Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 05/29/2025 View Wed 05/28/2025 View Tue 05/27/2025 View Mon 05/26/2025 View Sun 05/25/2025 View Sat 05/24/2025 View Fri 05/23/2025
2006-03-17 Home Front: Politix
Supreme Court Gals Threatened By "Irrational Fringe"
Boo!
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg assailed the court's congressional critics in a recent speech overseas, saying their efforts "fuel" an "irrational fringe" that threatened her life and that of a colleague, former justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

Addressing an audience at the Constitutional Court of South Africa on Feb. 7, the 73-year-old justice, known as one of the court's more liberal members, criticized various Republican-proposed House and Senate measures that either decry or would bar the citation of foreign law in the Supreme Court's constitutional rulings. Conservatives often see the citing of foreign laws in court rulings as an affront to American sovereignty, adding to a list of grievances they have against judges that include rulings supporting abortion rights or gay rights.

Though the proposals do not seem headed for passage, Ginsburg said, "it is disquieting that they have attracted sizeable support. And one not-so-small concern -- they fuel the irrational fringe."
Posted by Captain America 2006-03-17 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11142 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 "...irrational fringe."

Ruth - Looked in the mirror, lately?
Posted by PBMcL 2006-03-17 00:12||   2006-03-17 00:12|| Front Page Top

#2 ruth get a high colonic and stfu.
Posted by RD 2006-03-17 00:23||   2006-03-17 00:23|| Front Page Top

#3 Arrogant warmongering trouble-making Male Brute GOP-Conservative Fascists = Half-A-Commie(s) trying to escape the glutches of their Commie Mothers again - look, Ruthie, bring it up again when Russia-China, etal. dev a history of using American laws in own jurisprudence systems: DON'T ARGUE GLOBAL/INTERNAT EQUALISM, BILATERALISM, or MUTI-LATERALISM WHEN YOU REALLY MEAN "AMERICA-ONLY"!? No law(s) in America stops the US DemoLeft from making the same public or private demands on other world states which the US DemoLeft demands from America.
Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-03-17 00:40||   2006-03-17 00:40|| Front Page Top

#4 "...irrational fringe." ?

I thought they were her backers....
Posted by GK 2006-03-17 02:54||   2006-03-17 02:54|| Front Page Top

#5 Ah, I see. Jet lag is why she can't stay awake during court sessions.
Posted by Flirt Ebboting9253 2006-03-17 06:16||   2006-03-17 06:16|| Front Page Top

#6 Why this sudden need to go abroad to criticize? Is she not capable of saying such things at home, where something might be done about it... if there is something that needs to be done? Was it perhaps a mild senility that led to her retirement?
Posted by trailing wife 2006-03-17 07:18||   2006-03-17 07:18|| Front Page Top

#7 This one isn't retired yet. That is what makes it worse.
Posted by whitecollar redneck 2006-03-17 07:40||   2006-03-17 07:40|| Front Page Top

#8 Well, I for one am beside myself with joy that she is going on a fact finding trip of international courts to bolster her fine arguments for inspired decisions like Kelo.

I mean, US Constitutional law is sooooo restrictive on what an unelected judge can do....
Posted by Desert Blondie 2006-03-17 08:02|| http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]">[http://azjetsetchick.blogspot.com]  2006-03-17 08:02|| Front Page Top

#9 Maybe when she arrives home, she'll be wearing a burka.
Posted by wxjames 2006-03-17 09:38||   2006-03-17 09:38|| Front Page Top

#10 'L'Etat, c'est moi'
Posted by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg 2006-03-17 09:38||   2006-03-17 09:38|| Front Page Top

#11 Do go live in l'etat then,
Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-03-17 09:41||   2006-03-17 09:41|| Front Page Top

