Article

2006-09-17 International-UN-NGOs

U.S. War Prisons Legal Vacuum for 14,000

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-09-17 12:45|| || Front Page|| [6 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Critics protest that penalties have been too soft and too little has been done, particularly in tracing inhumane interrogation methods from the far-flung islands of the overseas prison system back to policies set by high-ranking officials.

In other words, the critics are whining that the people in charge -- who HAVEN'T approved any real abuse of anyone -- haven't been punished for crimes they didn't commit.

Posted by Rob Crawford">Rob Crawford 2006-09-17 13:04|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2006-09-17 13:04|| Front Page Top

#2 Rob - exactly, because ultimately anything that goes wrong anywhere on the planet (and possibly beyond) is George Bush's fault.

Posted by DMFD 2006-09-17 14:14|| 2006-09-17 14:14|| Front Page Top

#3 I can report that the AP writer who wrote this has expressed, in what seem to be frequent unguarded moments, exactly the sort of mind-boggling, anti-American, morally inverted sentiments one assumes but secretly hopes are not characteristic of the reporters who churn out this sort of thing.

One would need lots of space and patience and time to catalogue the distortions and errors here, but this article does serve as a nice compendium of the slander that passes for "journalism" regarding US detention policies.

No doubt the detention situation is fairly assed up, but by historic standards it's not bad at all, and of course one can completely dismiss the baseless "legal" arguments state or implied in the article. My favorite is the preposterous and illiterate yet breezy reference to habeas corpus - which of course is utterly irrelevant in a war-time detention operation against war criminals (which, ipso facto, the "insurgents" are - oh, that's if you take the Geneva Conventions seriously).

I know it's a tired theme of mine, but the Conventions are being ripped to shreds by the "critics," the truly bizarre and laughable US Supreme Court and its risible hallucination on Common Article 3, and even by the ICRC, which can't bring itself to imagine that the most significant change in warfare in centuries merits, oh, a wee little examination of the Conventions that naturally took absolutely no account whatever of such warfare.

I blame Bush - for his administration's five-year silence in the face of relentless, growing, high-impact distortion. The damage this administration is doing to the US, and to the civilized world, by refusing to even be a factor in discussion of US policy and world events, will be arguably its worst legacy.

Posted by Verlaine in Iraq 2006-09-17 16:15|| 2006-09-17 16:15|| Front Page Top

#4 "Americans," he muttered in fear. "Oh, my God, don't say that name," and he bolted for a city bus, and freedom.

Now if we could get the rest of the Arab world in that state...

Posted by Pappy 2006-09-17 16:32|| 2006-09-17 16:32|| Front Page Top

#5 The kooks are blowing up about 50 innocent civilians per diem - about the best possible case for the suspention of the Writ of Habeas Corpus I have ever heard of. Certainly a better case than Abraham Lincoln had.

Posted by Super Hose 2006-09-17 23:22|| 2006-09-17 23:22|| Front Page Top

23:59 JosephMendiola
23:43 JosephMendiola
23:37 Super Hose
23:30 JosephMendiola
23:29 Super Hose
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:22 Super Hose
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 Super Hose
23:05 Same as last time
23:03 TMH
23:03 Super Hose
22:55 USN,Ret
22:50 trailing wife
22:50 Super Hose
22:47 Old Patriot
22:39 Super Hose
22:34 trailing wife
22:18 Cleaque Omavimble7481
22:00 Old Patriot
21:42 RWV
21:39 3dc
21:32 Penguin
21:26 Penguin