Article

2021-09-26 Israel-Palestine-Jordan

Is AOC's deplorable Iron Dome move a shift for the Democrats?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Frank G 2021-09-26 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top
File under: Hamas

#1 McCollum's district is mostly St Paul, not Minneapolis

Posted by Lord Garth 2021-09-26 00:19|| 2021-09-26 00:19|| Front Page Top

#2 Minny / St. Paul - same difference, right?

Posted by Raj 2021-09-26 00:28|| 2021-09-26 00:28|| Front Page Top

#3 I’ll correct it. We pride ourselves on getting things right, here at Rantburg. ;-)

Posted by trailing wife 2021-09-26 00:35|| 2021-09-26 00:35|| Front Page Top

#4 Lord Garth's probably right as far as specific congressional districts are concerned; I'm just saying I've always remembered both cities being mentioned in the same breath - Minneapolis / St. Paul. A distinction without a difference, in other words.

Posted by Raj 2021-09-26 00:41|| 2021-09-26 00:41|| Front Page Top

#5 Marxist took over education, now expect anti-semitism to get much worse in Democratic Party.

Posted by Kofi Panda2845 2021-09-26 04:19|| 2021-09-26 04:19|| Front Page Top

#6 Just to confirm Lord Garth's point - McCollum is the rep. for the 4th district (St. Paul) and the Muslim for the 5th District (Minneapolis).

Posted by Raj 2021-09-26 10:00|| 2021-09-26 10:00|| Front Page Top

#7 I'm curious as to what made AOC change her vote from "no" to 'present' on something she was obviously excited about. Did evil Nancy Pelosi make our plucky heroine cry?

As for Minneapolis/St Paul, they are known locally as the Twin Cities.

Posted by SteveS 2021-09-26 10:35|| 2021-09-26 10:35|| Front Page Top

#8 She read somewhere that most of Bath House Barry's votes as a state legislator were "present" and decided to give it a whirl.

Posted by M. Murcek 2021-09-26 10:51|| 2021-09-26 10:51|| Front Page Top

#9 I laughed at AOC's blubbering, but it occurs to me that blubbering is how she communicates with her base. If she had stepped to the podium and offered three good reasons not to fund Iron Dome, she would have exceeded her followers' twenty-second attention span and none of them would have remembered a word of it anyway. But now they know that those mean men made AOC cry.

Posted by Matt 2021-09-26 11:16|| 2021-09-26 11:16|| Front Page Top

#10 The moron is an actress. A B-lister in 'Hollywood for Ugly People.'

She's another version of Megan Markle -- BU / Washington instead of Northwestern/Hollywood. Same shtick. Same grift.

Posted by Faux Drapeau 2021-09-26 11:22|| 2021-09-26 11:22|| Front Page Top

#11

Classic role reversal as crazy drunk schools bartender.

Posted by Besoeker 2021-09-26 11:26|| 2021-09-26 11:26|| Front Page Top

#12 She's just sad more jews won't be killed

Posted by Deacon Blues 2021-09-26 12:02|| 2021-09-26 12:02|| Front Page Top

#13 I'm curious why a first world nation like Israel still needs foreign funding for Iron Dome. It is no longer in development is it?

Iron Dome seems like something you'd want protected from the whims of the Democrats who take power in the USA from time to time.

Posted by rjschwarz 2021-09-26 13:01|| 2021-09-26 13:01|| Front Page Top

#14 I'm curious as to what made AOC change her vote from "no" to 'present'

I understand she had a direct order from Nancy Pelosi. But the New York Times had a different take, according to Jewish Journal (I avoid giving the New York Times et al any clicky attention if I can avoid it):

The New York Times appeared to remove a line from a September 23 article stating that Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) had changed her vote from “no” to “present” on the Iron Dome funding bill because of “influential lobbyists and rabbis.”

The article stated that Ocasio-Cortez “tearfully” decided to change her vote after a meeting with her fellow Squad members, which the article initially said “underscored how wrenching the vote was for even outspoken progressives, who have been caught between their principles and the still powerful pro-Israel voices in their party, such as influential lobbyists and rabbis.” It was subsequently changed to say that the matter “underscored how wrenching the vote was for even outspoken progressives, who have been caught between their principles and the still powerful pro-Israel voices in their party.” As of this writing, the article does not provide an editor’s note explaining the change.

Posted by trailing wife 2021-09-26 13:06|| 2021-09-26 13:06|| Front Page Top

#15 Thanks, tw. I interpret that as Mom Nancy telling little AOC to knock it off before she scares the big-money donors. The sobbing is amusing, but I get it - to be caught between your 'principles' and money... *shudder*

Posted by SteveS 2021-09-26 15:41|| 2021-09-26 15:41|| Front Page Top

#16 Even Judas was eventually ashamed he took the money

Posted by Deacon Blues 2021-09-26 18:23|| 2021-09-26 18:23|| Front Page Top

23:59 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
23:10 SteveS
23:09 KBK
22:59 Rob Crawford
22:44 rjschwarz
22:06 trailing wife
22:02 The Walking Unvaxed
22:02 trailing wife
21:55 Faux Drapeau
20:44 SteveS
20:33 SteveS
20:08 Lord Garth
19:50 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
19:44 Blackbeard Barnsmell6454
19:19 49 Pan
18:52 Slappy
18:29 Frank G
18:23 Deacon Blues
18:15 Deacon Blues
18:07 Dale
18:03 Deacon Blues
17:41 Dale
17:39 Silentbrick
17:33 Dale