Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025
2007-05-17 Caribbean-Latin America
Chavez Follows Zim-Bob's Lead in Giant Land Re-Distribution
Or, Why 'Democracy' Always Eventually Fails
Clash of Hope and Fear as Venezuela Seizes Land

URACHICHE, Venezuela — The squatters arrive before dawn with machetes and rifles, surround the well-ordered rows of sugar cane and threaten to kill anyone who interferes. Then they light a match to the crops and declare the land their own.

For centuries, much of Venezuela’s rich farmland has been in the hands of a small elite. After coming to power in 1998, and especially after his re-election in December, President Hugo Chávez vowed to end that inequality, and has been keeping his promise in a process that is both brutal and legal.

Mr. Chávez is carrying out what may become the largest forced land redistribution in Venezuela’s history, building utopian farming villages for squatters, lavishing money on new cooperatives and sending army commando units to supervise seized estates in six states.

The violence has gone both ways in the struggle, with more than 160 peasants killed by hired gunmen in Venezuela, including several here in northwestern Yaracuy State, an epicenter of the land reform project, in recent years. Eight landowners have also been killed here.

“The oligarchy is always on the attack and trying to say you are no good,” Mr. Chávez said to squatters in a televised visit here. “They think they’re the owners of the world.”

Mr. Chávez’s supporters have formed thousands of state-financed cooperatives to wrest farms and cattle ranches from private owners. Landowners say compensation is hard to obtain. Local officials describe the land seizures as paving stones on “the road to socialism.”

“This is agrarian terrorism encouraged by the state,” said Fhandor Quiroga, a landowner and head of Yaracuy’s chamber of commerce, pointing to dozens of kidnappings of landowners by armed gangs in the last two years.

The government says the goal of the nationwide resettlement is to make better use of idle land and to make Venezuela less dependent on food imports. New laws allow squatters to manage and farm land that has now been placed in government hands.

Before the land reform started in 2002, an estimated 5 percent of the population owned 80 percent of the country’s private land. The government says it has now taken over about 3.4 million acres and resettled more than 15,000 families.

Poor farmhands and unemployed town dwellers who squatted on land here are as filled with optimism as wealthy land owners are with dread. On the outskirts of the town of Urachiche, for instance, is Fundo Bella Vista, a farming community inaugurated by Mr. Chávez during an episode of his television program broadcast here in April.

Bella Vista is one of 12 “communal towns” that Mr. Chávez plans to build this year. It has neat rows of identical three-bedroom homes for 83 families, a reading room, a radio station, a building with free high-speed Internet service, a school and a plaza with a bust of Simón Bolívar, Venezuela’s national hero.

With financing from state banks, the cooperative plants crops like manioc, corn and beans, which officials in Caracas say are better suited to soils here than sugar cane. By burning the cane during land seizures, the squatters prepare the land for other crops and give owners less incentive to fight for control. The state and federal government holds Bella Vista as an example of the ideological fervor Mr. Chávez is trying to instill in the countryside.

But while some of the newly settled farming communities are euphoric, landowners are jittery. Economists say the land reform may have the opposite effect of what Mr. Chavez intends, and make the country more dependent on imported food than before.
Amazing this slipped past the New York Times editor!
The uncertainties and disruptions of the land seizures have led to lower investment by some farmers. Production of some foods has been relatively flat, adding to shortages of items like sugar, economists say.
Posted by Glenmore 2007-05-17 13:07|| || Front Page|| [11136 views ]  Top

#1 Because it worked so well in Zimbabwe!
Posted by Jonathan">Jonathan  2007-05-17 13:23||   2007-05-17 13:23|| Front Page Top

#2 In an interview at the governor’s palace, where the halls are decorated with images of Che Guevara and Mr. Chávez, Governor Giménez said some friction should be expected on “the road to socialism.”

Like...moving out of "palaces" maybe, guvnah?
Oh, right, that ain't happenin."Friction" is for the little people....
Posted by tu3031 2007-05-17 13:26||   2007-05-17 13:26|| Front Page Top

#3 NY Times'll buy that old oppression by the Kulaks story every time.
Posted by Fred 2007-05-17 14:12||   2007-05-17 14:12|| Front Page Top

#4 Here's a tip. If you are running low on sugar, quit burning down the goddamned sugar cane.

This has been done before, several times, and never works.
Posted by Sneper the Wide5582 2007-05-17 14:25||   2007-05-17 14:25|| Front Page Top

#5 Take it from me, this'll work out great, especially if the Times is covering it...
Posted by The Ghost of Walter Duranty 2007-05-17 14:29||   2007-05-17 14:29|| Front Page Top

#6 The comments about burning the sugar cane are misleading. Cane is always burnt just before harvest to remove the huge amount of trash and pests, then it is cut. The cane is not harmed. This was preparation for stealing the crop, not sabotage. And after it is cut, the new owners will decide whether to grub out the roots to plant their corn and manioc, or sit back and let a new, lucrative, cane crop grow.
Posted by Grunter 2007-05-17 14:35||   2007-05-17 14:35|| Front Page Top

#7 aahhh just like the good ole days...

The NYT never met a Potemkin it didn't like! *Heart*
Posted by Grigori Alexandrovich Potemkin">Grigori Alexandrovich Potemkin  2007-05-17 15:08||   2007-05-17 15:08|| Front Page Top

#8 Much better article in the WSJ today. Chavez is not turning land over to the poor, he's establishing collectives along the Soviet and Cuban models, with the same results.

Due to land seizures and price controls agricultural production has dropped and there are shortages of basic items such as milk and meat.
Posted by DoDo 2007-05-17 17:57||   2007-05-17 17:57|| Front Page Top

#9 NY Times'll buy that old oppression by the Kulaks story every time.

That's damn mean.
Posted by Shipman">Shipman  2007-05-17 18:17||   2007-05-17 18:17|| Front Page Top

#10 That's damn mean.

yep Fred-man gives every commie-lover a phat meanie.
Posted by Red Dog">Red Dog  2007-05-17 19:28||   2007-05-17 19:28|| Front Page Top

#11 not mean truthful
Posted by sinse 2007-05-17 21:32||   2007-05-17 21:32|| Front Page Top

#12 Hey Hugo - beat 3714% inflation, biatch!!
Posted by Bob Mugabe 2007-05-17 23:32||   2007-05-17 23:32|| Front Page Top

17:02 Melancholic
16:27 Gravilet Snanter4154
16:20 Chaise Speaking for Boskone7897
16:02 Skidmark
16:01 Skidmark
15:46 Skidmark
15:41 Skidmark
15:37 swksvolFF
15:36 Skidmark
15:34 Skidmark
15:27 Skidmark
14:48 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:16 NoMoreBS
14:15 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:47 Regular joe
13:43 swksvolFF
13:38 swksvolFF
13:34 swksvolFF
13:31 Abu Uluque
13:25 Heribertus Vedente
13:24 mossomo
13:20 Abu Uluque









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com