Article

2010-03-16 Home Front: Politix

A state appellate panel today ruled New Jersey's secretary of state must accept a petition a citizens group filed to recall U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez. The court stayed with its decision to allow Menendez (D-N.J.) to appeal its ruling.

NJ Tea Parties United and the Sussex County Tea Party have said they want Menendez, (D-N.J.) recalled from office because he votes for too much government spending.

The case -- which puts the state in the unusual position of arguing against its own law and calling part of its constitution unconstitutional -- began last fall after then-Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells rejected the committee's notice that it intended to begin a recall effort against Menendez. The removal process requires the secretary of state to approve such a notice before a recall committee can begin generating petitions.

After the notice is approved, the committee then must secure the signatures of 25 percent of registered voters of the affected district before a recall election can be held. There were 5.2 million registered voters in November, meaning the committee would have to secure 1.3 million signatures.

Menendez lawyer Marc Elias argued that the petition drive should be halted because voters do not have the right to recall a federal lawmaker under the U.S. Constitution.

Menendez will be up for re-election in 2012.

Posted by Bob Gleanter3083 2010-03-16 14:15|| || Front Page|| [11143 views ] Top

#1 Vote them out or throw them out; whatever comes first.

Posted by airandee 2010-03-16 21:24|| 2010-03-16 21:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Worth a try. However, I thought the Constitution did not have any provision for the recall of Congressmen.

Posted by JohnQC 2010-03-16 21:34|| 2010-03-16 21:34|| Front Page Top

#3 It's covered by the 10th Amendment. It's up to the states.

Posted by Procopius2k 2010-03-16 21:37|| 2010-03-16 21:37|| Front Page Top

#4 If this recall does work, it would be a powerful deterent to politicians who are not responsive to the voters and who act outside of or try to sidestep the Constituted duties. Or who are corrupt.

Posted by JohnQC 2010-03-16 21:39|| 2010-03-16 21:39|| Front Page Top

14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master
12:24 Matt
12:07 Abu Uluque
12:03 Grom the Affective
11:59 Grom the Affective
11:35 Super Hose
11:33 Super Hose
11:29 Besoeker
11:28 Besoeker
11:28 Super Hose
11:27 Besoeker
11:23 Besoeker
11:22 Grom the Affective
11:20 Super Hose