Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025 View Thu 05/22/2025
2006-09-27 Home Front: Politix
"I Failed"
Amid Clinton-Wallace babble, 2 words get lost
Within 24 hours of Bill Clinton's public paddling on Sunday of Chris Wallace on the Fox News Channel, pundits, politicians and a salivating army of miked-and-ready windbags had already meticulously sliced and diced the conversation to within an inch of its life, exercising the kind of analytic fervor customarily reserved for the text of a newly uncovered gospel.

Hard-core conservatives claimed that Clinton's meltdown was carefully preplanned and cagily calculated, a September Surprise orchestrated solely to pump up the Democratic Party while setting the stage for his wife's much-rumored run for the White House.

Perennial presidential adviser David Gergen, meanwhile, couldn't restrain a slight smile as he told CNN's Anderson Cooper that Clinton's touchiness was understandable, given Wallace's insinuation that Sept. 11, 2001, could be laid at Clinton's feet. Gergen also noted that Clinton's performance in the Fox faceoff was just the kind of lesson in counterpunching that could inspire Democrats this campaign season.

And over in the blogosphere, Arianna Huffington split the difference. Applauding Clinton for tossing obvious Republican National Committee talking points back in Wallace's face, she also gave the 42nd president a nice "it's-about-time" jab in the ribs. "That bipartisan love-in he's been engaged in over the last several years," wrote Huffington, "has resulted in jack-squat."


Continued from Page 4


And yet for all the chatter about the unexpected Foxfire--which arguably edged out the National Football League and Major League Baseball for the weekend's best sporting event--I have yet to hear one analysis of the encounter that zeroes in on perhaps the two most important words spoken by Clinton during his dress-down of Wallace:

"I failed."

No less than three times during the 10-minute squabble, Bill Clinton candidly acknowledged his unsuccessful attempts to capture or kill Osama bin Laden and pull the plug on Al Qaeda during his presidency, each time underscoring his sworn responsibility to have done so and his deep regret at having not succeeded.

"I tried and I failed to get bin Laden," he told Wallace a third time, his words unencumbered by either sanctimony or spin. "I regret it. But I did try. And I did everything I thought I responsibly could."

This is why Bill Clinton left office with a higher approval rating than any departing president since such polling began.

When it comes to American presidents, history has proven time and again that the strongest leaders are those who cop to their weakest moments.

John F. Kennedy held a news conference within days of the botched Bay of Pigs invasion, taking full responsibility for the fiasco. This candid contrition not only sparked a skyrocket in Kennedy's poll numbers, but it also earned him the respect and authority he'd need 18 months later, when he carefully steered the nation through the touch-and-go Cuban Missile Crisis.

Then there was Ronald Reagan in 1987, who after a few false starts ultimately took a pass on the "I am not a crook" option of a Republican predecessor and sucked up the blame for the convoluted Iran-contra mess. The guy wound up on a stamp.

And, yes, despite his initial--and notorious--finger-wagging denial of the Monica Lewinsky debacle, Bill Clinton eventually begged the nation's forgiveness for his lies and lapses (some say ad nauseam) and the country lapped it up. America loves its reformed sinners.

By contrast, George W. Bush continues to pass the buck. Not once in six years has this president looked the nation squarely in its eye and plainly uttered the words, "I failed." Not with Abu Ghraib. Not with Katrina. Not with Iraq.

This is why Bill Clinton's clash with Chris Wallace was so inspiring. Because amid the poking and prodding, the raised eyebrows and clenched jaw, the man simply said he had tried and failed. And that he was sorry.
Logic only a Donk could love.
Posted by Thesing Unavise4426 2006-09-27 10:50|| || Front Page|| [11136 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 What the article speaks of the left not of America. The left loves the "I tried" "I feel" "I failed" far more than success.
Posted by rjschwarz 2006-09-27 13:48||   2006-09-27 13:48|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm sure that it is great comfort to the thousands killed by Clinton's decision not to kill him.
Posted by anon 2006-09-27 15:29||   2006-09-27 15:29|| Front Page Top

#3 He's right, He failed. He failed all the Americans lost on 911. He failed the 2700 dead soldiers, and the countless crippled for life. He failed our national deficite fighting this war. He's the leader of the free world where second place send us down this road. He does not get a pass from me on this because he hung his head down and cried. My sone will fight in this war, and about half the RB'rs are fighting or have loved ones fighting it. Being the president is no sport, he get no sympathy from me.
Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan  2006-09-27 16:37||   2006-09-27 16:37|| Front Page Top

#4 Spitting mad and no spell check. Sorry.
Posted by 49 Pan">49 Pan  2006-09-27 16:38||   2006-09-27 16:38|| Front Page Top

#5 HHHHHHMMMMMMM, so BUSH 1, i.e. "Herbert/Herbie", is blamed by Bill for US troops being in Somalia ala "BlackHawk Down" months after Bush 1 became EX-POTUS BUSH and Clinton was formally in office; whilst Texas State Governor Bush, aka BUSH 2, i.e. Dubya, is responsible for econ downturns during Bill's 2nd Term [(State Governor) Bush's economy of 1998-2000] + stealing Y2000 elex from Gore + 9-11 + not doing enuff to get Osama in his first 8 months while the Dems in Congress challenged each and every of Dubya's Cabinet appointees. ALL THE ABOVE IS EXCLUSIVE AND SEPARATE from Clinton himself saying he's POTUS twice by elex fraud + saying the US economy was expanding before he entered office andor left office. NOW ALL AMERICANS ARE IN A WOT = IS ALSO A WAR FOR CONTROL OF THE WORLD WHETHER AMERS WANT SAID WAR OR NOT, WHETHER AMERS WANT GLOBAL EMPIRE OR NOT, BECUZ IF WE DON'T AMERICA'S ENEMIES WILL DESTROY HER. NOT JUST ATTACK AND DEFEAT/SUBORN US, BUT TO DESTROY US ONCE AND FOREVER. Neither the Radical Islamists nor the Commies-Chicoms make any distinction between Repub vs Democrat vs. Independent-Moderate, White vs. Black vs. Brown vs Yellow, Right vs Left vs Center, etal. as to which America gets to live or die. *MOSNEWS.com [2004/5?] > RUSSIA testing its mil systems agz US stealth technology via pieces of the the F117 shot down by SERBIA during Clinton's BALKANS escapade. Serbia gave Russia US stealth tech to test, evaluate, and compare [re-engineer].
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-09-27 23:18||   2006-09-27 23:18|| Front Page Top

13:00 swksvolFF
12:59 Regular joe
12:55 Skidmark
12:53 Skidmark
12:52 Abu Uluque
12:50 Abu Uluque
12:49 Skidmark
12:48 NN2N1
12:46 Skidmark
12:44 Bobby
12:43 Abu Uluque
12:41 Bobby
12:38 Skidmark
12:31 swksvolFF
12:30 Skidmark
12:22 Abu Uluque
12:19 Abu Uluque
12:17 Abu Uluque
12:17 Skidmark
12:15 Abu Uluque
12:11 Skidmark
12:01 Crusader
11:55 Grom the Affective
11:52 Crusader









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com