|
2009-10-14 Home Front: Politix
|
|
Watchdog comes back to bite Democrats
|
 Senior Democrats are taking shots at the House's new ethics watchdog, which has come back to bite some caucus members a year after Democratic leaders created it.
Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) acknowledged a growing number of concerns about the Office of Congressional Ethics's (OCE) record and predicted a coming public clash over its activities. "A lot of people have been raising concerns [about the OCE], and I support them," Clyburn said. "At some point in the not-so-distant future, these concerns will have to be addressed."
| Its proponents argue that it is needed to fix a broken, self-policing, members-only ethics committee, which rarely initiated investigations unless compelled to do so by a formal complaint from another member or via intense public scrutiny. |
Clyburn's terse comments are surprisingly strong from a member of the Democratic leadership. The OCE, an independent ethics board made up mostly of former members of Congress, was the brainchild of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who pushed for an added layer of ethics oversight after Democrats won the majority in 2006. She succeeded in ramming legislation creating the OCE through the House despite serious opposition within her party.
As a Democratic leader, Clyburn voted in favor of the OCE, but then-Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) appeared to buttonhole the most members. Resentment over Pelosi's drive to create the extra layer of ethics scrutiny has lingered ever since.
"It was a mistake," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) said flatly. "Congress has a long and rich history of overreacting to a crisis." Cleaver, a Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) member who voted against creating the OCE, was referring to the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal. Democrats used the controversy to impugn the GOP for creating a culture of corruption when it controlled Congress and the White House. "The truth of the matter is -- everything Jack Abramoff did was against the law and many people involved in that scandal have gone to jail," Cleaver continued.
Cleaver is most concerned about the ability of the OCE to launch an investigation based on media reports or an anonymous complaint. The ethics committee can initiate investigations from media reports as well, but a member must file a formal public complaint to require the ethics committee to launch a probe.
A significant number of members on both sides of the aisle were wary of handing any power to monitor members' activities over to a group of non-lawmakers, and the OCE's record so far has confirmed their worst fears, they argue.
The OCE is charged with reviewing suspected ethics rules violations and complaints and making recommendations to the full ethics committee for further investigation and action. Its proponents argue that it is needed to fix a broken, self-policing, members-only ethics committee, which rarely initiated investigations unless compelled to do so by a formal complaint from another member or via intense public scrutiny. 
|
Posted by Fred 2009-10-14 00:00||
||
Front Page|| [11130 views ]
Top
|
|
Posted by Gloluger the Great5876 2009-10-14 00:29||
2009-10-14 00:29||
Front Page
Top
|
|
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-10-14 08:32||
2009-10-14 08:32||
Front Page
Top
|
|
19:51 trailing wife
18:31 Difar Dave
18:16 Besoeker
17:17 Gustav
17:04 Bobby
17:01 Bobby
16:57 Glolutch Tingle1702
15:37 Procopius2k
15:29 NoMoreBS
15:21 NoMoreBS
15:04 NN2N1
15:03 NN2N1
14:55 NN2N1
14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master
|
