Article

2021-12-10 Science & Technology

Debate Is Over Folks; Facts Came In The Market Ticker - Cancelled ® - What 'They' Don't Want Published

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by The Walking Unvaxed 2021-12-10 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11131 views ] Top

#1 The Future for The Jabbed is Bleak
^source
Conclusion Paragraphs in the article:

Many researchers warn of sterility associated with the jabs
A peer reviewed study has incidentally warned against taking the shot when pregnant while other studies have highlighted the toxicity of the shots in terms of reproductive health.

Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet stated during the second Stop the Shot online conference streamed on August 19 by LifeSiteNews that peer-reviewed scientific research from 2012 and 2018 as well as evidence from whistle-blowers showed that the jabs damaged fertility and pregnancy. It was not being reported to the public.

The vaccine nanoparticles “can pass through the blood-testis barrier, placental barrier, and epithelial barrier, which protect reproductive tissues,” she said.

Human immune cells are thus “trained to attack” a protein vital to a successful pregnancy, as in the case of PZP. Vliet warned that this would lead to “miscarriages, birth defects, and infertility” when taking the jab.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president at Pfizer, has corroborated the claims, saying that the jabs pose a “severe risk” of infertility. Yeadon cited scientific research specifically on lipid nanoparticles, found in the shots. “Do not take these vaccines,” he warned. “There’s a severe risk to your ability to conceive and carry a baby to term.”

Although the research into nanoparticle toxicity was conducted on animals, Yeadon argued that humans were also mammals and therefore at similar risk. “If someone wants to persuade me that they’re not concentrating in human ovaries, they are going to have to provide me with some data,” he said.

The jab has also been correlated with thousands of reports of menstrual irregularities. Gynecologist Christiane Northrup warned in April this year that the Covid vaccine could cause infertility in women, because the protein Syncytin-1 present in the placenta was very similar to the Covid virus SARS-CoV-2’s spike protein.

Commentary by Clyde Cleanter5535
It turns out the claims that "you must get jabbed", especially if you were previously infected, were a damned lie.

Due to the nearly-universal vaccination in this nation (Israel) there is no longer a control group of unvaccinated people of sufficient size to provide good data.

Frankly,
People being Israeli are likely not to exist by 2032, no or low birth spells extinction - fact that no mammal species having been injected with mNRA survives years, another.

Posted by Clyde Cleanter5535 2021-12-10 01:45|| 2021-12-10 01:45|| Front Page Top

#2 I suspect concerns about sterility will turn out to be groundless. Nor have I noticed reports of unusual numbers of miscarriages, despite numerous dire predictions.

Posted by trailing wife 2021-12-10 02:28|| 2021-12-10 02:28|| Front Page Top

#3 You don’t see negative reports of almost anything to do with the jab. It’s called censorship. The negative consequences will be hard to hide forever though. We don’t even really know what they are yet. 10 years from know we will look back and see this was the most disastrous public health response to anything in history.

I do know for sure, there is ample evidence that seems to indicate that for some people they are more susceptible to Covid in the immediate days an weeks right after the jab. There are quite a few deaths shortly after the jab, especially in the elderly. My uncle died a week after the jab. Since it was only a week after he was considered an “unvaccinated death”. Another friend watched as several elderly ladies that lived together died within days of the jab. The nurse was fearful about reporting the event due to backlash.

Posted by Albemarle Jack6733 2021-12-10 04:40|| 2021-12-10 04:40|| Front Page Top

#4

Like I have said since the experimental VAX was released....

We'll wait and see the long range affects and benefits. Having seen too many tried and tested Vax's still producing Adverse reactions years later.

In the case of this still experimental VAX.
What we have seen is a organized and media assisted MASSIVE PUSH to Vax at any cost. All without providing the public with full disclosure and even consealing the complete facts for generations to come.

BTW: I am sure the Mid-Election Variant will be the DEADLIEST ever seen by mankind according the Liberals and their Media

Posted by NN2N1 2021-12-10 07:53|| 2021-12-10 07:53|| Front Page Top

#5 There are reports coming out of Canada of unusual increases of stillbirths.

I tend to believe the Israeli reports but would like to see other corroborating research.

Posted by Vespasian Ebboting9735 2021-12-10 08:02|| 2021-12-10 08:02|| Front Page Top

#6 Re: 2

TW. been reading about stillbirths among vax'd going way up. Most recent I saw said the number of cases in some areas of Canada had gone up 28 times the previous period; most if not all of the women had been vax'd - not sure which brand. link

Posted by Mercutio 2021-12-10 09:02|| 2021-12-10 09:02|| Front Page Top

#7 naturally acquired immunity plus vax exceeds either alone in resistance to further infection

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475821/

Posted by Lord Garth 2021-12-10 09:05|| 2021-12-10 09:05|| Front Page Top

#8 If done more widely, autopsies on those deceased after COVID &/or after immunizations might shed light on this issue. However, they have fallen out of favor & are rarely done.

Posted by Bubba Lover of the Faeries8843 2021-12-10 09:18|| 2021-12-10 09:18|| Front Page Top

#9 Causes and origins serve no useful purpose. Prevention is the enemy of crisis. Those in power are already witting of the causes. We (the downstairs people) have no real need to know. Just go with the bi-government 'Wet Market' theory and stand-by for additional boosters and further instructions.

