreme Court overturns the appeals court decision, that will be the end of it. Almost all universities, public and private, take millions of dollars in federal money that would be next to impossible to give up. That's especially true of the elite schools, both public and private. Still, it would be nice to think that the nation's universities would welcome the military for reasons other than the mercenary. Patriotism, perhaps?
Elites only welcome the military when they are hurt or dead
Posted by: badanov || 02/02/2005 4:48:44 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Remove the federal funds. In fact I think the feds should remove federal funds from any organization or government body who refuses to follow federal law. Including Immigration laws.

Either that or send in the recruiters anyway.
Posted by: CrazyFool || 02/02/2005 9:31 Comments || Top||

#2  You have to love the idea of drafting lawyers. I think all of them would be a good start. Give them rifles and send them to the front. Any front, as long as there's shooting involved. With other troops behind them to help them along if they feel like deserting.
Posted by: Weird Al || 02/02/2005 10:30 Comments || Top||

#3  Perhaps a practical demonstration of military skills will drive the point home?
Posted by: BH || 02/02/2005 10:32 Comments || Top||

#4  Drafting law students? Wrong, wrong, wrong. Draft the teachers and the staff!
Posted by: JFM || 02/02/2005 13:25 Comments || Top||

#5  Draft beer not teachers!
Posted by: BH || 02/02/2005 13:27 Comments || Top||

#6  give em a fork and let em clear the minefields of the 3rd world
Posted by: Frank G || 02/02/2005 13:28 Comments || Top||

#7  Draft the profs to serve ICC summons to bin Laden, Kimmie and the mullahs.
Posted by: ed || 02/02/2005 13:49 Comments || Top||

#8  Hey, we're doing our part for the war effort. You think it's easy filing those Guantanamo prisoner lawsuits for the ACLU?
Posted by: A. Chaser: Attorney at Law || 02/02/2005 13:58 Comments || Top||

#9  Funny side effect:

If this goes, then the states can use it as a precedent to prevent highway funds cuts and can set the drinkign age and BAC levels and seatbelt laws any damned way they want - because its the treat of federal fund witholding that dirves those laws into compliance with Federal (as opposed to state/local) desires.

Same goes for "Workfare" laws passed under Clinton and enforced under Bush: States can say they will just give the money away and disregard the work requirements for the funds - especially in places like CA (Bezerkely). And they will be able to successfully sue based on this sort of precedent.

This is a big can of worms - and you bet the courts will uphold the recruiters - because if they dont, then all kinds of hell breaks loose over Congress' inability to withhold funds conditionally.
Posted by: OldSpook || 02/02/2005 20:51 Comments || Top||

#10  Funny side effect:

If this goes, then the states can use it as a precedent to prevent highway funds cuts and can set the drinkign age and BAC levels and seatbelt laws any damned way they want - because its the treat of federal fund witholding that dirves those laws into compliance with Federal (as opposed to state/local) desires.

Same goes for "Workfare" laws passed under Clinton and enforced under Bush: States can say they will just give the money away and disregard the work requirements for the funds - especially in places like CA (Bezerkely). And they will be able to successfully sue based on this sort of precedent.

This is a big can of worms - and you bet the courts will uphold the recruiters - because if they dont, then all kinds of hell breaks loose over Congress' inability to withhold funds conditionally.
Posted by: OldSpook || 02/02/2005 20:51 Comments || Top||

#11  Funny side effect:

If this goes, then the states can use it as a precedent to prevent highway funds cuts and can set the drinkign age and BAC levels and seatbelt laws any damned way they want - because its the treat of federal fund witholding that dirves those laws into compliance with Federal (as opposed to state/local) desires.

Same goes for "Workfare" laws passed under Clinton and enforced under Bush: States can say they will just give the money away and disregard the work requirements for the funds - especially in places like CA (Bezerkely). And they will be able to successfully sue based on this sort of precedent.

This is a big can of worms - and you bet the courts will uphold the recruiters - because if they dont, then all kinds of hell breaks loose over Congress' inability to withhold funds conditionally.
Posted by: OldSpook || 02/02/2005 20:51 Comments || Top||


Israel-Palestine
Israel Puts Off Power Transfer
Cause and effect at work. Hamas is determined to spike any kind of diminution in hostilities...
Israel put on hold the transfer of security control in West Bank towns to the Palestinians, citing resumption of Palestinian rocket attack on Jewish settlements. Hamas activists fired volleys of mortars into Gaza settlements on Monday and yesterday in retaliation for the killing of a Palestinian schoolgirl in Israeli tank fire. A bullet hit the 10-year-old in the face as she was lining up in the yard of a United Nations Relief and Works Agency school in Rafah. A seven-year-old girl was injured in the hand.