#12 When will they get it through their thick skulls that the large majority of America has begun to see them as the lunatic fringe and shoving their morals down our throats? 33 years later, Roe v Wade (no matter your feelings on the matter) is still un-settled law, in that it's still very much debated publicly, and not accepted by many in the US. Even without that, though their march to protect it all the way to 9 months (and sometimes beyond) after conception disgusts a huge majority of Americans. Many show that even those who agree with RvW may not agree with it all the way to term (e.g. the courts' smack down of the Partial birth Abortion Ban, smack downs of State parental notification laws, etc.). But add all the other rulings more recently (gay "rights", Kelo (eminent domain), the ACLUs march to ban any single crucifix in the nation, etc.) decided by them and you see why Jefferson called them "the despotic branch." Even if Roe v Wade gets overturned (a BIG if), it still basically goes back to the way it was pre-Roe...to the States. You can't tell me that blue states will "ban" abortion too (like California, NY, pretty much the entire NE, etc.).
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 10:16||   2006-03-17 10:16|| Front Page Top

#13 that should be "Many polls show..."
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 10:16||   2006-03-17 10:16|| Front Page Top

#14 Sorry, that was me ranting....Anyways, I meant to add that we have enough issues here just following our own Constitution. Throw in other nation's laws/mores, and besides being un-Constitutional itself, you're asking for a disaster.
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 10:18||   2006-03-17 10:18|| Front Page Top

#15 Bros. Judd posted an article yesterday(?) that Germany has a more restrictive abortion policy than we do, yet our jet-setting international law-loving judges don't want to apply that particular law.....
Posted by anonymous2u 2006-03-17 10:44||   2006-03-17 10:44|| Front Page Top

#16 Criminey - they're as bad as those "educate" Haaaa-vard Victorians who needed the fainting couches.

Appointed because of the feminist movement and they can't stand their widdle feelings being hurt and can't take criticism.

In short, no balls.
Posted by anonymous2u 2006-03-17 10:47||   2006-03-17 10:47|| Front Page Top

#17 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 12:25||   2006-03-17 12:25|| Front Page Top

#18 No, it's to bring you here to post your inane asinine insincere tripe posed as a simpleton's questions. Works like a champ.
Posted by Glirong Whong8693 2006-03-17 12:27||   2006-03-17 12:27|| Front Page Top

#19 I don't like Bader Ginsburg's politics, but I'm pretty unhappy about SCOTUS justices receiving death threats.

That's a big more serious than "having their widdle feelings hurt" anon2u.
Posted by lotp 2006-03-17 12:56||   2006-03-17 12:56|| Front Page Top

#20 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 13:15||   2006-03-17 13:15|| Front Page Top

#21 Lol. And you've just admitted you're an inane asinine insincere tripe troll.

Mods?
Posted by Glirong Whong8693 2006-03-17 13:35||   2006-03-17 13:35|| Front Page Top

#22 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 14:50||   2006-03-17 14:50|| Front Page Top

#23 Lol! Roflamo! Ha ha!

Cutting edge arguments their BiStander.
Posted by 6 2006-03-17 15:36||   2006-03-17 15:36|| Front Page Top

#24 I find it very interesting that she traveled to South Africa and sited some web site that allegedly addressed "Commando" threats to her life. The word "kommando" is an Afriaans invention dating back to the early Boer Wars. Boer cavalary elements were so named. One must wonder if it's use in her speech was intentional.
Posted by Besoeker 2006-03-17 15:36||   2006-03-17 15:36|| Front Page Top

#25 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 16:00||   2006-03-17 16:00|| Front Page Top

#26 Clearly paranoid, Bystander. Have you taken your meds today? Did you support "poor Harriet Miers"?

For many of us, one of our reasons for voting for Bush was to get judges like Roberts and Alito. Are ANY of my fellow Bush-supporters here disappointed with Roberts and Alito?

