Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 05/30/2025 View Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025
2022-09-18 Government Corruption
Fauci misled Congress About Gain-Of-Function Research, But 'Protected By Biden Admin'; Former CDC Chief Says
[American Thinker] Just last week, Senator Rand Paul appeared on Fox News and slammed Anthony Fauci for taking the default position of trying to "cover up" his activities, including potentially encouraging social media companies to censor medical information.
"I think that all of America should be appalled that America’s doctor, the leading expert on COVID in public health, doesn’t want to divulge information, doesn’t want to divulge his communications with Big Tech," Paul urged, adding that Fauci’s "modus operandi" is to "cover up".

A month before that, Senator Paul spoke after first ever Senate hearing on gain of function research, having revealed that there is a committee that is supposed to oversee such experimentation with potentially lethal viruses, but that it is above the oversight of Congress.
"We don’t know the names. We don’t know that they ever meet, and we don’t have any records of their meetings," the Senator reiterated, adding "It’s top-secret. Congress is not allowed to know. So whether the committee actually exists, we’re uncertain."

"We do know that they’ve met three times and there are thousands of gain-of-function research proposals. They’ve only met three times, they’ve only reviewed three projects," Paul continued.

The Senator added that "When Dr. Fauci said, ’Oh, we’ve reviewed this and the experts have looked at this, and said it’s not gain-of-function,’ even that wasn’t true. There was a committee that was formed after 2017 to look at this dangerous research. They didn’t look at this research at all because they never reviewed it. So no one reviewed this to say it wasn’t gain-of-function research. They didn’t review it, period."
"So we learned a lot of things, but I think we reconfirmed that Dr. Fauci is not being honest with us," Paul urged, adding "Yes, the NIH funded gain-of-function research. Yes, it was dangerous. And yes, nobody looked over this. Nobody reviewed the research. Yes, a million people died. And there still seems to be a significant lack of curiosity on the part of Democrats."
Of course, Fauci shrugged this off as just more 'vast-right-wing-conspiracy-theory' or some-such.
Posted by Besoeker 2022-09-18 07:36|| || Front Page|| [11131 views ]  Top

#1 1946-1958 US 'Gain-Of-Function' testing in the Pacific.

Fauci was simply protecting a sensitive Sino-American contractual research arrangement.

Posted by Besoeker 2022-09-18 08:02||   2022-09-18 08:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Redfield went along for the ride at the time. Again, late is not necessarily better than never.
Posted by M. Murcek 2022-09-18 08:10||   2022-09-18 08:10|| Front Page Top

#3 Had an interesting conver with my ex' husband who works at Genentech. He was insistent that Covid-19 came from a wet market given it's genetic code. I had to repeatedly remind him that A) He has no direct data as all is filetered through the CCP. B) All such genetic code are natural until they are not. He had no answers so then I pressed him on why he was so insistent. Silence, until he offered up his regrets that science has become so politicized. If only I had a hand mirror ready.
Posted by Rex Mundi 2022-09-18 11:24||   2022-09-18 11:24|| Front Page Top

#4 "ex's husband" PIMF
Posted by Rex Mundi 2022-09-18 11:25||   2022-09-18 11:25|| Front Page Top

#5 Misled, that's the same as LIED.
Posted by AlanC 2022-09-18 13:06||   2022-09-18 13:06|| Front Page Top

#6 Ref #3: Additional validation was probably not necessary, but it appears your conversation went a long way to further validate your decision to free yourself from Wally Wet Market.

'Skin in the game' possibly ?

Roche, Genentech plunk down $60M upfront to partner with Chinese pharma on PROTAC-based prostate cancer drug


Posted by Besoeker 2022-09-18 14:16||   2022-09-18 14:16|| Front Page Top

#7 That wet market "argument" or "theory" was so f'ing weak right off the bat that it was pathetic.
Posted by DooDahMan 2022-09-18 14:26||   2022-09-18 14:26|| Front Page Top

#8 /\ ....right off the bat

Snark O'The Day


* Nothing gets by us, nothing.

Posted by Besoeker 2022-09-18 14:30||   2022-09-18 14:30|| Front Page Top

#9 Wait...whut?
Posted by Frank G 2022-09-18 14:54||   2022-09-18 14:54|| Front Page Top

21:16 Anomalous Sources
19:26 NN2N1
19:12 Elmerert Hupens2660
18:34 Chantry
18:23 Gritch Throlumble3163
18:15 Elmerert Hupens2660
18:11 MikeKozlowski
18:11 MikeKozlowski
17:50 Pancho Poodle8452
17:34 Elmerert Hupens2660
17:22 DooDahMan
17:15 DooDahMan
17:10 DooDahMan
17:08 DooDahMan
17:08 DooDahMan
16:52 DarthVader
15:31 NoMoreBS
15:24 DarthVader
15:20 NoMoreBS
15:15 Griter+Slash1619
15:04 NoMoreBS
14:51 Grom the Affective
14:50 Secret Master
14:06 swksvolFF









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com