"We will not allow the daily Zionist aggression to go unanswered," warned a joint leaflet signed by the armed wings of eight Palestinian factions. "Any cease-fire agreement will succeed only if the Zionist enemy accepts our terms, including ending all forms of aggression and releasing prisoners," it added. Palestinians had been preparing to take control in the city of Ramallah, as well as Qalqilya, Jericho and Tulkarm yesterday but talks between Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and former Palestinian Security Minister Mohammed Dahlan on the issue on Monday night ended without agreement.
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 || Comments || Link || [1 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Let's not forget that the Palestinian child was killed by bullets fired by Palestinians rejoicing at returning from Haj. But why allow the truth to get in the way of a good excuse to kill Jews?
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 0:40 Comments || Top||

#2  I put my trust in the Palestinian People.
Posted by: gromgorru || 02/02/2005 6:30 Comments || Top||

#3  Grom:

Your trust is misplaced. After all, they supported Arafat who, by objective standards, only caused them greater misery and hardship.

The palis are moved more by ideas and fantasy than by facts.
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/02/2005 8:45 Comments || Top||

#4  I have faith in the pali people too.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 9:32 Comments || Top||

#5  PlanetDan, gromgorru is posting out of Israel. I suspect he trusts the Palestinian People to screw up yet another opportunity.
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 10:32 Comments || Top||

#6  do not be so blind as to think Israeli troops are not guilty of killing innocent children here and there. Palestinian suicide bombers will be right alongside Israeli mercenaries in hell.
Posted by: shellback || 02/02/2005 14:17 Comments || Top||

#7  Hey shellback:

I actually agree that Israeli troops kill innocent children. It's not because the kids are targeted, it's because Hamas and IJ and al aqsa operatives hide behind them, knowing that Israelis are reluctant to kill innocents. It's called "collateral damage."

This goes exactly back to my original point, above: The palis bring their misfortune upon themselves and have only themselves to blame. It's a cryin' shame they hate Israel more than they love their kids.
Posted by: PlanetDan || 02/02/2005 15:07 Comments || Top||

#8  Wow! Been around Shellback have 'ya? Seen the big line around the globe?
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 15:39 Comments || Top||


Abbas pledges to wipe out 'black stains' of Arafat era
New Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas pledged to wipe out the "black stains" of his predecessor Yasser Arafat and reform political and security stuctures in an interview with Russian daily Kommersant published Tuesday. Abbas, who held talks with Russian leaders Monday to win support for his key upcoming summit with Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, said the main task of his new administration was to institute a rule of law. "Our main principle is the supremacy of the law. Our parliament is now passing laws on the reform of the security system and financial and administrative reform," Abbas told Kommersant. The moderate Palestinian Authority (PA) president, elected last month, conceded that under the rule of Arafat, "there were black stains in his policy."
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 || Comments || Link || [15 views] Top|| File under:

#1  We can hope that he succeeds...
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 0:41 Comments || Top||

#2  Our main principle is the supremacy of the law.

In the very best and worst sense;

Good luck.
Posted by: Zenster || 02/02/2005 4:20 Comments || Top||

#3  We can hope that he succeeds...

Depends on your definition of black stains.
Posted by: gromgorru || 02/02/2005 6:28 Comments || Top||

#4  Is he talking about the chair?
Posted by: BH || 02/02/2005 10:12 Comments || Top||

#5  Black stains on a ten thousand dollar Chanel dress can be removed by... buying another one.
Trust me, I know.
Posted by: Suha Arafat || 02/02/2005 10:17 Comments || Top||

#6  One stain can ruin your whole term.
Posted by: Bill Clinton || 02/02/2005 10:56 Comments || Top||

#7  heh
Posted by: Steve || 02/02/2005 10:58 Comments || Top||


Iraq-Jordan
Iraq Shiite bloc claims victory
A SHIITE leader claiming victory in Iraq's election said today he wanted all groups, including Sunni Arabs, to help shape the country's future. "The United Iraqi Alliance scored a sweeping victory. We know that the majority of those who voted cast their vote for the alliance," Abdul Aziz al-Hakim said. Hakim tops the candidate list of the Alliance, drawn up with the blessing of revered Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. He also leads the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, one of the main parties in the powerful Alliance. Iraq's 60 per cent Shiite majority thronged to the polls on Sunday, but many of the Sunni minority, which dominated Iraq under deposed dictator Saddam Hussein, stayed away.
"We'll stay in our tents and sulk. Elections are ucky."
Hakim said Iraq's next government might discuss whether to tell foreign troops to leave. Washington has said it will pull out its forces if Baghdad asks it to, but says such a request is unlikely. Many mainstream Iraqi politicians say it is far too soon to talk about a troop withdrawal. "No one welcomes the foreign troops in Iraq. We believe in the ability of Iraqis to run their own issues, including the security issue," Hakim said. "Of course this issue could be brought up by the new government." Hakim, dressed in a brown robe and black turban, said the Shiite alliance would work to build consensus and ensure that all Iraq's ethnic and sectarian groups were included in the political process. "We don't want anyone to be marginalised. We want everyone to take part in writing the constitution," the soft-spoken, bearded cleric said. "We will defend the rights of all minorities and all groups no matter how small they are."

