|
2005-11-09 Home Front: Politix
|
|
A Reporter's Duty (Wallace Lectures Jennings)
|
Let us now sing the qualified praises of questioning patriotism. Sunday, Mike Wallace of â60 Minutesâ fame appeared on Chris Wallaceâs must-watch show, âFox News Sunday.â Having the CBS liberal lion appear on the upstart Fox â particularly after Fox had so much fun with the â60 Minutesâ memogate story â made it the journalistic equivalent of an exciting crossover episode. You know, like when âHappy Daysâ was continued on âMork & Mindy.â The fact that Chris is the son of Mike made it simultaneously more and less interesting. The less interesting part was that the interview was fairly soft, and it probably wouldnât have taken place had not the son wanted to help Dad move his new book. What made it more interesting was that Mike Wallace felt a bit more relaxed to speak freely. To wit: Chris asked Mike, âDo you understand why some people feel such disaffection for the mainstream media?â âOh, yes,â Mike answered. âThey think weâre wild-eyed commies, liberals. Yes?â
âThatâs what they think. And how do you plead?â
âI think itâs damn foolishness,â Dad retorted, continuing, âlook, you know as well as I, reporters are in the business because they want to be â first of all, theyâre patriots just as much as any conservative. Even a liberal reporter is a patriot, wants the best for this country. And people â you know, your fair and balanced friends at Fox â donât fully understand that.â
Well, not only is that more than a little condescending. Itâs highly concentrated damn foolishness. What Wallace doesnât fully understand is that lots of people have good reason to suspect that media Brahmins like him are less patriotic than the average Joe.
Now, before everybody gets their knickers in a twist, let me be clear. Iâm not saying that journalists are unpatriotic. No. Not at all. They're just a bunch of wild-eyed commies. Commies can be patriotic, too, they just have a different vision of what's best for the country. Nor am I discrediting the argument that it is the hallmark of the true patriot to tell unpleasant or inconvenient truths. Chesterton was right when he declared: âMy country right or wrong is a thing that no patriot would think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying, âMy mother, drunk or sober.â â
But what Mike Wallace and so many others seem to forget is that patriotism, like most any other trait, comes in varying quantities. Person A can be less nice than person B and still be perfectly nice. Joe can be more tolerant than Phil, but that doesnât make Phil a bigot. And Mike can be less patriotic than whomever and not be a traitor or a âwild-eyed commie.â Indeed, many journalists seem to believe that a certain impatience for patriotic appeals is a hallmark of good journalism. And hyperbole is a great way to mock someone else's point of view.
One such journalist is Mike Wallace. In a famous PBS-televised seminar at Columbia University, the moderator imagined a hypothetical in which the late Peter Jennings was embedded with enemy troops in a Vietnam-like war. He then asked whether, if given the opportunity, heâd warn American troops they were about to be ambushed or whether heâd hang back and simply âroll tapeâ on the slaughter.
Jennings agonized. âI think,â he said after a long pause, âthat I personally would do what I could to warn the Americans.â Mike Wallace was appalled. âI am astonishedâ that you would interfere, he said to Jennings. âYouâre a reporter!â When asked if American reporters have a higher duty to their country or fellow Americans, Wallace replied, âNo, you donât have a higher duty. No. No. Youâre a reporter.â This browbeating was enough to get Jennings to change his mind.
This is just one of countless examples of how patriotic waters run tepid in the elite media. In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, ABCâs David Westin told journalism students that he couldnât take a position on whether the Pentagon was a legitimate target. Other journalists agonized about whether there was an inherent conflict between wearing a tiny American flag on their lapels and doing their jobs. In World War II, American journalists â including Walter Cronkite and the legendary Ernie Pyle â wore American military uniforms and saw no conflict.
Some of this has to do with the growing cosmopolitanism of American journalism. Elite reporters like Mike Wallace and the late Jennings think they are âcitizens of the world.â Years ago, CNN banned the use of the word âforeignersâ to describe, well, foreigners.
And some of this has to do with tendency to define good reporting as revealing or exaggerating Americaâs problems to the world. This is a needed and important trait in reporters, but like any trait, including patriotism, one can have too much of it, or too little.
DC Examiner columnist Jonah Goldberg is editor
at large at the National Review 
|
Posted by Bobby 2005-11-09 11:08||
||
Front Page|| [11133 views since 2007-05-07]
Top
|
|
14:09 Grom the Affective
14:04 Super Hose
14:02 Super Hose
13:37 Procopius2k
13:35 Grom the Affective
13:34 Procopius2k
13:27 Grom the Affective
13:21 NN2N1
13:18 Grom the Affective
12:50 Remoteman
12:45 Secret Master
12:24 Matt
12:07 Abu Uluque
12:03 Grom the Affective
11:59 Grom the Affective
11:35 Super Hose
11:33 Super Hose
11:29 Besoeker
11:28 Besoeker
11:28 Super Hose
11:27 Besoeker
11:23 Besoeker
11:22 Grom the Affective
11:20 Super Hose
|
