Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 01/25/2025 View Fri 01/24/2025 View Thu 01/23/2025 View Wed 01/22/2025 View Tue 01/21/2025 View Mon 01/20/2025 View Sun 01/19/2025
1
2025-01-25 -Great Cultural Revolution
Birthright Citizenship Is A Pernicious Lie That's Destroying America
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-01-25 05:48|| || Front Page|| [11137 views ]  Top

#1 "the 14th Amendment requires a person to be born in the United States and be "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," which means you owe your total allegiance to the United States alone and not some foreign power."

Nop it doesn't mean that. If this were so the framers wouldn't have to specifically mention diplomats and their families in the category of aliens who'd be excluded. All aliens would be included, and status of "illegal immigrant" did not exist back then.

And yes, my daughter, who is a U.S. citizen, just sent me this: This interpretation would also exclude ALL (lawful) aliens in the U.S. It would even excluse U.S. citizens with double nationality (which she has), as there's some allegiance to foreign nations involved.

It would even exclude naturalized American citizens who come from countries that don't allow you to renounce citizenship (i.e. Argentina).

My daughter has read up on the framing of the 14th Amendment and she would give you an earful if you were to discuss this with her. If you want I can give you details.
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 09:03||   2025-01-25 09:03|| Front Page Top

#2 She sounds like a delight to parent, European Conservative, and a benefit to whichever of her countries she ends up settling in when she’s grown.

All this argument is healthy mental exercise while we await the result of President Trump’s executive order — and probably a subsequent law passed by Congress after the Supreme Court rules against the EO as being an inadequate tool for the purpose.

I wouldn’t be surprised if in the end it will indeed require amending the 14th Amendment to get the Supreme Court to agree, and possibly it will take years to accomplish, to be finally consummated sometime in President JD Vance’s second term, or President Barron Trump’s. ;-)

If so, at least the process is being started, because this is as important to resolve as Roe v. Wade, which also went untouched for generations until President Trump got the ball rolling.
Posted by trailing wife 2025-01-25 09:18||   2025-01-25 09:18|| Front Page Top

#3 I take it you weren't here illegally, or just on a week long vacation. That is, an invited residency.
Posted by swksvolFF 2025-01-25 10:09||   2025-01-25 10:09|| Front Page Top

#4 Maher: Birthright Citizenship ‘Has Been Bastardized’
Posted by Skidmark 2025-01-25 11:12||   2025-01-25 11:12|| Front Page Top

#5 Khanna: Birth Tourism Is ‘Some Extreme Example’ Not Worth Changing Constitution Over
Posted by Skidmark 2025-01-25 11:13||   2025-01-25 11:13|| Front Page Top

#6 We lived, worked and employed people in the U.S. for quite some years. Legally, of course.

"subject to the jurisdiction thereof," which means you owe your total allegiance to the United States alone and not some foreign power.

From what I've read about the history of the 14A, that was a dissenting view. I'll have more on that subject later (my daughter sent me some sckientific research on this), starting with the Virginia citizenship statute of 1783 that said that "all free persons born within the territory of this Commonwealth shall be deemed citizens of this Commonwealth."
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 11:40||   2025-01-25 11:40|| Front Page Top

#7 We lived, worked and employed people in the U.S. for quite some years. Legally, of course.

Dein repatriierung, unser verlus.
Posted by Besoeker 2025-01-25 11:45||   2025-01-25 11:45|| Front Page Top

#8 We seriously considered to stay and already had a path to citizenship. Then a business opportunity came up in Germany which was to good to ignore, and here we are.
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 11:48||   2025-01-25 11:48|| Front Page Top

#9 Unfortunately, we have no Bavaria :-(
Posted by Besoeker 2025-01-25 11:50||   2025-01-25 11:50|| Front Page Top

#10 51st state? Politically better than Canada ;-)
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 11:55||   2025-01-25 11:55|| Front Page Top

#11 Btw I do think the 14A is no longer adequate given the situation with millions of illegal immigrants. It should be amended, but the proper way.
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 11:59||   2025-01-25 11:59|| Front Page Top

#12 Bring along Austria and it's a GO !
Posted by Besoeker 2025-01-25 12:18||   2025-01-25 12:18|| Front Page Top

#13 The EO will be struck down. Although there can be much debate about the intentions of the folks who enacted the 14th Amendment, there shouldn’t be much debate about the fact that the framers knew that situations would change and the Constitution should have an amendment process. In the current situation we have poor pregnant illegals invading our countries to birth citizens that immediately go on welfare. We also have rich pregnant foreigners visiting our country temporarily for the purposes of creating dual citizens that not or may not share American values. How many Soros’s and Bin Ladin’s qualify for US citizenship?
Unfortunately, Congress is broken so the Amendment will have have to go to the states. More than likely, Trump already has one drafted. I expect to see it on ballots this fall.
Posted by Super Hose 2025-01-25 12:44||   2025-01-25 12:44|| Front Page Top

#14 "The Constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. None of the 27 amendments to the Constitution have been proposed by constitutional convention.

https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/constitution

31 states voted for Trump, you'd need 34.
Posted by European Conservative 2025-01-25 13:07||   2025-01-25 13:07|| Front Page Top

#15 There are enough Trump supporters in every state to get it on the ballot for the fall. It will be ratified by at those 31 immediately which starts the clock. Don’t assume that states like New Hampshire and Virginia won’t vote for it as well. If there is a Hamas style attack in the US in the meantime, it will pass unanimously. Also, only motivated people vote in off year elections. MAGA folks are highly motivated by immigration issues.

Posted by Super Hose 2025-01-25 13:28||   2025-01-25 13:28|| Front Page Top

#16 Don’t assume that states like New Hampshire and Virginia won’t vote for it as well.

Voters, unlike politicians, rely on common sense.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2025-01-25 14:10||   2025-01-25 14:10|| Front Page Top

#17 So are the Latinos who work above the table and Blacks who may not necessarily be Go Trump! but understand that this massive illegal influx directly negatively impacts their financial prospects. Basically, the Turnstile Jumpers. It is the same grocery aisle of those who hire out handicapped people to get the fast track at amusement parks with the connection I pay for it.

According to The Law, if I want to buy a new pair of shoes for my children it is considered optional, but if I don't pay my taxes which pays for Anchor Babies, I get my door kicked down. That is immoral.
Posted by swksvolFF 2025-01-25 14:30||   2025-01-25 14:30|| Front Page Top

23:16 trailing wife
23:12 Skidmark
23:04 Skidmark
22:57 Skidmark
22:52 Skidmark
22:50 Skidmark
22:45 Skidmark
22:44 Skidmark
22:40 Skidmark
22:02 DarthVader
21:12 SteveS
21:04 Regular joe
21:01 SteveS
20:56 Airandee
20:41 Lord Garth
20:18 Super Hose
20:14 Super Hose
20:07 Pancho Poodle8452
20:05 Pancho Poodle8452
20:03 James
19:58 James
19:57 3dc
19:41 ed in texas
19:40 ed in texas









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com