Hakim said his Alliance was discussing a coalition with the main Kurdish bloc, expected to come second in the polls. Such a combination could well dominate the new National Assembly. But he said that Shiites wanted to reach out to Sunni Arab groups, including those that boycotted the polls. "We want to work with them," he said. "Even those who didn't take part in the elections, we are ready to cooperate with them. We will work to make them part of the political process, in writing the constitution and also to take part in the responsibility of running Iraq."

The election was for a 275-member National Assembly which must agree, with a two-thirds majority, on a president and two vice presidents, who will pick a prime minister and a cabinet. The Assembly will also oversee the drafting of a permanent constitution. Sunni Arab participation is essential because Sunnis could potentially veto the constitution when a referendum is held to approve it in October. Hakim said it was too soon to speculate who the next prime minister would be. The incumbent, Iyad Allawi, a secular Shiite, is seen as a leading candidate, along with Finance Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, a member of Hakim's party.
Posted by: God Save The World || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [2 views] Top|| File under:

#1  This is the tale of the wrath of the Sunni, Fred?
Posted by: trailing wife || 02/02/2005 6:39 Comments || Top||


Africa: North
Bouteflika Takes Control of Ruling Party
President Abdelaziz Bouteflika has won a power struggle with Algeria's ruling party, paving the way for an amnesty offer to rebels that could end 13 years of civil strife and speed liberalization of the oil-rich economy. Analysts said the National Liberation Front (FLN)'s decision, announced on Monday, to end almost two years of friction and rally behind Bouteflika, gives him a free hand to press ahead with his painful but wide-ranging reform plans. "Bouteflika is now assured of complete fidelity from the former single party ruler (FLN)," the influential newspaper Le Quotidien d'Oran said in an editorial yesterday

Analysts said that for the first time Algeria has a democratically elected president who controls both the ruling party and the once-mighty military, enabling him to push ahead with political and economic reforms. "A market economy is the most efficient system that will guarantee economic growth and create jobs," Hassan Bahloul, FLN member and university professor, told Reuters. Privatizing the banking sector and opening up the key oil and gas industry are high priorities, analysts said. But another FLN member, who asked to remain anonymous, was unhappy with the party's decision. "The FLN is no longer a party but just a committee to support Bouteflika. I have no doubt this is a good day for Bouteflika but a bad day for democracy," he said.
Posted by: Fred || 02/02/2005 00:00:00 AM || Comments || Link || [3 views] Top|| File under:

#1  Quite a way from Long Island.
Posted by: Shipman || 02/02/2005 18:00 Comments || Top||



Who's in the News
101[untagged]

Bookmark
E-Mail Me

The Classics
The O Club
Rantburg Store
The Bloids
The Never-ending Story
Thugburg
Gulf War I
The Way We Were
Bio

Merry-Go-Blog











On Sale now!


A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.

Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.

Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has dominated Mexico for six years.
Click here for more information

Meet the Mods
In no particular order...
Steve White
Seafarious
tu3031
badanov
sherry
ryuge
GolfBravoUSMC
Bright Pebbles
trailing wife
Gloria
Fred
Besoeker
Glenmore
Frank G
3dc
Skidmark

Two weeks of WOT
Wed 2005-02-02
  4 al-Qaeda members killed in Kuwait
Tue 2005-02-01
  Zarqawi sez he'll keep fighting
Mon 2005-01-31
  Kuwaiti Islamists form first political party
Sun 2005-01-30
  Iraq Votes
Sat 2005-01-29
  Fazl Khalil resigns
Fri 2005-01-28
  Ted Kennedy Calls for U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq
Thu 2005-01-27
  Renewed Darfur Fighting Kills 105
Wed 2005-01-26
  Indonesia sends top team for Aceh rebel talks
Tue 2005-01-25
  Radical Islamists Held As Umm Al-Haiman brains
Mon 2005-01-24
  More Bad Boyz arrested in Kuwait
Sun 2005-01-23
  Germany to Deport Hundreds of Islamists
Sat 2005-01-22
  Palestinian forces patrol northern Gaza
Fri 2005-01-21
  70 arrested for Gilgit attacks
Thu 2005-01-20
  Senate Panel Gives Rice Confirmation Nod
Wed 2005-01-19
  Kuwait detains 25 militants


Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
3.137.185.180
Help keep the Burg running! Paypal:
WoT Operations (38)    Non-WoT (17)    Opinion (3)    Local News (5)    (0)