|
2022-11-08 Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
|
|
Court approves the sentence of a resident of Dagestan for participation in the IG
|
Direct Translation via Google Translate. Edited.
[KavkazUzel] The court of appeal upheld the sentence of a resident of Dagestan, Inge Mamedova, who was sentenced to 8.5 years in prison for participating in a terrorist organization in Syria.
The "Caucasian Knot" has reported that in March Abdurashid Magomedov, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Dagestan, said that 1,967 residents of Dagestan were on the wanted list as members of international terrorist organizations. According to him, in 2021, 104 Dagestanis who left for Syria to participate in terrorist organizations were put on the wanted list, and 23 were detained upon their return from there.
The Supreme Court of Dagestan upheld the sentence of a resident of the republic, Inga Mamedova, who was sentenced to 8.5 years in prison on charges of participating in an illegal armed group, Kavkaz.Realii reports today.
According to the materials of the criminal case, Mammadova participated in the activities of the Islamic State terrorist organization banned in Russia in Syria. She pleaded guilty.
The verdict was challenged by the prosecutor's office, pointing out, in particular, that the judge of the Khiva district court did not take into account the time the defendant was in custody. In addition, the decision was made by a federal judge who, at the pre-trial stage of the investigation, chose a preventive measure for Mammadova, and the verdict, according to the prosecutor's office, could indicate his bias, the newspaper writes.
"Having checked the materials of the criminal case, having discussed the arguments set forth in the appeal presentation, having listened to the explanations of the participants in the trial, the judicial panel finds the court's verdict to be upheld," the appeal ruling, published in the case card of Mamedova on the website of the Supreme Court of Dagestan, says.
In addition, the panel of judges considered "unfounded and not based on the law" the prosecutor's arguments that the criminal case had been considered by the judge who had previously chosen the measure of restraint. "Since there were no obstacles to the consideration of the criminal case on the merits by the presiding judge," the judicial act states.
|
Posted by badanov 2022-11-08 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [5 views ]
Top
File under: Islamic State
|
|
00:50 DarthVader
00:01 Skidmark
|
