Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 04/24/2020 View Thu 04/23/2020 View Wed 04/22/2020 View Tue 04/21/2020 View Mon 04/20/2020 View Sun 04/19/2020 View Sat 04/18/2020
1
2020-04-24 Science & Technology
French Doctor Didier Raoult Cites ‘Scientific Misconduct' in Recent VA Study on Hydroxychloroquine; Two Major Flaws
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-04-24 04:53|| || Front Page|| [11 views ]  Top

#1 A clinical test can be designed to fail (usually it's to succeed regardless).
Posted by g(r)omgoru 2020-04-24 05:00||   2020-04-24 05:00|| Front Page Top

#2 Researchers found that not only did the drug show no benefit, it may have actually caused harm. Study results can be viewed in the medRxiv online depository.

This must account for the extremely high demand for the relatively inexpensive hydroxychloroquine. Keep up the good work Dr. Raoult.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-04-24 05:07||   2020-04-24 05:07|| Front Page Top

#3 The first major flaw is that President Trump even uttered its name. The second is that it probably saved lives, when clearly people were supposed to die so internationalism and 'global cooperation' could be promoted.
Posted by Dron66046 2020-04-24 05:21||   2020-04-24 05:21|| Front Page Top

#4 it was a useless study, as the VA statement makes clear

the only reason it was published was that publishing was required since they got grants.
Posted by lord garth 2020-04-24 07:13||   2020-04-24 07:13|| Front Page Top

#5 Are VA studies of equal quality to VA care in general?
Posted by Raj 2020-04-24 08:15||   2020-04-24 08:15|| Front Page Top

#6 ^ yes.
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-04-24 08:22||   2020-04-24 08:22|| Front Page Top

#7 Did you need to ask? Some animals are more equal than others.
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-04-24 08:24||   2020-04-24 08:24|| Front Page Top

#8 They gave the HQC too late.
Ingraham translates: “The later you take HCQ, the worse the outcome will be.”

The second problem: “Incomprehensibly, the ‘untreated group’ actually received azithromycin in 30% of cases,
but results did not reflect that, almost like they wanted the "study' to fail.

This is science?
Posted by Bobby 2020-04-24 08:46||   2020-04-24 08:46|| Front Page Top

#9 Thomas Dolby knows more about 'science'...
Posted by Raj 2020-04-24 08:49||   2020-04-24 08:49|| Front Page Top

#10 
Posted by Warthog 2020-04-24 10:18||   2020-04-24 10:18|| Front Page Top

#11 The findings should not be viewed as definitive because the analysis doesn’t adjust for patients’ clinical status and showed that hydroxychloroquine alone was provided to VA’s sickest COVID-19 patients, many times as a last resort

These aren't findings unless by 'findings', you mean here is some data we found laying on the floor so we, like, analyzed it and stuff. It will get endless play on the Orange Man Bad news channels, which is to say pretty much all of them.
Posted by SteveS 2020-04-24 10:59||   2020-04-24 10:59|| Front Page Top

#12 They gave the HQC too late.

And probably too much.
Posted by gorb 2020-04-24 11:00||   2020-04-24 11:00|| Front Page Top

#13 "[Scientific] Misconduct"? At the VA? NOOOOO, say it ain't so!
Posted by Clem 2020-04-24 11:15||   2020-04-24 11:15|| Front Page Top

#14 OK so the VA says its bad. This is the same VA stat told our Korean vets asbestos was safe, told our Viet Nam vets Agent Orange could never cause cancer, told our Desert Storm vets that Desert Storm syndrome was all in their heads, Told us the Anthrax vaccine was safe, told the Afghan vets that burn pits were healthy, and lastly that PTSD was a be existing mental condition. Now I am supposed to believe these guys on this? Their batting average shows to bet the opposite.

Me thinks whoever released this report needs to be removed from any government position.
Posted by 49 Pan 2020-04-24 11:21||   2020-04-24 11:21|| Front Page Top

#15 VA is an absolute disgrace. And that word isn't strong enough.
Posted by Clem 2020-04-24 11:23||   2020-04-24 11:23|| Front Page Top

#16 Sadly, I think comments #15 and #16 are correct. The VA is my primary care provider. The quality of care is mixed. One doctor won't take calls or respond to written inquiries. In the same hospital, my other doctor calls me at home, checks up on me, and chats weekly. Night and day, in adjacent offices. It also depends on which VA hospital you use. If I had been using the closer one, I would likely be dead. By driving 3X as far, I live. Seemed like a worthwhile trade off.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2020-04-24 12:04||   2020-04-24 12:04|| Front Page Top

#17 Sorry to hear, Whiskey Mike, but I am not surprised. I, too, know of someone who would rather drive one hour to a VA facility and deal with a doctor he knows and trusts, rather than visit a closer VA facility.
Posted by Clem 2020-04-24 12:10||   2020-04-24 12:10|| Front Page Top

#18 Gorb, the too little, too late or too much is the story of care at the VA hospitals I have used.
Posted by Whiskey Mike 2020-04-24 12:11||   2020-04-24 12:11|| Front Page Top

#19 The mechanism by which hydroxyquinoline supposedly works is to reduce the ability of the virus to replicate quickly, so that it slows the damage to something the body can handle, giving the immune system time to recover and work properly. Giving it after ARDS sets in would have ZERO effect, because the damage is already done and its the immune response of a cytokine storm, SIRS (Look it up), DIC and organ failure that kill the patient, not the virus itself.

This study is like saying that having a fire department is useless because your house burned down even though you called 911. When actually your kitchen was on fire and you waited until it spread to other rooms to call.
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-04-24 16:31||   2020-04-24 16:31|| Front Page Top

#20 Good info. Thanks Marilyn.
Posted by Besoeker 2020-04-24 16:51||   2020-04-24 16:51|| Front Page Top

#21 was the medicine only given as a last chance effort for the sickest persons who were dying. That was what it was officially approved for. Were the 'control' patients the less sick ones who were to whom the medicine was not considered needed?
Posted by daniel  2020-04-24 21:59||   2020-04-24 21:59|| Front Page Top

#22 It was a retrospective report, an observation, not a controlled study. There were NO control groups, no patient tracking, no criteria for selection bias or anything else. They simply pulled the charts for everyone at that particular hospital with a COVID-19 diagnosis within an arbitrary 30 day period. It was largely composed of males, over 65, and with multiple commodities. And the hospital was giving the medication as a "last resort", rather than sooner as has been done in the real clinical trials and previous treatments.

In other words, its scientifically invalid, and so poorly thought out that there are no viable conclusions to draw from it other than the VA has had trouble treating patients too late.
Posted by Marilyn Tojo7566 2020-04-24 23:01||   2020-04-24 23:01|| Front Page Top

23:01 Marilyn Tojo7566
21:59 daniel
21:45 SteveS
21:33 Lex
21:11 Clem
21:09 Clem
21:02 USN, Ret.
20:48 trailing wife
20:45 ruprecht
20:36 Skidmark
20:10 49 Pan
20:09 Zhang Fei
20:09 49 Pan
19:54 Procopius2k
19:50 Procopius2k
19:46 Procopius2k
19:34 trailing wife
19:34 Clailet Hupinesing9972
19:28 European Conservative
19:26 European Conservative
19:25 Lex
18:56 JohnQC
18:50 ruprecht
18:40 Frank G









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com