Article

2024-12-29 Government Corruption

Fani To Be Slapped With Subpoenas After Court Rules Lawmakers Can Demand Answers

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2024-12-29 04:37|| || Front Page|| [11139 views ] Top

#1 Republican state Senator Greg Dolezal applauded the ruling.

Senator Delezal's applause was joined by the citizens of 158 of the 159 counties in Georgia.

Posted by Besoeker 2024-12-29 04:42|| 2024-12-29 04:42|| Front Page Top

#2
We have people working the Atlanta Metro-Area FD.

The joke making the rounds is...

The Atlanta Fulton FD has a team on standby waiting for a call about a room full of Shredders and paper catching fire.

Posted by NN2N1 2024-12-29 06:43|| 2024-12-29 06:43|| Front Page Top

#3 The humor aside...

Why has this taken 4 years?

Posted by NN2N1 2024-12-29 06:44|| 2024-12-29 06:44|| Front Page Top

#4 Her testimony will be very short, but she will still have to dig a couple of Gs from under her mattress to cover the cost. Maybe her county will foot the bill. Maybe she will charge back the DOJ. My quest remains: will the Trump DOJ follow the Biden precedent and negate any Biden claims of Executive Privilege?

In reality nobody was advising or counseling Biden of anything other than when to sit down and how to get off the podium without wandering into a jungle or a closet. Merrick Garland gets no protection for his scam to coordinate all this Lawfare.

Posted by Super Hose 2024-12-29 08:56|| 2024-12-29 08:56|| Front Page Top

#5 I suspect the directives from the White House will remain undisclosed.

Posted by Skidmark 2024-12-29 11:03|| 2024-12-29 11:03|| Front Page Top

#6 ^ Not if Wade is put into a pinch

Posted by Frank G 2024-12-29 11:09|| 2024-12-29 11:09|| Front Page Top

#7 The argument for the concept of executive privilege is made based on the idea of a sole executive needing high quality advice. It makes sense with regard to Donald Trump, who makes good decisions based on debate among subordinates. Ironically, Trump was routinely given knowingly false and misleading information by various people and departments.
Currently, no argument can be made that the DOJ has executive privilege itself separate from the AG providing advice to Biden. We are in an interesting reality where no rational person would believe that the DOJ was providing Biden privileged advice on their Lawfare campaign against DJT. The DOJ would claim that no such initiative ever existed. Biden wasn’t taking advice on complex topics to begin with. He had four staged cabinet meetings and needs a teleprompter to order ice cream.
Uniquely, the DOJ has negated the idea of executive privilege with regard to the Fulton County case anyway. They negated it for Trump. Why should they enjoy protection?
The table is set to use this case to clean out a large rotting chunk of DOJ. Will Bondi and Patel go after this? Conventional thinking says no. We will see.

Posted by Super Hose 2024-12-29 11:53|| 2024-12-29 11:53|| Front Page Top

#8 "Fani to be slapped"...heh...i see what you did there

Posted by BrerRabbit 2024-12-29 14:22|| 2024-12-29 14:22|| Front Page Top

#9 ^ *spanked* would also work

Posted by Frank G 2024-12-29 16:33|| 2024-12-29 16:33|| Front Page Top

#10 "Fani to be slapped..."

I laughed.

Posted by swksvolFF 2024-12-29 20:06|| 2024-12-29 20:06|| Front Page Top

23:04 JohnQC
23:02 JohnQC
22:58 trailing wife
22:50 SteveS
22:49 Lampedusa Sinatra1169
22:42 JohnQC
22:36 JohnQC
20:47 Lord Garth
20:06 swksvolFF
19:34 swksvolFF
18:16 49 Pan
17:00 Regular joe
16:43 Pancho Poodle8452
16:33 Frank G
16:31 Frank G
16:00 Procopius2k
15:58 Nero
15:49 Nero
15:42 Crusader
15:24 swksvolFF
15:19 Super Hose
14:23 Mercutio
14:22 Besoeker
14:22 BrerRabbit