Article

2019-12-01 -War on Police-

Starbucks: Employee Who Wrote ‘PIG’ on Police Officer’s Cup Is ‘No Longer a Partner’

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2019-12-01 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11 views ] Top

#1 the employee reached out to him personally and apologized, saying it was a joke.

The ex-employee is going to find, IMO, that cops also have a sense of humor.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-12-01 01:35|| 2019-12-01 01:35|| Front Page Top

#2 Last year, Starbucks closed stores and had employees undergo anti-bias training

Time for another anti-bias training session -- with a different bias victim.

Posted by Lex 2019-12-01 01:37|| 2019-12-01 01:37|| Front Page Top

#3 How about everybody who leans nationalist across the country boycott Starbucks completely in solidarity with the police.

It would surely set some public precedent; take public matters out of black robed manicured hands and where they should be settled.

Posted by Dron66046 2019-12-01 01:43|| 2019-12-01 01:43|| Front Page Top

#4 I have nothing against Starbucks - I just wish they'd stop claiming that they serve coffee.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-12-01 01:51|| 2019-12-01 01:51|| Front Page Top

#5 Yowza ! Early contender for Snark o' the day ?

Posted by Dron66046 2019-12-01 01:55|| 2019-12-01 01:55|| Front Page Top

#6 DHanyavaaD

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-12-01 01:57|| 2019-12-01 01:57|| Front Page Top

#7 ^ Is that another Starbucks sugary concoction? With cardamom 'n' açaí?

Posted by Lex 2019-12-01 01:59|| 2019-12-01 01:59|| Front Page Top

#8 ^It's, according to Google, "thank you" in Hindi.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2019-12-01 02:01|| 2019-12-01 02:01|| Front Page Top

#9 Starbucks: Employee Who Wrote ‘PIG’ on Police Officer’s Cup Is ‘No Longer a Partner’

yeah, now a VP at SPLC.

Posted by Procopius2k 2019-12-01 07:08|| 2019-12-01 07:08|| Front Page Top

#10 Aren't we routinely told that "freedom of speech" doesn't apply to private bidness?

Posted by M. Murcek 2019-12-01 07:39|| 2019-12-01 07:39|| Front Page Top

23:54 JohnQC
23:50 JohnQC
23:49 JohnQC
23:38 CrazyFool
23:31 Zhang Fei
23:23 Lex
23:20 Zhang Fei
23:02 Dron66046
22:42 Dron66046
22:19 Lex
22:04 Unaitle Panda6599
22:01 Grunter
21:36 JohnQC
20:59 CrazyFool
20:43 Lex
20:38 Lex
20:36 Lex
20:34 Lex
20:32 Lex
20:31 Lex
20:29 Lex
20:27 Lex
20:18 Lex
20:11 Lex