Posted by Besoeker 2021-12-10 09:31|| 2021-12-10 09:31|| Front Page Top

#10 Most recent I saw said the number of cases in some areas of Canada had gone up 28 times the previous period

Thank you, Mercutio. Read with interest, and sadness. Lots of medical things are dangerous for developing fetuses even when safe for the already-born. For that reason alone I’d have avoided vaccination while pregnant, even though I judged it the right choice for my particular current situation.

Posted by trailing wife 2021-12-10 14:57|| 2021-12-10 14:57|| Front Page Top

#11 Re#12

I wouldn’t trust anything from NIH again at least for another generation. Politics has infested science. And science lost.

When I heard that over 1000 doctors claim that BLM riots in my town did not pose a risk of spreading Covid but the handful of people peacefully protesting lockdowns were super spreaders I knew we were doomed. And the FDA tried to sell the “Ivermectin is horse medicine ya’ll” I knew there was not an institution left in the Federal government that has not been exposed to the corruption infection. And the “ya’ll” part was just to connect with us stupid red state Trump voters and smelly Wal Mart people. They do despise us and think we are idiots.

When it became clear natural immunity was better and more durable than the vaxx I wondered how long it would be for them to manufacture something that would negate that evidence and create a permitted narrative. It’s BS.

Fauci and crew are simply the “science” component of the deep state. Just like all the players we know that created the thousands of pieces phony evidence of Russia Collusion, etc.

What I am to believe now is that the vaxx is good for the old, the young, the very young, pregnant “people” :), those with autoimmune disease, those who have had bad reactions to other vaccines, those who have already had 3 jabs and might need a 4th, etc., etc. And it works on every variant really well.

I am not an anti vaxxer and, although I was born on a Monday, i wasn’t born last Monday.

The way I see it, for those over 80 I would probably get it, benefit outweighs risk. 50- 80 is a toss up, only of comorbidities. Under 50 risk outweighs benefit. And it is child abuse in school age kids, IMHO.

Posted by Albemarle Jack6733 2021-12-10 16:19|| 2021-12-10 16:19|| Front Page Top

#12

Posted by Albemarle Jack6733 2021-12-10 19:07|| 2021-12-10 19:07|| Front Page Top

#13 Sorry, I think I posted link wrong

Posted by Albemarle Jack6733 2021-12-10 19:08|| 2021-12-10 19:08|| Front Page Top

#14 busted, so I spamcopped it - no judgement meant

Posted by Frank G 2021-12-10 20:10|| 2021-12-10 20:10|| Front Page Top

#15 Albemarle's sentents are shared by hundreds of millions around the world. Focused protection of the elderly and high-risk subgroups should have been the approach. Children and anyone under 65 or 70 should have been / should be given the option of joining this experiment -- that's what it amounts to -- which we know creates MORE risk to young men than the virus does.

The "science" on this is a joke . Upside down: it's far more contagious and far less fatal than the types of diseases you treat with vaccines (smallpox, measles etc).

Posted by Merrick Ferret 2021-12-10 22:43|| 2021-12-10 22:43|| Front Page Top

#16 An excellent survey and explanation of the science (and anti-science) surrounding this fiasco is here.

Nb Brownstone.org is an excellent source of rational, fearless analysis by intelligent and knowledgeable people (Substack, Quillette, Spectator and city-journal are also superb).

Excerpt:

"By now it is abundantly clear from the epidemiological data that the vaccinated are able to both catch and spread the disease. Clearly vaccination isn’t going to make this virus disappear. Only a mind that has lost its grasp on reality can fail to see how ridiculous all this has become.

"But a tour through pre-COVID science demonstrates that, from day one, long before you and I had even heard of this virus, it was 100% inevitable and 100% predictable that these vaccines would never be capable of eradicating this coronavirus and would never lead to any kind of lasting herd immunity.

"Even worse, lockdowns and mass vaccination have created a dangerous set of circumstances that interferes with our immune system’s ability to protect us against other respiratory viruses. They also risk driving the evolution of this virus towards mutations that are more dangerous to both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated alike.

"Lockdowns, mass vaccinations, and mass booster shots were never capable of delivering on any of the promises that were made to the public...."

Posted by Merrick Ferret 2021-12-10 22:49|| 2021-12-10 22:49|| Front Page Top

23:17 Unavimp Chusogum4170
22:49 Merrick Ferret
22:43 Merrick Ferret
22:42 Unavimp Chusogum4170
22:37 trailing wife
22:33 trailing wife
22:30 Anomalous Sources
22:26 Anomalous Sources
22:22 Anomalous Sources
21:10 Raj
20:31 Frank G
20:22 NN2N1
20:10 Frank G
19:47 Flatch Wittlesbach3456
19:20 Merrick Ferret
19:08 Albemarle Jack6733
19:07 Albemarle Jack6733
18:45 Thing From Snowy Mountain
18:17 Airandee
18:15 Airandee
18:11 Kofi Spaing3074
18:03 Rob Crawford
17:01 Whiskey Mike
16:45 Dron66046