Oh, by the way, Bystander, we love John Bolton too. Try not to soil your pants at the thought.
Posted by Darrell 2006-03-17 16:22||   2006-03-17 16:22|| Front Page Top

#27 BiStander
Posted by RD 2006-03-17 16:29||   2006-03-17 16:29|| Front Page Top

#28 
Redacted by moderator. Comments may be redacted for trolling, violation of standards of good manners, or plain stupidity. Please correct the condition that applies and try again. Contents may be viewed in the
sinktrap. Further violations may result in
banning.
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 16:42||   2006-03-17 16:42|| Front Page Top

#29 what hospital are you posting from, little boy? Patient or bedpan collector? IP check again?
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2006-03-17 17:13||   2006-03-17 17:13|| Front Page Top

#30 What do bet ByStander is CommonSense, BirdDirt, Left Angle, Cassini...?
Posted by SR-71">SR-71  2006-03-17 18:02||   2006-03-17 18:02|| Front Page Top

#31 RubberNecker's so twisty-curvy his issues have issues.
Posted by Threrong Sholet2426 2006-03-17 18:03||   2006-03-17 18:03|| Front Page Top

#32 Clearly paranoid, Bystander. Have you taken your meds today? Did you support "poor Harriet Miers"?

Whah, whah, whah! Poor Harriet Miers. Good grief, you think that bistander had forgotten how the Dems treated Robert Bork and Justice (my, how I love the sound of that) Clarence Thomas? Now, THAT was brutal! And, somehow, just because lil' old Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it was the VRWC boogie men attacking her doesn't make it so, Bi! Whoops, almost forgot to add your signature ROFLMAO!
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 18:10||   2006-03-17 18:10|| Front Page Top

#33 Whoops, cut and pasted wrong quote. Meant to cut/paste this one at top of my previous rant (sorry Darrell). And, none of us really think the libs used their nominees to "take over the USSC and enforce it's agenda thru pressuring President Bush and the Republican Congress into nominating only persons pre-approved by them" do we Rantburgers?

"Whats really interesting is the rise of the Conservative movements influence in trying to take over the USSC and enforce it's agenda thru pressuring President Bush and the Republican Congress into nominating only persons pre-approved by them. What they did to poor Harriet
Miers was particularly brutal."
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 18:13||   2006-03-17 18:13|| Front Page Top

#34 D@mn strikethrough button and Mozilla! Anyone have a fix?
Posted by BA 2006-03-17 18:14||   2006-03-17 18:14|| Front Page Top

#35 anonymous2u, Germany's abortion law is indeed much more restrictive than America's. Or at least was so a decade ago. In an attempt to make up for Nazi atrocities (or so I was told), no woman can get an abortion unless a) she pursuades her doctor that having the baby will cause severe mental distress or physical disability, and b) she obtains a signed letter from the doctor that she persists in her conviction despite having received counselling. Without that letter, no abortion. As most of the doctors don't believe in abortions under any circumstances, it isn't easy to get that letter.

However, I b'lieve the laws are less draconian in Holland, and that isn't so far away.
Posted by trailing wife 2006-03-17 23:31||   2006-03-17 23:31|| Front Page Top

#36 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 12:25||   2006-03-17 12:25|| Front Page Top

#37 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 13:15||   2006-03-17 13:15|| Front Page Top

#38 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 14:50||   2006-03-17 14:50|| Front Page Top

#39 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 16:00||   2006-03-17 16:00|| Front Page Top

#40 Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by Bystander 2006-03-17 16:42||   2006-03-17 16:42|| Front Page Top

17:40 swksvolFF
17:34 Ebbuger Whuque4103
17:30 Ebbuger Whuque4103
17:02 Melancholic
16:27 Gravilet Snanter4154
16:20 Chaise Speaking for Boskone7897
16:02 Skidmark
16:01 Skidmark
15:46 Skidmark
15:41 Skidmark
15:37 swksvolFF
15:36 Skidmark
15:34 Skidmark
15:27 Skidmark
14:48 NoMoreBS
14:31 NoMoreBS
14:16 NoMoreBS
14:15 NoMoreBS
14:04 swksvolFF
13:47 Regular joe
13:43 swksvolFF
13:38 swksvolFF
13:34 swksvolFF
13:31 Abu Uluque









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com