Article

2025-02-07 Home Front: Politix

Federal Judge rails against Trump and blocks birthright executive order for second time

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by NN2N1 2025-02-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11144 views ] Top

#1 An 84 year old judge in Washington State.
... spit.. time to retire and leave the bench old man.

Posted by 3dc 2025-02-07 01:02|| 2025-02-07 01:02|| Front Page Top

#2 Technically as the amendment is written, the order is unconstitutional. It is up to the Supreme Court to decide if you commit a crime to have an anchor baby here if the crime makes the citizenship null and void.

Posted by DarthVader 2025-02-07 01:24|| 2025-02-07 01:24|| Front Page Top

#3 What would Andrew Jackson do?

Posted by Grom the Affective 2025-02-07 01:38|| 2025-02-07 01:38|| Front Page Top

#4 What would Andrew Jackson do?

In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act. This act, which has been described as ethnic cleansing, displaced tens of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral homelands east of the Mississippi and resulted in thousands of deaths.

Posted by Skidmark 2025-02-07 02:37|| 2025-02-07 02:37|| Front Page Top

#5
Andrew Jackson was a key figure in the founding of the Democratic Party,

President Andrew Jackson signed the 1830 Indian Removal Act, which started the Trail of Tears and other force marches.

Which resulted in about 20,000+ American Indian deaths.
Due to the piss poor way the Democrat administration handled marching the people 1,400+ miles, poorly supplied them and placed them in a strange new, freezing prison environment with no shelter or supplies.

TRUMP'S plan greatly differs in that it would return those persons ILLEGALLY here to their original Homeland, using modern transport and food. Plus the US is already giving Foreign Aid these offending nations. Plus there will likely be give relocation $$$ to keep the liberals and MSM happy.

Posted by NN2N1 2025-02-07 08:55|| 2025-02-07 08:55|| Front Page Top

#6 The point he told a judge "sod off swampy!". With samples of judicial activism whenever we open a newspaper, this is a valuable approach.

Posted by Grom the Affective 2025-02-07 09:17|| 2025-02-07 09:17|| Front Page Top

#7 Article this morning - the business about a Fed court putting out a nation-wide injunction is bogus; only authorized to address the actual plaintiff.

Posted by Mercutio 2025-02-07 10:04|| 2025-02-07 10:04|| Front Page Top

23:21 Hupoluth Dribble3876
23:15 Skidmark
22:59 Canuckistan sniper
22:48 Vortigern+Phert8938
22:46 Glerese the Bald8430
22:26 KBK
22:06 trailing wife
21:25 swksvolFF
21:16 swksvolFF
21:14 swksvolFF
21:14 Frank G
21:13 Frank G
21:12 Frank G
21:07 swksvolFF
20:56 Frank G
20:55 swksvolFF
20:47 swksvolFF
20:45 swksvolFF
20:41 Super Hose
20:37 Difar Dave
20:21 Difar Dave
20:06 Difar Dave
18:54 Seeking Cure For Ignorance
18:38 Super Hose