Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 03/02/2020 View Sun 03/01/2020 View Sat 02/29/2020 View Fri 02/28/2020 View Thu 02/27/2020 View Wed 02/26/2020 View Tue 02/25/2020
1
2020-03-02 -Land of the Free
Adam Schiff complains that ‘Trump's lawyers convinced two judges' to rule against him
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by DarthVader 2020-03-02 10:02|| || Front Page|| [11134 views ]  Top

#1 Then come up with a better argument or go fuck yourself, pencil dick.
Posted by DarthVader 2020-03-02 10:04||   2020-03-02 10:04|| Front Page Top

#2 "The force schadenfreude is strong with this one."
Posted by PBMcL 2020-03-02 11:12||   2020-03-02 11:12|| Front Page Top

#3 I'm not a lawyer, but isn't that what those in the business call a "trial"?
Posted by SteveS 2020-03-02 11:30||   2020-03-02 11:30|| Front Page Top

#4 Dear Rep. Schiff -

Sorry about that, Sugarplum. This sorta thing works both ways, ya know.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2020-03-02 11:37||   2020-03-02 11:37|| Front Page Top

#5 In heavily left leaning courts no less.
Posted by Iblis 2020-03-02 12:22||   2020-03-02 12:22|| Front Page Top

#6 Buffoon. Moron.

Meet my Arab friend, FOAD.
Posted by Lex 2020-03-02 12:40||   2020-03-02 12:40|| Front Page Top

#7 The problem, Mr. Schiff, is that your reputation precedes you. The colloquial expression is that you are telling tall tales out of school. The crude, more direct expression is that you are a liar and full of sh*t.

Attorney-Client relationship has something to do with that, too. Some subpoenas are quashed. Some are squashed. The President follows the law. Sometimes he wins. Sometimes he loses. Get over it, Narcissus.
Posted by Alaska Paul 2020-03-02 13:40||   2020-03-02 13:40|| Front Page Top

#8 I was hoping Trump's lawyers would convince the two judges to keelhaul slimy Schiff.
Posted by JohnQC 2020-03-02 14:12||   2020-03-02 14:12|| Front Page Top

#9 ostensibly, that is why lawyers exist; but this statement was probably just an attempt to get a talking point out to his media allies.

wall-to-wall coverage, 'we're getting more news on the 2 judges who ruled in favor of Trump'
Posted by Bob Grorong1136 2020-03-02 15:10||   2020-03-02 15:10|| Front Page Top

#10 Implicit in his statement is the assumption that the judiciary is 'suppose' to rule against Trump without having to provide sufficient ground to do so.
Posted by Procopius2k 2020-03-02 16:08||   2020-03-02 16:08|| Front Page Top

#11 Attorney-Client relationship has something to do with that, too.
Causing an Attorney to testify on a "fishing expedition" was several steps too far. Can the White House have Schiff's staff all be deposed just... because as well?
Posted by magpie 2020-03-02 21:35||   2020-03-02 21:35|| Front Page Top

#12 Can the White House have Schiff's staff all be deposed just... because as well?

Is "deposed" that thing where you skin them and make a pyramid with their skulls on the lawn?
Posted by SteveS 2020-03-02 22:15||   2020-03-02 22:15|| Front Page Top

22:56 jpal
22:44 Cholush Throck7862
22:15 SteveS
22:03 DooDahMan
22:01 DooDahMan
21:59 DooDahMan
21:58 DooDahMan
21:35 magpie
21:33 Barbara
21:27 Barbara
20:59 Frank G
20:59 Procopius2k
20:45 Frank G
20:35 Goober Tingle7365
20:33 Glumble Shavish8733
20:22 Anomalous Sources
19:57 Frank G
19:27 M. Murcek
19:25 trailing wife
19:23 Woodrow
19:20 Bobby
19:17 Woodrow
19:13 Woodrow
19:11 Procopius2k









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com